Show Comments


Close Comments

Join the conversation!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  1. Empty it does look but because those pillars and walls are there. without them it would have been just open space and instead of emptiness it would have given a feel of freedom.Emptiness depends on the presence of objects for it’s being as ”nothingness” can’t be it without ‘thing” in it.


    1. i certainly agree with you namitsunder… emptiness is nothingness, nothing else…. objects defeat the phenomenon of emptiness… in the photo, the pillars are it… the objects… even the tiles the make up the pillar and the floor are objects…