<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>posted-by-matthew-williams &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/posted-by-matthew-williams/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "posted-by-matthew-williams"</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:34:41 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Chesterfield to his Son on Vanity (1774)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=540</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=540</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: Letters Written by the Late Right Honourable Philip Dormer Stanhope, Earl of Chesterfiel]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: Letters Written by the Late Right Honourable Philip Dormer Stanhope, Earl of Chesterfield, to His Son, Philip Stanhope, Esq; Late Envoy Extraordinary at the Court of Dresden. Together with Several Other Pieces on Various subjects. Published by Mrs. Eugenia Stanhope, From the Originals Now in Her Possession. In Two Volumes. Vol. II. Dublin: Printed by G. Faulkner, in Parliament-street, M.DCC.LXXIV.</p>
<p>Letter LXXII.</p>
<p>Bath, November the 16th, 1752.</p>
<p>My Dear Friend,</p>
<p>Vanity, or to call it by a gentler name, the desire of admiration and applause, is, perhaps, the most universal principle of human actions; I do not say, that it is the best; and I will own, that it is sometimes the cause of both foolish and criminal effects.  But it is so much oftener the principle of right things, that, though they ought to have a better, yet, considering human nature, that principle is to be encouraged and cherished, in consideration of its effects.  Where that desire is wanting, we are apt to be indifferent, listless, indolent and inert; we do not exert our powers; and we appear to be as much below ourselves, as the vainest man living can desire to appear above what he really is.</p>
<p>As I have made you my confessor, and do not scruple to confess even my weaknesses to you, I will fairly own, that I had that vanity, that weakness, if it be one, to a prodigious degree; and, what is more, I confess it without repentence; nay I am glad I had it; since, if I have the good fortune to please in the world, it is to that powerful and active principle that I owe it.  I began the world, not with a bare desire, but with an insatiable thirst, a rage for popularity, applause, and admiration.  If this made me do some silly things, on one hand, it made me, on the other hand, do almost all the right things that I did:  it made me attentive and civil to the women I disliked, and to the men I despised, in hopes of the applause of both:  though I neither desired, nor would have accepted the favours of the one, nor the friendship of the other.  I always dressed, looked, and talked my best; and, I own, was overjoyed whenever I perceived that by all three, or by any one of them, the company was pleased with me.  To men, I talked whatever I thought would give them the best opinion of my parts and learning; and, to women, what I was sure would please them; flattery, gallantry, and love.  And moreover, I will own to you, under the secrecy of confession, that my vanity has very often made me take great pains to make many a woman in love with me, if I could, for whose person I would not give a pinch a snuff.  In company with men, I always endeavoured to out-shine, or, at least, if possible, to equal the most shining man in it.  This desire elicited whatever powers I had to gratify it; and where I could not perhaps shine in the first, enabled me, at least, to shine in the second or third sphere.  By these means I soon grew in fashion; and when a man is once in fashion, all he does is right.  It was infinite pleasure to me, to find my own fashion and popularity.  I was sent for to all parties of pleasure, both of men or women; where, in some measures, I gave the tone.  This gave me the reputation of having had some woman of condition; and that reputation, whether true or false, really got me others.  With the men I was a Proteus, and assumed every shape, in order to please them all: among the gay, I was the gayest, among the grave, the gravest; and I never omitted the least attentions of good breeding, or the least offices of friendship, that could either please, or attach them to me: and accordingly I was soon connected with all the men of any fashion or figure in town.</p>
<p>To this principle of vanity, which Philosophers call a mean one, and which I do not, I owe great part of the figure which I have made in life.  I wish you had as much, but I fear you have too little of it; and you seem to have a degree of laziness and lislestness about you, that makes you indifferent as to general applause...</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Madison's Papers (1842)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=538</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=538</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: The Papers of James Madison, Purchased by Order of Congress; Being His Correspondence an]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: The Papers of James Madison, Purchased by Order of Congress; Being His Correspondence and Reports of Debates During the Congress of the Confederation and his Reports of Debates in The Federal Convention; Now published from the original manuscripts, deposited in the Department of State, By Direction of the Joint Library Committee of Congress, Under the Superintendence of Henry D. Gilpin.  Volume I.  Mobile:  Allston Mygatt.  1842.</p>
<p>Letters Preceding the Debates of 1783.</p>
<p>To Thomas Jefferson.  Philadelphia, March 27, 1780.</p>
<p>Dear Sir,</p>
<p>Nothing under the title of news has occurred since I wrote last week by express, except that the enemy on the first of March remained in the neighbourhood of Charleston, in the same posture as when the preceding account came away.  From the best intelligence from that quarter, there seems to be great encouragement to hope that Clinton's operations will be again frustrated.  Our great apprehensions at present flow from a very different quarter.  Among the various conjunctures of alarm and distress which have arisen in the course of the Revolution, it is with pain I affirm to you, Sir, that no one can be singled out more truly critical than the present.  Our army threatened with an immediate alternative of disbanding or living on free quarter; the public treasury empty; public credit exhausted, nay, the private credit of purchasing agents employed, I am told, as far as it will bear; Congress complaining of the extortion of the people; the people of the improvidence of Congress; and the army of both; our affairs requiring the most mature and systematic measures, and the urgency of occasions admitting only of temporizing expedients generating new difficulties; Congress recommending plans to the several states for execution, and the States separately rejudging the expediency of such plans, whereby the same distrust of concurrent exertions that has damped the ardor of patriotic individuals must produce the same effect among the States themselves; an old system of finance discarded as incompetent to our necessities, an untried and precarious one substituted, and a total stagnation in prospect between the end of the former and the operation of the latter.  These are the outlines of the picture of our public situation.  I leave it to your own imagination to fill them up.  Believe me, Sir, as things now stand, if the States do not vigorously proceed in collecting the old money, and establishing funds for the credit of the new, that we are undone; and let them be ever so expeditious in doing this, sill the intermediate distress of our army, and hinderance to public affairs, are a subject of melancholy reflection.  General Washington writes that a failure of bread has already commenced in the army; and that, for any thing he sees, it must unavoidably increase.  Meat they have only for a short season, and as the whole dependence is on provisions now to be procured, without a shilling for the purpose, and without credit for a shilling, I look forward with the most pungent apprehensions.  It will be attempted, I believe, to purchase a few supplies with loan-office certificates; but whether they will be received is perhaps far from being certain; and if received will certainly be a more expensive and ruinous expedient.  It is not without some reluctance I trust this information to a conveyance by post, but I know of no better at present, and I ceonceive it to be absolutely necessary to be known to those who are most able and zealous to contribute to the public relief.     </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: The True Sentiments of America(1768)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=537</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=537</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
The True Sentiments of America: Contained in a Collection of Letters Sent from the House]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>The True Sentiments of America: Contained in a Collection of Letters Sent from the House of Representatives of the Province of Massachusetts Bay to Several Persons of High Rank in the Kingdom: Together with Certain Papers Relating to a Supposed Libel on the Governor of that Province, and a Dissertation on the Canon and the Feudal Law.  London, Printed for J. Almon, In Piccadilly. 1768.</p>
<p>Agreeable to a Vote of the Honourable House of Representatives of the Province of the Massachusett's-Bay, the following humble, dutiful, and loyal Petition to the King, signed by the Speaker, by their Order of the 20th January 1768; together with the Representatives of the House to his Majesty's Ministers; their Letter to their Agent, &#38;c. are here inserted.</p>
<p><em>An humble Petition to the King's most Excellent Majesty.</em></p>
<p>Most Gracious Sovereign,</p>
<p>Your Majesty's faithful subjects, the representatives of your province of the Massachusetts-Bay, with the warmest sentiments of loyalty, duty, and affection, beg leave to approach the throne, and to lay at you Majesty's feet their humble supplications, in behalf of your distressed subjects the people of the province.</p>
<p>Our ancestors, the first settlers of this country, having with the royal consent, which we humbly apprehend involves the consent of the nation, and at their own great expence, migrated from the mother kingdom, took possession of this land, at that time a wilderness, the right whereof they had purchased a valuable consideration of the council established at Plimouth, to whom it had been granted your Majesty's royal predecessor King James the first.</p>
<p>From the principles of loyalty to their Sovereign which will ever warm the breast of a true subject, though remote they acknowledged their allegiance to the English crown: and your Majesty will allow us with all humility to say, that they and their posterity, even to this time, have afforded frequent and signal proofs of their zeal for the honour and service of their prince, and their firm attachment to the parent country.</p>
<p>With toil and fatigue, perhaps not to be conceived by their brethren and fellow-subjects at home, and with the constant peril of their lives, from a numerous, savage, and warlike race of men, they began their settlement, and God prospered them. </p>
<p>They obtained a charter from King Charles the first; wherein his Majesty was pleased to grant them and their heirs and assigns for ever, all the lands therein described, to hold of him and his royal successors in free and common soccage; which we humbly conceive is as absolute an estate as the subject can hold under the crown.  And in the same charter were granted to them, and their posterity, all the rights, liberties, privileges, and immunities of natural subjects, born within the realm. </p>
<p>This charter they enjoyed, having, as we most humbly conceive, punctually complied with all the conditions of it, till in an unhappy time it was vacated--But after the revolution, when King William and Queen Mary, of glorious and blessed memory, were established on the throne: In that happy reign, when, to the joy of the nation and its dependencies, the crown was settled in your Majesty's illustrious family, the inhabitants of this province shared in the common blessing.  Then they were indulged with another charter; in which their Majesties were pleased for themselves, their heirs and successors, to grant and confirm to them as ample estate in the lands or territories as was granted by the former charter, together with other the most essential rights and liberties contained therein:  The principal of which, is that which your Majesty's subjects within the realm have ever held a most sacred right, of being taxed only by representatives of their own free election...</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Congress Canvassed (1774)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=534</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=534</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
The Congress Canvassed: Or, An Examination into the Conduct of the Delegates, at their G]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>The Congress Canvassed: Or, An Examination into the Conduct of the Delegates, at their Grand Convention, Held in Philadelphia, Sept 1, 1774.  Addressed, to the Merchants of New-York.  By A. W. Farmer.  Author of Free Thoughts, &#38;c.  Printed in the Year M,DCC,LXXIV.</p>
<p>Gentlemen,</p>
<p>I shall make no apology for addressing myself to you, the Merchants of the city of New-York, upon the present unhappy and distressed state of our country.  My subject will necessarily lead me to make some remarks on your past and present conduct, in this unnatural contention between our parent country and us.  I am duly sensible of what importance you are to the community, and of the weight and influence you must have in the conduct of all our public affairs: I know that the characters of many of you are truly respectable, and I shall endeavour to express what I have to say to you, consistently with that decency and good manners which are due, not only to you, but to all mankind.</p>
<p>But you must not expect any undue complaisance from me.--You must be content with plain English, from a plain countryman; I must have the privilege of calling a fig--a Fig; an egg, --an Egg.  If, upon examination, your conduct shall, in any instances, appear to be weak, you must bear to be told of it:---if wrong, to be censured:---if selfish, to be exposed:---if ridiculous, to be laughed at :--- Do not be offended if I omit to say, that if your conduct shall appear to be honourable, that it shall be commended.  Honourable and virtuous actions want no commendation,---they speak for themselves:  They affect not praise, but are rather disgusted with it,---instead of heightening, it tarnishes their lustre.  If you have acted from honourable motives, from disinterested principles, from true patriotism,---if justice and prudence, and a love of your country have been the guides of your conduct, you need fear no attack, nor the strictest scrutiny of your actions. </p>
<p>Nor, upon the other hand, ought you to be displeased with the man, who shall point out your errors, supposing you have acted wrong.  To err is common,--- I wish it was uncommon to persist in error.  But such is the pride of the human heart, that when we have once taken a wrong step, we think it an impeachment of our wisdom and prudence to retreat.  A kind of sullen, sulky obstinacy takes possession of us; and though, in the hour of calm reflection, our hearts should condemn us, we had rather run the risk of being condemned by the world too, than own the possibility of our having been mistaken.  Preposterous pride!  It defeats the end it aims at:  It degrades instead of exalting our characters, and destroys that reputation which it seems so solicitous to establish.  To become sensible of our errors, and to mend them,---to grow wiser by our own mistakes,---to learn prudence from our misconduct,---to make every fall a means of rising higher in virtue,---are circumstances which raise the dignity of human nature the nearest to that perfection of conduct which has never erred.   </p>
<p>Possibly, in many instances, I shall need your candour:  In one particular I must bespeak it.  I live at a distance from the city, and visit it but seldom.  The opinion I have formed of your conduct, depends, a good deal, upon report, and the common newspapers.---I have, however, endeavoured to get the best information I could; and I have not the least inclination to put unfair constructions upon your actions; and should I, in any instance, misrepresent you, I will, upon good information, make all proper acknowledgements.  Under these circumstances, and with this disposition, I think I have a right to expect, that you will read this Address without prejudice, and judge of it with impartiality, and such a regard to truth and right, as every reasonable man ought to make the basis of his opinion in all the discussions, and the rule of his conduct in all his actions.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Almon's Anecdotes (on Wm. Knox) (1797)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=533</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=533</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
Biographical, Literary, and Political Anecdotes of Several of the Most Eminent Persons o]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>Biographical, Literary, and Political Anecdotes of Several of the Most Eminent Persons of the Present Age.  Never Before Printed.  With an Appendix; Consisting of Original, Explanatory, and Scarce Papers.  By the Author of Anecdotes of the Late Earl of Chatham.  In Three Volumes.  Volume II.  London: Printed for T. N. Longman, and L. B. Seeley.  In Pater-Noster-Row.  1797. </p>
<p>Chapter XXI.</p>
<p><em>William Knox, Esq.  Advocate for the American War.  Secretary to Lord George Germaine.  His State of the Nation; assisted by Mr. Grenville.  Other Publications.</em></p>
<p>This gentleman was another of Mr. Grenville's friends; and was a very strenuous and persevering advocate of the British measures against America.  He was agent for Georgia; and Under Secretary of State to Lord Hillsborough, and to Lord George Germaine, during the American war.  To his zeal and suggestions, many of the unfortunate measures against America were ascribed, and he sustained much of the hatred of the Americans on that account.  He was the author of several tracts on American subjects, the principal of which was,</p>
<p>"The Controversy between Great Britain and her Colonies reviewed."  It is obviously a work of much labour and contains extracts from many papers.  The writer's view is to support the right of Great Britain to tax America.</p>
<p>He was also the writer of a tract intitled "The Present State of the Nation; particularly with respect to its Trade, Finances, &#38;c."  This pamphlet was, at first, ascribed to Mr. Grenville; and Mr. Burke, by his pamphlet intitled "Observations upon it," gave a temporary currency to that opinion.  Mr. Grenville undoubtedly assisted the writer with materials and arguments, but the compositions belong to Mr. Knox.  It consists principally of a defence of Mr. Grenville's ministry and measures, and a condemnation of the Rockingham ministry, and their measures.</p>
<p>Mr. Knox has also published two small volumes, called "Extra-official State Papers;" which contain many useful hints. </p>
<p>The two following Letters are not unworthy of the reader's notice:</p>
<p>5th March 1783.</p>
<p>"Sir,</p>
<p>"Letters having been written to the Secretary of the late Board of Trade, and to my colleague, for the last six months, as Under Secretary of State in the American department, and to all the clerks who have been deprived of their situations in those offices by their suppression, acquainting them, that the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury had made them all allowances in compensation of the incomes they had been deprived of; and no such letter having come to me, I am constrained to give you the trouble of this letter, to request the favour of you to move their Lordships to permit you to inform me of what account it is that I, who had served as Under Secretary to every Secretary of State that has filled the American department, from its institution to its suppression, and even attended the Earl of Shelburne when that department was absorbed in the domestic, until his Lordship was more ably served, should be the only person passed over upon this occasion without compensation, and even without notice.</p>
<p>"I am, Sir, &#38;c. William Knox."</p>
<p>"Geo. Rose, Esq."</p>
<p>Copy of Mr. Rose's Answer, dated 17th of March 1783.</p>
<p>"Sir,</p>
<p>"Upon reading to my Lords Commissioners of the Treasury your letter, dated the 5th instant, respecting a compensation for your office of Under Secretary of State for the American department, I am directed to acquaint you, that my Lords are of opinion that you have no claim whatever to a compensation for the loss of your office, you already having a pension of six hundred pounds a-year for yourself, and the like sum for Mrs. Knox.</p>
<p>"I am, Sir, &#38;c. Geo. Rose."  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Franklin on the Interest of Great Britain (1760)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=532</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=532</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
The Interest of Great Britain Considered with Regard to Her Colonies and the Acquisition]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>The Interest of Great Britain Considered with Regard to Her Colonies and the Acquisitions of Canada and Guadaloupe.  To which are added, Observations concerning the increase of Mankind, peopling of Countries, &#38;c.  As the very ingenious, useful, and worthy Author of this Pamphlet [B------n F------n, LL. D.] is well-known and much esteemed in England and America; and seeing that his other Works have been received with universal Applause; the present Production needs no further Recommendation to a generous, free, an intelligent, and publick-spirited People.  The Second Boston-Edition.  London, Printed MDCCLX.  Boston, N. E. Reprinted and Sold by B. Mecom, at the New Printing-Office, near the Town-House.  1760.</p>
<p>I have perused with no small Pleasure the <em>Letter addressed to Two Great Men</em>, and the <em>Remarks</em> on that Letter.  It is not merely from the Beauty, the Force and Perspicuity of Expression, or the general Elegance of Manner conspicuous in both Pamphlets, that my Pleasure chiefly arises; it is rather from this, that I have lived to see Subjects of the greatest Importance to this Nation publickly discussed without Party-Views, or Party-Heat, with Decency and Politeness, and with no other Warmth than what a Zeal for the Honour and Happiness of our King and Country may inspire;--and this by Writers whose Understanding (however they may differ from each other) appears not unequal to their Candour and Uprightness of their Intention.</p>
<p>But, as great Abilities have not always the best Information, there are, I apprehend, in the <em>Remarks</em> some Opinions not well founded, and some Mistakes of so important a Nature, as to render a few Observations on them necessary for the better information of the Publick.   </p>
<p>The Author of the <em>Letter</em>, who must be every Way best able to support his own Sentiments, will, I hope, excuse me, if I seem officiously to interfere; when he considers, that the Spirit of Patriotism, like other Qualities good and bad, is catching; and that this long Silence since the <em>Remarks</em> appeared has made us despair of seeing the Subject further discussed by masterly Hand.  The ingenious and candid <em>Remarker</em>, too, who must have been misled himself before he employed his Skill and Address to mislead others, will certainly, since he declares <em>he aims at no Seduction</em>, be disposed to excuse even the weakest effort to prevent it. </p>
<p>And surely if the general Opinions that possess the Minds of the People may possibly be of Consequence in publick Affairs, it must be fit to set those Opinions right.  If there is Danger, as the <em>Remarker</em> supposes that "extravagant Expectations" may embarrass "a virtuous and able Ministry," and "render the Negotiation for Peace a Work of infinite Difficulty;" there is no less Danger that Expectations too low, through Want of proper Information, may have a contrary Effect, may make even a virtuous and able Ministry less anxious, and less attentive to the obtaining Points, in which the Honour and Interest of the Nation are essentially concerned; and the People less hearty in supporting such a Ministry and its Measures. </p>
<p>The People of this Nation are indeed respectable, not for their Numbers only, but for their Understanding and their publick Spirit: They manifest the first, by their universal Approbation of the late prudent and vigorous Measures, and the Confidence they justly repose in a wise and good Prince, and an honest and able Administration; the latter they have demonstrated by the immense Supplies granted in Parliament unanimously, and paid through the whole Kingdom with Chearfulness.  And since to this Spirit and these Supplies our "Victories and Successes" have in great Measure been owing, is it quite right, is it generous to say, with the <em>Remarker</em>, that the People "had no Share in acquiring them?"  The mere Mob he cannot mean, even when he speaks of the <em>Madness of the People</em>; for the Madness of the Mob must bee too feeble and impotent, arm'd as the Government of this Country at present is, to "over-rule," even in the slightest Instances, the "Virtue and Moderation" of a firm and steady Ministry.</p>
<p>While the War continues, its final event is quite uncertain.  The Victorious of this Year may be  the Vanquished of the next.  It may therefore be too early to say, what Advantages we ought absolutely to insist on, and make the <em>sine quibus non</em> of a Peace, If the Necessity of our Affairs should oblige us to accept of Terms less advantageous than our present Successes seem to promise us, an intelligent People, as ours is, must see that Nesessity, and will acquiesce.  But as a Peace, when it is made, may be made hastily; and as the unhappy Continuance of the War affords us Time to consider, among several Advantages gain'd or to be gain'd, which of them may be most for our interest to retain, if some and not all may possibly be retained; I do not blame the public Disquisition of these Points, as premature or useless.  Light often arises from a Collision of Opinions, as Fire from Flint and Steel; and if we can obtain the Benefit of the <em>Light</em>, without Danger from the <em>Heat</em> sometimes produc'd by Controversy, why should we discourage it.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Locke on Toleration (1777)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=527</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=527</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: The Works of John Locke, In Four Volumes.  The Eighth Edition.  Volume the Second.  L]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: The Works of John Locke, In Four Volumes.  The Eighth Edition.  Volume the Second.  London:  Printed for W. Strahan, J. F. and C. Rivington, L. Davis, W. Owen, S. Baker and G. Leigh, T. Payne and Son, T. Caslon, S. Crowder, T. Longman, B. Law, C. Rivington, E. and C. Dilly, J. Wilkie, T. Cadell, N. Conant, T. Beecroft, T. Lowndes, G. Robinson, Jos. Johnson, J. Robson, J. Knox, T. Becket, and T. Evans.  MDCCLXXVII.</p>
<p>A Letter Concerning Toleration [p. 316].</p>
<p>Honoured Sir,</p>
<p>Since you are pleased to enquire what are my thoughts about the mutual Toleration of Christians in their different professions of religion, I must needs answer you freely, that I esteem that Toleration be the chief characteristical mark of the true church.  For whatsoever some people boast of the antiquity of places and names, or of the pomp of their outward worship; others, of the reformation of their discipline; all, of the orthodoxy of their faith, for everyone is orthodox to himself: these things, and all others of this nature, are much rather marks of men striving for power and empire over one another, than of the church of Christ.  Let any one have ever so true a claim to all these things, yet if he be destitute of charity, meekness, and good-will in general towards all mankind, even to those that are not Christians, he is certainly yet short of being a true Christian himself.  "The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them, said our Saviour to his disciples, but ye shall not be so," Luke xxii. 25, 26.  The business of true religion is quite another thing.  It is not instituted in order to the erecting an external pomp, nor to the obtaining of ecclesiastical dominion, nor to the exercising of compulsive force; but to the regulating of men's lives according to the rules of virtue and piety.  Whosoever will lift himself under the banner of Christ, must, in the first place and above all things, make war upon his own lusts and vices.  It is in vain for any man to usurp the name of Christian, without holiness of life, purity of manners, and benignity and meekness of spirit.  "Let every one that nameth the name of Christ, depart from iniquity. 2. Tim. ii. 19. Thou, when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren," said our Lord to Peter, Luke xxii. 32.  It would indeed be very hard for one that appears careless about his own salvation, to persuade me that he were extremely concerned for mine.  For it is impossible that those should sincerely and heartily apply themselves to make other people Christians, who have not really embraced the Christian religion in their hearts.  If the Gospel and the Apostles may be credited, no man can be a Christian without charity, and without that faith which works, not by force, but by love.  Now I appeal to the consciences of those that persecute, torment, destroy, and kill other men upon pretence of religion, whether they do it out of friendship and kindness towards them, or no; and I shall then indeed, and not till then, believe they do so, when I shall see those fiery zealots correcting, in the same manner, their friends and familiar acquaintance, for the manifest sins they commit against the precepts of the Gospel; when I shall see them prosecute with fire and sword the members of their own communion that are tainted with enormous vices, and without amendment are in danger of eternal perdition; and when I shall see them thus express their love and desire of the salvation of their souls, by the infliction of torments, and exercise of all manner of cruelties.  For if it be out of a principle of charity, as they pretend, and love to men's souls, that they deprive them of their estates, maim them with corporal punishments, starve and torment them in noisome prisons, and in the end even take away their lives; I say, if all this be done merely to make men Christians, and procure their salvation, why then do they suffer "whoredom, fraud, malice, and such-like enormities," which according to the Apostle, Rom. i. manifestly relish of heathenish corruption, to predominate so much and abound amongst their flock and people?  These, and such-like things, are certainly more contrary to the glory of God, to the purity of the church , and to the salvation of souls, than any conscientious dissent from ecclesiastical decision, or separation from publick worship, whilst accompanied with innocency of life.  Why then does this burning zeal for God, for the church, and for the salvation of souls; burning, I say, literally with fire and faggot; pass by those moral vices and wickedness, without any chastisement, which are acknowledged by all men to be diametrically opposite to the profession of Christianity; and bend all its nerves either to the introducing of ceremonies, or to the establishment of opinions, which for the most part are about nice and intricate matters, that exceed the capacity of ordinary understandings?  Which of the parties contending about these things is in the right, which of them is guilty of schism or heresy, whether those that domineer or those that suffer, with then at last be manifest, when the cause of their separation comes to be judged of.  He certainly that follows Christ, embraces his doctrine, and bears his yoke, though he forsake both father and mother, separate from the publick assemblies and ceremonies of his country, or whomsoever, or whatsoever else he relinquishes, will not then be judged an heretick.       </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Bougainville's Voyage (1772)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=526</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=526</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:  A Voyage Round the World.  Performed by Order of His Most Christian Majesty, In the Y]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:  A Voyage Round the World.  Performed by Order of His Most Christian Majesty, In the Years 1766, 1767, 1768, and 1769.  By Lewis De Bougainville, Colonel of Foot, and Commodore of the Expedition in the Frigate La Boudeuse, and the Store-ship L'Etoile.  Translated from the French by John Reinhold Forster, F. A. S.  Dublin:  Printed for J. Exshaw, H. Saunders, J. Potts, W. Sleater, D. Chamberlaine, E. Lynch, J. Williams, R. Moncrieffe, T. Walker, and C. Jenkins.  MDCCLXXII.</p>
<p>A Voyage Round the World.  Part the First.  Departure from France--clearing the Straits of Magalhaens. </p>
<p>Chap. I.</p>
<p><em>Departure of the Boudeuse from Nantes; puts in at Brest; run from Brest to Montevideo; junction with the Spanish frigates, intended for taking possession of the Malouines, or Falkland's islands</em>.</p>
<p>In February 1764, France began to make a settlement on the Isles of Malouines.  Spain reclaimed these isles as belonging to the continent of South America; and her right to them having been acknowledged by the king, I received orders to deliver our settlement to the Spaniards, and to proceed to the East Indies by crossing the South Seas between the Tropics.  For this expedition I received the command of the frigate la Boudeuse, of twenty-six twelve pounders, and I was to be joined at the Malouines by the store-ship l'Etoile, which was intended to bring me the provisions necessary for a voyage of such length, and to follow me during the whole expedition.  Several circumstances retarded the junction of this store-vessel, and consequently made my whole voyage near eight months longer than it would otherwise have been. </p>
<p>In the beginning of November, 1766, I went to Nantes, where the Boudeuse had just been built, and where M. Duclos Guyot, a captain of a fireship, my second officer was fitting her out.  The 5th of this month we came down from Painbeuf to Mindin, to finish the equipment of her; and on the 15th we sailed from this road for the river de la Plata.  There I was to find two Spanish frigates, called le Esmeralda and le Liebre, that had left Ferrol the 17th of October, and whose commander was ordered to receive the Isles Malouines, or Falkland's islands, in the name of his Catholic majesty.</p>
<p>The 17th in the morning we suffered a sudden gust of wind from W. S. W. to N. W. it grew more violent in the night, which we passed under our bare poles, with our lower-yards lowered, the clue of the fore sail, under which we tried before, having been carried away.  The 18th, at four in the morning, our fore-top-mast broke about the middle of its height; the main-top-mast resisted till eight o-clock, when it broke in the cap, and carried away the head of the main mast.  This last event made it impossible to continue our voyage, and I determined to put into Brest, where we arrived the 21st of November.</p>
<p>This squall of wind, and the confusion it had occasioned, gave me room to make the following observation upon the state and qualities of the frigate which I commanded.</p>
<p>1. The prodigious tumbling home of her top-timbers, leaving too little open to the angles which the shrouds make with the masts, the latter were not sufficiently supported. </p>
<p>2. The preceding fault became of more consequence by the nature of the ballast, which we had been obliged to take in, on account of the prodigious quantity of provisions we had stowed.  Forty tons of ballast, distibuted on both sides of the kelson, and at a short distance from it, and a dozen twelve-pounders placed at the bottom of the pump-well (we had only fourteen upon deck) added a considerable weight, which being much below the center of gravity, and almost entirely rested upon the kelson, put the masts in danger, if there had been any rolling.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Rights of Man (1791)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=525</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=525</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: Rights of Man: Being an Answer to Mr. Burke&#8217;s Attack on the French Revolution.  S]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: Rights of Man: Being an Answer to Mr. Burke's Attack on the French Revolution.  Second Edition.  By Thomas Paine, Secretary for Foreign Affairs to Congress in the American War, and Author of the Work Intitled "Common Sense."  London: Printed for J. S. Jordan, No. 166.  Fleet-Street.  MDCCXCI.</p>
<p>Preface to the English Edition.</p>
<p>From the part Mr. Burke took in the American Revolution, it was natural that I should consider him a friend to mankind; and as our acquaintance commenced on that ground, it would have been more agreeable to me to have had cause to continue in that opinion, than to change it.</p>
<p>At that time Mr. Burke made his violent speech last winter in the English Parliament against the French Revolution and the National Assembly, I was in Paris, and had written him, but a short time before, to inform him how prosperously matters were going on.  Soon after this, I saw his advertisement of the Pamphlet he intended to publish: As the attack was to be made in a language he little studied, and less understood, in France, and as every thing suffers by translation, I promised some of the friends of the Revolution in that country, that whenever Mr. Burke's Pamphlet came forth, I would answer it.  This appeared to m the more necessary to be done, when I saw the flagrant misrepresentations which Mr. Burke's Pamphlet contains; and that while it is an outrageous abuse on the French Revolution, and the principles of Liberty, it is an imposition on the rest of the world.</p>
<p>I am the more astonished and disappointed at this conduct of Mr. Burke, as (from the circumstance I am going to mention), I had formed other expectations.</p>
<p>I had seen enough of the miseries of war, to wish it might never more have existence in the world, and that some other mode might be found out to settle the differences that should occasionally arise in the neighborhood of nations.  This certainly might be done if Courts were disposed to set honestly about it, or if countries were enlightened enough to not be made the dupes of Courts.  The people of America had been bred up in the same prejudices against France, which at that time characterized the people of England; but experience and an acquaintance with the French Nation have most effectually shown to the Americans the falsehood of those prejudices; and I do not believe that a more cordial and confidential intercourse exists between any two countries than between America and France. </p>
<p>When I came to France in the Spring of 1787, the Archbishop of Thoulouse was then Minister, and at that time highly esteemed.  I became much acquainted with the private Secretary of that Minister, a man of an enlarged and benevolent heart; and found, that his sentiments and my own perfectly agreed with respect to the madness of war, and the wretched impolicy of two nations, like England and France, continually worrying each other, to no other end than that of a mutual increase of burdens and taxes.  That I might be assured I had not misunderstood him, nor he me, I put the substance of our opinions into writing, and sent it to him; subjoining a request, that if I should see among the people of England, any disposition to cultivate a better understanding between the two nations than had hitherto prevailed, how far I might be authorized to say that the same disposition prevailed on the part of France?  He answered me by letter in the most unreserved manner, and that not for himself only, but for the Minister, with whose knowledge the letter was declared to be written.</p>
<p>I put this letter into the hands of Mr. Burke almost three years ago, and left it with him, where it still remains; hoping, and at the same time naturally expecting, from the opinion I had conceived of him, that he would find some opportunity of making good use of it, for the purpose of removing those errors and prejudices, which two neighboring nations, from the want of knowing each other, had entertained, to the injury of both.</p>
<p>When the French Revolution broke out, it certainly afforded to Mr. Burke an opportunity of doing some good, had he been disposed to it; instead of which, no sooner did he see the old prejudices wearing away, than he immediately began sowing the seeds of a new inveteracy, as if he were afraid that England and France would cease to be enemies.  That there are men in all countries who get their living by war, and by keeping up the quarrel of Nations, is as shocking as it is true; but when those who are concerned in the government of a country, make it their study to sow discord, and cultivate prejudices between Nations, it becomes more unpardonable.</p>
<p>With respect to a paragraph in this Work alluding to Mr. Burke's having a pension, the report has been some time in circulation, at least two months; and as a person is often the last to hear what concerns him the most to know, I have mentioned it, that Mr. Burke may have an opportunity of contradicting the rumour, if he thinks proper.</p>
<p>THOMAS PAINE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Hamilton's Full Vindication... (1774)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=524</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=524</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: A Full Vindication of the Measures of the Congress, From the Calumnies of their Enemies;]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: A Full Vindication of the Measures of the Congress, From the Calumnies of their Enemies; In Answer to a Letter, Under the Signature of A. W. Farmer.  Whereby his <em>Sophistry</em> is exposed, his <em>Cavils</em> confuted, his <em>Artifices</em> detected, and his <em>Wit</em> ridiculed; In a General Address to the Inhabitants of America, And a Particular Address to the Farmers of the Province of New-York.  [By Alexander Hamilton.]  New York: Printed by James Rivington, 1774.</p>
<p>Friends and Countrymen,</p>
<p>It was hardly to be expected that any man could be so presumptuous, as openly to controvert the equity, wisdom, and authority of the measures, adopted by the congress; an assembly truly respectable on every account!--Whether we consider the characters of the men, who composed it; the number, and dignity of their constituents, or the important ends for which they were appointed.  But, however improbable such a degree of presumption might have seemed, we find there are some, in whom it exists.  Attempts are daily making to diminish the influence of their decisions, and prevent the salutary effects, intended by them.--The impotence of such insidious efforts is evident from the general indignation they are treated with; so that no material ill-consequences can be dreaded from them.  But lest they should have a tendency to mislead, and prejudice the minds of a few; it cannot be deemed altogether useless to bestow some notice upon them.</p>
<p>And first, let me ask these restless spirits, whence arises that violent antipathy they seem to entertain, not only to the natural rights of mankind; but to common sense and common modesty.  That they are enemies to the natural rights of mankind is manifest, because they wish to see one part of their species enslaved by another.  That they have an invincible aversion to common sense is apparant in many respects: They endeavour to persuade us, that the absolute sovereignty of parliament does not imply our absolute slavery; that it is a Christian duty to submit to be plundered of all we have, merely because some of our fellow-subjects are wicked enough to require it of us, that slavery, so far from being a great evil, is a great blessing; and even, that our contest with Britain is founded entirely upon the petty duty of 3 pence per pound of East India tea; wheras the whole world knows, it is built upon this interesting question, whether the inhabitants of Great-Britain have a right to dispose of the lives and property of the inhabitants of America or not?  And lastly, that these men have discarded all pretension to common modesty, is clear from hence, first because they, in the plainest terms, call an august body of men, famed for their patriotism and abilities, fools or knaves, and of course the people whom they repsented cannot be exempt from the same opprobrious appellations: and secondly, because they set themselves up as standards of wisdom and probity, by contradicting and censuring the public voice in favour of those men...</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Oration... to Commemorate the Bloody Tragedy (1775)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=523</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=523</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: An Oration Delivered March 6, 1775, At the Request of the Inhabitants of the Town of Bos]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: An Oration Delivered March 6, 1775, At the Request of the Inhabitants of the Town of Boston; To Commemorate the Bloody Tragedy of the Fifth of March, 1770.  By Dr. Joseph Warren.  Newport, Rhode Island: Reprinted and Sold by S. Southwick, in Queen Steet, 1775.</p>
<p>My Ever Honored Fellow-Citizens,</p>
<p>It is not without the most humiliating conviction of my want of ability that I now appear before you: But the sense I have of the obligation I am under to obey the calls of my country at all times, together with an animating recollection of your indulgence exhibited upon so many occasions, has induced me once more, undeserving as I am, to throw myself upon that candour which looks with kindness on the feeblest efforts of an honest mind.</p>
<p>You will not now expect elegance, the learning, the fire, the enrapturing strains of eloquence which charmed you when a Lovell, a Church, or a Hancock spake; but you will permit me to stay that with a sincerity, equal to their's [sic], I mourn over my bleeding country: With them I weep at her distress, and with them deeply resent the many injuries she has received from the hands of cruel and unreasonable men.</p>
<p>That personal freedom is the natural right of every man; and that property or an exclusive right to dispose of what he has honestly acquired by his own labor, necessarily arising therefrom, are truths which common sense has placed beyond the reach of contradiction.  And no man or body of men can, without being guilty of flagrant injustice, claim a right to dispose of the persons or acquisitions of any other man, or body of men, unless it can be proved that such a right has arisen from some compact between the parties in which it has been explicitly and freely granted.</p>
<p>If I may be indulged in taking a retrospective view of the first settlement of our country, it will be easy to determine with what degree of justice the late parliament of Great-Britain have assumed the powers of giving away <em>that property</em>  which the Americans have earned by their labor. </p>
<p>Our fathers, having nobly resolved never to wear the yoke of despotism, and seeing the European world, through indolence and cowardice, falling a prey to tyranny; bravely threw themselves upon the bosom of the ocean; determined to find a place in which they might enjoy the freedom, or perish in the glorious attempt.  Approving Heaven beheld the favourite ark dancing upon the waves, and graciously preserved it until the chosen families were brought in safety to these western regions.  They found the land swarming with savages, who threatened death with every kind of torture.  But savages, and death with torture, were far less terrible than slavery:---Nothing was so much the object of their abhorrence as a tyrant's power:---They knew that it was more safe to dwell with man in his more unpolished state than in a country where arbitrary power prevails.  Even <em>anarchy itself</em>, that bugbear held up by the tools of power (though truly to be deprecated) is infinitely less dangerous to mankind than <em>arbitrary government</em>.  <em>Anarchy</em> can be but of short duration; for when men are at liberty to pursue that course which is most conducive to their own happiness, they will soon come into it, and from the rudest state of nature, order and good government must soon arise.  But <em>tyranny</em>, when once established, entails its curse on a nation to the latest period of time; unless some daring genius, inspired by Heaven, shall unappalled by danger, bravely form and execute the arduous design of restoring liberty and life to his enslaved, murdered country.</p>
<p>The tools of power in every age have racked their inventions to justify the FEW in sporting with the happiness of the MANY; and having found their sophistry too weak, to hold mankind in bondage, have impiously dared to force <em>religion</em>, the daughter of the king of <em>Heaven</em>, to become a prostitute in the service of <em>Hell</em>.  They taught that princes, honored with the name of christian, might bid defiance to the founder of their faith, might pillage pagan countries and deluge them with blood, only because they boasted themselves to be the disciples of that teacher who strictly charged his followers to <em>do to others as they would that others should do unto them</em>.   </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Declaration by Representatives of the United Colonies (1775)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=522</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=522</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
The Declaration by the Representatives of the United Colonies of North America, Now met ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>The Declaration by the Representatives of the United Colonies of North America, Now met in General Congress at Philadelphia, Setting forth the Causes and Necessity of taking up Arms.  The Letter of the Twelve United Colonies by their Delegates in Congress to the Inhabitants of Great Britain, Their Humble Petition to his Majesty, and their Address to the People of Ireland.  Collected together for the Use of Serious Thinking Men, By Lovers of Peace.  [John Dickinson].  Read with Candour:  Judge with Impartiality.  London: Printed in the Year, MDCCLXXV.</p>
<p>The following is a Declaration [...] taking up Arms.</p>
<p>If it was possible for Men, who exercise their Reason, to believe that the Divine Author of our Existence intended a part of the human Race to hold an absolute Property in, and an unbounded Power over others, marked out by his infinite Goodness and Wisdom, as the Objects of legal Domination, never rightfully resistible, however severe and oppressive, the Inhabitants of these Colonies might at least require from the Parliament of Great Britain some Evidence that this dreadful Authority over them has been granted to that Body.  But a Reverence for our Great Creator, Principles of Humanity, and the Dictates of Common Sense, must convince those who reflect upon the Subject, that Government was instituted to promote the Welfare of Mankind, and ought to be administered for the Attainment of that End.  The Legislature of Great Britain, however stimulated by an inordinate Passion for a Power not only unjustifiable, but which they know to be peculiarly reprobated by the very Constitution of that Kingdom, and desperate of success in any Mode of Contest, where Regard should be had to Truth, Law, or Right, have at length, deserting those, attempted to effect their cruel and impolitic Purpose of enslaving these Colonies by Violence, and have thereby rendered it necessary for us to close with their last Appeal, from Reason to Arms.--Yet, however blinded that Assembly may be, by their intemperate Rage for unlimited Domination, so to slight Justice and the Opinion of Mankind, we esteem ourselves bound by the Obligations of Respect to the rest of the World, to make known the Justice of our Cause.</p>
<p>Our Forefathers, Inhabitants of the Island of Great Britain, left their Native Land, to seek on these Shores a Residence for Civil and Religious Freedom.  At the Expence of their Blood, at the Hazard of their Fortunes, without the least Charge to the Country from which they removed, by unceasing Labour, and an unconquerable Spirit, they effected Settlements in the distant and inhospitable Wilds of America, then filled with numerous and warlike Nations of Barbarians.  Societies or Governments, vested with perfect Legislatures, were formed under Charters from the Crown, and an harmonious Intercourse was established between the Colonies and the Kingdom from which they derived their Origin.  The mutual Benefits of this Union became in a short Time so extraordinary, as to excite Astonishment.  It is universally confessed, that the amazing Increase of Wealth, Strength, and Navigation of the Realm, arose from this Source; and the Minister who so wisely and successful directed the Measures of Great Britain in the late War, publickly declared, that these Colonies enabled her to triumph over her enemies.--Towards the Conclusion of that War it pleased our Sovereign to make a Change in his Counsels.--From that fatal Moment the Affairs of the British Empire began to fall into Confusion, and gradually sliding from the Summit of glorious Prosperity, to which they had been advanced by the Virtues and Abilities of on Man, are at length distracted by the Convulsions that now Shake it to its deepest Foundations.  The new Ministry finding the brave Foes of Britain, tho' frequently defeated, yet still contending, took up the unfortunate Idea of granting them a hasty Peace, and of then subduing her faithful Friends.</p>
<p>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Trial of Sykes for Bribery (1776)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=519</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=519</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: The Trial of the Cause on the Action Brought by Hans Winthrop Mortimer, Esq; Member for ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: The Trial of the Cause on the Action Brought by Hans Winthrop Mortimer, Esq; Member for the Borough of Shaftesbury, Against Francis Sykes, Esq; for Bribery Committed at Shaftesbury, Previous to the General Election, in October, 1774.  Tried by a Special Jury, on Saturday the 27th of July, 1776.  At the Assize held at Dorchester for the County of Dorset, Before the Honourable Sir James Eyre, One of the Barons of His Majesty's Court of Exchequer.  Printed in the Year M.DCC.LXXVI.</p>
<p>[...]  The Declaration, &#38;c. were opened by Mr. Buller.</p>
<p>Mr. Dunning.</p>
<p>May it please your Lordship, and you Gentlemen of the Jury, I am likewise council for Mr. Mortimer, who brings this action, by which he claims of the defendant no less a sum than 13000 l. which is the amount of 26 penalties incurred by Mr. Sykes, by those practices which he is now charged to have used at the late election for Shaftesbury.--The fame of the Shaftesbury election, which has been very much spread throughout this kingdom, must have brought you to a general knowledge of the sort of practices to distinguish that borough from other boroughs at the late election.  The flagrancy, notoriety, and openness in which this business was conducted at Shaftesbury, has rendered, and will continue to render that borough infamous, unless others are induced to follow the same example by the impunity with which these escape the consequences they have incurred by that sort of conduct.--Gentlemen, it now remains with you, whether that encouragement shall be afforded to other boroughs, or upon the contrary you will set such example, as will contribute to deter other places and persons from finding themselves in that predicament in which this borough stands, and in which the object of this prosecution, Mr. Sykes, stands personally.</p>
<p>Gentlemen, Mr. Sykes was originally a stranger to this country;--he found out a way to come into it by a purchase which he made in the neighborhood of Shaftesbury some years ago.--From the situation of that purchase, and from the reputation which Mr. Sykes's fortune spread throughout that country, it is natural to suppose that if Mr. Sykes had been content to wait for the not very tardy operation of those circumstances, his object might, without much difficulty, have been obtained from Shaftesbury.  But whether it was an oriental idea that requires the same thing to be done at once, which in a plainer and simpler manner would be done in a little time, no great time however, or whether the object was more desirable from that manner of obtaining it, I don't know; but you will find he was hardly possessed of this property in the neighbourhood of Shaftesbury.</p>
<p>Gentlemen, Mr. Sykes represented Mr. Shaftesbury in the last parliament; but it seems that it was not then permitted to him to name his colleague.--He signified his displeasure, and the resolution he had formed in his mind, which he would carry into execution the first opportunity, as will be expressly proved to you by the witnesses present with him at the time he intimated his then resolution and determination; which was to appropriate the whole representation of Shaftesbury to himself and colleague; and that he would do if it were to cost him that manor, which had cost him 40,000 l. or would add that, if necessary, twice as much more.--You will presently see the consequence of those sort of speeches, though they seemed to be rather unguarded.--A little attention to the manners of that country from which Mr. Sykes imported those ideas, will easily convince you of his ability with respect to fortune.--These things will appear very clearly in evidence, if found necessary to lay them before you.--As occasions presented themselves, there was repetitions of these declarations, and a variety of acts indicating his intention to pursue those measures and they grew more and more frequent, preparatory to the last election: and there was a great deal of manoeuvre made use of, which is unnecessary to be explained in the present stage of this business.--As the election drew near, the necessary engine for the purpose of accomplishing those designs was provided, which was a large sum of money.--We shall prove the manner it was collected, conveyed, and distributed.--I shall at present state the evidence that we be given in a future stage of the cause.--It is unnecessary for me to trouble you with observations upon this sort of case, knowing you will be beforehand in all those observations;--for it is impossible such a case can be stated and proved to an intelligent jury, that would not incite in their minds all those things which are necessary for them to consider.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Pitt's Political Debates]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=518</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=518</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
Political Debates.  [Featuring William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chatham]  &#8220;Upon the who]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>Political Debates.  [Featuring William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chatham]  "<em>Upon the whole, I will beg leave to tell the House what is really my opinion.  It is, that the Stamp Act be</em> REPEALED ABSOLUTELY, TOTALLY, <em>and</em>IMMEDIATELY." The Great Commoner.  A Paris, Chez J. W. Imprimeur, Rue du Colombier Fauxbourg St. Germain, a l'Hotel de Saxe. M DCC LXVI. [Prix 30 Sous.] <em>Avec Approbation, &#38; Privilege</em>. </p>
<p>It is necessary to inform the reader, that some time before the meeting of parliament, a report had been artfully propogated, that the ministry had changed their minds with regard to the Stamp-Act, and, instead of repealing, were resolved to enforce it.  If it could be proved, that this report did not come originally from the favourites of a certain northern nobleman, yet it was certainly much indebted to them for its progress, which was so great as to affect the stocks.</p>
<p>The king's speech to the parliament on the 14th of January, 1766, gave some colour to the suggestion; but when the gentleman had spoke who moved for the address, and who seconded it, nothing could be clearer, than that the ministry persisted in their intention to promote the repeal.  The friends of the late ministry applauded the king's speech, and approved of the proposed address, which, as usual, only recapitulated the speech.</p>
<p>The opposition took great offence at the tenderness of the expression, that the first gentlemen had made use of concerning America.  Mr. Nugent particularly insisted, "That the HONOR and dignity of the kingdom obliged us to compel the execution of the Stamp-Act, except the right was acknowledged, and the repeal solicited as a favour.  He computed the expence of the troops now employed in America for their defence, as he called it, to amount to nine-pence in the pound of our land-tax; while the produce of the Stamp-Act would not raise a shilling a head on the inhabitants of America; but that a pepper-corn, in acknowledgement of the right. was of more value than millions without.  He expatriated on the extreme ingratitude of the colonies; and concluded, with charging the ministry with encouraging petitions to parliament, and instructions to members from the trading and manufacturing towns, against the Act."</p>
<p>Mr. Pitt was the next speaker.  Every friend of his country rejoiced to see him again in that house, and more so, in such perfect health.  As he always begins very low, and as every body was in agitation at his first rising, his introduction was not heard, 'till he said, "I came to town today; I was a stranger to the tenor of his majesty's speech, and the proposed address, 'till I heard them read in this house.  Unconnected and unconsulted, I have not the means of information; I am fearful of offending through mistake, and therefore beg to be indulged with a second reading of the proposed address."  The address being read, Mr. Pitt went on:--"He commended the king's speech, approved of the address in answer, as it decided nothing, every gentleman being left at perfect liberty to take such  a part concerning America, as he might afterwards see fit.  One word only he could not approve of, and EARLY, is a word that does not belong to the notice the ministry have given to parliament of the troubles in America.  In a matter of such importance, the communication ought to have been immediate:  I speak not with respect to parties; I stand up in this place single and unconnected.  As to the late ministry, (turning himself to Mr. G----lle, who sat within one of him) every capital measure they have taken, has been entirely wrong!"</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Proceedings... Abolition Societies (1797)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=517</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=517</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
Minutes of the Proceedings of the Fourth Convention of Delegates from the Abolition Soci]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>Minutes of the Proceedings of the Fourth Convention of Delegates from the Abolition Societies Established in different Parts of the United States, Assembled at Philadelphia, on the Third Day of May, One Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety-Seven, and Continued, By Adjournments, Until the Ninth Day of the Same Month, Inclusive.  Philadelphia: Printed by Zachariah Poulson, Junior, Number Eighty, Chesnutt-Street. 1797. </p>
<p>May fifth, 1797. </p>
<p>The committee appointed at the last meeting to take into consideration the reports from the different Abolition Societies, and to report to the Convention the measures necessary to be taken in consequence of those communications, as well as the objects proper for the attention of the Convention, and the most suitable means for their attainment, report,</p>
<p>I. That they have carefully attended to the communications, from several Societies, made to the Convention for the past and present years, and compared with them the recommendations and requirements of the Convention of 1796.  By the annexed table, the Convention will perceive what these requisitions and recommendations were, and how far each society has complied therewith.</p>
<p>II. The committee recommend it to the Convention, to address a letter or memorial to the Secretary of State of the United States, recapitulating the evidence which the records of the District Court of the United States, for the Pennsylvania District afford, of attempts made by citizens of the United States, to evade the law prohibiting our citizens from supplying foreign countries with slaves, by clandestinely using the Danish flag and registers, and praying such aid and interference of the government of the United States, with the court of Denmark, or with other governments under whose authority such practices now obtain, as may consist with propriety, for the prevention of the use of their flag or registers, by the citizens of the United States, under any pretence whatever, for the purpose of pursuing the trade in men. </p>
<p>III. It appearing from the report of the Alexandria Society, that the law of the United States, entitled, "An act to prohibit the carrying of the slave-trade from the United States to any foreign place or country," is defective, in that it does not prevent the shipment of slaves (for sale in the West Indies and elsewhere) on board vessels, not specially fitted out for that purpose--an act being thereby evaded.</p>
<p>The committee recommend it to the Convention, to present a memorial or petition to Congress, praying such an ammendment of the act above referred to, as may oblige the master or owner of any vessel or vessels before clearing out, to declare on oath or affirmation, that no slaves are received or taken on board said vessel or vessels, for sale in any foreign port; and as may further oblige him to enter into a recognizance or bond, with a sufficient penalty to be put in suit, and the penalty recovered, in case a sale of any slave so put on board should take place. </p>
<p>IV. It appears from the papers from North Carolina, that, by a law of that state, passed in 1777, certain negroes and others, who had been previously emancipated by their proprietors, citizens of that state, were taken up, and again reduced to slavery; and this, not only where the persons so emancipated had continued in the state, but also where the emancipation had been effected in other states, and the freed-man had returned into North Carolina, to reside there: in both cases, tin direct violation of the constitution of the state.  But the committee would recommend it to the Convention to obtain the opinion of the most eminent counsel in this city, whether an action for damages, by a person emancipated in another state before the passing of the act in 1777, and who was again reduced to slavery on returning to North Carolina, could not be maintained against the purchaser or holder of such person in the Courts of the United States; or whether any, and what legal remedy may be had for persons under these circumstances, and where they were made slaves, without having quitted the state.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Abingdon's Thoughts on Burke's Letter (1777)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=513</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=513</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
Thoughts on the Letter of Edmund Burke, Esq; to the Sheriffs of Bristol, on the Affairs ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>Thoughts on the Letter of Edmund Burke, Esq; to the Sheriffs of Bristol, on the Affairs of America.  By the Earl of Abingdon.  Oxford: Printed for W. Jackson: Sold by J. Almon, in Piccadilly, and J. Bew, in Peternastor-Row, London; and by the Booksellers of Bristol, Bath, and Cambridge. [Price One Shilling] 1777.</p>
<p>Having seen Mr. Burke's late Publication on the affairs of America, I was led to read it with all that attention which every performance of his must necessarily deserve.  I sympathise most cordially with him in those feelings of humanity, which mark, in language so expressive, the abhorrence of his nature with the effusion of Human Blood.  I agree with him in idea, that the War with America is "fruitless, hopeless, and unnatural"; and I will add, on the part of Great-Britain, cruel and unjust.  I join hand in hand with him in all his propositions for Peace; and I look with longing eyes for the event.  I participate with him in the happiness of those friendships and connexions, which are the subjects, so deservedly, of his panegyric.  The name of Rockingham is a sacred deposit in my bosom.  I have found him disinterested, I know him to be honest.  Before I quit him therefore, I will first abandon human nature.</p>
<p>So far then are Mr. Burke and I agreed.  I am sorry that we should disagree in anything.  But finding that we have differed, on a late occasion, in our parliamentary conduct; and that I cannot concur with him in opinion on a matter, as I think, of great national importance: it is therefore not in the zeal of party, but in the spirit of patriotism, not to confute, but to be convinced, not to point out error, but to arrive at truth, that I now venture to submit my thoughts to the Public.  I feel the weight of the undertaking, and I wish it in abler hands.  I am not insensible to my own incapacity, and I know how much I stand in need of excuse: but as public good is my object, public candor, I trust, will be my best apologist.</p>
<p>Mr. Burke commences hi Letter with the mention of "the two last Acts which have been passed with regard to the Troubles in America."  The first is, "for the Letter of Marque," the second, "for a partial suspension of <em>Habeus Corpus</em>."  Of the former, he says littler, as not worthy of much notice.  Of the latter, his distinctions are nice, his strictures many, his objections unanswerable; and yet, although so well apprised of the dangers and mischiefs of the Act, he says, "I have not debated against this Bill in its progress through the House, because it would have been vain to oppose, and impossible to correct ti."  But this is a matter of inquiry.  As I thought differently, I acted differently.  Being in the country, this Bill was in its way through the House of Lords before I knew any thing of it.  Upon my coming accidentally to town, and hearing of its malignity, I went down to the House, opposed it, and entered my solemn protest in the Journals against it.  It is true, I stood single and alone in this business; but I do not therefore take shame to myself.  Rectitude of intention will even sanctify error.  But Mr. Burke says, "During its progress through the House of Commons, it has been <em>amended</em>, so as to express more distinctly than at first it did, the avowed sentiments of those who framed it."  Now if the Bill was <em>amended</em> in its progress through the House of Commons, Mr. Burke's reason "for not debating against the Bill" cannot be well founded; for his reason is, "that it would have been vain to oppose, and <em>impossible to correct</em> it:" but to <em>amend</em> a thing is to correct it; and therefore it the Bill was <em>amended</em>, it was <em>not impossible to correct it</em>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Rush on Bloodletting (1789)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=512</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=512</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
Medical Inquiries and Observations.  To which is added an Appendix, containing Observat]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>Medical Inquiries and Observations.  To which is added an Appendix, containing Observations on the Duties of a Physician, and the Methods of improving Medicine.  By Benjamin Ruch, M. D. Professor of Chemistry in the University of Pennsylvania.  The Second Edition.  Philadelphia, printed.  London, reprinted for C. Dilly, in the Poultry, MDCCLXXXIX.</p>
<p>An Account of the Effects of Blisters and Bleeding, In the Cure of Obstinate Intermitting Fevers.</p>
<p>The efficacy of these remedies will probably be disputed by every regular-bred physician, who has been a witness of their utility in the above disorder; but it becomes such physicians, before they decide upon this subject, to remember, that many things are true in medicine, as well as other branches of philosophy, which are very improbable. </p>
<p>In all those cases of <em>autumnal </em>intermittents, whether quotidian, tertian, or quartan, in which the bark did not succeed after three or four days trial, I have seldom found it fail after the application of blisters to the wrists.</p>
<p>But in those cases where blisters had been neglected, or applied without effect, and where the disease had been protracted into the <em>winter</em>months, I have generally cured it by means of one or two moderate bleedings. </p>
<p>The pulse in those cases is generally full, and sometimes a little hard, and the blood when drawn for the most part appears sizy. </p>
<p>The bark is seldom necessary to prevent the return of the disorder.  It is always ineffectual, where bloodletting is indicated.  I have known several instances where pounds of this medicine have been taken without effect, in which the loss of ten or twelve ounces of blood has immediately cured the disorder.</p>
<p>How shall we reconcile the practice of bleeding in intermittents, with our modern theories of fever?</p>
<p>May not the long continuance of an intermittent, by debilitating the system, produce such an irritability in the arteries, as to dispose them to the species of inflammatory diathesis which is founded on indirect debility?  Or,</p>
<p>May not such congestions be formed in the viscera, as to produce the same species of inflammatory diathesis which occurs in several other inflammatory diseases?</p>
<p>Doctor Cullen has taught us, in his account of chronic hepatitis, that there may be topical affection and inflammatory diathesis, without much pain or fever; and had I not witnessed several cases of this kind, I should have been forced to have believed it possible, not only in this disorder, but in many others, from the facts which were communicated to me by Doctor Michaelis in his visit to Philadelphia in the year 1783.</p>
<p>I once intended to have added to this account of the efficacy of blisters and bleeding in curing obstinate intermittents, testimonies from a number of medical gentlemen, of the success with which they have used them; but these vouchers have become so numerous, that they would swell this essay far beyond the limits I wish to prescribe to it.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Gordon's Thanksgiving Discourse (1775)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=511</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=511</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
Mr. Gordon&#8217;s Thanksgiving Discourse.  A Discourse Preached December 15th 1774.  ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>Mr. Gordon's Thanksgiving Discourse.  A Discourse Preached December 15th 1774.  Being the Day Recommended by the Provincial Congress; and Afterwards at the Boston Lecture.  By William Gordon.  Pastor of the Third Church of Roxbury.  Boston:  Printed for, and sold by Thomas Leverett, in Corn-Hill.  1775.</p>
<p>From Lam. III. 22.  <em>It is of the Lord's mercies that we are not consumed, because his companions fail not</em>.</p>
<p>The pulpit is devoted, in general, to more important purposes, than the fate of kingdoms, or the civil rights of human nature; being intended, to recover men from the slavery of sin and satan--to point out their escape from future misery, through faith in a crucified Jesus--and to assist them in their preparations for eternal blessedness:  But still, there are special times and seasons when it may treat of politics.  And surely, if it is allowable for some who occupy it, by preaching up the doctrines of non-resistance and passive obedience, to vilify the principles, and to sap the foundations of that glorious revolution, that exalted the house of <em>Hanover</em> to the <em>British</em> throne; it ought to be no transgression in others, nor be construed into a want of loyalty, to speak consistently with those approved tenets, that have made George the third, the first of <em>European</em> sovereigns, who otherwise, with all his personal virtues, might have lived an obscure Elector. </p>
<p>Having then, the past morning of this provincial thanksgiving, accommodated the text to the case of individuals, I shall now dedicate it, according to its original intention, to the service of the public, the situation of whose affairs, is, both <em>distressing</em> and <em>alarming</em>.</p>
<p>The capital of the colony is barbarously treated, pretendedly for a crime, but actually, for the noble stand she has made in favor of liberty, against the partisans of slavery.  She has distinguished herself by an animated opposition to arbitrary and unconstitutional proceedings; and therefore has been markt out, by ministerial vengeance, to be made an example of, whereby to terrify other American cities into a tame submission.  She is an example--and, thanks to heaven! an example of patience and fortitude, to the no small mortification of her enemies, whose own base feelings led them to imagine, that she would immediately become an abject supplicant for royal favour, tho' at the expence of natural and charter'd rights.  May some future historian, the friend of mankind and citizen of the world, have to record in his faithful and ever-living page, that she never truckled, though British sailors and soldiers, contrary to their natural affection for the cause of liberty, were basely employed to intimidate her; but perseveringly held out, through the fiery trial, 'till a revolution of men and measures brought on her deliverance!</p>
<p>But it is not the capital alone that suffers.  The late venal Parliament, in compliance with the directions of administration, have, under the false colour of regulating the government of the colony, mutilated its charter, and conveyed dangerous power to individuals, for the enforcing and maintaining those encroachments, that they have ventured, in defiance of common equity, to make upon the rights of a free people.--And had not the calmness and prudence of others supplied their lack of wisdom, the country might by this time have become an <em>Aceldama</em>.</p>
<p>Upon the principles, which the British legislature have adopted in their late extraordinary proceedings, I see not, how we can be certain of any one privilege--nor what hinders our being really in a state of slavery to an aggregate of masters, whose tyranny may be worse than that of a single despot--nor that a man can with propriety say, <em>his soul's his own</em>, and not the spring to move his bodily machine, in the performance of whatever drudgery his lords may appoint--nor that the public have a permanent and valuable constitution.  If the British legislature is the constitution, or superior to the constitution, <em>Magna Charta, the bill of rights, and the protestant succession,</em> these boasts of Britons, are the toys to please the vulgar, and not <em>solid securities</em>[...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Akenside's Poems (1772)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=510</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=510</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
The Poems of Mark Akenside, M. D.  London, Printed by W. Bowyer and J Nichols: And Sold]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>The Poems of Mark Akenside, M. D.  London, Printed by W. Bowyer and J Nichols: And Sold by J. Dodsley, In Pall Mall.  MDCCLXXII.</p>
<p>The Pleasures of the Imagination: Book the Second.</p>
<p><em>Introduction to this more difficult part of the subject.  Of truth and its three classes, matter of fact, experimental or scientifical truth, (contradistinguished from opinion) and universal truth: which last is either metaphysical or geometrical, either purely intellectual or purely abstracted.  On the power of discerning truth depends that of acting with the view of an end; a cicumstance essential to virtue.  Of virtue, considered in the divine mind as a perpetual and universal beneficence.  Of human virtue, considered as a system of particular sentiments and actions, suitable to the design of providence and the condition of man; to whom it constitutes the chief good and the first beauty.  Of vice and its origin.  Of ridicule: its general nature and first cause.  Of the passions; particularly of those which relate to evil natural or moral, and which are generally accounted painful, though not always unattended with pleasure.  </em> </p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Thus far of beauty and the pleasing forms</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Which man’s untutor’d fancy, from the scenes</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Imperfect of this ever-changing world,</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Creates; and views, inamor’d. Now my song</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Severer themes demand: mysterious truth;</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">And virtue, sovran good: the spells, the trains,</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">The progeny of error: the dread sway </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Of passion; and whatever hidden stores </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">From her own lofty deeds and from herself</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">The mind acquires.<span>  </span>Severer argument: </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Not less attractive; nor deserving less </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">A constant ear.<span>  </span>For what are all the forms</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Educ’d by fancy from corporeal things,</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Greatness, or pomp, or symmetry of parts?</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Not tending to the heart, soon feeble grows,</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">As the blunt arrow ’gainst the knotty trunk,</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Their impulse on the sense: while the pall’d eye</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Expects in vain its tribute; asks in vain, </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Where are the ornaments it once admir’d?</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Not so the moral species, nor the powers </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Of passion and of thought.<span>  </span>The ambitious mind</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">With objects boundless as her own desires</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Can there converse: by these unfading forms</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Touch’d and awaken’d still, with eager act</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">She bends each nerve, and meditates well-pleas’d</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Her gifts, her godlike fortune.<span>  </span>Such the scenes</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Now opening round us.<span>  </span>May the destin’d verse</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Maintain its equal tenor, though in tracts </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Obscure and arduous.<span>  </span>May the source of light </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">All-present, all sufficient, guide our steps </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Through every maze: and whom in childish years</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">From the loud throng, the beaten paths of wealth</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">And power, thou did’st apart send forth to speak</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">In tuneful words concerning highest things,</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Him still do thou, o father, at those hours </font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Of pensive freedom, when the human soul</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Shuts out the rumour of the world, him still</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Touch thou with secret lessons: call thou back</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Each erring thought; and let the yielding strains</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">From his full bosom, like a welcome rill</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Spontaneous from its healthy fountain, flow [...] </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Franklin on the Slave Trade (1790/1836)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=505</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=505</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
The Works of Benjamin Franklin; Containing Several Political and Historical Tracts Not I]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>The Works of Benjamin Franklin; Containing Several Political and Historical Tracts Not Included in Any Former Edition, And Many Letters Official and Private Not Hitherto Published; with Notes and A Life of the Author.  By Jared Sparks.  Volume II [of 9].  Boston: Hilliard, Gray, and Company. </p>
<p>On The Slave Trade.</p>
<p>To the Editor of the Federal Gazette. </p>
<p>March 23rd, 1790.</p>
<p>Sir,</p>
<p>Reading last night in your excellent paper the speech of Mr. Jackson in Congress against their meddling with the affair of slavery, or attempting to mend the condition of the slaves, it put me in mind of a similar one made about one hundred years since by Sidi Mehemet Ibrahim, a member of the Divan of Algiers, which may be seen in Martin's Account of his Consulship, anno 1687.  It was against granting the petition of the sect called <em>Erika</em>, or Purists, who prayed for the abolition of piracy and slavery as being unjust.  Mr. Jackson does not quote it; perhaps he has not seen it.  If, therefore, some of its reasonings are to be found in his eloquent speech, it may only show that men's interests and intellects operate and are operated on with surprising similarity in all countries and climates, whenever they are under similar circumstances.  The African's speech, as translated, is as follows.</p>
<p>"<em>Allah Bismallah, &#38;c.  God is great, and Mahomet is his Prophet.</em></p>
<p>"Have these <em>Erika </em>considered the consequences of granting this petition?  If we cease our cruises against the Christians, how shall we be furnished with the commodities their countries produce, and which are so necessary for us?  If we forbear to make slaves of their people, who in this hot climate are to cultivate our lands?  Who are to perform the common labors of our city, and in our families?  Must we not then be our own slaves?  And is there not more compassion and more favor due to us as Mussulmen, than to these Christian dogs?  We have now above fifty thousand slaves in and near Algiers.  This number, if not kept up by fresh supplies, will soon diminish, and be gradually annihilated.  If we then cease taking and plundering the infidel ships, and making slaves of the seamen and passengers, our lands will become of no value for want of cultivation; the rents of houses in the city will sink one half; and the revenue of government arising from its share of prizes be totally destroyed!  And for what?  To gratify the whims of a whimsical sect, who would have us, not only forbear making more slaves, but even manumit those we have. </p>
<p>"But who is to indemnify their masters for the loss?  Will the state do it?  Is our treasury sufficient?  Will the Erika do it?  Can they do it?  Or would they, to do what they think justice to the slaves, do a greater injustice to the owners?  And if we set our slaves free, what is to be done with them?  Few of them will return to their countries; they know too well the greater hardships they must there be subject to; they will not embrace our holy religion; they will not adopt our manners; our people will not pollute themselves by intermarrying with them.  Must we maintain them as beggars in our streets, or suffer our properties to be the prey of their pillage?  For men accustomed to slavery will not work for a livelihood when not compelled.  And what is there so pitiable in their present condition?  Were they not slaves in their own countries?</p>
<p>"Are not Spain, Portugal, France, and the Italian states governed by despots, who hold all their subjects in slavery, without exception?  Even England treats its sailors as slaves; for they are, whenever the government pleases, seized, and confined in ships of war, condemned not only to work, but to fight, for small wages, or a mere subsistence, not better than our slaves are allowed by us.  Is their condition then made worse by their falling into our hands?  No; they have only exchanged one slavery for another, and I may say a better; for here they are brought into a land where the sun of Islamism gives forth its light, and shines in full splendor, and they have an opportunity of making themselves acquainted with the true doctrine, and thereby saving their immortal souls.  Those who remain at home have not that happiness.  Sending the slaves home then would be sending them out of the light and into darkness.</p>
<p>"I repeat the question, What is to be done with them?  I have heard it suggested, that they may be planted in the wilderness, where there is plenty of land for them to subsist on, and where they may flourish as a free state; but they are, I doubt, too little disposed to labor without compulsion, as well as too ignorant to establish a good government, and the wild Arabs would soon molest and destroy or again enslave them.  While serving us, we take care to provide them with every thing, and they are treated with humanity.  The laborers in their own country are, as I am well informed, worse fed, lodged, and clothed.  The condition of most of them is therefore already mended, and requires no further improvement.  Here their lives are in safety.  They are not liable to be impressed for soldiers, and forced to cut one another's Christian throats, as in the wars of their own countries.  If some of the religious mad bigots, who now tease us with their silly petitions, have in a fit of blind zeal freed their slaves, it was not generosity, it was not humanity, that moved them to the action; it was from the conscious burden of a load of sins, and a hope, from the supposed merits of so good a work, to be excused from damnation.</p>
<p>"How grossly are they mistaken to suppose slavery to be disallowed by the Alcoran!  Are not the two precepts, to quote no more, '<em>Masters, treat your slaves with kindness; Slaves, serve your masters with cheerfulness and fidelity</em>,' clear proofs to the contrary?  Nor can the plundering of infidels be in that sacred book forbidden, since it is well known from it, that God has given the world, and all it contains, to his faithful Mussulmen, who are to enjoy it of right as fast as they conquer it.  Let us then hear not more of this detestable proposition, the manumission of Christian slaves, the adoption of which would, by depreciating our lands and houses, and thereby depriving so many good citizens of their properties, create universal discontent, and provoke insurrections, to the endangering of government and producing general confusion.  I have therefore no doubt, but this wise council will prefer the comfort and happiness of a whole nation of true believers to the whim of a few <em>Erika</em>, and dismiss their petition."      </p>
<p>The result was, as Martin tells us, that the Divan came to the resolution; "The doctrine, that plundering and enslaving the Christians is unjust, is as best <em>problematical</em>; but that it is in the interest of this state to continue the practice, is clear; therefore let the petition be rejected."</p>
<p>And it was rejected accordingly.</p>
<p>And since like motives are apt to produce in the minds of men like opinions and resolutions, may we not, Mr. Brown, venture to predict, from this account, that the petitions to the Parliament of England for abolishing the slave-trade, to say nothing of other legislatures, and the debates upon them, will have a similar conclusion?  I am, Sir, your constant reader and humble servant,</p>
<p>HISTORICUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Trevett against Weeden (1787)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=504</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=504</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
The Case, Trevett against Weeden: On Information and Complaint, for refusing Paper Bills]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>The Case, Trevett against Weeden: On Information and Complaint, for refusing <em>Paper Bills</em> in Payment for <em>Butcher's Meat</em>, in Market, at Par with Specie.  Tried Before the Honourable Superior Court, in the County of <em>Newport</em>, <em>September</em> Term, 1786.  Also, The Case of the Judges of Said Court, Before the Honourable General Assembly, at <em>Providence</em>, <em>October</em> Session, 1786, on Citation, for diminishing said Complaint.  Wherein the Rights of the People to <em>Trial by Jury</em>, <em>&#38;c</em>. are stated and maintained, and the Legislative, Judiciary and Executive Powers of Government examined and defined.  By James M. Varnum, Esq; Major-General of the State of <em>Rhode Island</em>, <em>&#38;c.</em> Counsellor at Law, and Member of Congress for said State.  Providence:  Printed by John Carter, 1787. </p>
<p>Upon the last Monday of September, in the eleventh year of the Idependence of the United States, in the city of Newport, and State of Rhode Island, &#38;c. was heard, before the Superior Court of Judicature, Court of Assize, and General Gaol-Delivery, a certain information, John Trevett against John Weeden, for refusing to receive the paper bills of this State, in payment for meat sold in market, equivalent to silver and gold: And upon the day following the Court delivered the unanimous opinion of the Judges, that the information was not cognizable before them.</p>
<p>That this important decision may be fully comprehended, it will be necessary to recur to the acts of the General Assembly, which superinduced the trial.--At the last May session, an act was made for emitting the sum of one hundred thousand pounds, lawful money, in bills, upon land security, which should pass in all kinds of business, and payments of former contracts, upon par with silver and gold, estimating an ounce of coined silver at six shillings and eightpence.  Another act was passed in the June following, subjecting every person who should refuse the bills in payment for articles offered for sale, or should make a distinction in value between them and silver and gold, or should in any manner attempt to depreciate them, to a penalty of one hundred pounds, lawful money; one moiety to the State, and the other moiety to the informer; to be recovered before either of the Courts of General Sessions of the Peace, or the Superior Court of Judicature, &#38;c.</p>
<p>Experience soon evinced the inadequacy of this measure to the objects of the Administration: And at a session of the General Assembly, specially convened by his Excellency the Governor, upon the third Monday of the following August, another act was passed, in addition to and amendment of that last mentioned, wherein it is provided, that the fine of one hundred pounds be varied; and that for the future the fine should not be less than six, nor exceed thirty pounds, for the first offence: The mode of prosecution and trial was also changed, agreeably to the following clauses, "that the complainant shall apply to either of the Judges of the Superior Court of Judicature, &#38;c. within this State, or to either of the Judges of the Inferior Court of Common Pleas within the county where such offence shall be committed, and lodge his certain information, which shall be issued by the Judge in the following form," &#38;c.  It is then provided, that the person complained of come before a Court to be specially convened by the Judge, in three days; "that the said Court, when so convened, shall proceed to the trial of said offender, and they are hereby authorized so to do, without any jury, by a majority of the Judges present, according to the laws of the land, and to make adjudication and determination, and that three members be sufficient to constitute a Court, and that the judgment of the Court, if against the offender so complained of, be forthwith complied with, or that he stand committed to the county gaol, where the said Court may be sitting, till sentence be performed, and that the said judgment of said Court shall be final and conclusive, and from which there shall be no appeal; and in said process no essoin, protection, privilege or injunction, shall be in anywise prayed, granted or allowed."   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Gallatin's Sketch of the Finances (1796)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=503</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=503</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
A Sketch of the Finances of the United States.  By Albert Gallatin.  New York: Printed]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>A Sketch of the Finances of the United States.  By Albert Gallatin.  New York: Printed by William A. David, No. 438 Pearl Street.  1796.</p>
<p>[...]  The tax upon snuff manufactured within the United States, was first laid on the quantity manufactured, at the rate of eight cents per pound, and during the six months ending on the last day of March 1795, while it remained in that shape, is stated to have yielded only 2,400 dollars; in which account, however, are not included the returns of the first survey of Pennsylvania, and for the state of Delaware, which pay about one half of the duty.  From the first of April 1795, the tax has been laid on the mills employed in the manufacture, as is stated for the six following months, to have produced 7,112 dollars, but on account of deficient statements, may be estimated for one year at about 20,000 dollars.  But, during the same period, the drawbacks allowed, at the rate of six cents per pound, seem to have excluded the amount of gross revenue.  From the first of April 1795, to the 23rd of February 1796, there were exported, from the port of Philadelphia alone, 237,000 lb. and, from the shipments then going on, there is little doubt that the quantity exported from that port, for the whole year ending on the first of April 1796, amounted to 350,000 lb; the drawbacks whereon would form a sum of 21,000 dollars.  The quantity exported was even increasing; for, of the above 237,000 lb, only 75,000 were exported during the sixth [sic] first months, and 162,000 during the five last.  In fact snuff was amnufactured for exportation, for the sake of the drawback which operated as a bounty.  An alteration in a revenue law, which thus drained the treasury, instead of yielding a revenue, became necessary.  The difficulty of rendering the duty equal, on account of the great difference in the relative situation and powers of the mills, the consequent complaints of the small manufacturers, the necessity of allowing a drawback upon the exportation of an article both of the growth and of the manufacture of the United States; the impossibility of fixing a drawback on the quantity of the article, proportionate to the duty laid on the machinery employed in manufacturing that article, together with the evasions stated to have taken place, by hand-mills employed in vaults, where the noise could not be heard, determined Congress, during last session, to suspend the law for one year.  As the suspension may continue, and as, unless an entirely new plan is proposed and adopted, this duty cannot yield any thing, it cannot at present be counted amongst the productive branches of revenue.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Pye's Poetics of Aristotle (1792)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=502</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=502</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
A Commentary Illustrating the Poetic of Aristotle, By Examples Taken Chiefly from the Mo]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>A Commentary Illustrating the Poetic of Aristotle, By Examples Taken Chiefly from the Modern Poets.  To Which is Prefixed, A new and corrected edition of the Translation of the Poetic.  By Henry James Pye, Esq.  London: Printed for John Stockdale, Piccadilly.  M.DCC.XCII.</p>
<p>COMMENTARY.  Chap. I. Note I.</p>
<p><em>The Epopee and Tragedy, as also comedy and dithyrambics, and the greater part of those compositions which are set to the flute and the lyre, all agree in the general character of being imitations.</em> </p>
<p>By imitation, Aristotle does not mean merely description, but a lively representation of human actions, passions, and manners.  It would be superfluous to say much on a subject which has been so amply and clearly treated by Mr. Twining, in his 'Dissertation on Poetry considered as an imitative art,' and to which I refer such of my readers as desire full and satisfactory information on this subject.  Aristotle, undoubtedly, places that species of imitation in the first class, which is performed by persons acting, as in the drama, and, for the most part, in the epopees of Homer.  This appears from what he says of the epopee, in the twenty-fourth chapter.  'The poet (he observes) should appear himself as little as possible, for whenever he speaks in his own person he ceases to be an imitator;' seeming even to contradict what he had before allowed in the third chapter, 'that the poet might imitate, either like Homer, sometimes by simple narration, and sometimes by assuming a different character; or entirely by narration, without assuming any character.'  It may perhaps be impossible strictly to reconcile this difference of opinion, but it obviously shews the great preference he gave personal imitation to any other, from which arose his strong predilection for tragedy; and I think we may fairly deduce from it, that even the poet whose imitation is solely narrative, must paint in strong colours the effects of action, passions and manners, and not merely relate a fable though fictitious, like an historian, for the purpose of drawing moral reflections from it.</p>
<p>Those passages, nevertheless, of an epic poem, where the poet speaks in his own person, have great beauty from their contrast with the impassioned parts, and the relief they give the mind, provided they are neither too frequent nor too long, and the rule laid down by Aristotle, in his twenty-fourth chapter, concerning the elegance of the versification be carefully observed.  Mr. Twining quotes a beautiful example from the first Aeneid.</p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">‘Urbs antique fuit, (Tyrii tenuêre coloni,)</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Carthago, Italiam contra Tiberinaque longe</font></p>
<p style="margin:0;" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Ostia—.’</font></p>
<p>Innumerable instances may be produced from Milton; as the description of evening and of paradise, in the fourth book of Paradise Lost; in this he is superior to any poet ancient or modern, though there are many striking passages of the same kind in the Odyssey.</p>
<p>The modern invention of reciting a tale, by means of an epistolary correspondence between the persons concerned, is a very happy mode of imitation, uniting in some measure the different advantages of epopee and the drama.  Perhaps a work of this nature, where the character and style of all the persons corresponding, is nicely discriminated and rigidly observed, is yet a desideratum in imitative composition.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Gibbon's Decline and Fall (1797)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=501</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=501</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. By Edward Gibbon, Esq. Volume t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. By Edward Gibbon, Esq. Volume the Third. A New Edition. London: Printed for a. Strahan; and T. Cadell Jun. and W. Davies (Successors to Mr. Cadell) in the Strand, M.DCC.XCVII.</p>
<p>See earlier post <a target="_blank" href="http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2006/12/29/item-of-the-day-gibbons-decline-and-fall-of-the-roman-empire-1797/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Chap. XX.</p>
<p><em>The Motives, Progress, and Effects of the Conversion of Constantine.--Legal Establishment and Constitution of the Christian or Catholic Church.</em></p>
<p>The public establishment of Christianity may be considered as one of those important and domestic revolutions which excite the most curiosity, and afford the most valuable instruction.  The victories of the civil policy of Constantine no longer influence the state of Europe; but a considerable portion of the globe still retains the impression which it received from the conversion of that monarch; and the ecclesiastical institutions of his reign are still connected, by an indissoluble chain, with the opinions, the passions, and the interests of the present generation.</p>
<p>In the consideration of a subject which may be viewed with indifference, but cannot be viewed with indifference, a difficulty immediately arises of a very unexpected nature; that of ascertaining the real and precise date of the conversion of Constantine.  The eloquent Lactantius, in the midst of his court seems impatient to proclaim the world the glorious example of the sovereign of Gaul; who, in the first moments of his reign, acknowledged and adored the majesty of the true and only God.  The learned Eusebius has ascribed the faith of Constantine to the miraculous sign which was displayed in the heavens whilest he meditated and prepared the Italian expedition.  The historian Zosimus maliciously asserts that the emperor had embrued his hands in the blood of his eledest son, before he publicly renounced the gods of Rome and of his ancestors.  The perplexity produced from these discordant authorities, is derived from the behavior of Constantine himself.  According to the strictness of ecclesiastical language, the first of the <em>Christian</em> emperors was unworthy of that name, till the moment of his death; since it was only during his last illness that he received, as a catechumen, the imposition of hands, and was afterwards admitted, by the initiatory rites of baptism, into the number of the faithful.  The Christianity of Constantine must be allowed in a much more vague and qualified sense; and the nicest accuracy is required in tracing the slow and almost imperceptible gradations by which the monarch declared himself the protector, and at length the proselyte, of the church.  It was an arduous task to eradicate the habits and prejudices of his education, to acknowledge the divine power of Christ, and to understand that the truth of his revelation was incompatible with the worship of the gods.  The obstacles which he had probably experienced in his own mind, instructed him to proceed with caution in the momentous change of a national religion; and he insensibly discovered his new opinions, as far as he could enforce them with safety and with effect.  During the whole course of his reign, the stream of Christianity flowed with a gentle, though accelerated motion: but its general direction was sometimes checked, sometimes diverted, by the accidental circumstances of the times, and by the prudence, or possibly the caprice, of the monarch.  His ministers were permitted to signify the intentions of their master in the various language which was best adapted to their respective principles; and he artfully balanced the hopes and fears of his subjects, by publishing in the same year two edicts; the first of which enjoined the solemn observance of Sunday, and the second directed the regular consultation of the Aruspices.  While this important revolution yet remained in suspense, the Christians and the Pagans watched the conduct of their sovereign with the same anxiety, but with very opposite sentiments.  The former were prompted by every motive of zeal, as well as vanity, to exaggerate the marks of his favour, and the evidences of his faith.  The latter, till their just apprehensions were changed into despair, and resentment, attempted to conceal from the world, and from themselves, that the gods of Rome could no longer reckon the emperor in the number of their votaries.  The same passions and prejudices have engaged the partial writers of the times to connect the public profession of Christianity with the most glorious or the most ignominious aera of the reign of Constantine.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Parkinson's Medical Admonitions (1803)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=499</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=499</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
Medical Admonitions to Families, Respecting the Preservation of Health, and the Treatmen]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>Medical Admonitions to Families, Respecting the Preservation of Health, and the Treatment of the Sick.  Also, a Table of Symptoms, Serving to Point out the Degree of Danger, and, to Distinguish one Disease from Another.  With Observations on the Improper Indulgence of Children, &#38;c.  By James Parkinson, M.D.  Hoxton.  First American, from the Fourth English Edition.  Portsmouth, New-Hampshire: Printed for Charles Peirce, by N. S. &#38; W. Peirce.  1803.</p>
<p><strong>Gout.</strong></p>
<p>The paroxysms of this tormenting disease are most commonly preceded, by a general uneasiness; the feet and legs are afflicted with numbness and coldness, and frequently also with the sense of prickling; the veins on the surface are also said to become unusually turgid, and the muscles of the leg to be affected with the cramp.  But the circumstances which have been observed, most particularly to precede the attacks of this disease, are the changes which, for some little time before, take place in the stomach; this organ generally suffers a considerable derangement of its functions; the appetite being much impaired, and the stomach and bowels distended with wind, the consequence of digestion not being properly carried on; the appetite becoming, however more eager before the attack. </p>
<p>According to the observations of the attentive Sydenham, the paroxysm generally begins about two o'clock in the morning.  The patient, having gone to bed free from pain, is waked about the time with pain possessing commonly some part of the foot.  Soon after this, comes on a coldness and shivering, which terminates in fever.  The pain increasing, sometimes resembles that which might by expected to be produced by the stretching and tearing of the ligaments, or the gnawing of a dog; at others, the parts seem to suffer the effects of a tight stricture, or considerable pressure, being so feelingly alive, as not only, not to bear the weight of bed-clothes, but not even the heavy tread of any one across the room.  In this miserable state the patient continues, tossing about the bed, in vain trying the effect of variety of posture to lessen his sufferings.  At about the same hour of the following morning, the patient, in general, experiences a sudden mitigation of the pain, which he commonly attributes to the last position in which the limb was placed.  Soon after this, a moderate sweat coming on, he falls asleep, and, upon waking, finds that the pain is considerably diminished; but that the part which suffers is affected with a red shining swelling.  The pain sometimes continues two or three days, increasing at night, and becoming more mild towards morning. </p>
<p>If, after the disease has thus completed its course in one foot, it disappears entirely, the patient regains use of the foot, and experiences a most grateful change--strength and alacrity having taken the places of debility and languor.  But it often happens, that after the violence of the first attack has subsided, a second will be experienced in the other foot.  In more inveterate cases, both feet, sometimes, are affected at the same time; an repeated paroxysms sometimes extend the sufferings of the patient for six weeks or two months, or even longer.     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
