Both rooms, the section and the junkstore, is set with a very unrealistic Medieval background. In his own bogus blog, Ham, in his own sick, delusional mind claims,

"Dinosaurs received their “independence” at the Creation Museum on July 4. Instead of being captured by evolutionists, they have been released to be able to have their “freedom,” as explained in a biblical context—which is the correct way to explain their history."

You call that independence? You called that freedom? How are evolutionists capturing the dinosaurs, Ham? Or is it just another one of your stupid, empty-headed declarations of ignorance, denial, and distortions of biblical context that promotes no freedom and no correct ways of explaining any history let alone dinosaur history that's entirely all made up to just rally your fool-hearted followers into believing all your stupid lies?

The dinosaur and pterosaur models dotting Dino Den and the junkstore, shown on flickr and on Ham’s bogus blog, are made by Buddy Davis who’s notorious for claiming to have allegedly found “fresh” unfossilized dinosaur remains in Alaska that were really fossilized after all. The exhibit also claims to have “real” fossil bones and eggs of dinosaurs shown along with the models. But are they really real, or are they just faked, cast versions of fossil eggs and bones made to look real? Knowing their blatant dishonesty in what they claimed about, I’d say the fossils shown at the exhibit are all fakes in which some are forged from Buddy’s studio and made to make it as if they are real while it’s not.

Other dinosaur models, which in many cases are animatronic robots shown in other parts of the crackhouse, also in very unrealistic settings, such as a wall of a city are just knock-off versions of Jurassic Park dinosaurs made by a man who formerly works for Universal Studios in Orlando, Florida.

The exhibit is said to also contain a badly built cast skeleton of a Triceratops that’s not as accurate as the real skeletal mounts of Triceratops as shown in real museums based on the latest studies on the dinosaur’s bone structure. The mount, as shown in Ham’s crackhouse, is built to portray Triceratops in an old fashioned pose while modern reconstructions of Triceratops shows a more accurate dynamic pose based on modern studies of the anatomy of this three-horned dinosaur.

The exhibit will also feature videos and a theater where tourists can go in and see a 12 minute film promoting the dragon/dinosaur fallacy which I’ve shown to you all to be nothing more than fabrications creationists have rigged up by taking ancient literature out of context and twist them to fit their "baby earth" perspective and to make it as if they are accounts of people meeting live dinosaurs instead of what they really are. Then, the tourists will be escorted to the junkstore, the so-called “dragon bookstore” unrealistically resembling a castle reading room where dotting the area are unrealistically made pterosaur models and a Baryonyx that isn't and scores of crappy junk being sold at, including a book that targets young children entitled, It’s Designed To Do What It Does Do, which is also made up by Davis (Based on one of his idiot songs, no doubt.) who along with Ham has made this book up to compete against Ten Little Dinosaurs and other toddler-style wiggly eye books for the minds of little toddlers, who are extremely vulnerable to be exposed at by even the most dangerous and venomous of lies ever spew out in front of their faces by Davis and Ham’s’ fairy tale literature.

It’s without doubt all made up to take advantage of both the huge popularity of dinosaurs and the people (mainly children) who love dinosaurs deeply and plan to use such models to proselytize people especially children into believing all their stupid lies, pseudo-histories, pseudo-bible stories, pseudo-Christianity, and empty fantasies creationists made up about dinosaurs for their own criminal ends. Thus, Dino Den is, without doubt, the worst dinosaur exhibit ever.

The 1st reason not to see the movie is,

“A silly and contrived plot (featuring: ‘talking’ Velociraptor dinosaurs who possess ‘social intelligence,’ and even the ability to set traps for unsuspecting humans; people yelling for each other in the jungle as they try to avoid detection by the raptors–in this movie, the dinosaurs are smarter than the people).”

The movie is entirely science fiction. Those are there to provide entertainment. Yet the pack-hunting dromaeosaurs in the film is indeed based on fossil discoveries of dromaeosaurs found together in one place, indicating that the dinosaurs did lived in packs like wolves do today in real life. They may use sound as a form of communication to keep in touch with each other, even though no one knows what kind of sound the dinosaurs make. Yet, scientists do find evidence of voice communication in other dinosaurs such as the hadrosaurs who, in many cases, possessed hollow crests that carry the same function as a trumpet.

In real life dromaeosaurs don't set traps to catch other dinosaurs to eat. They simply just ambush their prey, leaping up to claw, bite, and slash their prey until the prey falls and dies from its wounds before the pack gorge themselves on their kill.

There's nothing wrong with the concept of dinosaurs being smarter than people. Perhaps there were dinosaurs back then that were as smart or much smarter than people. Otherwise, the concept of dinosaurs being smarter than people can only be seen in the world of science fiction.

The 2nd stupid reason not to see the movie is,

"Poor cinematography (a rather dark and poorly lit film–even in its daylight scenes); the dinosaur special effects, however, are quite good."

Since when is this concept poor? The movie is entirely made to be mostly dark to add suspense to the film the same way they create echoing affects of normal sounds. How stupid their reasoning can get?

The 3rd reason not to see the movie is,

"Very scary and violent–dinosaurs graphically munch on people as if they were pretzels. Several scenes which would give young children nightmares."

Then why take small children to see it if that's going to give them nightmares? There possibly were small children who went and saw the movie. Some possibly were scared by the movie, while others don't mind seeing all of it and not even once did they had nightmares from it. It really all depends how sensitive small children are towards scary monster movies like that. Besides, all Jurassic Park movies are rated PG-13 which is indeed not at all for small children and the producers behind the movie have been encouraging everyone to leave small children at home when one goes out so see the movie every time they promote the Jurassic Park films.

The 4th reason not to see the movie is,

"Evolutionary content (e.g. dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago in evolutionary history; the movie’s raptors are said to have an ‘evolutionary advantage’ because they could speak to each other; there is a reference to Darwinism, etc.)"

There's NO SIN in accepting the evolutionary/old earth content, including the evidence of dinosaurs becoming extinct 65 million years ago based on valid, physical evidence pointing to the concept. What creationists claim in the 4^th reason makes no difference. All dinosaurs did speak to each other in one form or another, whether it is through sound or through showing off their special displays on their frills, tails, etc., not just the dromaeosaurs.

The 5th reason not to see the movie is,

"The movie is produced by Universal Studios, the same film company that gave the world the blasphemous movie ‘The Last Temptation of Christ’–many Christians, in fact, have been refusing to watch Universal movies since."

So what? That also makes no difference. Over the years, Universal Films have been known to promote both good and bad films of all types, including the R-rated movie that was made based on this controversial novel. Quite possibly this claim concerning Christians' refusal to go see films from Universal is nothing more than a made-up distorted version of a report that tells of Christian leaders' refusal to attend any screening by Universal based on the disclosures of the content (Citations here).

The 6th reason not to see the movie is,

"$8.25 (US) a ticket! (and the movie is only about 85-90 minutes long, not the typical 100-plus minutes)"

So what? What difference does it make? Any movie, nowadays, cost that much!

And The Final Reason is...

"Bad science–putting aside the bankrupt view of evolution presented in the film, it’s impossible to clone dinosaurs back to life anyway!"

Even evolutionists knows that dinosaurs cannot be cloned! Obviously creationists never get it in their stupid, little heads that this movie is all science fiction, not at all a documentary movie like The March of The Penguins and the upcoming dinosaur movie, Dinosaurs in 3D: Giants of Patagonia. As mentioned before, Jurassic Park III is all about entertainment, not education.

In the conclusion of the article, the writer makes this remark,

"Three ‘Jurassic Park’ films with the same ‘menacing-raptors-chasing-scared-people’ theme have definitely run their course. It’s gotten to be quite boring–you won’t be held in rapt attention if you saw either of the previous films.* Two claws down on this one."

How can it be boring? These scenes are anything but boring! It's obvious the writer behind the article never saw the movie in person. Instead, he draws conclusions from seeing only film promos and makes stuff up here and there. You can bet this person, who made up this article, will never become the likes of Siskel and Ebert.