para que se diviertan jajaja...

ps antes que nada me presento mi nombre es Anahi García vivo en México, baja california sur en un lugar donde es realmente caluroso casi desierto por no decir que ya lo es jeje ps contamos con la gran fortuna de tener el mar a las orillas y de vez en cuando le damos una visita dita a el señor mar para refrescarnos un poco, aunque solo es a veces ps la mayoría de el tiempo no logro salir mucho ps prefiero estar en la web

como mucho me a gustado esto de los blogs por fin me decidí en crear uno ultra mejorado siii así es ultra mejorado y que mejor que realizar lo en wordpress, aunque fue de muy difícil decisión eligir de que trataría ps con eso que adoro el país d el sol naciente, el anime y mas lo mas seguro es que lo haría de algo relacionado a ello no podría hacer algo sin tener que hablar d e lo maravilloso que es eso, mm pero después de pensar y pensar decidí que trataría de mi trauma, mi pasión, y todo mi tiempo compartido para mi artista preferida, mi favorita IDOL (así es como se les llama a las artistas japonesas o a los famosos) la muy famosa Aya HIrano por mi muy conocida como Ayanito, este es el seudónimo que le puse me gusto mucho es muy lindo y se escucha muy bien.

y para aquellos que aun no conozcan a ayanito o mejor conocida como Aya Hirano , aquí les dejo un poco de información, resumida claro esta no quiero que se pierdan de mi post dedicado a ella y una linda imagen de ella.

Aya Hirano es muy conocida por muchos de los fanaticos del anime, su carrera despegó meteoricamente al interpretar a Haruhi Suzumiya, la protagonista en el anime “Suzumiya Haruhi no Yuutsu”, así como también participó en las series de NANA y Death Note. Anteriormente en el 2003 formó parte de una unite de 3 chicas que se hicieron llamar “Springs”, una carrera musical demasiado fugaz, pues practicamente todo su éxito se lo debe a su profesión como “seiyuu” (actriz de doblaje). En Marzo del 2006 lanza su primer sencillo que se tituló “Breakthrough”, pero no fué hasta el segundo sencillo en Abril de ese año que alzanzó popularidad hilarante, el sencillo se llamó “冒険でしょでしょ? (Bouken desho desho?)” el cual fue el opening de la mencionada Suzumiya Hrauhi no Yuutsu.

bueno eso es todo, espero verlos muy pronto y que sigan la carrera de esta gran actriz que al parecer aun tiene mucho por dar al mundo.

y si a ti te gusta ayanito que esperas para unirte!!!

descargar hole mtv unplugged

I bring  a unique and different voice and dare I say; a breath of fresh air. A little bit about myself. I am a harsh critic about everything including myself (it's a cultural thing). I have an opinion on everything and I am not afraid to use it. I am looking forward to sharing my stance and in the process learning about yours.

Se titula:

El mejor momento de mi vida
DD: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=00TE474X
Torrent: http://www.mininova.org/tor/1544564

-1: Me encanta el Software Libre y su filosofía.

2-:Me encanta TODA la filosofía en general

3-Si busco ayuda, quiero encontrarla, por eso mismo, escribiré tutoriales y/o alguna noticia interesante.

3-Así tengo una parte de mí en la web, lo cúal le de cierto sentido a mi tiempo libre, ya que ayudo a las personas en general.

Por eso, abro esta bitácora, para tratar los siguientes temas:

Filosofía, Humor, Software Libre, entre cosas mas generales.

Saludos.

Bienvenidos al Suplemento de Zuplemento (SUPdeZUP ó SdZ)
Esta semana estrenando como nuevo patrocinador a Sendoblog.com y a un talento de Colombia: Luto, con su tira "careyoufuck"
Adelante:

[algunas imágenes se agrandan al clickearlas, duh]

.

La Bufanda Intensa “F1 For Tears”
por El Rabino
Fuente: http://elrabino.blogspot.com

.

Die Schroedingers Katze
Por Noiryaguara
Fuente: http://decadentiacoprofaga.blogspot.com

.

“Dibujitos”
Por Javo01

Fuente: http://javo01.deviantart.com/

por Liniers [Argentina]

Fuente: http://autoliniers.blogspot.com (website no oficial)

http://www.sendoblog.com/
.

carefuckyou

Por Luto [Colombia]

Fuente: http://lutocorps.blogspot.com

.

Por Randall Munroe [EEUU]

Fuente: xkcd.com

Hola compañeros, las clase de podcast está muy interesante, ya me estoy emocionando mucho. Espero que a ustedes también le emocione tanto como a mi, espero que esta misma emoción me ayude a postear el video de nuestro grupo.

Ivette

El saludo es una forma cortés en que una persona hace notar a otra u otras, su presencia o a través de la cual comienza una conversación.

Medio redundante que esté posteando esto acá cuando se supone que si llegaron acá es porque ya leyeron lo mismo allá, pero bueno, tenía que hacer algun post inaugural.

Esta es la primera entrada del blog. Así que como verán, esto esta verde, jejeje. Empezaré por decir quien soy, bueno eso no porque ni yo se. Pero mis padres decidieron llamarme Juan Manuel, pero para los cuates soy mue. Apunto de cumplir 20 años y a mitad de mi carrera profesional.

Ahora el motivo del blog es para aprender y compartir conocimientos, ideas e intereses. Espero haber comenzado con el pie derecho, porque acuerdense del dicho:

Todo lo que empieza bien, acaba mal. Todo lo que empieza mal, acaba dando lastima.

Espero que este no sea nuestro caso, y esto crezca. Saludos.

Atte...

ADC

Aqui la descarga del capitulo 22 de la segunda temporada de Kyle XY. Aunque ya conocemos la trama de la tercera temporada no queremos desvelarla, es mucho mas agradable así.
El capitulo se titula Hola.

DD: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=JGDZEXC3
Torrent: http://www.mininova.org/tor/1528701 ]]> http://livinglies.wordpress.com/?p=291 Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:50:16 +0000 livinglies http://livinglies.wordpress.com/?p=291 As with all cases cited here, you should get on line and capture the pleading documents and other pertinent motions, discovery etc. It would help us and thousands of others, if you would send what you find to ngarfield@msn.com.

LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

McKell v. Washington Mutual-Class Action Defense Cases: Defense Motion To
Dismiss Class Action Improperly Granted As To Breach of Contract And UCL
Claims Based On Federal RESPA Violations California Court Holds
California Court Holds as Matter of First Impression that RESPA Prohibits
Lender from Marking Up Costs of Another Provider's Services Without
Providing Additional Services of its Own 

Plaintiffs filed a putative class action lawsuit against Washington Mutual
Bank in California state court alleging inter alia violations of
California’s unfair competition laws (UCL), Consumers Legal Remedies Act
(CLRA), and breach of contract. “The basis of all causes of action was
defendants’ overcharging plaintiffs for underwriting, tax services, and wire
transfer fees in conjunction with home loans. Defendants charged plaintiffs
more for these services than defendants paid the service providers.” McKell
v. Washington Mutual Bank,___ Cal.App.4th___, 2006 WL 2664130 (Cal.App.
September 18, 2006) [Slip Opn., at 2]. Plaintiffs’ UCL claim was premised
upon alleged violations of the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act
(CRMLA) and the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and
Regulations X, among other state and federal laws. Slip Opn., at 5. The
trial court granted a defense motion to dismiss the class action complaint,
presumably on the ground that the claims “turn on the alleged existence of
an agreement requiring Washington Mutual to charge no more than pass-through
costs for underwriting, tax services, and wire transfers,” id., at 3, which
plaintiffs could not do. The California Court of Appeal affirmed in part and
reversed in part. We do not here discuss those aspects of the trial court’s
ruling that the divided appellate court opinion affirmed. Rather, we focus
on the Court of Appeal’s holdings that plaintiffs had adequately pleaded UCL
and breach of contract claims.

The appellate court first held that the trial court did not err “in
requiring plaintiffs to plead a factual basis for implying an agreement by
[the Bank] to charge only pass-though costs,” Slip Opn., at 8. But in
analyzing the UCL claims, the Court of Appeal explained at page 10,

A cause of action for unfair competition under the UCL may be established
“‘independent of any contractual relationship between the parties.’” . . .
Thus, the determination whether plaintiffs have stated a cause of action for
violation of the UCL is not dependent upon their ability to plead the
existence of an implied agreement to charge only pass-through costs for
underwriting, tax services and wire transfer services.” (Citations omitted.)
Plaintiffs’ fraudulent business practices claims survived demurrer because
“a reasonable consumer likely would believe that fees charged in connection
with a home mortgage loan bore some correlation to services rendered.” Slip
Opn., at 11. The Court rejected the Bank’s argument that Regulation X “only
requires that the HUD-1 statement itemize the charges imposed on the buyer
and seller” because listing the charge “does not preclude a finding [that]
it is deceptive.” Id. (citations omitted).

Plaintiffs’ unfair business practices allegations also survived demurrer
because “the determination whether [a business practice] is unfair is one of
fact which requires a review of the evidence from both parties” and “thus
cannot usually be made on demurrer.” Id., at 12. The Court of Appeal
rejected the Bank’s judicial abstention argument because the Court was
“doing no more than enforcing already-established economic policies.” Id.,
at 13. The Court rejected also the Bank’s argument that the Court “should
not interfere” because “lending practices are strictly regulated” because
plaintiffs are not challenging the amount of the fees per se but rather the
business practice of “lead[ing] borrowers to believe it is charging them for
the cost of certain services it provides, when in reality it is charging
them substantially in excess of such costs.” Id., at 13-14.

Turning to the RESPA claim, the Court of Appeal quoted at length from Kruse
v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., 383 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 2004), Slip Opn.,
at 16 et seq. Kruse analyzed HUD’s interpretation of section 8(b) and
concluded that it “prohibits a ‘“settlement service provider” from
“mark[ing]-up the cost of another provider’s services without providing
additional settlement services.”’” Id., at 19 (quoting Kruse, at 61-62). As
a matter of first impression, the California appellate court agreed with
Kruse and “adopt[ed] that court’s reasoning as our own.” Id. In accepting
HUD’s interpretation of section 8(b), the Court also noted that “its
interpretation of section 8(b) is consistent with Congress’s stated intent
to protect consumers from unnecessarily high settlement charges.” Id., at 20
(citation omitted).

The Court rejected defense arguments that RESPA and Regulation X expressly
preempt state law claims alleging violations of RESPA and Regulation X, Slip
Opn., at 21-24, and additionally rejected defense claims that plaintiffs’
claims were preempted by the federal Home Owners’ Loan Act (HOLA), 12 U.S.C.
§ 1461 et seq., id., at 24-31. With respect to the HOLA preemption claim,
the appellate court observed that “plaintiffs are not attempting to employ
the UCL to enforce a state law purporting to regulate the lending activities
of a federal savings association” but rather “to enforce federal law
governing the operation of federal savings associations.” Id., at 27. As the
Court explained at page 29,

Insofar as plaintiffs are using the UCL to enforce federal laws as set forth
in RESPA, they are not seeking to enforce “state laws affecting the
operations of federal savings associations.” (§ 560.2(a).) The UCL does not
“purport[] to regulate or otherwise affect [a savings’ association’s] credit
activities” (ibid.) but only provides a means of enforcing federal
requirements. It is thus the type of state law not preempted by federal law.
[Citations.]
With respect to the breach of contract claim, the appellate court admitted
that “[p]laintiffs have still failed to identify the contract and
contractual provision under which [the Bank] required them to pay
underwriting and wire transfer costs” but that they identify the deed of
trust for the fee for tax services. Slip Opn., at 32. The Court agreed that
“[t]he deed of trust . . . required that any tax services fee [the Bank]
charged plaintiffs comported with RESPA,” id., at 33. Because plaintiffs
alleged the fee violated RESPA, they adequately pleaded a breach of contract
claim so as to survive demurrer. Id. 

NOTE: The Court of Appeal had no trouble in affirming the dismissal of the
CLRA claim: “Plaintiffs cite no authority or make no argument demonstrating
that Washington Mutual’s actions were undertaken ‘in a transaction intended
to result or which results in the sale or lease of goods or services.’ . . .
Rather, its actions were undertaken in transactions resulting in the sale of
real property. The CLRA thus is inapplicable . . . ” Slip Opn., at 31
(citation and footnote omitted). The Court also affirmed dismissal of the
common law claims for unjust enrichment, bailment, and conversion, id., at
33-35.

One of the appellate court judges issued a concurring and dissenting opinion
in which he expressed the view that “this entire action is preempted by
federal law,” specifically, the Home Owners’ Loan Act (HOLA). Slip Opn.,
Vogel, J., concurring and dissenting, at 4

 

Espero contar con su apoyo y comentarios, y como soy nueva ene sto necesitare ayuda, asi que espero que alguien quiera ser mi... socia o algo asi jajaja, quien lo desee dejeme su e-mail y me contactare lo más pronto posible.

Deseo que este blog le sea de ayuda para ir descubriendo las nuevas tecnologías de Microsoft.

Saludos