“Point of view” or “narrative mode” describes the pronouns used when writing a story. At the most basic level, the points of view can be broken down as follows:

POV Pronouns
First person I, we
Second person you
Third person he, she, it, they

Stories written in the third person are probably the most familiar to most of us. Consider this sentence from Melville’s The Confidence Man:

His cheek was fair, his chin downy, his hair flaxen, his hat a white fur one, with a long fleecy nap. He had neither trunk, valise, carpet-bag, nor parcel.

As an example of first person narrative, consider another hopefully familiar passage from Melville:

Call me Ishmael. Some years ago — never mind how long precisely — having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me on shore, I thought I would sail about a little and see the watery part of the world.

Although second person narratives are fairly rare in writing for grown-ups, there are dozens if not hundreds of instances available in the form of Choose Your Own Adventure books. Here’s a sample from one entitled Space and Beyond:

You are born on a spaceship traveling between galaxies on a dangerous research mission. The crew of the spaceship includes people from five different galaxies. Your parents are not from the same galaxy, but both have features common to those found on the planet Earth in the Milky Way galaxy.

Of course, point of view isn’t really just about the pronouns — it’s about how the use of those pronouns orients you in relation to the story. Third person generally keeps you at a little distance as an outside observer, as if you’re watching the story like a movie.

A story told in the first person lets you stare out from the eyes of the narrator. Even if you wouldn’t necessarily expect to identify with a particular first-person narrator, looking at the world he describes as if from his vantage can have the effect of making you feel more sympathetic to his perspective. It’s easier to relate to melancholy Ishmael in the first person than it might have been in the third.

Second person narratives turn the camera around and dump you into the story. They can be pretty gimmicky (see Choose Your Own Adventure above) and accordingly aren’t terribly common.

Other narrative modes abound, however. For example, there’s a subdivision between third-person limited and third-person omniscient. In the limited POV, the narrator has access to the thoughts and feelings of one character but not others. In the omniscient POV, the narrator can tell you what any character is thinking and feeling. By contrast, in straight third-person POV, the narrator simply relates events as they happen, without subjective access to any character’s thoughts and feelings.

For an example of third-person omniscient narrator, I give you Dan Brown in Angels and Demons:

Before ascending, Langdon knew he needed a weapon, any weapon… He hoped the element of surprise, combined with the Hassassin’s wound, would be enough to tip the scales in his advantage.

That’s followed on the next page by the following:

When she had first awoken to find them tied behind her back, she’d thought she might be able to relax and work her hands free… Vittoria knew in an instant that she was capable of killing.

Within a very short span, we have not only descriptions of different characters’ behaviors but actual access to the things going through their minds. Third-person limited provides the same sort of access, but for just one character within the story.

Then there are epistolary stories. These are written in the forms of letters between characters, and though each letter is written in the first-person, the effect to me is one of almost a third-person omniscient narrative. The first novels were written in this form, and you can find fairly palatable examples in books like Dracula, Frankenstein, and another little favorite of mine, Ella Minnow Pea (which is also incidentally a riff on the lipogram).

Authors can choose to mix narrative modes, of course, switching from one POV to another as theme or character merits. Some of the most fun fiction to read, I think, is fiction that does this sort of switching, keeping the reader really on her toes.

Some authors write from the perspective of what’s known as an unreliable narrator. It’s POV-independent and is often used to comment on the nature and mechanism of story-telling itself. Of course, it can also be used, as in movies like Fight Club and The Usual Suspects, to turn around a big surprise at the end. You find unreliable narrators all through literature, but one striking example lies in David Markson’s Wittgenstein’s Mistress:

Though perhaps another reason why I did not remember it is that I am feeling somewhat tired.

Actually, I am not feeing tired. How I am feeling is not quite myself.

Again and again in Markson’s book, the speaker makes a statement and then corrects or contradicts it, so that you begin to wonder over time whether there’s any truth at all in what she’s saying. In a book partially about the slipperiness of language, it’s a very fitting device.

There are plenty of other ways to tell stories. James Joyce’s Ulysses switches styles and viewpoints in at least 18 noteworthy ways. David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas (out in theaters now but well worth a read if you like ambitious novels) includes an astonishing set of nested stories told in different modes and voices. William Gaddis’s J R is written almost completely in unattributed dialogue that makes it, I suppose, a strange variant on third-person omniscient but that’s really sort of unclassifiable.

When choosing a point of view, I think most of us will choose a first-person voice if we’re telling a story that’s fairly personal or close to the truth, a third-person voice if we want to distance ourselves from the story a bit, and a second-person voice if we’re trying to be innovative (but we’ll probably fail). Sometimes when I run into a roadblock when writing something, I’ll think about changing the POV to see if it lets me think about the story a little differently and head in a better direction.

Show Comments

57 Comments

Comments are closed.

Close Comments

Comments

  1. Interesting on the POV, Daryl, thanks. I know 1st and 3rd. I’ve not encountered, or rather recognized or was aware of 2nd. I have no creative writing training, and my English classes were 50 years ago. I’m still not clear on the Second, but intend to investigate. I think it means the writer is speaking directly to the reader and making him feel the story is about him. I thought I’d like to try, and was glad to see your fail warning near the end. So it is really hard to do? I’d better learn then… I wouldn’t want to appear the fool.

    Like

  2. Helpful! Thanks for the insight! The examples you’ve used help me with a recent writing challenge I had. If only I had read this two weeks ago…… oh well. I’ll be a better writer from this point forward!

    Like

  3. Reblogged this on I Don't Care-I Amuse MYSELF and commented:
    I found this informative and inspiring. I usually always write in first person. But when I am daydreaming or just unoccupied, ideas pop into my head and expand into scene after scene, fleshing out into almost an entire movie with settings and dialogue-and I never write them down. I feel challenged to take up a different perspective in my writing, which I have never had the courage to share publicly until now.

    Like

    1. Wow, that’s how I got started writing. I’d just press play on the mental VCR and write down what I saw. It actually happened for years before I started writing them down, though. You should consider keeping a pen and pad down to at least jot down the main theme of your “movies” so you can spin them into stories later.

      Here’s an idea. If you can recall one of those mental movies, use that as the basis for your different-POV writing! 🙂

      Like

  4. Ms. Snarker writes letters to people who have pinned silly things on Pinterest. She likes to sound snooty and condescending, so she uses the third person when referring to herself, but uses the second person when referring to the “recipient” of her letters. Would this be classified as epistolary or is it some variation within epistolary? (All snootiness aside, I really liked this post. The wonderful thing about writing is that there is always, always room for improvement and exploring new ideas. This post was inspiring!)

    Like

    1. This isn’t quite epistolary because there’s not a fabrication of back-and-forth exchanges. In a true epistolary work, there are letters back and forth between at least two authors. What you describe would seem to be pure snark. 😉

      Like

      1. Aha! Ms. Snarker can live happily with “pure snark.” 🙂 Actually, this has given her the idea that perhaps one of her victims should write a letter rebutting her snark. That could be fun…

        Like

    2. Misterdoe likes Ms. Snarker’s approach. In fact, Misterdoe has used such an approach in his fiction, placing “himself” as the POV character in his surreal fiction but using third-person narration. 😉

      Like

  5. Reblogged this on Write on and commented:
    Really useful article last week about pov (Points of View) in the Daily Post. Particularly good for writers like me who haven’t studied literature post… er… O level.

    Like