As with everything liberals say, they just assert things and then call you names if you disagree with them, instead of trying to prove their assertions.

But let's look at history.

Let us begin in ancient times before farming. Men hunted, women stayed back and "gathered".

Now who here would prefer to chase a large wild animal with a stick and who would prefer to collect berries? Anyone? I didn't think anyone would.

Think about it for a second. For a band of men to be able to feed their families, they can't just catch a rabbit. That won't feed multiple families the whole day. And rabbit fur certainly won't be enough to keep anyone warm.

What was necessary was to chase a large animal, the kind of animal that would easily kill a human if it got the chance to kick him.

There were no guns, just sticks. You had to surround an animal that was much bigger than any man and then beat down this animal with a stick as it fought back by desperately trying to kill you. Does that sound like a job you'd want or would you prefer to collect some berries while playing with your kids?

Next came farming. That's what people did until the 19th century and in some countries until the early 20th century.

What did men do? They farmed.

What did their wives do? They also farmed.

What did 99% of the population do? They farmed.

And among the elites at this time there were more female generals and heads of state than at any point during the Era of Feminism. If so much progress was made for women's rights by feminists, how come women are now winning several times fewer Nobel Prizes and hardly ever become heads of feminist-dominated Western states? Why did women just go back in their achievement as compared to the farming period?

Then the Industrial Revolution begins. The average man had to work in a disgusting sweat shop where they got abused and received barely human wages.

Staying home to cook one or two meals a day and clean once a week was certainly preferable to working in a sweat shop. Once again women got the preferable position.

Women did go to work in factories - when wars broke out.

During wars, one gender had to die on battle fields and the other gender had to work in a factory. I think it's pretty clear which job is preferable and as usual women got that job.

After each war, women ran right back home from factories. Now that men are back from war, let them work in sweat shops, and women can go back to playing with their kids while spending no more than a couple hours a day cooking and cleaning.

Feminists claim that men forced women out of sweat shops. But they didn't. There were no protests from women demanding work on the assembly line. Women gladly left - ran from! - the sweat shops and assembly line jobs.

As industrialization developed further, women learned that men created institutions with desirable jobs. Men built schools that required teachers. Men built hospitals that needed doctors. Men built non-profits that needed social workers.

All these institutions were built almost exclusively by men. Name one major hospital, university or non-profit founded by a woman (except female-oriented ones that do not admit men). I bet you can't. I bet nobody reading this can.

So feminists began clamoring that it's unfair that institutions created by men would hire men and men acquiesced and began to hire women.

But that wasn't enough for feminists: Apparently it's not fair that the person who created a corporation should have the right to own it. Why are the boardrooms full of men, they ask. They never ask, how dare someone demand that the person who created a company from scratch be forced to give it up only because he has the wrong type of genitals.

Half the corporations should be run by women, according to feminists, who simply disregard who actually created the company and all the products it sells.

And how do they explain that men created all these corporations and invented all those products?

They claim that women were discriminated against when throughout history they did not have to chase wild animals, work in sweat shops and die in wars. Who knew that when men were doing that, they were persecuting women!

Logically, you'd think they were protecting their wives and this was anything but sexism. But logic means nothing to feminists.

Half the men who started a successful business must give it up. They owe this much because their grandfather had the amazing opportunity ... to work in a sweat shop!

--------------------

Everything that I wrote is known to everyone. Nobody doubts that men were the hunters chasing wild animals with sticks, the terrible conditions of factories 100 years ago or that men fought wars.

This is all very well known to each and every person in the world.

But because of the daily feminist brainwashing from academia and mainstream media, we just ignore and forget known facts.

They tell us every day, "women were persecuted, women were persecuted, women were persecuted" and like idiot zombies, we just repeat it.

But how were women persecuted? How is staying at home worse than chasing a wild animal or working in a sweat shop? How's that sexism or persecution?

Nobody asks this. We just repeat the lies told to us. Goebbels would've been so proud of Femi-Nazis.

JAIPUR, India - In an unprecedented attempt to revive the tiger population in western India, authorities airlifted a female tiger to a national reserve Friday where it will join a male tiger delivered there last week.

The tigers were carried by Indian Air Force helicopters to Sariska Tiger Reserve in the western state of Rajasthan, whose entire tiger population has been wiped out by poachers in the last five years.

Poaching and a vanishing habitat have savaged Indian tigers, which were believed to number in the tens of thousands a century ago. The tiger population has dropped from nearly 3,600 five years ago to about 1,400, according to the latest tiger census in February.

Environmentalists hailed the airlifting of the tigers from Ranthambore Tiger Reserve, one of India's most popular places for tourists to see tigers, to Sariska.

''The killing off of the entire population in Sariska was devastating, but we hope the reintroduction of the species in this reserve will spawn a new population and ultimately expand the region where tigers can grow and flourish,'' said Sybille Klenzendorf, director of WWF's Species Conservation Program.

The male tiger was airlifted to Sariska last Saturday and is doing well, said R.N. Mehrotra, chief wildlife warden of Rajasthan.

Both tigers were outfitted with radio collars so wildlife authorities can monitor them in the reserve.

If their introduction to Sariska goes well, authorities will consider bringing more tigers there, Mehrotra said.

The government has proposed the creation of a Tiger Protection Force that would combat poachers. While the special force is not yet in place, Mehrotra said wildlife officials would do their best to protect the new tigers in Sariska.

''Tiger numbers are dwindling at an alarming rate and it is imperative we take action now to keep them from disappearing altogether,'' Klenzendorf said.

By Associated Press
SAM DOLNICK

-SWEETHEART Leather patch and vintage scarf bowling bag.

WAS - £120.00, NOW - £60.00

Click here! to view and purchase.

-SWEETHEART Leather vintage patchwork over body bag.
WAS - £85.00, NOW £42.00

Click here! to view and purchase.

-SWEETHEART Leather Vintage scarf messenger bag.
WAS - £120.00, NOW - £84.00

Click here! to view and purchase.

Ms. Judy Pink.

All these images where taken naturally with no post manipulation.

This image is entitled "Cauldron In The Flame". This was taken at a high shutter speed but low F stop. This image to me, seems to show a figure holding a cauldron or bowl inside a flame.

This image is entitled "Horror's End?". Again, this was taken at a high shutter speed but low F stop. It seems to clearly depict a image of a man or woman for that matter, seemingly suffering in a ring of fire.

This image is entitled "Hell's Angel" and simply depicts just that in my eyes. Also, it would seem to be a female form, based on the structure and pose. . This was taken at a high shutter speed but low F stop.

This image is entitled "Flaming Duck". This was taken at a high shutter speed but low F stop. This is one of the clearest images that has come out of this set. It lookd remarkably like a cartoon duck.

This image is simply entitled "Flames", and you may have guest it from that, that this was the first image to be posted. It is a much simpler composition and is nothing more that a piece of paper burning, again at a low F stop and hight shutter. You may be able to make out the letter R withing the flame. This has happened at least twice during this set.

And finally, this image, entitled "Flaming Macro!", has often been seen to have certain sexual connotations, but in all honesty, I didn't see that until it was pointed out! But now, yes, I can see it. I was more taken with fluidity of the flames and the macro of the fir shot. This was taken at a high shutter speed and a higher F stop.

© nEoPOL 2008 All rights reserved

Visit my Flckr Profile @ http://www.flickr.com/people/neopol/

1. Vol.1 Just Listen

1. Intro (ft.Perry & G-Dragon)
2. I Just Wanna Be...
3. 와줘 (Come Back to Me)
4. 한번 단 한번 (Once, Just Once)
5. One to Ten
6. 아쉬운 이별 (Sad Parting)
7. Seven (interlude)
8. 우연히 널 봐도 (ft.Wheesung)
9. Luz Control (ft.Wheesung & Lexy)
10. Baby I Like You Like That
11. 꽃을 들고서 (With Flowers)
12. 안녕 (ft.Gummy) (Goodbye)
13. 더 멀리 떠나요 (Please Go Away)
14. 너이길 바래 (I Hope It Is You)

2. Vol.2 Must Listen

1. 열정 (Passion)
2. 욕심 (Greed)
3. Honey I Know
4. 2Nite
5. 두걸음 (ft.Perry) (Two Steps)
6. 문신 (Tattoo)
7. Se7en's Love
8. I Just Know (interlude)
9. 알아 ( I Know)
10. 오기 (ft.Masta Wu) (Error)
11. Wishy Washy
12. Christmas with You
13. 듣고 싶지 않은 말 (What I Don't Want to Hear)
14. You're My Everything
15. Real Love Story (ft.Wheesung & Taebin)

3. Vol.3 24/Se7en

1. Intro - 24/7
2. 난 알아요 (ft.Teddy) (I Know)
3. Love Story (ft.Masta Wu)
4. 와줘 Part 2 (Come Back To Me Part 2)
5. Oh-No! (ft.Teddy)
6. Heaven (Interlude)
7. 밤새도록 (All Night)
8. 살고 싶어서 (Because I Want to Live)
9. The One
10. 벌레 (ft.Jinu) (Bug)
11. 내 입 좀 막아줘 (ft.Perry) (Close My Mouth)
12. Follow Me (Interlude)
13. Baby U
14. Run (ft.G-Dragon & Taeyang)
15. 얼음 같은 이별 (Ice Cold Departure)
16. 그 남자처럼 (Just Like Him)
17. 7 Virus (Outro)

4. Vol.4 Se7olution

1. Se7olution(Intro)
2. Girl Friend
3. 라 라 라 (LA LA LA)
4. 잘할게 (I Will Do Well)
5. Last of Diary
6. Again
7. Can You Feel Me
8. 닮은 사랑 (A Similar Love)
9. I’m Sorry
10. Oh~ My Girl
11. Get up and Dance
12. 허락해줘 (Let Me)
13. 독백 (Monologue)
14. Promise

1. 癡心絕對

1. 癡心絕對
2. 如果你愛他
3. 不安
4. 想太多
5. 擁抱
6. 看見
7. Now and Forever
8. 灰色地帶
9. 求你
10. Angel

2. 絕對癡心手放開

Disc 1

1. 癡心絕對
2. 你走了
3. 手放開
4. 遠走高飛
5. 抓!愛情的兇手
6. 你們要快樂
7. 我懂了她
8. 親愛妹妹的眼睛
9. 不顧一切的愛
10. 不是對手
11. 位置

Disc 2

1. 癡心絕對 (REMIX)
2. 癡心絕對 (KALA)
3. 手放開 (KALA)

3. 關於妳的歌

Disc 1

1. 眼底星空
2. 最近
3. 很想說
4. 重來
5. 我以為
6. 關於妳的歌
7. Angel
8. 就是現在
9. 聽，我愛你
10. 記得嗎

Disc 2

1. 痴心絕對
2. 手放開
3. 你那麼愛他 (李聖傑 & 林隆璇)

This male cardinal kept walking back and forth on this granite bench…he seemed to be in deep thought about something troubling him.

© 2008 D L Ennis, All rights reserved.

NOTE: Permission for the use of my images is granted for personal websites and blogs but is to include a link back to this site and proper credit given to me, D L Ennis. Link to be used...(Visual Thoughts http://dlennis.wordpress.com/)

NOTE: Commercial use, and the creation of prints, must be purchased! For more information you can contact me here.

I går malede jeg tigrenes striber op med pastose sorte penselstrøg, som kalligrafiske skrifttegn, der dannede dyrenes form og bvægelse.

På samme måde fortsætter jeg med farverne. Disse maler jeg med lange penselstrøg i en fortsættelse af de sorte striber. Bundfarven ser man mellem de farvede penselstrøg og de giver derved den malede figur en helhedstone. I modsat fald, hvis strøgene var malet direkte på en hvid grund, havde det været usammenhængende.

I den venstre del af billedet har jeg malet tigeren gul, som en kontrast til den violette baggrund. Det får den gule farve til at blive meget aktiv så den nærmest presser  den røde tiger frem mod billedets midte. Den røde tiger, som er en kontrast farve til den blå tiger, driver denne op i luften til angreb mod den mørkerøde tiger. Farverne til de to kæmpende tigre har jeg valgt som aktive kontrastfarver til den lysende sol i baggrunden. Det er det mest aktive område i billedet.

For at holde modet oppe under det store arbejde har jeg lavet den lille sang om de ti små tigerbilleder - nød lærer nøgen tiger at spinde!

Ti malerier blir tegnet op så fri;
Et blev af dem blev sat væk og så var der ni.
Der var en, der var to, der var tre,
der var fir’, der var fem i atelieret,
der var seks, der var syv, der var otte,
der var ni, der var ti i atelieret.

Ni malerier blir farvelagt så flotte;
Et blev gemt, var så sejt - og så var der otte.
Der var en, der var to, der var tre,
der var fir’, der var fem i atelieret,
der var seks, der var syv, der var otte,
der var ni, der var ti i atelieret.

Det næste maleri ta’r jeg som en tyv;
Det bli’r til side sat og så er der syv.
Der var en, der var to, der var tre,
der var fir’, der var fem i atelieret,
der var seks, der var syv, der var otte,
der var ni, der var ti i atelieret.

Seks tigerbilleder små kom på bordet frem;
et malet færdig blev - og så var der fem.
Der var en, der var to, der var tre,
der var fir’, der var fem i atelieret,
der var seks, der var syv, der var otte,
der var ni, der var ti i atelieret.

Midtown Atlanta