<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>regenerate &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/regenerate/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "regenerate"</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:40:04 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Chapter 9: Particular Directions for Mortification]]></title>
<link>http://proverbs2717.wordpress.com/?p=147</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kendrick</dc:creator>
<guid>http://proverbs2717.wordpress.com/?p=147</guid>
<description><![CDATA[This chapter begins Owen&#8217;s discourse on practical steps in the process of mortification. The f]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This chapter begins Owen's discourse on practical steps in the process of mortification. The following chapters till chapter 13 all discuss mediums of introspection and examination as well as mortification strategies. Puritans were known for their ability to dissect the human heart and explore its deepest recesses. Owen is a great example of this surgical analysis of human motives and ulterior ones as well.</p>
<p>Owen lists some dangerous symptoms that accompany our sin.</p>
<p><strong>Hardened, habitual, deep-rooted state.</strong> The sinful habit has lain in the heart for a long period of time and become familiar with it, it is no longer startling or shocking. Owen brings in the element of assurance and how this symptom will blur the line between whether it is an unmortified sin or the unregenerate dominion of sin.</p>
<p><strong>Petitions in the heart to allow sin. </strong>Owen delves further and describes how this may be done: we may search our hearts for signs of good as an excuse to sin.</p>
<p><strong>Applying grace and mercy to unmortified sin.</strong> We sanction sin as if it's alright because grace will cover it. The classic argument of "letting grace abound".</p>
<p><strong>Sin is frequently victorious.</strong> Owen again goes further and says that victory is not only constituted as the completed, acted-out sin (James 1:14-15), but even the willingness to act out the sin when the outward expression of the desire is not possible.</p>
<p><strong>We fight against sin only with the fear of punishment.</strong> Paul's main argument against sinning was not fear of hell and repercussions, but that we are not under the law, but under grace (Romans 6:14). We should not fight sin on legal accounts and motives, or else what assurance will you have? Gospel principles, not legal motives.</p>
<p><strong>Judiciary hardening in our sin.</strong> God leaves His sheep under the temptation of certain sins. This is definitely a way that God deals with unregenerate men, but how do we know if we are regenerate or not when under this condition? Examine the time previous to the onslaught of this sin and try to discern signs of grace.</p>
<p><strong>God has dealt against it, but it remains.</strong> God may convict the man of his sin, he repents, but slides back into the sin.</p>
<p>First particular direction for mortification is therefore examining your sin and seeing if it bears any of the above symptoms. Owen is quick to remind his readers that if these symptoms are present, it does not mean we are Christians, but may in fact mean we are unregenerate.</p>
<div><span lang="EN-US"><strong>Read this chapter online (Crossway edition), click </strong><strong><a href="http://www.crossway.org/product/1581346492/browse?pg=89">here</a></strong><strong>.<br />
Read this chapter online (Banner of Truth/CCEL edition), click <a href="http://www.ccel.org/ccel/owen/mort.i.xii.html">here</a>.</strong></span></div>
<div>
<p style="text-align:center;">&#60;&#60;&#60;&#60; <a href="http://proverbs2717.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/chapter-8-there-will-be-no-mortification-of-any-sin-without-sincerity-and-diligence-in-a-universality-of-obedience/">Previous Chapter</a> &#124; <a href="http://proverbs2717.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/of-the-mortification-of-sin-in-believers-blog-index/">Return to Blog Index</a> &#124; <a href="http://proverbs2717.wordpress.com/2008/08/11/chapter-10-particular-directions-for-mortification-2/">Next Chapter</a> &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Jesus in the Feast of Pentecost (part 3)]]></title>
<link>http://oncedelivered.wordpress.com/?p=129</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rphilli</dc:creator>
<guid>http://oncedelivered.wordpress.com/?p=129</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Pentecost
Download audio file (part 2)
Dowload audio file (part 1)
Completing our study of the fourt]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[[caption id="attachment_124" align="alignleft" width="128" caption="Pentecost"]<a href="http://oncedelivered.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/pentecost.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-124" style="margin:3px;" src="http://oncedelivered.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/pentecost.jpg?w=128" alt="" width="128" height="96" /></a>[/caption]
<p><a href="http://www.box.net/shared/static/sjdmgfig4g.mp3" target="_self">Download audio file (part 2)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.box.net/shared/static/a4xrf7xck0.mp3" target="_self">Dowload audio file (part 1)</a></p>
<p>Completing our study of the fourth spring feast, we find that every person can see Jesus in the Feast of Pentecost by observing His promises about the coming Holy Spirit:</p>
<p> </p>
<ol type="1">
<li><strong>His promise to depart and return to the Father</strong> (John 16:7). The coming of the Holy Spirit was contingent upon Jesus completing His work of redemption and returning to His Father.  See also John 7:39; Acts 2:32-3.  A.J. Gordon writes, "The Spirit of God is the successor of the Son of God in His official ministry on earth. Until Christ's earthly work for His church had been finished, the Spirit's work in this world could not properly begin. The office of the Holy Spirit is to communicate Christ to us - Christ in His entireness" (<em>The Ministry of the Spirit</em>, p. 28).</li>
<li><strong>His promise to send the Holy Spirit.</strong> The Spirit is said to be a gift from the Father (John 14:16, 26) sent by the Son (John 15:26: 16:7). Roy B. Zuck, in <em>A Biblical Theology of the New Testament</em>, comments: "Whatever else is meant by the difficult statement that the Spirit ‘goes out from the Father' (John 15:26), it implies that the Spirit shares the same essential nature as the Father. In fact, John was indicating here the parallelism between the mission of the Son, sent from God (3:17, 34; 5:36-38; 6:29, 57; 7:29; 8:42; 10:36; 11:42; 17:3, 8, 18, 21, 23, 25; 20:21), and the mission of the Son's replacement, the Holy Spirit, who would be ‘another Paraclete' to the disciples and who would enable them to carry on Jesus' mission after He returned to the Father."</li>
<li><strong>His promise of the Spirit's ministry to unbelievers </strong>(John 16:8-11). Without the Spirit's work to convince unbelievers of the sin of unbelief, the righteousness of Christ, and the judgment that will fall upon them if they persist in their rejection of Jesus, no one could be saved. In fact, the Spirit already was at work on the morning of Pentecost, pricking the hearts of the Jewish unbelievers listening to Peter (Acts 2:37).</li>
<li><strong>His promise of the Spirit's ministry to believers, specifically:</strong>
<ul type="disc">
<li>To regenerate us, or make us spiritually alive (John 3:3-8; Titus 3:5).</li>
<li>To indwell us, or take up permanent residence in our human spirit (John 14:17; 1 Cor. 3:16).</li>
<li>To baptize us, initiating our relationship to Him and establishing our connection with Christ and other believers (Acts 1:5; 1 Cor. 12:13).</li>
<li>To seal us, a guarantee that God will take us fully into His presence one day (Eph. 1:13-14).</li>
<li>To teach us, or give us divine assistance (John 14:26; 1 Cor. 2:12-13; 1 John 2:27).</li>
<li>To empower (fill) us for witnessing (Acts 1:8).</li>
<li>To empower (fill) us for service (Act. 6:5; Eph. 5:18). As Paul S. Karleen writes in <em>The Handbook to Bible Study: With a Guide to the Scofield Study System</em>, "Filling is the result of a consistent walk with God, and depends on a genuine and mature relationship with the Holy Spirit, Simply asking to be filled will not bring it."</li>
<li>To equip us with spiritual gifts (Rom. 12:6-8; 1 Cor. 12:7-11; Eph. 4:11; 1 Peter 4:11).</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
<p style="padding-left:30px;">5.   <strong>His promise to identify His Body (the church) by the Spirit</strong> (John 14:16-18; Rom. 8:9-11).</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://oncedelivered.wordpress.com/category/feasts-of-israel/" target="_self">Read more about Jesus in the feasts of Israel</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mindfuck XXXX]]></title>
<link>http://motivateurself.wordpress.com/?p=1483</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>motivat0r</dc:creator>
<guid>http://motivateurself.wordpress.com/?p=1483</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://motivateurself.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/mindfuck38.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1474" src="http://motivateurself.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/mindfuck38.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stop Smoking without the Weight Gain]]></title>
<link>http://quitsmokingarticles.wordpress.com/?p=15</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>edresearches</dc:creator>
<guid>http://quitsmokingarticles.wordpress.com/?p=15</guid>
<description><![CDATA[If you are smoking and want to make a healthy lifestyle you could start by deciding for yourself to ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are smoking and want to make a healthy lifestyle you could start by deciding for yourself to strip off the habit from your system. But together with aiming to strip off the habit is weight gain because you will increase your appetite when you stop smoking. How can you fight this problem?</p>
<p>Cigarettes stimulates metabolism according to smoking cessation therapist, 250 calories in the body get burned when you consumed a pack of cigarette a day. When you quit, the body metabolism slows down resulting for those calories to slowly burn and giving you extra weight. Some people gain 2 pounds once they quit for 2 weeks and with this occurrence they tend to resume smoking to prevent weight gain so quitting will then be unsuccessful. Sticking to the decision of quitting will not be that much of a burden because eventually the metabolism will normalize. Typically, smokers only gain 5-7 pounds throughout the process of quitting. And when you think about the advantages of having a healthy and smoke free living, you will feel great inside and out and not minding those gained extra pounds.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>You vital organs like the lungs, heart and arteries will be free of the toxins and will start to regenerate new cells after being intoxicated with nicotine.</p>
<p>Gradually after quitting you will notice changes in your physical appearance. Your skin is free from stress and will appeal to be fairer and smoother, those yellow stains on your fingers and fingernails will disappear, you won’t have bad breath anymore, and your teeth will be free from stains and you will have healthier gums too. These are the good fallback of quitting. To lessen the cravings and weight gain, do drinks lots of water ideally 8oz glasses a day to keep you hydrated and to flush out toxins. Substitute healthy food with cigarette but not use junk foods because it won’t help you in becoming healthy. Don’t go for sugar rich and unhealthy foods. Do also have exercises so to keep you busy and increase metabolism. Join group therapy this will help you be encourage on the continuous quitting agenda, use also nicotine replacements. You have to have a focused mind to be able to fight challenging moments that will tempt you to go back to smoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Chapter 7: General Directions for Mortification]]></title>
<link>http://proverbs2717.wordpress.com/?p=57</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kendrick</dc:creator>
<guid>http://proverbs2717.wordpress.com/?p=57</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In this chapter, Owen wishes to discuss the ways and means in which mortification occurs. He lays do]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this chapter, Owen wishes to discuss the ways and means in which mortification occurs. He lays down principles and rules that are necessary to understand for mortification:</p>
<p><strong>There Will Be No Mortification Unless a Man Be a Believer<br />
</strong>Mortification is the work of believers (Rom. 3:18, Col. 3:1-5). "There is no death of sin without the death of Christ (p. 79)." Paul speaks of those who seek mortification, but fail to become righteous. Why? Because they seek mortification through the law, not through faith (Rom. 9:31-32). All believers must mortify sin as a duty, but something must be done first before mortification can happen. Unless we are in Christ we cannot please God (Rom. 8:9). Thus the only way to please God is through the union with Christ achieved by the Holy Spirit (v. 11), when we are dead to the flesh and live in the Spirit. It is the duty of the regenerate to mortify sin and the duty of the unregenerate to be converted. That is why when the Jews were convicted of their sins and asked Peter what they must do, Peter told them to repent and put their faith in Christ, not mortify such and such sin (Acts 2:37-38).<!--more--></p>
<p>Owen presents a common scenario of how men mistakenly try to mortify sin. God, through is word and law, convicts a man of his sins. Instead of turning to the gospel as the solution, he seeks to mortify his sins. This is an example of self-love, for such a man is only trying to be freed from his trouble. Thus the mortification of their sins eludes their grasp. We should not seek to satisfy our consciences through our own means. The duty to mortify sin is indeed a good one to fulfill, but I cannot be done without going to the great Physician. Sometimes, such men even try to mortify sin in secret as a way to prove to themselves their sincerity, yet they are hardened by a kind of self-righteousness. So what happens is the man finds that he cannot mortify the sin (either he cannot overcome a specific sin or new sins keep appearing to take the place of other sins) and so gives up, deciding to simply embrace sin for he cannot defeat it.</p>
<p>"Be sure to get an interest in Christ-if you intend to mortify any sin without it, it will never be done. (p. 83)"</p>
<p><strong>Objection</strong><br />
What should unregenerate men do then when convicted of their sin? Should they simply not try to mortify them and embrace it? Will not the whole world be set into a state of confusion and sinful behavior run rampant?</p>
<p><strong>Answers</strong><br />
No! The fact that unregenerate men seek to mortify sin is a sign of God's kindness and goodness. God chooses to restrain men from fulfilling the full depravity of their nature. The word is to be preached and sin rebuked and restrained, although this is not the end effect that is aimed for. Though the conviction and restraining of sin is the work of the Spirit and the word, it is not good in and of itself. "You set yourself against <em>a particular</em> sin and do not consider that you are <em>nothing</em> but sin (p. 84)."</p>
<p>To plead with men about their sin, to try to get them to understand their unregenerate state, is a good thing. But we must not allow that to lead the gospel and not to self-mortification. Let our preaching be a call to believe, not a call to mortify sin. If not, faith becomes agreement with a certain doctrine in the church, and mortification simply means abstinence from particular sins and a lifestyle.  Our directions must never only change lifestyles, but change hearts.</p>
<div><span lang="EN-US"><strong>Read this chapter online (Crossway edition), click </strong><strong><a href="http://www.crossway.org/product/1581346492/browse/78#browse">here</a></strong><strong>.<br />
Read this chapter online (Banner of Truth/CCEL edition), click <a href="http://www.ccel.org/ccel/owen/mort.i.ix.html">here</a>.</strong></span></div>
<div>
<p style="text-align:center;">&#60;&#60;&#60;&#60; <a href="http://proverbs2717.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/chapter-6-what-mortification-is/">Previous Chapter</a> &#124; <a href="http://proverbs2717.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/of-the-mortification-of-sin-in-believers-blog-index/">Return to Blog Index</a> &#124; <a href="http://proverbs2717.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/chapter-8-there-will-be-no-mortification-of-any-sin-without-sincerity-and-diligence-in-a-universality-of-obedience/">Next Chapter</a> &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Regenerate Church Membership: Is it possible?]]></title>
<link>http://exotesparemboles.wordpress.com/?p=26</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
<guid>http://exotesparemboles.wordpress.com/?p=26</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Is it possible to have a purely regenerate church? Below is a resolution that was passed at the 2008]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="Normal">Is it possible to have a purely regenerate church? Below is a resolution that was passed at the 2008 SBC convention.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.bpnews.net/blog/article.asp?id=176&#38;title=Complete+text+of+amended+membership+resolution" target="_blank">On Regenerate Church Membership and Church Member Restoration </a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">WHEREAS, The ideal of a regenerate church membership has long been and remains a cherished Baptist principle, with Article VI of the Baptist Faith and Message describing the church as a “local congregation of baptized believers”; and</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">WHEREAS, A New Testament church is composed only of those who have been born again by the Holy Spirit through the preaching of the Word, becoming disciples of Jesus Christ, the local church’s only Lord, by grace through faith (John 3:5; Ephesians 2:8-9), which church practices believers’ only baptism by immersion (Matthew 28:16-20), and the Lord’s supper (Matthew 26:26-30); and</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">WHEREAS, Local associations, state conventions, and the Southern Baptist Convention compile statistics reported by the churches to make decisions for the future; and</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">WHEREAS, the 2007 Southern Baptist Convention annual Church Profiles indicate that there are 16,266,920 members in Southern Baptist churches; and</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">WHEREAS, Those same profiles indicate that only 6,148,868 of those members attend a primary worship service of their church in a typical week; and</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">WHEREAS, The Scriptures admonish us to exercise church discipline as we seek to restore any professed brother or sister in Christ who has strayed from the truth and is in sin (Matthew 18:15-35; Galatians 6:1); and now, therefore, be it</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">RESOLVED, That the messengers to the Southern Baptist Convention meeting in Indianapolis, Indiana, June 10-11, 2008, urge churches to maintain a regenerate membership by acknowledging the necessity of spiritual regeneration and Christ’s lordship for all members; and be it further</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">RESOLVED, That we humbly urge our churches to maintain accurate membership rolls for the purpose of fostering ministry and accountability among all members of the congregation; and be it further</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">RESOLVED, That we urge the churches of the Southern Baptist Convention to repent of the failure among us to live up to our professed commitment to regenerate church membership and any failure to obey Jesus Christ in the practice of lovingly correcting wayward church members (Matthew 18:15-18); and be it further</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="text-decoration:none;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">RESOLVED, That we humbly encourage denominational servants to support and encourage churches that seek to recover and implement our Savior’s teachings on church discipline, even if such efforts result in the reduction in the number of members that are reported in those churches, and be it finally</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">RESOLVED, That we humbly urge the churches of the Southern Baptist Convention and their pastors to implement a plan to minister to, counsel, and restore wayward church members based upon the commands and principles given in Scripture (Matthew 18:15-35; 2 Thessalonians 3:6-15; Galatians 6:1; James 5:19-20).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Decisionism vs Repentance!]]></title>
<link>http://devoteddads.wordpress.com/?p=527</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 04:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
<guid>http://devoteddads.wordpress.com/?p=527</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The church must wake up to the fact that about 95% of those setting in the church pews or seats toda]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>The church must wake up to the fact that about 95% of those setting in the church pews or seats today are lost and hell bound.  Most of these have made a "decision" for Christ in their past, but live as though they have never known of Jesus before.  Paul Washer gives a great talk on this very subject.</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/wCbYrdxNUwU'></param><param name='wmode' value='transparent'></param><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/wCbYrdxNUwU&rel=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='transparent' width='425' height='350'></embed></object></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Salvation Not By Asking Jesus Into Your Heart!]]></title>
<link>http://devoteddads.wordpress.com/?p=525</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
<guid>http://devoteddads.wordpress.com/?p=525</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;There are so many people, especially in my own denomination (Southern Baptist). . . because ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><strong>"There are so many people, especially in my own denomination (Southern Baptist). . . because of the pathetic theology and pathetic preaching . . . the people on our church membership rolls—are as lost as they can be. Because we have forgotten that salvation <span style="text-decoration:underline;">does not</span> come by praying and asking Jesus to come into your heart; salvation <span style="text-decoration:underline;">does not</span> come by going through four spiritual laws and saying a prayer at the end; salvation <span style="text-decoration:underline;">does not</span> come by all these silly little mechanisms we’ve developed (that are unbiblical). It comes as a supernatural work of God through which God regenerates, makes the heart alive (Born Again), He gives the man repentance, He gives the man faith, the man repents, man then believes and is saved. And it is a supernatural work of God that manifests as much if not more of the power of God than when God stood on the first day and said, 'Let there be light'.”</strong></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><em>Comment by Paul Washer and agreed to by me.</em></strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;"><strong><em><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/V4axy22oTkA'></param><param name='wmode' value='transparent'></param><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/V4axy22oTkA&rel=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='transparent' width='425' height='350'></embed></object></span></em></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;"><strong><em>&#38;</em></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;"><strong><em><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/WBl568p7aSY'></param><param name='wmode' value='transparent'></param><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/WBl568p7aSY&rel=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='transparent' width='425' height='350'></embed></object></span></em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mindfuck XXI]]></title>
<link>http://motivateurself.wordpress.com/?p=913</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>motivat0r</dc:creator>
<guid>http://motivateurself.wordpress.com/?p=913</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://motivateurself.wordpress.com/files/2008/05/mindfuck1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-894" src="http://motivateurself.wordpress.com/files/2008/05/mindfuck1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stem Cell the Promise and the Price]]></title>
<link>http://jhoijoii.wordpress.com/?p=35</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jhoijoii</dc:creator>
<guid>http://jhoijoii.wordpress.com/?p=35</guid>
<description><![CDATA[What is a stem cell?
&gt;&gt;Stem cells are unspecialized cells that are capable of self renewal. It]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is a stem cell?</p>
<p>&#62;&#62;Stem cells are unspecialized cells that are capable of self renewal. It has also the ability to become specialized cells such as heart, lung, kidney cells etc. by introduction to specific organ or place in the body. But the effectivity depends on what type of stem cells will be used is it embryonic or adult. Though at any rate the body who will accept the stemcells may experience rejection of the introduced cells in the body.</p>
<p>What is your opinion on using embryonic stem cells in research/medical treatment?</p>
<p>&#62;&#62;&#62;If you have to choose which works best. it is definitely the embryonic stem cells compared to the adult stem cells eventhough there are moral issues on the use of e-stemcells.</p>
<p>The only place where you can get an e-stemcell is from the blastocyst stage of a fertilized egg and sperm cell and in order to attain it the life of the fertilized egg should be terminated Thus the moral issue of "murder" of an innocent being is involved now.</p>
<p>[though they say e-stemcells can be obtained from the umbilical cord of a newly born baby - this statement is absolutely false because the stemcells from he umbilical cord is already differentiated to a certain individual which is the new born baby thus it is already a cndiered an adult stem cell] Embryonic stem cell resrearch is good.. no... GREAT but if you have to consider morals im not for it but if you think for practicality for future the future human race then It ok.. For me i think im gonna pass researching about e-stemcells</p>
<p>What is your opinion on using adult stem cells in research/medical treatment?</p>
<p>&#62;&#62;&#62;Im totally on for the use of adult stem cells, no moral issues to solve involved, though u can have problems manipulating it because theres a minimum chance rate of cell division than the e-stemcells, difficulty in isolation and they are few compared to e-stemcells.</p>
<p>What is your opinion on using in-vitro multiplied stem cells in medical treatment?</p>
<p>&#62;&#62;&#62;In vitro stemcells are ok as long as its from an adult stem cell.</p>
<p>Should stem cell research be federaly funded?<br />
&#62;&#62;&#62; yes it should be funded so that scientists, doctors and the like can further study the use of stem cells because stem cells would really help individuals who are ill.  If they coulld perfect this innovation then people may live longer than a hundred years old while lets say when you reach 90 you'll say to yourself Wow! im still young and you wont be needing to retire yet..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Advances to curing Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Lou Gehrig's (old article)]]></title>
<link>http://phaktor7.wordpress.com/?p=170</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>phaktor7</dc:creator>
<guid>http://phaktor7.wordpress.com/?p=170</guid>
<description><![CDATA[http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200410/s1225290.htm
Another old medical article detailing advan]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200410/s1225290.htm" target="_blank">http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200410/s1225290.htm</a></p>
<p>Another old medical article detailing advances in studies on mice. From the site:</p>
<blockquote><p>The researchers' goal is not to create a therapy that would kill neurons in order to activate the birth of new ones. Rather, they hope experiments like this one, which appeared in the <cite><a href="http://www.pnas.org/">Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</a></cite> online, will lead to new ways to grow neurons. Researchers could eventually identify key molecules involved with neuron birth and translate them into drugs, said Jeffrey Macklis, a researcher at Harvard Medical School who led the study.</p>
<p>"(The neurons) developed into mature neurons that not only took up proper locations within the brain, but reconnected to the spinal cord," Macklis said.</p>
<p>The newborn neurons took the place of many damaged neurons in the mice. The work could be a model for neuron replacement in spinal cord injury or diseases including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and Lou Gehrig's. And such a therapy would avoid any immune or other complications that might result from stem-cell transplantation.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sin, Regeneration, and Faith]]></title>
<link>http://theperichoresis.wordpress.com/?p=13</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Berny</dc:creator>
<guid>http://theperichoresis.wordpress.com/?p=13</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m continuing my discussion of sin, regeneration, and faith (among other things) with Remy ov]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2"><font face="Arial">I'm continuing my discussion of sin, regeneration, and faith (among other things) with Remy over at his <a title="Soli Deo Gloria" href="http://solideusgloria.blogspot.com/">blog</a>. Remy's proven to be a delightful conversation partner who is as enthusiastic as he is intelligent. Freddy has also contributed some important insights. But this reply is to Remy's <a href="http://solideusgloria.blogspot.com/2008/04/so-it-finally-comes-to-this-in-face-of.html">latest post</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>"So the question has been laid out: can unregenerate man not reject God?</p>
<p>The new testament contains roughly 16 phrases that have a similar pattern:<br />
"those who believe shall...(be saved, have eternal life, have everlasting life, is not condemned, never die, etc.) Romans 10:9 states that ""if you believe in your heart that God raised Jesus from the dead, you will be saved." So can an unregenerate man believe without God causing him to believe?"</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I'll take this opportunity to mention a few preliminary observations.</p>
<p>Remember that both Reformed and non-Reformed agree that there are several stations or segments in the process of salvation. Paul names at least five in Romans 8:29-30, but there are more than five. And it isn't Paul's intention in this passage to give an exhaustive account anyhow.</p>
<p>When theologians look into these segments of the salvation process they usually concern themselves with establishing the <em>ordo salutis</em>, or the "order of salvation." They have a grasp on the segments themselves and now they want to put them into the order in which they occur.</p>
<p>It's obvious that we learn about the salvation process from the authors of Scripture. They are the ones who first tell us about regeneration, justification, glorification, etc. Yet they don't employ a singular approach in their presentations of these topics. At times they speak of salvation holistically and other times they compartmentalize the process and speak of salvation atomistically. That is, sometimes they refer to the entire salvation process, which includes all of the parts, and other times they refer to the individual parts within the larger framework of salvation.</p>
<p>Our goal should be to exegete these passages--and indeed all passages--correctly. This involves trying to find the historical context as well as the literary context. The first is concerned with the historical situation into which the text belongs. The second is concerned with the surrounding text which provides the context.</p>
<p>I say all this because many people read a verse and immediately assume an interpretation without ever bothering to exegete the passage. I'm not suggesting that we need to spend hours mulling over a verse before we can finally ascribe an interpretation to it. Not at all. But then again, in discussions such as these, when the topic is of no small consequence, unfortunately many leapfrog the entire hermeneutical process and end up arriving at faulty interpretations.</p>
<p>When the Bible writers, for example, say something to the effect of, "Believe and you will be saved," in this particular phrase they have neither explicitly nor implicitly said anything about the extent of sin's influence. Instead, the passage is concerned with justification and salvation, and with its corollaries faith and grace, respectively. It would be a mistake, then, to stretch this verse beyond its reach and apply it to a situation that it has not said anything about.</p>
<p>I say this because recently I was debating this issue with one of my professors at Trinity, and he brought up the passages that you list above. His argument was that these passages don't mention regeneration in the Reformed sense, therefore, the Reformed sense is wrong. Yet when I explained to him that in Reformed theology regeneration is a passive work, and that it would've been non-sensical for the Bible writer to say "Be regenerated, then believe and you will be saved," my professor didn't realize that he had been violating the context of the verses he was citing as well distorting the Reformed doctrine of regeneration. I told him that other passages talk about regeneration, but in these particular passages, when a Bible writer tells someone in his audience what to do to be saved he doesn't tell them the part of salvation that is outside of their reach. He tells them the part that they can grab hold of. He tells them, "Believe," knowing that those who have been regenerated can accept this message and those who haven't been regenerated cannot.</p>
<p>Man, that's a lot of preliminary information! Hopefully I haven't worn out my welcome already!</p>
<p><em></p>
<blockquote><p>"I believe as you do that sin has separated us from the Lord. In fact, we are so separated due to sin that we are considered "dead" to God. This is supported as you quoted in Ephesians 2:1, 4-5) "and you were dead in your trespasses and sins... But God...made us alive" (Eph. 2:1, 4-5) God states in Genesis 2:16-17 the effect that sin will have on us: "... Of every tree of the garden surely you may eat;but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil not you shall eat from it;in the day of your eating from it surely you shall die -[dying you shall die]" But Adam and Eve did not die a physical death, at least not then. So what kind of death did they die? Was it a spiritual death? Did their spirit actually die?</p>
<p>Let's consider the basics, if an unregenerate person has a literally dead spirit, how can that person be alive? It was when God breathed into Adam that he live. Prior to that spirit (breath) Adam was a corpse. (Genesis 2:7) Even when people die in the Bible it doesn't say that their spirit literally dies, but that it is 'given up,' (Gen 25:8, 17, 35:29, Job 3:11,) Can a spirit literally die? I hope you can shed some light on this."</p></blockquote>
<p></em></p>
<p>I think the view of Scripture is that man's spirit is morally, not metaphysically, dead. The problem is the ambiguous term "spiritual death." People hear that and they insert what they know of physical death onto the meaning of spiritual death. That is, they think of a corpse lying motionless and unresponsive and they imagine the spiritual death as a lifeless <em>animus</em>, unresponsive and motionless. But Scripture isn't saying that the spirit is dead in this way. Obviously our spirits are metaphysically alive, but when we talk about their moral dispositions we conclude that they are unfailingly and absolutely bent on perpetuating their unrepentance. In this way they are dead. Remember that it's a metaphor, not a literal description. I know you know this, but just as a reference for whoever else is reading, when I say that God creates a new heart I don't mean to say that God replaces the organ inside of me that pumps blood. But he takes my spirit which is continuously set against him by nature and changes it so that I can now worship him.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>"Here [In Eph. 2:1] the word “dead” is used figuratively, emphasizing that the chasm created between God and man because of sin is as unbridgeable as the chasm between the dead and the living.... So our spirit is separated from God and that is the effect of sin, but it does not mean that we cannot respond to God."</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I agree that Paul's point is not to say that the unregenerate man is unable to respond to God. Reformed people sometimes misspeak in this way. I think it's clear that unregenerate man certainly <em>does</em> respond to God, but his response is always the same, he rejects God's authority and Lordship, and chooses his own sin instead.</p>
<p>I think the mistake we sometimes make is to confuse words with concepts. For example, some read 1. Cor 2:14 and have a hard time reconciling their interpretation with reality.</p>
<p>1 Cor. 2:14: <em>"The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned."</em></p>
<p>They see the phrase that the unregenerate man "cannot understand...the things that come from the Spirit of God" and they think that "cannot understand" means that they cannot comprehend what the data means. Yet what is meant here is not that an unbeliever cannot intellectually assent to the truths of Scripture, but rather, that he cannot find any spiritual significance for his own life in them.</p>
<p>We need to remember to not confuse words with concepts. And with metaphors, not to incorrectly locate the point of comparison. In the case of Ephesians 2:1, the point of comparison between physical death and "dead in trespasses and sins" is not metaphysical, but moral. Therefore, our moral inability is so total that it is as though we were dead.</p>
<p>Think about it, if Paul is trying to convey how deeply and totally we are committed to perpetuating our unrepentance, what metaphor could he use that would serve as the best illustration? That morally we are <em>dead</em>!</p>
<blockquote><p><em>"Sin could affect us to the point where we cannot "thwart its corrupting influence" yet still not be pervasive, the same way unbeliever’s feel guilt and know the difference from right and wrong (C.S. Lewis’ Moral Law) and still not be able to thwart temptation. Even our 'regenerated' man does not always thwart sin, but it does thwart the effect of sin which is spiritual death."</em></p></blockquote>
<p>We need to distinguish here between a civic good and a spiritual good. In God's economy, both regenerate and unregenerate can perform civic goods, but as we know, these are not meritorious in God's eyes and they do not necessarily arise from a pure heart. Think of Schindler from <em>Schindler's List</em>. Yet spiritual goods are those goods that God delights in because they arise from a redeemed heart. The difference here is a difference of motivation.</p>
<p>Are our moral actions motivated by love for God or by anything else. Civic goods can be motivated by either one. But spiritual goods arise purely from a heart that wants to please and honor God.</p>
<p>I agree that each man violates his inherent sense of right and wrong when he sins. Both regenerate and unregenerate.</p>
<p>But when an unregenerate person does right he is not doing so to glorify God. In the example I gave earlier, Russell Crowe's character didn't steal the money that was left over in drug busts not because he wanted to thwart sin and follow God, but because he wanted to justify himself in his own eyes.</p>
<p>When a regenerate person does right he is doing it for the glory of God. When a Christian police officer refuses to take the money left over in drug busts, the same as Crowe, he is refusing to take it for an entirely different reason. It is for the glory of God.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>"So, can an unbeliever separated from God believe unto righteousness? Yes! (Romans 10:10) Now, here is where some would say, well this means that salvation is credited to man because he believed.</p>
<p>No. Man could believe all he wants, but unless Christ did the work, belief means nothing.It is because Christ has done the work that our belief causes us to be saved. (John 3:16 - is preempted with God first giving His Son)"</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Both Reformed and non-Reformed believe that unbelievers can become believers. The question is how an unbeliever comes to believe. Typically, non-Reformed will begin at faith, whereas Reformed will begin at regeneration.</p>
<p>My question for non-Reformed is this: Why does one man believe and another disbelieve? What is behind each of their decisions to choose one over the other?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>"So does that mean that because I believe that now I am saved by my works in believing? Here a person is making the assumption that belief is a 'work.' Let's look at Ephesians 2:8-9 - "for by grace have ye been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God not of works, that no man should glory. " Now, let's look at the context. Paul's main issue with works throughout the New Testament is directed to the Jews that believed that Salvation was not due to Christ's redemptive work, but rather by their adherence to the law (Romans). In fact, all of the world's religion have this characteristic, man working their way into heaven or enlightenment. Instead, here we have Christianity that states just the opposite. Man cannot do anything to attain salvation. Salvation was attained for us by Christ, but it doesn't mean everyone is automatically saved. We most respond. This response is faith, believing, entrusting. This does not 'count' as work (especially in consideration of the sabbath day of rest rules in the Old Testament. None of which say that you cannot have faith on the Sabbath day because otherwise you would be working.)"</em></p></blockquote>
<p>That is a good observation that all of the world's religions have that characteristic in common. I think you are absolutely right. That's one of the things that makes Christianity so unique.</p>
<p>I also agree with you that man is not automatically saved. We do indeed need to respond. But from where does our response come from? When we reject God, from where does that rejection come from? And when we accept God, from where does that acceptance come from?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>"When studying the Ephesians verse some may say, "look, we are depraved because that faith isn't even ours, it is a gift of God!" But this is a typical misunderstanding that is made due to a lack of understanding of Greek. Not that I'm a Greek expert, but I have my sources, :-)<br />
The verse should read: for by Grace you are save through faith, and this salvation is not of yourselves, it is a gift of God. The word "this" refers to being saved. Salvation is the gift of God. Faith is our response to the salvation that God has provided."</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Warfield has given the standard three-part definition to saving faith: 1) knowledge, 2) assent, and 3) trust. According to him, these three must be evident for faith to be true faith. Yet if Eph. 2:1 is correct that we are dead in our trespasses and sins, then the truths (knowledge) of God shouldn't move us or make us want to (assent) accept God (trust). What is needed is what Paul describes in vv. 4-5, for God to make us alive, that is, for God to make us want to trust him.</p>
<p>I think sometimes Reformed and non-Reformed misunderstand each other's positions here and as a result get confused. When Reformed stress that even faith is a gift from God, by that we don't mean to say that the person who is exercising faith is passive like he is in the process of regeneration. No, the person is a willing participant in the process of faith. Yet he is only willing because he has had some heart-work performed on him by God. And this new ability to believe, as well as the belief itself, is a gift given to the person by God.</p>
<p>And to that, Reymond in his <em>Systematic Theology</em> states <em>"Of course, faith in Jesus Christ is not a natural reaction to the gospel; it is not native to the depraved human heart.... Faith in Christ is the inevitable Spirit-wrought response by the elect to the gospel, an effect of the Holy Spirit's regenerating activity in conjunction with the ministry of the Word. Bu so conceived, it is still a human act. Just because man cannot in himself respond in saving faith to God's gracious overtures...does not become thereby, in Berkuwer's words, 'a divine monologue in which man is a mere telephone through which God addresses himself.' It is the regenerated person, not God, who believes in Christ. But in this regenerated person's justifying and sanctifying faith in Christ that the Spirit generates in his heart, the sovereignty of salvation's sola gratia is not spurned but affirmed."</em></p>
<p>Reymond also cites Abraham Kuyper has one who has presented evidence in favor of the view that "faith" is included in "the gift of God" in Eph. 2:8-9. Reymond also exegetes the verse himself and arrives at the same conclusion.</p>
<p>Besides, do we really want to say that faith, which justifies and is the channel through which we receive grace, is a work that we produce ourselves?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>"Our response is from ourselves. Salvation is from God. This is more consistent with the scriptures. This doesn't give any credit to man because we can respond all we want, but unless God died on the cross we have no salvation. To God be the Glory, but each man must face God in the day of Judgment and be judged for their belief or lack thereof."</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I gotta go take my new dog to the vet! So I'm outta time! But the problem I have with this is that I can't make sense of why someone believes and why another does not on a non-Reformed scheme.</p>
<p>Also, in judgment, you'll be able to stress that you had faith whereas others didn't. How is that not meritorious on your part, especially when others didn't have either the intelligence or the enlightened sense that you did when you made the right choice to put your faith in Christ?</font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Love Story - Journey of Last 7 Months of My Life]]></title>
<link>http://soumitra78.wordpress.com/?p=3</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>soumitra78</dc:creator>
<guid>http://soumitra78.wordpress.com/?p=3</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Have you ever experienced how your life can turn upside down in a span of two days? I have. Read the]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever experienced how your life can turn upside down in a span of two days? I have. Read the story below. Those who have gone through similar phases in life can feel what I feel. From a loser's (or winner's ?)perspective -</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;" align="center"><b><u><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:Arial;">A Love Story</span></u></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;"><br />
This is the story of one girl &#38; two boys. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">The girl dearly loved one boy. The boy also. They planned their life together. But between them came the social wall. The boy could not take the decision. The girl waited. He finally told the girl that he could not honor her love. The girl was shattered. The boy was shaken, but could not commit. She cried her heart out, but she waited. When there was no hope, she waited. The girl left the place, came to her home, tears in her heart. When she had none to turn to, she cried &#38; prayed to God. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">But what the girl could do? She has to marry someone. Family pressure increased. No promise from the boy, no assurance, only the mutual feelings lingered, perhaps unspoken, unheard, but alive. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">Enter the second boy. An arranged match. Why the girl chose him among others, unclear. This boy was a loner in heart games. Naïve. Shy. From the first, he opened his heart like a long closed metal chest, opening with a clank. Nothing was hidden from view. Suddenly the world seemed too colorful, too rosy to him. He never thought the feeling of belonging to someone special can be so fulfilling. All of a sudden, the long lost sweet romantic self woke up in him. He consciously tried to change his wild lifestyle. He prepared himself for her to come into his life, oblivious to any sign of the storm that is brewing in the distant sky. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">The girl was hesitant, but went along. She never committed mentally, but without any option, gave in and tried to walk along. But the mental barrier was there. The boy had sensed the presence of the barrier, but didn’t understand why it was there. He thought he was impatient. She also told him that. He learnt to be patient. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">Time went by. His attachment to her grew deeper &#38; deeper. He said that he could literally take his heart out if she wanted. She said that she would see that in time. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">Marriage was coming nearer. The girl thought, thought and thought. And cried. She never told him about the first boy. Was it for the fear of rejection from this second boy also? Or for the eternal hope that she was carrying in her heart? It will never be known. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">Marriage bells ringing now in the doorsteps. Preparations complete, on both sides. She grudgingly accepted, hiding her feelings from everyone but her heart. Even now she prayed to God, cried &#38; waited. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">The second boy was living in dreams. His life was coming to a fulfillment he cherished from his imaginative, dreamy childhood. He was ecstatic. He planned so much for the new life. He sacrificed dreams that were once very dear to his heart. Only for the life of togetherness, for the bliss. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">Did we forget the first boy? No, obviously not! Not the girl. Not their common friends, who have seen them together, happy as butterflies in the spring. For the first time he was feeling the pangs of impending loss, the loss which could be very dear and unrecoverable. His behavior was erratic, friends feared for him. His family gave the nod finally. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">Marriage is now less than seven days away. The first boy summed up his courage and arrived on the stage. Was the timing deliberate? Was it forced? Perhaps yes, perhaps not. Never could it be known. The first boy met the girl to say something dearest to her at the last hour. The girl was overjoyed, happy as a reborn. What she wanted all her life God has gifted her. God has heard the cries she always had deep within her heart. She believed and had faith that “true love comes back”. She was proved right! </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">But at this stage, what her options were? No one from her family would listen to her. Who is the last person to save her and her love? Why, the second boy? Didn’t he promise that he would give her his heart if she wished? But is she doing the right thing? Who knows, but in her heart she knew that she might not make him happy if married. Perhaps this realization came too late, perhaps too early. Perhaps it was true, perhaps not. Who knows the answer? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">So, now is the time to tell everything to the second boy. The causes of her hesitation, the barrier that he easily felt, the emotional disconnect that he might have perceived, her first love and the returning of her first love, all, everything. She begged him to leave her, for all the good or bad she had done, uttered, written, spoken, unspoken. She said everything between her and him was forced and possibly untrue, that she had taken her chances and acted accordingly. Perhaps true, perhaps not. Who knows? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">Even now, dear reader, waiting for what happened next? The story has reached the climax, no? Yes, it was really a climax. To put in a single line the condition of the second boy, his soul was fatally wounded. The pain of the shock numbed him. His faith in human beings was shaken for life. He was adamant to let his love desert him. He could not fathom the fact that the girl he dearly loved loves someone else. But he could not tolerate the girl’s cries. The voice that gave him company in lonely nights, in heavy workdays, in the wee hours of the night, in the morning, in the evening, in the mountains, in the city, in the rains, in the summer, in Sundays, in Mondays, in the train, in the hotel, among friends, within family, however fake that might have been, however forced that might have been, how much acting that might have been, but it was the voice he can never bear to hear it cry, to beg, to plead, even for all the right reasons, for all the wrong demands, for all the wrong acts. Is this what love is like? He does not know. It is for you, dear reader, to decide. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">The second boy let the girl go to the boy of her choice. Laughable. He never had this girl, so how can he “let her go”? No answers. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">He thought what he did was the right thing to do in such a situation. But he was not happy. There was enormous swelling of emotion in him which rapidly transformed into a wildfire of anger of unknown proportions. He felt that it is not right to let others, who let him trap and suffer in such a manner without any of his fault, remain happy. He promised to himself that he will see the end of it. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">In all this earthquake in his mind, there came an angel in the disguise of a friend, who supported him, cared for his well-being &#38; health and tried to heal the deepest of the wounds. She reasoned, coaxed, and pleaded him not to destroy his core, which he was hell-bent to exterminate for he thought goodness has no value in this earth anymore. He wanted to be the baddest of the bad, worst of the lot and take revenge. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">But he was not happy. He reached deep in his heart to find out what is the cause of all this unrest. Why is he not happy even when he is revengeful and taken the first step? He found that these thoughts are actually killing whatever little bit of older heart remained in him, not regenerating. These thoughts do not suit him. But why is he so angry? It is because of his hurt ego &#38; pride, which let him believe that if he ever loves a girl dearly, she will never turn away or betray him for another boy. He believes that love can not be forced. This is why the cry of the girl, whom he loved so dearly, for another boy was so bitter, so painful, so hurting to him. Perhaps she felt worse than him in doing all these, perhaps not. No one has any answer. She cried when none supported her decision. She cried because she thought what she was doing was beyond forgiveness, not right. Perhaps she was true, perhaps she was acting, but he could not bear her cry. It pained him so much to hear her cry. He gave his support to her decision, steadied her and asked her to move forward. He did what his heart told him to do. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">What makes a man happy? To love and forgive the ones he loves, loved and would love. The second boy has learnt a lesson of a lifetime. Everybody else is right, there are more to life than this one setback. After all, we have only one life to live, play, sing, explore, expand. The second boy is now at the lowest point in his life. He can only rise from there. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">He earnestly prays to God that the boy &#38; girl live happily ever after, otherwise his sacrifice would not be worth a bit. Not an iota of what have happened till now should jeopardize their lives from now on. They showed what true love is all about. The second boy was very much jealous of the first boy, for he is luckier to have a girl like her in his life. But this jealousy would end. The second boy would move on in his life. He really thinks that someday he would find a soul mate who would want him for what he is worth of or unworthy of. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">He truly has forgiven her at this point of time for what right or wrong she has done in her immaturity, in her indecisiveness, in her selfishness, in the situation she was in, for love, for the one boy she wanted in her life. The pain will linger for sometime more, but he wants somebody to heal that slowly, surely by understanding him, caring for him, nurturing him. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">This story is a tribute to love, to the wonderful girl and to the angel. And to all who supported the three main protagonists throughout. Let the story unfold beautifully in the years to come, when the last protagonist is also happily settled in life. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">Cheers to all who have the patience to read this far and maybe, are part of this journey. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">Amen.<br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;">------- The Second Boy.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;"><span>            </span>In a city in India.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;"><span>            </span>31.01.2008</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;"><span>            </span>5:00 pm.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thank You Jesus]]></title>
<link>http://churchbuilding101.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/thank-you-jesus/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 16:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>madamish</dc:creator>
<guid>http://churchbuilding101.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/thank-you-jesus/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Not much has happened in the last few days, other than the Pastor took a well-deserved long weekend ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.feed2podcast.com/podcast/56204960.xml"></a>Not much has happened in the last few days, other than the Pastor took a well-deserved long weekend to be with his family. Of course this placed in the minds of a few that he was looking for a new church to pastor. I know him too well. Here is where he feels the call. This is his home for the foreseeable future. Thank God.</p>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
