<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>firefox-3-against-opera &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/firefox-3-against-opera/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "firefox-3-against-opera"</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:40:15 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox 3 mais eficiente que IE ou Opera]]></title>
<link>http://snnangola.wordpress.com/?p=344</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>snnangola</dc:creator>
<guid>http://snnangola.wordpress.com/?p=344</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
É o que pretende demonstrar um benchmark realizado pela Ars Technica , foram testados os browser]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"> <img src="http://arstechnica.com/news.media/browser-memory-comparison.png" align="middle" height="380" width="633" /></p>
<p>É o que pretende demonstrar um <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080317-firefox-3-goes-on-a-diet-eats-less-memory-than-ie-and-opera.html">benchmark</a> realizado pela <i>Ars Technica , </i>foram testados os browsers <i>IE7, Firefox 2, Opera 9.5 Beta, e Safari 3.0.4 Beta </i> e o uso de memoria do Firefox 3 mostrou ser mais baixo que todos os demais concorrentes.<i></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
