El actor peruano y su ex esposa, Marisol Aguirre, firmaron la demanda que disuelve su matrimonio de 13 años

Hace ahora casi un año, Marisol Aguirre, quien fuera esposa de Christian Meier por una década, no sólo gritó al mundo su separación entre ella y el actor, sino que realizó graves acusaciones en su contra, entre ellas, la de haberla maltratado física y sicológicamente.

El polémico caso quedó en manos de los abogados quienes hasta hace apenas días no habían podido llegar a un acuerdo.

La pareja que se conociera en la telenovela Gorrión parece que entró en razón y acaba de firmar la papelería legal que disuelve su matrimonio.

Aguirre, a quien hemos podido ver recientemente en la edición peruana de Bailando por un sueño, confesó hace unas semanas a la agencia de noticias Órbita que “soñaba con su libertad”.

Este sueño ya se ha hecho realidad y la ex pareja ya está “oficialmente” separada.

Según cuenta el sitio Terra.com, Meier, de 38 años, recibió la noticia de sus abogados por mensaje de texto mientras rueda en Colombia la telenovela Doña Bárbara, de Telemundo.

En lo referente a la pensión de sus tres hijos: Stefano, de 13 años; Taira, de 7; y Gia, de 6, Aguirre aseguró que ya los abogados de ambas partes se pusieron de acuerdo en eso y que nunca hubo ningún problema en este sentido.

Fuente: People en Espanol

"Hemos llegado a un acuerdo de divorcio integral. La solución ha sido armoniosa. Acordamos que la pensión para los chicos será de 12 mil soles mensuales (unos 4.000 dólares)", señaló Enrique Ghersi, abogado de Aguirre en declaraciones citadas por el diario El Comercio en alusión a los 3 hijos de la pareja.

Tanto Meier como Aguirre, cuya separación fue ensombrecida por acusaciones de maltrato e incumplimientos de pagos por alimentos, compartirán la patria potestad de sus hijos: Stefano y las niñas Taira y Gia, aunque los menores vivirán con su madre.

Además, "Marisol recibirá un pago único de 50.000 dólares por compensación matrimonial, además se quedará con la casa y el auto", agregó el letrado.

Meier fue premiado recientemente como el rostro masculino del año por la Asociación de Cronistas de Espectáculos de Nueva York (ACE).

La pareja se separó en octubre pasado y se prevé que el divorcio se concrete a más tardar en ocho meses.

Supe de ella cuando Frank Pérez Garland (su director) participó en un conversatorio del 10º Festival elcine Lima 2006, evento en el cual presentó su ópera prima: Un día sin sexo (2005, Perú).

Por como la describió era una idea muy atractiva, ¿quién no ha tenido líos para comunicarse con el sexo opuesto? A veces pareciera que somos de planetas diferentes, como nos dice John Gray en su libro Los hombres son de Marte, las mujeres son de Venus.

Su productor fue Ana María Roca Rey y Jaime Carbajal de JC Films (quien después también produciría La Gran Sangre: La película).

Frank, Paul Vega y Christian Buckley son los creadores. Los guiones estuvieron a cargo de Gerardo Ruiz Miñan, Wendy Ramos y Yashim Bamonde.

Al principio se negoció presentarlo en un canal de cable, luego Frecuencia Latina (de señal abierta en Perú) se animó a presentarla este año.

Durante 21 episodios, Jose (Giovanni Ciccia) revisa sus relaciones con las mujeres en su vida. Las ex's: Sol (Gianella Neyra), Caro (Rossana Fernández Maldonado). Su actual pareja, Pamela (Vanessa Saba). Adriana (Melania Urbina), la mejor amiga y claro, no podía faltar la madre (fuente de grandes de sus traumas).

Simon (Alberto Isola), su psicólogo, es el encargado de escucharlo y lo ayuda mientras pasa por este autodescubrimiento. 

Otro de los protagonistas es Ernesto (Paul Vega), el machista amigo. Ellos son los únicos hombres que trabajan en la empresa, plagada de mujeres.

A continuación pueden ver el piloto:

La serie no pegó con el rating, una lástima pues este trabajo estaba llena de humor, frescura. Sobre todo cuando los personajes hablaban consigo mismos, como en la siguiente escena:

Se habló de realizar una segunda temporada, hasta de tener a Christian Meier como actor invitado, pero parece que al final se canceló el proyecto. Así que sólo nos quedarán estos 21 episodios.

Creo que como regalo de cumpleaños atrasado, me regalaré los dvd's.

No se lo digas a nadie, 1998, Peru/Spanien

Ett peruanskt drama om en ung överklassstudent som är homosexuell. Han försöker sig på ett heterosexuellt förhållande, men det går inte så bra. Han blir intresserad av en man som han börjar ha sex med, men den där mannen vill bara ha sex och inget mer. Den peruanska killen börjar knarka och så minns jag inte så mycket mer. Sådär trevlig och kulturell film ;) /Imdb/

1. America as a model state: a capitalistic democratic republic which values its citizens' liberty.
2. American as a superpower, or even the sole superpower.
3. The American dollar as reserve currency; "good as gold" for holding the world's savings
4. 3rd generation warfare as the dominant mode of military force.
5. Growing American wealth through the "debt supercycle", continuously expanding debt of both Government and households.
6. Cheap energy, largely from coal, oil, and natural gas.

Today we see all these things slowly fading away.  The daily newspapers record its passing, although most journalists are unaware of the larger significance of what they report. We are suffering from "change blindness," a flaw in our mental processing in which we fail to recognize large changes which should be clearly visible.

Change blindness must be experienced to believe it.  Take the test at this website.  Read the instructions!  Right click on the picture to move to the next one.  If you cannot see the change and give up, reduce the "gap" to zero.

A brief check on the health of the American nation-state.

Aristotle said that the political regime of a state dominated other aspects of its society.  Let's have a quick test about the health of the American Nation-State.  Following Aristotle's view, it looks at the foundations of our polity.  The correct answers are given directly after the list of questions.

1. Describe the major features of the Code of Hammurabi.
2. List a simple majority of the Ten Commandments (either version, that of Exodus or Deuteronomy).
3. List any three rights guaranteed under Magna Carta, the Great Charter of Freedoms - one of the foundational documents for our system of laws.

The correct answers, unless you're are a student or teacher, are all "so what."  Who cares?  These are all dead documents, with no current effect on our lives.

Let's be relevant, and test our knowledge of the American Constitution.  The questions are conveniently segmented for each age group.

For the Greatest Generation, whose courage defeated fascism, whose love of freedom helped end legalized racial discrimination, and whose insatiable greed saddled their descendents with debts and liabilities impossible for them to ever pay.

1. Quote the Preamble to the Constitution. Or paraphrase it for half credit.
2. When drafted and by whom? Who ratified it? What came before it?
3. Outline the Constitution's major features, including powers of each branch of the Government and the checks of each branch on the other two.
4. What is the Bill of Rights? Describe all ten amendments in the Bill of Rights, and list ten rights so guaranteed.

For the Baby Boomers, who passively volunteered to be the subjects of a series of social experiments whose scope and daring would have horrified Dr. Frankenstein:

1. Quote the opening three words of the Constitution.
2. What was the Constitutional Convention?  Date?  Name two members.  Hint: Ben Franklin was one (from which state?).
3. List the major features of the Constitution, including three powers of each branch.
4. What is the Bill of Rights? List six rights it guarantees.

For everyone born after 1964, who inherit the mess left by the Greats and Boomers:

1. What is the Constitution?
2. Who wrote it, and when?
3. What are the three branches of Government and the powers of each branch?
4. What is the Bill of Rights? List any three rights it guarantees.
5. What is a living Constitution?

An excerpt from Federalist Paper #39 (Madison)

The first question that offers itself is, whether the general form and aspect of the government be strictly republican.  It is evident that no other form would be reconcilable with the genius of the people of America; with the fundamental principles of the Revolution; or with that honorable determination which animates every votary of freedom, to rest all our political experiments on the capacity of mankind for self-government. 

Standing firmly on the foundation provided by our Constitution, the American people grew to a level of wealth and freedom unknown in human history.  IA constitution - written or unwritten - lives only to the degree it is inscribed on the hearts of its citizens. That was true throughout most of our history. That is no longer true today.

Item: A 1998 national survey of teenagers conducted by the National Constitution Center found that 59 percent of those interviewed could identify the Three Stooges while only 45 percent could provide the name of the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, and even fewer (41 percent) knew the three branches of the U.S. Government! Less than 2 percent could correctly identify James Madison as the "father" of the U.S. Constitution, including the Bill of Rights.

... In another poll taken by the National Constitution Center in November 2001, for example, two-thirds of those responding could not identify the Constitution as the framework for American government, while less than one-fourth could identify correctly the provisions of the Declaration of Independence and those of the U.S. Constitution; others were unclear as to the Bill of Rights' place within the Constitution.

"Bill of Rights Memories" by Allen Weinstein, Archivist of the United States, in Prologue (Winter 2005)

Once we no longer revere the Constitution, or even know what it says, it becomes a different kind of living document.  Its meaning now changes to conform to the current needs of our ruling elites.  We return to the state of the Romans before the laws were posted on the Twelve Tables of ivory (or brass) and posted in the Forum for all to see.  Or, if history repeats as farce, we are like the beasts in George Orwell's Animal Farm.  The laws are written on the side of the barn, but most are too stupid to realize that they are changed by the pigs during the night.

Death of the American Constitution

... the preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the Republican model of Government, are justly considered as deeply, perhaps as finally staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.

George Washington's First Inaugural Address (1789)

The Constitution was designed largely according to the ideas of Montesquieu and John Locke.  Following Montesquieu, it specifies the separate duties for each of America's three branches.  Following Locke, it limits the government's powers so as to protect individual liberties.

Its ability to do the latter function has faded rapidly since the New Deal.  For example, most of the Bill of Rights remain de jure in force but are de facto void.  This can be easily tested by a Lexis search of successful attempts to use them in litigation.  You will find almost none for most of them.

At some point in our future the Constitution seems likely to become a purely procedural document, much like that of the former Soviet Union, and equally effective at preserving our liberties.  Our rights will exist only on the sufferance of the government and our ruling elites.  This is already true in the UK, as their "unwritten constitution" protecting the "rights of Englishmen" has blown away like smoke in the wind.

One can see our future in the fracas over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review.  Judicial outrage over the Bush administration bypassing of the Court of Review cannot result from concern over our civil liberties, as the Court of Review apparently seldom if ever denied requests for government action.  The Supremes' horror is understandable, however, as this cut the judiciary out from a role in the rapidly expanding national security apparatus -- an obvious violation of the balance of power among the three Branches.

Perhaps this was inevitable, as "consent of the governed" to the Constitutional regime becomes a meaningless formula with the passing of time, as it refers to consent to the regime by folks long dead -- not even ancestors to many of today's Americans.  It becomes a founding myth, like the foundation of all traditional governments.

We have become consumers, clients of the government, instead of citizens.

What more befits a decent man, a decent, peaceful citizen, than that he should remain aloof from civil disputes?
Letter from Caesar to Cicero, from Christian Meier's Caesar  (1982)

History shows that people's recognition of a regime's passing usually lags behind the facts.  Generations passed before the Roman people recognized that the Republic was truly dead.

Who killed the Constitution?

What kind of a crisis was it in which it was not Roman society that fell apart, but Roman reality - the sense of shared security in an order that was essentially unquestioned?
Meier (1982)

How did this happen? There are many possible explanations. A few are discussed below.

A. It's the Founders' fault.  The Constitution was just not good enough.

B. America has changed.  Perhaps we no longer meet the conditions the Founders considered necessary for a republic.

1. A small government
2. A citizenry of farmers, self-employed craftsman, and business owners (property owners, one and all)
3. An educated citizenry, knowledgeable about the republic's history and operation
4. A people jealous of their liberties and willing to fight to preserve them.
5. Also, our population has grown by a factor of 90 since the Convention. The Constitution might not work for such a large, complex state.

C. A contingency of history: it just happened.  The Constitution may have died to due our cumulative errors in judgment over the past two centuries. Plus some bad luck.

D. Bad or even evil people have killed the Constitution.

Both right and left sound alarms about the evil leadership plaguing America, although they differ on the names of those responsible.  Why we tolerate such leaders is seldom explained.  One exception is Thomas Frank in his book What's Wrong with Kansas, who attributes this to the stupidity of the American people (excepting only liberals).  The cause of this epidemic of stupidity seems unclear to Frank.  Too much TV, perhaps.

E. A simple explanation.

We have traded liberty for promises of equality, security, and prosperity.  The cost is our Constitution.  Everything has a price.

Do not scatter diamonds before ducks. They prefer grain.
Chiun, the current Master of Sinanju (from The Destroyer series of books by Richard Sapir and Warren Murphy)

Once a people come to believe that governing themselves is too difficult or burdensome, someone will volunteer to take this load from them. After that happens there is no point in crying about the consequences.

If God didn't want them sheared, he would not have made them sheep.
Calvera, bandit leader in the movie "The Magnificent Seven" (1960)

Consequences of the Constitution's death

Instead of decency, self-discipline and competence, there was insolence, corruption and rapacity.
Sallust (Roman historian, 86 - 34 BC), quoted in Meier (1982)

The American government will likely continue to operate as it does today, evolving in the same directions as it has since WWI.  It will grow larger, more intrusive, and absorb an ever larger fraction of the national income.  It will become less responsive to direction from the American people and more controlled by for the benefit of our elites.

As discussed at the opening, this evolution is to a large extent unseen by us.   When it is seen, to many these things appear both natural and perhaps even desirable.  Worst of all, many of those who consider this undesirable also believe it unstoppable.  Most often we show ourselves to be easily guided by appeals to our base emotions of fear and greed, with the short memories suitable to and characteristic of sheep.

The experience of Europe shows how quickly deeply held beliefs can diminish.  Christianity was a large and fundamental aspect of European culture, whose doctrines shaped their lives and whose rites occupied a large fraction of their time.  All this faded quickly away once God died in their hearts.  After only a handful of generations the churches now see only tourists during the week and remain mostly empty even on Sunday.  Divorce is common, and the cutting edge of social policy concerns euthanasia and infanticide (both relabeled for people's comfort).

What might be the effect of the Constitution's death on the cohesion of the American polity?  It has been a primary source of America's strength, helping us survive many crises of types often fatal to political regimes.

• The Civil War
• The Great Depression
• The racial turmoil of the late 1960's, which at its worst burnt large areas of several cities.

What gives us a sense of mutual belonging (social cohesion) after the Constitution dies?  What gives us a sense of being Americans?  We share no common religion, ethnicity, heritage, or (with each passing year) even a common language.  To what will we give our allegiance?

As cohesion decreases with every new generation, recruiting for the combat units of our military services might become far more difficult.  For what will these men and women putting their lives at risk?  Especially in future wars far more lethal than those now waged in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The cutting edge of the scythe

We might stumble on for a few generations not noticing the corpse of the Constitution lying about except for one destabilizing factor: immigration.  Although opposed by a large percentage of Americans of all ethnic groups (including Hispanics) our elites find open borders highly beneficial.

• Cheap servants for the upper middle classes
• For the business class, workers willing to work for low wages (perhaps what the Republican Party leaders find attractive).
• Clients for the welfare state
• Future voters for the Democratic Party

Perhaps most important, large numbers of hard-working and ambitious immigrants create competition for the middle class, spurring desperate efforts to maintain a stable lifestyle for themselves and their children.  This creates a hard-working labor force, willing to work 24-7 at their Blackberries and home computers, with no thought of unions or overtime pay, and (best of all) no time or energy leftover for politics.

However desirable to our elites, the cost to America is high.  To what will these new "Americans" give their allegiance?  To our Constitution?  That is radical concept in most lands, where they change constitutions as easily as our football teams change cities.  Nor can they learn this allegiance from us, as most of us no longer have it.

Will they give their allegiance to the American nation-state?  While our love of country lives on, it fades with each generation.  Reading our children's schoolbooks, watching their TV shows and movies, one wonders where the next generation will learn it -- let alone transmit it to millions of immigrants.

The future of America

The predominate reaction of the Romans to the death of the Republic was resignation, as seen in the popular philosophies of the Empire: Stoicism, Epicureanism, Hedonism, and Christianity.  How will Americans react when they realize that the Constitution has died?  Reform, rebellion, or resignation?

There was a dream that was Rome. You could only whisper it. Anything more than a whisper and it would vanish, it was so fragile.
Marcus Aurelius, in the movie "Gladiator" (2000)

The coming years might test America more than anything in our past, including the Revolutionary and Civil wars.  America might lose both what defines it and what we hold most dear:  our Constitution, our vast wealth, and our role as global hegemon.

This transition will be like a singularity in astrophysics, a point where the rules breakdown - and beyond which we cannot see.

Such trials appear throughout history.  Consider Russia in 1942. Ruled by a madman.  Their government had betrayed the hopes of the revolution, killed tens of millions, and reduced the nation to poverty.  Most of their generals were dead, their armies were in full retreat, and vast areas were controlled by a ruthless invader.

The mark of a great people is the ability to carry on when all is lost, including hope.  We can learn much from the Russian people's behavior in WWII.  I doubt we will fall into such peril.  On the other hand, our situation might be far more complex, with no clear enemy to unify us.  But there is no cause for despair.

People, Ideas, and Hardware. "In that order!" the late Col John R. Boyd, USAF, would thunder at his audiences.

Our wealth is just things ("hardware"), an inheritance from past generations.  What we lose we can work to replace.  Our aspirations to global hegemony were revealed as a mirage in Vietnam and Iraqi, lasting less than two generations after WWII.

Our Constitution is just an idea, inherited from the founders.  We created it, and its death will give us the experience to do better with the next version.

Our culture is a collection of discordant ideas, mixing lofty and base elements in a manner despised by much of the world - an easily understood disgust to anyone watching many of our TV shows and movies, or listening to some of our popular music.

The Constitution is not America.  We are America.  We are strong because of our ability to act together, to produce and follow leaders.  We are strong due to our openness to other cultures and ability to assimilate their best aspects.  We are strong due to our ability to adapt to new circumstances, to roll with defeat and carry on.

We will be what we want to be.  The coming years will reveal what that is.

There was a dream that was Rome. It shall be realized. These are the wishes of Marcus Aurelius.
Maximus Decimus Meridius, in the movie "Gladiator"

Other posts about this topic

1. Some good news (one of the more important posts on this blog)
2. An important thing to remember as we start a New Year
3. Diagnosing the Eagle, Chapter II — book recommendations for 2008
4. A time-saving tip when reading the daily news
5. Diagnosing the Eagle, Chapter III — reclaiming the Constitution
6. Is America’s decline inevitable? No.
7. The Constitution: wonderful, if we can keep it
8. Congress shows us how our new government works

  Me entere de la entrega de los Premios ACE 2008 por el programa Al Rojo Vivo y siendo la fan de las telenovelas de Telemundo que soy, me puse a investigar.

 Marlene Favela gano como Mejor Actriz por El Zorro: La Espada y la Rosa.

Ariel López Padilla gano por Pecados Ajenos como mejor coactuación masculina.

Osvaldo Ríos gano por El Zorro: La Espada y la Rosa como mejor actor de carácter.

María Antonieta de las Nieves "La Chilindrina” gano como mejor actriz de carácter por Dame Chocolate.

Christian Meier el protagonista de El Zorro: La Espada y la Rosa gano como rostro masculino del año.

Lupita Ferrer quedo excluida para premios competitivos por haber recibido el Premio Extraordinario ACE por Distinción y Mérito.

Nos da mucho gusto por todos los ganadores. Todos se lo merecen. Lástima por Lupita Ferrer estoy segura que se hubiera ganado un premio por su personificación de “Ágata” en Pecados Ajenos. Nos encanta el humor negro que le impregna Ferrer al personaje.

La ceremonia de los Premios ACE, llevada a efecto todos los años sin interrupción desde 1969 en Nueva York, es uno de los honores más codiciados de los medios artísticos latinoamericanos.  Este premio celebra la excelencia de los artistas hispanos en el cine, la televisión y los escenarios.

Pecados Ajenos -Ariel López Padilla – Rogelio

Pecados Ajenos -Lupita Ferrer – Ágata

Dame Chocolate- María Antonieta de las Nieves- Dulce Amado

El Zorro: La Espada y la Rosa-Marlene Favela- Esmeralda Sánchez de Moncada
 

So it is with Winslow T. Wheeler. An expert on defense issues after 3 decades working with senators from both political parties and the Government Accountability Office. Author of The Wastrels of Defense, he now directs the Straus Military Reform Project of the Center for Defense Information in Washington.

The US government that he knows has changed, right before his eyes. He sees the new order but does not recognize it. Just like us. His review of the The Petraeus / Crocker Hearings (Counterpunch, 8 April 2008) makes this evident.

It had all the panoply of a modern congressional hearing and what we have come to expect from senators confronting important witnesses. We saw:

• Speeches parading as questions.
• Staff prepared questions read off, again and again; no matter what the answer.
• Asking a non-question and sternly demanding a specific response.
• Platitudes pretending to be questions.
• Failure-to-launch oversight.
• Studied posing as president-to-be.
• Desperate grasp for political cover poorly disguised as a question.

Throughout all this palaver -- I can't say "questioning" because no real questions were asked -- there were no answers that advanced our knowledge of what is going on in Iraq.

... After all, the "questioners" were clearly not after information; they were after political advancement or protection. I f they were after information, they are gross incompetents.

Wheeler's outrage is unwarranted, or perhaps nostalgia for a past era. Our representatives in Congress are experienced professionals. Princes both in Washington and at home, the competition for their jobs is fierce. These hearings do not demonstrate their incompetence. The Committee was not seeking information, not for their themselves or for us. That is like askingfor justice from Stalin's show trials. It might have happened occasionally, but was not the purpose of the event.

The role of Congress has changed. Our representatives now function more as Tribunes than as law-makers.

1. They act as ombudsmen between the government and the people (no longer fully citizens). Mostly the powerful, but even the proles get assistance on a low level.
2. They act as magistrates, holding hearings on past events to judge both the policies and the key actors (both public and private). Playing mock judge is much safer for one's career than setting policy.
3. They divide the spoils of government among America's powerful special interest groups. Business, labor unions, government agencies, non-governmental organizations (a misnomer, mostly representatives for powerful interests) -- both foreign and domestic. Spoils include government money, tax policy, and how to apply (or lift) the government's omnipresent heavy hand of regulation.

The changing role of Congress is a small part of a larger evolution, as we slide from being citizens to subjects. We have the tools to govern ourselves, but have lost the will to use them. As I said in Forecast: Death of the American Constitution:

At some point in our future the Constitution seems likely to become a purely procedural document, much like that of the former Soviet Union, and equally effective at preserving our liberties. Our rights will exist only on the sufferance of the government and our ruling elites. This is already true in the UK, as their “unwritten constitution” protecting the “rights of Englishmen” has blown away like smoke in the wind.

Eventually the American people will recognize the new regime. How will we react? There are solutions, but not the kind loved by technocrats. Reform probably requires changing the relationship of citizens to the regime. That is, changes in how we think and act, seeing ourselves as citizens, not consumers. Not only might technocratic fixes -- new policies and programs -- not work, they might exacerbate the underlying problem.

I recommend reading Christian Meier’s “Caesar” to see where this leads. He describes how by late Republic times the Roman people had lost the will to govern themselves. As always, volunteers appeared to take on the job.

Please share your comments by posting below (brief and relevant, please), or email me at fabmaximus at hotmail dot com (note the spam-protected spelling).

Recommendation: You might find this post from last week worthwhile reading: We are withdrawing again from Iraq, forever.

Other posts on this topic

1. Forecast: Death of the American Constitution (17 July 2006)
2. Diagnosing the Eagle, Chapter III — reclaiming the Constitution (3 January 2008)
3. The Constitution: wonderful, if we can keep it (15 Feburary 2008)

Las 6 de la tarde, ese horario sagrado que RCTV y Venevisón reservara durante décadas al Zorro de Walt Disney, es el mismo elegido sabiamente por Televen para estrenar "El Zorro, La Espada y La Rosa", de NBC Telemundo / Caracol TV. Con pluma del venezolano Kiko Olivieri (La Venganza, La Tormenta), basado en la novela homónima de la chilena Isabel Allende, la primera versión en formato telenovela del héroe ficticio más latino de todos los tiempos está protagonizada por el peruano Christian Meir (del filme "No se lo digas a nadie"),  como "El Zorro" Diego de La Vega, el puertorriqueño Osvaldo Ríos (Kassandra, un amor de leyenda) como Don Alejandro, y los mexicanos Marlene Favela (Gata Salvaje), como la heroína y Arturo Peniche (Alborada) como el Comandante... todos ellos en una historia ambientada en Los Angeles durante el dominio español y grabada totalmente en Colombia... asi es Latinoamérica.

Las grandes telenovelas cuentan historias de grandes mujeres... ésta fue la inspiración para todas...

"Doña Bárbara", la obra cumbre de la literatura venezolana, original de Rómulo Gallegos, adaptada a la televisión venezolana en los años 70 por el gran José Ignacio Cabrujas, renace en una nueva producción de Telemundo, gracias a una idea presentada por la mismísima Gabriela Spanic, quien irónicamente, después de ser aprobado el proyecto, tuvo que luchar a capa y espada por conseguir el papel protagónico.

Por ser éste precisamente uno de los íconos culturales más importantes que haya producido la literatura venezolana, interpretarlo siempre ha sido un sueño para cualquier actriz de la tierra de Bolívar. Ruddy Rodríguez ("Amas de Casa Desesperadas"), Gaby Spino ("Sinverguenza") y Natalia Streignard ("La Tormenta") fueron algunas de las chicas que "castearon" para este papel.

Para todos los interesados, para los que la leyeron en el colegio, para los que la olvidaron, o desean refrescarla, aqui está la sinopsis. Eso sí, ojalá que a alguno se le ocurriera acudir al libro.

Barbarita (Gabriela Spanic, "La Venganza" y "La Usurpadora", entre otras), es criada por una banda de contrabandistas de la selva. Allí conoce el amor con Asdrubal, pero éste es asesinado y la mestiza es salvajemente ultrajada por los mismos contrabandistas. Decidida a conseguir su venganza contra esos hombres; Bárbara seduce al propietario de una hacienda: Lorenzo Barquero y aunque tienen una hija lo empuja al alcoholismo y le roba la fortuna. Lorenzo es convertido en un guiñapo humano, y la pequeña Marisela , hija de ambos, es obligada a vivir en una choza miserable con su padre.

Quince años después; Santos Luzardo (Christian Meier, "El Zorro"), un abogado graduado con honores, primo de Lorenzo, vuelve a la tierra de su familia para reclamar la propiedad. Él pronto descubre que la región es controlada por Doña Bárbara, que ahora se ha convertido en una mujer dominante, que usa sus poderes de brujería y seducción para imponer su voluntad sobre la ciudad.

Con el tiempo, Santos intenta salvar a su primo y educar a la joven Marisela. Pero doña Bárbara acaba enamorándose de Santos; aunque para él su corazón pertenece a la pequeña Marisela (María Adelaida Puerta, "Sin Tetas no hay paraíso").

Fuente: www.elinformanteperu.com

Tal parece que 2008 serà el año de Ròmulo Gallegos, gracias a las telenovelas.

Mientras RCTV Internacional graba "La Trepadora", con Norkys Batista ("Estrambòtica Anastasia") en el papel de Victoria Guanipa y Jean Paul Leroux ("Secuestro Express") como Nicolàs del Casal; Telemundo y RTI Colombia echan a rodar "Doña Bàrbara", con la venezolana Gabriela Spanic ("La Venganza") en el papel principal, haciendo triàngulo con Marìa Adelaida puerta ("Sin tetas no hay paraìso") como Marisela y Christian Meier ("El Zorro") interpretando a Santos Luzardo.

Aquì està un pequeño adelanto de lo que serà la telenovela. Enjoy da show!

For the ancients the soul of the city was the regime, the arrangements of and participation in offices, deliberation about the just and the common good, choices about war and peace, the making of laws.  Rational choice on the part of citizens who were statesmen was understood to be the center of its regime.  ... Pericles {in his Funeral Oration, as given by Thucydides} says nothing about the gods, or the poetry, history, sculpture or philosophy of which we think.  He praises Athens' regime and finds beauty in its political achievement...

This is even more true of America, unlike Athens not famous for its philosophy, art, or culture.  The Americans who sat through the long hours of the Lincoln-Douglas debates would, I believe, have understood this.  When this is again true of America we will, I believe, find that the many threats we face no longer seem so dangerous.

It seems we have abandoned this tradition.  To see where this leads, read Christian Meier's biography Caesar.  He describes how the Roman people grew tired of governing themselves, perhaps finding the burden too great to bear.  Inevitably, strong men came forward to take this load from the people's backs.  People who will not govern themselves have no right to complain about the decisions of the elites who rule them.

I urge everyone to take action now.  Work for candidates -- local, state, national, it does not matter.  All are important.  If you can afford to do so, contribute to a candidate's election fund.  Write to your local newspapers or on the Internet.  History is being made today.  If we do not make it, others will do so for us.

 There is another element to America's strength:  our ability to work together.  To see this in action visit your local chapter of the Blue Star Mothers.  They collect money and goods to support our troops, with great success.  At their work days you will see a wide range of people side by side.  Different races and creeds.  Moms and Dads.  Liberals and Conservatives.  Old and young.  Boy Scouts and Hells Angels.  This is America at its best, a nation well able to weather the storms that lie ahead.

For more on this subject

• Forecast: Death of the American Constitution
• The Future of America (skip to forecasts #4 and #5)

Posts about good news

1. Good news: The Singularity is coming (again)  (8 December 2007) — History tends to look better over longer time horizons.
2. Some good news (one of the more important posts on this blog)  (21 December 2007)
3. Some good news (one of the more important posts on this blog)
4. A crisis at the beginning of the American experiment  (27 December 2008) — Looking at the problems looming before us, it is easy to forget those of equal or greater danger that we have surmounted in the past.  
5. An important thing to remember as we start a New Year  (29 December 2007) — As we start a New Year I find it useful to review my core beliefs. It is easy to lose sight of those amidst the clatter of daily events. Here is my list…
6. Is America’s decline inevitable? No.  (21 January 2008)
7. Let us light a candle while we walk, lest we fear what lies ahead  (10 February 2008) — Need we fear the future?
8. A happy ending to the current economic recession  (12 February 2008)
9. Fears of flying into the future  (25 February 2008)
10. Experts, with wrinkled brows, warn about the future  (2 May 2008) — Experts often see the future with alarm, seeing the dangers but not benefits. That gets attention, from both the media and an increasinly fearful public. Both sides feed this process. It need not be so, as most trends contain the seeds of good and bad futures. This post considers two examples.
11. Peak Oil Doomsters debunked, end of civilization called off  (8 May 2008)
12. Good news about the 21st century, a counterbalance to the doomsters  (9 May 2008)
13. An effective way to support our Troops: help the Blue Star Mothers of America (8 June 2008) — There are ways to support our troops, actions more effective than a bumper sticker on your car.
14. There is no “peak water” crisis  (19 June 2008)

Click here for all posts discussing good news about America's future.