<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cabalah &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/cabalah/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "cabalah"</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:39:08 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Reflection for February 19, 2008: What is God?]]></title>
<link>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/?p=574</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/reflection-for-february-19-2008-what-is-god/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[God is ineffable
as soon as you say what God is&#8230;
You have not said what God is.
The more you s]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:115%;">God is ineffable</span></p>
<p>as soon as you say what God is...<br />
You have not said what God is.</p>
<p>The more you speak, the less you say.</p>
<p>Amen</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:115%;">…………………………..</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">"When an individual goes through a traumatic experience and reacts as if nothing has occurred, then the experience has most likely not yet sunk in. The data is in the intermediate period between the gathering of the information and the time when it becomes fully processed and absorbed. The information is still lingering on in the passageway and has not yet trickled down into the heart. This occurs with all types of information. There is always a lapse between receiving information and the emotional absorption of that information. The only variable is how long this takes. Some information is processed immediately, while other data takes more time to absorb and to be registered emotionally. At times we smile walking down the street because of something we heard hours earlier, and it is only then that we feel its impact.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">        There are times when this connection is impaired, or severed, so that one's ability to feel what one thinks is all but absent. This occurs when the passageway is cluttered, and it is a no go between the mind and heart. On a physical level, within the neck of a human being there exists two passages, the esophagus, which is the food pipe, and the trachea, which is the windpipe. In the spiritual domain as well, these two passages can be stuffed and cluttered. Spiritual blockage of the food pipe occurs when one is filled to excess with physical nourishment, when one is so overly engrossed in consuming and absorbing physical pleasures that one neglects the spiritual. The windpipe, on the other hand, represents air and ambiance. When this pipe is clogged, it means that one is not in an appropriate environment conducive to the arousal of noble emotions. When these connecting pipes are congested, the intellect has no avenue to penetrate the heart. The thoughts cannot evolve into emotions, and so they remain in the mind.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">        In Kabbalistic terminology this phenomenon is called <i>Timturn halev</i>, dullness of the heart. This is when one suffers from the inability to be responsive and to feel emotions. One may perceive with one's intellect how one should love, yet one's emotions remain silent. One is incapable of feeling or being spiritual moved. This spiritual numbness arises from and is a manifestation of one's ego, where all that one feels is one's own existence and need for survival. The preoccupation with coarse bodily experiences does not allow for genuine sensitivity to spirituality. In this state of spiritual numbness the ego does not allow the light of comprehension to illuminate the emotions."</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">- DovBer Pinson (<i>Meditation and Judaism</i>)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:115%;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:115%;">………………………………</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">    </span><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Children, you belong to God, and you have defeated these enemies. God's Spirit is in you and is more powerful than the one that is in the world. These enemies belong to this world, and the world listens to them, because they speak its language. We belong to God, and everyone who knows God will listen to us. But the people who don't know God won't listen to us. That is how we can tell the Spirit that speaks the truth from the one that tells lies. My dear friends, we must love each other. Love comes from God, and when we love each other, it shows that we have been given new life. We are now God's children, and we know him. God is love, and anyone who doesn't love others has never known him. God showed his love for us when he sent his only Son into the world to give us life. Real love isn't our love for God, but his love for us. God sent his Son to be the sacrifice by which our sins are forgiven. Dear friends, since God loved us this much, we must love each other. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"><br />
--1 John 4-10</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">....................................</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">the words flow, decisions made<br />
idea's mine, but the inspiration not<br />
dreams of hangers on, dreams of getting well<br />
spells of ezmerelda, emeralds foretold<br />
splinters in the eye sentiments remain<br />
bones that never rest where we going to<br />
it was never up to me and yet i pushed until it broke</p>
<p>I love the open road and all that it suggests<br />
wheel wagon dust weeds and infidelities and<br />
always for a love never question why<br />
in a wooden house immoveable and silent and<br />
drinking strawberry wine forever lost in town<br />
and thru the sleeping streets night bound and heavy<br />
wheels in the spoke still spoken for himself</p>
<p>now my gates are high, my friends even higher<br />
forgotten in my mind, yet the sky still linger and<br />
cloud the blue skies, i'm jealous of you birds<br />
was the only truth in a world full of words?<br />
hear the prairie sound in a friend called near<br />
the heart is pointed down but my spirit pointed up<br />
his voice for siren of greek mythology</p>
<p>i pause with my pen i begin to defend<br />
every action taken, every moment sealed<br />
when i was quick it coursed through open veins<br />
the will to live the urgency to move<br />
behind a panel door sealing cherry stain<br />
i play my guitar and live those lonesome notes</p>
<p>like a dog that's down<br />
in a corner just a sigh<br />
waiting to be called<br />
waiting to be yours<br />
ghosts of all my shame<br />
without purpose or will</p>
<p>i often speak of you but the you is always me<br />
cause when i speak of me it's me i ask of you<br />
so let there be no truth just trickery in rhymes<br />
time the only thing waiting still as death</p>
<p>i hope for resolution pray one defining moment<br />
pause without restrain barren without child<br />
a child is who i was a child is who I'll die<br />
soot in my hair<br />
and stars in my hands<br />
soot in my hair<br />
and stars in my hands<br />
soot in my hair<br />
and stars in my hands</p>
<p>--soot and stars (smashing pumpkins)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&#160;</p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/hPBn4JUh74o'></param><param name='wmode' value='transparent'></param><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/hPBn4JUh74o&rel=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='transparent' width='425' height='350'></embed></object></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[reflection for February 1, 2008: Telling the truth]]></title>
<link>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/?p=534</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2008/02/01/reflection-for-february-1-2008-telling-the-truth/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Samsaric pleasures are like salt water, the more we indulge, the more we crave.&#8221; 
~ Ng]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-right:1.5in;"><b><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';">"Samsaric pleasures are like salt water, the more we indulge, the more we crave." </span></b><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';"></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:1.5in;"><b><span style="font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';">~ </span></b><span style="font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';">Ngulchu Gyalsey Thogmed Zangpo, </span><a href="http://www.namsebangdzo.com/product_p/5913.htm&#38;Click=1171"><b><i><span style="font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';">Thirty-Seven Practices of Bodhisattvas.</span></i></b></a></p>
<p style="margin-right:1.5in;">…………………………………………………….</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.7pt;margin:2.85pt 1.5in 10pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">The nature of will and the nature of ego are very close. A person who has labored long that the distinction between with his or her spiritual discipline often has great I illusion-it is all good! All pride. These are the people who have been punc- tilious about the law, observed the fasts, and given much time and energy to meditation and prayer. But this work and devotion have a hidden danger, which is the danger of pride. Pride is not the same as enjoying the labor or even rejoicing in one's accomplishment. These two feelings rest on the knowledge that life is temporary. Pride, on the other hand, knows of no future other than itself. Filled with itself, it believes that all reality revolves around it. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.7pt;margin:2.85pt 1.5in 10pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:14.85pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">The following story describes the danger that can bring to our practice: Naftali the <i>tzaddik </i>was sitting at home one evening and heard a <span> </span>knock at the door. He answered. Standing there was a young man dressed in the robes of a scholar.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:14.85pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:16.3pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">"Rebbe," he said, "I have come to study with you."</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:15.35pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:15.35pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">"Really?" said the rebbe. "What have you learned so far in your studies?" </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:15.35pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:15.35pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">"A tremendous amount," said the young man. " I have memorized all of Torah and most of Talmud." </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:15.35pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:16.3pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">"I am sorry, young man, I cannot teach you," the <i>tzaddik </i>said and closed the door.<span>  </span>A little later there was another knock. He.answered it, and a young woman was there. "Ex cuse me, Rebbe," she said. "I would like to learn with you." </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:16.3pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:16.3pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">"And what have you learned of Torah up to now?" he asked sternly.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:16.3pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;line-height:16.3pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">"To tell you the truth, I know nothing," she said. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:0.7pt 1.5in 10pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:0.7pt 1.5in 10pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">"Come in, come in," he said, smiling broadly. <span> </span>Later his wife asked him the meaning of this <span> </span>strange behavior. <span> </span>"The first lesson and the important-the one we must always begin with - every year, every day, every moment-is that we know nothing. <span> </span>If we come from a place of thinking we know, it is very hard to progress." </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:0.7pt 1.5in 10pt 0;"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:0.7pt 1.5in 10pt 0;"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">--The Klippah of pride (Avram Davis, “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Way-Flame-Forgotten-Tradition-Meditation/dp/1580230601/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1201872577&#38;sr=1-1">The Way of flame</a>”)</span><span style="font-size:12pt;"></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:1.5in;"><span style="font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';">……………………………………</span></p>
<p style="margin-right:1.5in;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';">"What meaning is there in that kind of happiness? It is like a dream that just stops in the middle when you wake up. Those who, as the result of some slight positive action, seem to be happy and comfortable at the moment, will not be able to hold on to that state for an instant longer once the effect of that action runs out. The  kings of the gods, seated high on their thrones of precious jewels spread with divine silks, enjoy all the pleasures of the five senses. But, once their lifespan is exhausted, in the twinkling of an eye they are plunged into suffering and fall headlong down to the scorching metal ground of hell. Even the gods of the sun and moon, who light up the four continents, can end up being reborn somewhere  between those very continents, in darkness so deep that they cannot see whether their own limbs are stretched out or bent in. So do not put your trust in the apparent joys of samsara."  </span></p>
<p style="margin-right:1.5in;"><span style="font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';">~ Patrul Rinpoche in </span><a href="http://www.namsebangdzo.com/product_p/6096.htm&#38;Click=1171"><b><i><span style="font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';">Words of My Perfect Teacher</span></i></b></a><i><span style="font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';">.</span></i><span style="font-family:'Book Antiqua','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;"> .....................................</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;"><b><span title="International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration" class="Unicode" style="white-space:normal;text-decoration:none;">Saṃsāra</span></b>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit" title="Sanskrit">Sanskrit</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C4%81li" title="Pāli">Pāli</a> term for "continuous movement" or "continuous flowing" refers in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism" title="Buddhism">Buddhism</a> to the concept of a cycle of birth (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jati_%28Buddhism%29" title="Jati (Buddhism)">jāti</a>) and consequent decay and death (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaramarana" title="Jaramarana"><span title="International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration" class="Unicode" style="white-space:normal;text-decoration:none;">jarāmaraṇa</span></a>), in which all beings in the universe participate and which can only be escaped through <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhi" title="Bodhi">enlightenment</a>. <span title="International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration" class="Unicode" style="white-space:normal;text-decoration:none;">Saṃsāra</span> is associated with suffering and is generally considered the antithesis of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana" title="Nirvana"><span title="International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration" class="Unicode" style="white-space:normal;text-decoration:none;">nirvāṇa</span></a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nibb%C4%81na" title="Nibbāna">nibbāna</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[reflection for January 31, 2008: The right approach to life is like water]]></title>
<link>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/?p=531</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/reflection-for-january-31-2008-the-right-approach-to-life-is-like-water/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8220;True will is participation in Divine Will. True awareness is participation in Divine Mind. Tr]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:240.7pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">"True will is participation in Divine Will. True awareness is participation in Divine Mind. True life is actually participation in Divine Life. We don't own them, we only participate.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:240.7pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">        If I am not the owner of will and consciousness, only a participant, then who am I?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:240.7pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">        The truth is that the self is the most elusive, most difficult to cognize. Why is this so? Because the self is that which is seeing. The eyes cannot see themselves."</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:240.7pt;"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:240.7pt;"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">- David Aaron (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Seeing-God-Changing-Lessons-Kabbalah/dp/0425183203/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1201653850&#38;sr=8-1" target="_blank"><i>Seeing God: Ten </i></a></span><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Seeing-God-Changing-Lessons-Kabbalah/dp/0425183203/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1201653850&#38;sr=8-1" target="_blank"><i><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Life-Changing Lessons of the Kabbalah</span></i></a><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.9pt;margin:29pt 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">………………………………………..</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.9pt;margin:29pt 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">The right approach to life is like water.</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.9pt;margin:29pt 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.9pt;margin:0.45pt 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Water is everywhere and exists in all places.</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.9pt;margin:0.45pt 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.9pt;margin:0.45pt 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.45pt;margin:2.4pt 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">It flows even in places that men reject.</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.45pt;margin:2.4pt 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.7pt;margin:0.05in 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">That is why the sage approximates Tao.</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.7pt;margin:0.05in 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.4pt;margin:1.4pt 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">He dwells in the right place. His heart is as deep as an abyss. His love is perfect. He abides in the truth and he does the truth. Destined to govern, he maintains order. He performs his actions well, and acts at the right time.</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.4pt;margin:1.4pt 240.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:240.7pt;line-height:14.6pt;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Since he does not quarrel or contend with others, there is no guilt in him. </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:240.7pt;line-height:14.6pt;"><i><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:240.7pt;line-height:14.6pt;"><i><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">--Tao Te Ching (chapter 8, </span></i><i><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Rijckenborgh and Petri,)</span></i><span style="font-size:24pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:240.7pt;line-height:14.6pt;"><span style="font-size:24pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:240.7pt;line-height:14.6pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">One can see why chapter eight of the Tao Te Ching compares the way of life to be followed by the liberation seeking personality with water. Water is a sublime, universal symbol of the power-radiations of the new life. Just as the ordinary human being lives and moves in the electro- magnetic radiation-field of dialectics, so the pupil who, through the sacrifice of the self, has established a liberating link with the spirit of the valley, the God in him, will enter and live in the new electromagnetic radiation-field. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.65pt;margin:29pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">This is the true, living water, which is poured out over him , and fills every corner of his existence. In this stream of new power he becomes a new creation, a new creature. He under- </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.65pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">goes a new Genesis, a new beginning. This process can be compared with the first Genesis, when the spirit of God moved over the face of the waters and created a firmament in their midst, for when the living water is poured out over the he, too, gains a new firmament. It is the new lipika, a new magnetic system which imparts to him a quite new and different personality-consciousness. He is again ensouled by his only God, who works for his salvation. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.65pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.15pt;margin:1.65pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">If we shift our attention from the individual, microcosmic level to the level of the cosmos and macrocosm, we can see that the same concepts must apply there, too. For obviously, the God in us, the true, divine human being, the source of true life in the heart sanctuary, does not live in isolation from other human Gods. Just as the earthly human being experiences and is conscious in the nature of death, so, by the law of analogy, the divine human being must exist in a nature of life, a quite different, divine universe. The life-substance, the radiation substance of that divine universe is living water, the pure, primordial substance.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.15pt;margin:1.65pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:14.6pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">This divine universe, this divine primordial substance, is not separated from us by time or distance; it is here and now, interpenetrating everything, nearer than hands and feet. The water is everywhere, and there is no place where it is not. It is even in places scorned by man. The sage knows this, and that is what makes him say, in the words of Psalm 139: </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:14.6pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:14.6pt;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">If I ascend to heaven, thou art there! </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.7pt;margin:15.6pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">If I descend into the realm of the dead, thou art there!</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12.7pt;margin:15.6pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.4pt;margin:1.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">If I take the wings of the morning and go and dwell in the </span></i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">thirst. That thirst is yearn <i>uttermost parts of the sea, even there thy hand shall lead me, and thy right hand shall hold me. </i></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.4pt;margin:1.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.15pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">If I say: 'Let darkness cover me', the night shall be a light about me </span></i><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">" <i>even the darkness is not dark to thee. The night is bright as the day, for darkness is as light with thee. </i></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.15pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.15pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">--<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Chinese-Gnosis-Catharose-Petri/dp/9067321834/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1201653955&#38;sr=1-1" target="_blank">The Chinese Gnosis</a> (Rijckenborgh and Petri, a Gnostic Rosicrucian commentary on the Tao Te Ching)</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.15pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">……………………………………………….</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.15pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><i><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.15pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">The highest good is like water; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:12pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Water is good at benefiting the ten thousand things <span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:5.75pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:5.75pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">and yet It does not </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:5.75pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:5.75pt;margin:0.2pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">compete with them.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:5.25pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Arial Narrow','sans-serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:13.65pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">It dwells in places the masses of people detest,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:13.65pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Therefore it is close to the Way.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:13.65pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:13.65pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">In dwelling, the good thing is the land; <span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:13.65pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">In the mind, the good thing is depth; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:168.7pt;line-height:13.65pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">In giving, the good thing is being like Heaven; <span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:1.4pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">In speaking, the good thing is sincerity;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:1.4pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:1.4pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">In governing, the good thing is order; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:1.4pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:1.4pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">In affairs, the good thing is ability; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:0.95pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:0.95pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">In activity, the good thing is timeliness. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:8.6pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">It is only because it does not compete, that therefore it </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:8.6pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">is without fault. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:12pt;margin:8.6pt 168.7pt 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">--<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Te-Tao-Ching-Modern-Library-Lao-Tzu/dp/0679600604/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1201654013&#38;sr=1-13" target="_blank">Tao Te Ching</a> (chap 8, trans. By Robert G Henricks)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[reflection for January 30, 2008: Polarity]]></title>
<link>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/?p=530</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/reflection-for-january-30-2008-polarity/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ 
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Polarity&#8230;.
left is right, right is left.
The key to polarity is to realize th]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0 1.5in 12pt 0;"> <a href="http://magdelene.wordpress.com/files/2008/01/800px-janus-vatican.jpg" title="800px-janus-vatican.jpg"><img src="http://magdelene.wordpress.com/files/2008/01/800px-janus-vatican.jpg" alt="800px-janus-vatican.jpg" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0 1.5in 12pt 0;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0 1.5in 12pt 0;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0 1.5in 12pt 0;"><span>Polarity....</span></p>
<p>left is right, right is left.</p>
<p>The key to polarity is to realize that opposites are the same thing.  A Kaplan explains this well early on in his version of the safer yetzirah.</p>
<p>Opposites if stretched out forever...will bend in upon themselves and meet.</p>
<p>However beyond opposites is the 3rd...</p>
<p>The sperm and the egg form a zygote<br />
a chemical wedding...marriage of opposites to create a 3rd</p>
<p>Thus a child is of the mother and the father, both and yet neither.<br />
Thus Christ is of the father and the world (the mother), both, and yet neither<br />
The line (father) and the circle (mother) when joined form the serpent (child), which is the circle and the line, yet neither.</p>
<p>the end is in the beginning, kether is in malkuth, kether is closer to malkuth than it is to chockmah.<br />
When united, there is no kether or malkuth.........there just is</p>
<p>"Tarry a little; there is something else. This bond doth give thee here no jot of blood; The words expressly are 'a pound of flesh:' Take then thy bond, take thou thy pound of flesh; But, in the cutting it, if thou dost shed one drop of Christian blood, thy lands and goods are, by the laws of Venice, confiscate unto the state of Venice.</p>
<p>Therefore prepare thee to cut off the flesh. Shed thou no blood, nor cut thou less nor more but just a pound of flesh: if thou cut'st more or less than a just pound, be it but so much as makes it light or heavy in the substance, or the division of the twentieth part of one poor scruple, nay, if the scale do turn but in the estimation of a hair, thou diest and all thy goods are confiscate."</p>
<p>--the merchant of venice, the bard</p>
<p>So we see, nothing exists in isolation.  Blood is inseparable from flesh. Good is inseparable from evil.</p>
<p>"Light and Darkness, life and death, right and left, are brothers of one another. They are inseparable. Because of this neither are the good good, nor evil evil, nor is life life, nor death death. For this reason each one will dissolve into its earliest origin. But those who are exalted above the world are indissoluble, eternal."</p>
<p>--gospel of Philip</p>
<p>good is not good, evil is not evil.  Christ is not the father or the mother.</p>
<p>This is dualism.....</p>
<p>OM...</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;"><b><span>He who has known that all beings have become one with his own self, and he who has seen the oneness of existence, what sorrow and what delusion can overwhelm him?</span></b><span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;"><b><span>He has occupied all. He is radiant,  without body (incorporeal), without injury, without muscles, pure, untouched by evil. He is the seer, thinker, all pervading, self-existent, has distributed various objects, through endless years,  each according to it's inherent  nature. </span></b><span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;"><span>--Isa Upanishad</span></p>
<p>of course concepts are concepts. Concepts by their very nature are inherently wrong.  The Tao that can be spoken of is not the Tao.  But concepts "help", the greatest thing you can say is however, to remain silent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[He who sees himself only on the outside]]></title>
<link>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/he-who-sees-himself-only-on-the-outside/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/he-who-sees-himself-only-on-the-outside/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I am the Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.
 
–Revelation 22:13
A]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0.1in;text-align:justify;"><b><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:Garamond;letter-spacing:-0.25pt;">I am the Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0.1in;text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:Garamond;letter-spacing:-0.25pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0.1in;text-align:justify;"><span style="font-family:Garamond;letter-spacing:-0.25pt;">–Revelation 22:13</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0.25in 0 0.0001pt 0.15in;"><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;">Actually, the ground of everything is within me and it is </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">God, and it’s within everybody too. And there’s one ground for</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">everybody, and this ground in the Divine Mercy. . . . The peo</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;">­ple of the unveiling, that </span><span style="font-family:Garamond;">is </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;">to say the Sufis, ask the Mercy of God to subsist in them. These are the ones who ask in the </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">Name of God and He shows Mercy upon them only by making</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">the Mercy subsist in them. This is a totally different outlook. It</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">is the outlook whereby the Mercy of God is not arranged on the</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> outside in events for </span><span style="letter-spacing:1.75pt;">me-in</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> good and bad events-but it is </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">subsisting</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> </span><span style="font-family:Garamond;letter-spacing:-0.1pt;">in </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">me all the time. Therefore what happens is that if</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">the Mercy of God is subsisting in</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> </span><span style="letter-spacing:1.4pt;">me-and</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;"> that goes to say if I</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.35pt;">am united with the will of</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> </span><span style="letter-spacing:2.2pt;">God-</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.35pt;"> . . . if I am completely united</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> with the will of God in love, it doesn’t matter what happens </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">outside, because everything that is going on outside that makes</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> any sense is grounded in the same ground in which I am grounded. The opposition between me and everything else </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">ceases, and what remains in terms of opposition is purely acci</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;">­</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">dental and it doesn’t matter. And this is . . . a basic perspective</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> </span><span style="letter-spacing:0.3pt;">in all . . . the highest religions. You ought to get down to this,</span><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> you get down to it in Christianity, you get down to it in Buddhism, you get down to it in Hinduism, and so forth. It is arriving at a unity in which the superficial differences don’t matter. It doesn’t, mean that they’re not real, it doesn’t mean that they’re not there. They still subsist… .</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0.25in 0 0.0001pt 0.15in;"><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0.25in 0 0.0001pt 0.15in;"><span style="letter-spacing:0.4pt;">–Thomas Merton</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0.1in;text-align:justify;"><span style="font-family:Garamond;letter-spacing:-0.25pt;"><br />
</span></p>
<h2><a href="http://www.dpjs.co.uk/lefthandpath.html">1. <i>Left Hand Path</i> Practices in the West</a></h2>
<blockquote class="Q"><p><font size="4">"</font>Satanism is not a white light religion; it is a religion of the flesh, the mundane, the carnal - all of which are ruled by Satan, the personification of the Left Hand Path<font size="4">"</font></p>
<p class="Author"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0380015390/vexencrabtree" title="Buy from amazon.co.uk" target="_blank">The Satanic Bible</a>, Book Of Lucifer 3:paragraph 30</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Left Hand Path is solitary, individualistic, personal, based on <i>self</i> development, <i>self</i> analysis, <i>self</i> empowerment. Altruism is materialistically equated as long term selfishness. I think all forms of Satanism are considered Left Hand Path, even Devil Worship and inverse Christian-Satanists are Left Hand Path, although they are frequently considered deluded. Frequently called "evil" and "dark" by <a href="http://www.dpjs.co.uk/white.html">non Satanic religions</a>, the followers of the left hand path often have had to remain in the darkness or face severe persecution from the religions that ironically call themselves "good". This is testimony enough that the image of the purely "good" icons is a veneer; a non-truth.</p>
<p><b>Features of LHP philosophies frequently include:</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Emphasis on freethought, not dogma or strict systems.</li>
<li>Highly individualistic</li>
<li>A distinct rejection of absolutes and moralism</li>
<li>Personal, not universal.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Freethought, Individualism and moral relativism</b><br />
Left Hand Path philosophies all have an emphasis on freethought; not dogma or strict systems. The "rules" in LHP religions are frequently merely "guidelines". The same attitude it applied to all knowledge, including that of the knowledge of reality and morals. Subjectivism and relativism are almost universally assumed amongst followers of the left hand path.</p>
<p><b>Personal Belief, not Universal</b><br />
Left Hand Path philosophies do not claim that they are the best religion for all people and frequently claim they are only a valid religion for some people. "Satanists are born, not made" <sub><a href="http://www.dpjs.co.uk/people.html#Anton%20LaVey" title="Click for information about Anton LaVey">Anton LaVey</a></sub>. Satanism and the LHP is striking for the lack of missionizing. This is probably the result of the admission that no religion, philosophy or belief system is suitable for all people.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0.1in;text-align:justify;"><i><span style="font-family:Garamond;letter-spacing:-0.25pt;">“</span>Yes, I can see why the idea of free thought, individualism and moral relativism (which requires the effort to think for yourself before judging something right or wrong) may be a turn off for some people or why they just don't get it.  I hope that doesn't apply to you.”</i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&#160;</p>
<p>oh I get it, I understand it fully</p>
<p>at a fundamental level I think it is <span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;"><span style="background-attachment:scroll;">un</span></span></span>-Christ like though...</p>
<p>give and receive...vessels and light...<span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;"><span style="background-attachment:scroll;">kabbalah</span></span></span>, that is all there is.</p>
<p>I know many see the divine as a nice treasure chest to plunder...I don't.<br />
I think the "gimme gimme gimme" approach to life and the divine is childish.<br />
At a very real fundamental level it is rape to my mind, forcing the hand, taking the fruit before it is ripe</p>
<p>Agenda is agenda. Agenda is always wrong, as you are not following the true self, the "divine will"; <span> </span>I realize it is your path and that it embraces selfishness and sees that as divine will...to some extent.</p>
<p>However I will never agree to something that is fundamentally about the self, survival is one thing, taking and empowering at the expense of others is another</p>
<p>This is not meant to be an attack, it is just my view.</p>
<p>You wrote<br />
<i>" Self development?  Isn't that what spiritual training is supposed to offer?  Isn't this the point of alchemy?<br />
Self Analysis?  Aren't we supposed to learn about ourselves?  Don't we value the inward path?<br />
Self Empowerment?  Don't we prefer to be beings that have significance in the world of others or do we prefer to be<br />
ineffectual?"<br />
</i><br />
No it is Self development, not self development. In the east views generally speaking there is ONLY self. This is the root of one of the misunderstandings of the LHP since its inception. <span> </span>That self is NOT the self, it is THE SELF; or, GOD.  The self development of alchemy etc. is to grow the true self as Thomas Merton calls it. It really has nothing to do with the self at all.</p>
<p><b>The I before is I and WE, the I after is I, and only I as there is no WE.  And there is no <i>i</i>.</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>That is the fundamental point. Your view is like a man who opens a door..but refuses to enter. They are happy quickly going in, and running back out.  Having gotten something that they want it is time to stay outside the door.  This makes illusion more attractive, nicer, you are indeed self empowering.  But illusion is illusion.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Like a drug addict you have to carry on taking more drugs to keep that high. That is of course part of where other people come in; little fish feed on big fish at a very real physical and spiritual level. Exploitation. There is someone at the top of the pyramid, sat back laughing, gaining all the power.</p>
<p>Just as the Buddha gained many great powers along the way, he also rejected them all.  For trinkets and power is not what it is about. That is the temptation of Christ by Satan in the desert.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> So no, I would say spiritual training has nothing to do with self development, no matter how many paper bags you put over your head to "look nice", you are still wearing a paper bag...  This goes for knowing yourself also, knowing yourself is NOT KNOWING YOURSELF.  This is fundamental basic thing.<br />
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--><br />
<!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:2in;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:2in;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:2in;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">“He who sees himself only on the outside, </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:2in;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">not within, becomes small himself and makes others small.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:2in;">–Mani (<span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;"><span style="background-attachment:scroll;">turfan</span></span></span> fragment M 801)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt;"> Power and influence, again this is a false notion.  God is the only Rabbi as the Jewish proverb goes.  Only God has power. Mankind may think he can build a dam and conquer nature, but he is fooling himself.  Power is for the weak.  Power in its "correct" application is about serving and sacrifice.  Agenda is agenda, and again is un-Christ like.</p>
<p>You said</p>
<p>"<i>Emphasis on free thought, not dogma or strict systems?  What's wrong with respecting members to be conscious and<br />
sentient adults who are capable of thinking  for themselves and deciding what is the right or wrong course of action<br />
instead of slavish devotion to some ancient text or the words of some "authority figure"? </i>"</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with free thought. But often it becomes childish. Too often people seek the mysteries, spirituality etc etc out of rebellion.<br />
Free thought is good, rebellion is good it helps grow new branches, new plants, where none would have grown.  However it soon devolves into as what James Dean said "What you got?" Until the point is reached when all you are doing is rebelling.  You gain a new uniform, a new prison.  Your prison becomes that of the "rebel", the "free thinker"</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1in;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">The fruitfulness of our life depends in large measure on our ability to doubt our own words and to question the value of our own work. The man who completely trusts his own estimate of himself is doomed to sterility. All he asks of any act he performs is that it be <i>his</i> act. If it is performed by him, it must be good. All words spoken by him must be infallible. The car he just bought is the best for its price, for no other reason that he is the one who has bought it. He seeks no other fruit than his, and therefore he generally gets no other.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1in;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">If we believe ourselves in part, we may be right about ourselves. If we are completely taken in by our own disguise, we cannot help being wrong.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1in;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1in;">–Thomas Merton</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We exchange one strait jacket for another.  Instead of embracing what is called the middle way. If we are rebelling we eventually miss the basic truth, the basic truth is we are all on the same boat. Spending your life preening and shouting "look at me, I am special, I think for myself, not like you" is great and dandy, but it really is childish. Like a teenager who dresses up as a punk or a Goth. Nihilism and solipsism only serve to embrace the self as opposed to the SELF.  Spiritual masturbation serves no purpose, it may feel good, and seem good..But again, like a drug addict you have to carry on doing it perpetually; or you are back to square one.</p>
<p>Instead there is another way...you open yourself to the wind and fly like a kite, like a kite that is unrestrained..guided by the wind...taken and changed and moved by what is.  Instead of fighting the wind and insisting that the wind does not exist.  Like the Shakespearean king....you can try to hold back the sea all you like, you are really fooling yourself.</p>
<p>You wrote<br />
<i><br />
" A distinct rejection of absolute moralism?  What is wrong with seeing that what may be considered right yesterday may not<br />
be right today (such as burning witches, jews, locking jews up in ghettos, killing in the name of religion, executing<br />
homosexuals, not giving women the same rights as men, etc.).  And what is wrong when thinking that what may be<br />
acceptable may not be so tomorrow and that there is a better way?  Is this "moral relativism" worse than the moral<br />
absolutism that created the atrocities mentioned above?<br />
Personal, not universal?  What is wrong with accepting that there are many paths to spiritual growth and development and<br />
that each person has a right to choose which is the best for them? </i>"</p>
<p>Now right and wrong are arguably subjective terms, yes I agree.  In Gnosticism (as you'll read below if you read it) there is no good and evil per se, there is more "levels of imperfection." So what are we to do when faced with good and evil, morals and dogmas? We have discernment.  Like a good parent would never hand a box of matches and gasoline to a child, we need to work out what is helpful and what is not.  For the LHP there is often stated the phrase "nothing is wrong, everything is permissible."  This is the mantra of Chaos magicians, as I am sure you know.  Well find and dandy, if we follow this logic, it means we should stick pencils in our ears and nose...after all it is not wrong, and ultimately will help in our spiritual development.  Clearly this is absurd.  Everything is permissible is nonsensical, an excuse for debauchery and to again bathe in temporary pleasures...back to taking drugs, again.</p>
<p>Your rejection is based upon the idea that absolute moralism=hatred.  This is untrue.  Anything taken to extremes and to an unswerving ascetic extreme is wrong.  Atrocities are atrocities, and are again about the individual not the group.  The individual hates the Jew and the homosexual.  The individual wants them gone, dead, removed.  These people are of the collective, the collective is the collective. By singling out the Jew, the witch, the homosexual...these acts are selfish. Suffer not a homosexual or Jew to live.</p>
<p>"The Jews are undoubtedly a race, but they are not human." --Adolf Hitler.</p>
<p>The act of purification, inquisition...again is serving a part of the collective, it is serving individuals.  NIMBY or "Not In My Back Yard" mentality.  "I do not mind homosexuals or blacks, as long as they don’t live near me."</p>
<p>In the end LHP becomes miniature acts of solipsism, misanthropy and nihilism.<br />
Solipsism is, well just plain "silly."  I have interacted with the non physical since I was child. Before I even knew what I was doing. So I reject solipsism.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nihilism is rejection, to take it to a tongue in cheek extreme; I would say the ultimate goal of nihilism is suicide. I would argue nihilism is suicide on a smaller lesser "vibration."</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Just as Nihilism is suicide, misanthropy is purely selfish. But that is the LHP, "selfishness and indulgence."  There really is nothing else to the LHP at a fundamental underlying basic level.  If Nihilism is suicide, then misanthropy in its embracing hatred of all mankind can only lead to one conclusion.  Misanthropy requires you to kill everyone, but yourself...in order that you are more and more self empowered.  Of course this never happens, but on a smaller level people try... Or as the rock star Marilyn Manson wrote "There's no time to discriminate, hate every motherf****** that gets in your way."</p>
<p>To conclude, this is what is wrong with the LHP, as you can see, I have indeed thought about this...for a very long time.  I really do like to think for myself.  But I am not afraid to admit and embrace knowledge, experience "energy" etc. that is far more wise, profound and simply BETTER than my self....as opposed to my SELF.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1in;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1in;">“To respect the personal aspect in man is to respect<br />
his solitude, his right to think for himself, his need<br />
to learn this, his need for love and acceptance by<br />
other persons like himself. Here we are in the realm<br />
of freedom and of friendship, of creativity and of<br />
love. And it is here that religion begins to have a<br />
meaning…”<br />
Thomas Merton, Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander, (N.<br />
Y: Doubleday, 1989) p 82.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1in;">Further (although flawed, but still interesting):</p>
<h2><span style="font-weight:normal;"><a href="http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/true-self-and-gay-spirituality/" title="“TRUE SELF” AND GAY SPIRITUALITY">“TRUE SELF” AND GAY SPIRITUALITY</a></span></h2>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1in;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">Dear Friends,</span></p>
<p>I am posting my response to a question in our Yahoo chat room about</p>
<p>the meaning of the term “archon.” I hope this very brief discussion</p>
<p>may interest you in finding more about the subject, perhaps in the</p>
<p>Nag <span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">Hammadi</span></span></span> text “Hypostasis of the <span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">Archons</span></span></span>.”</p>
<p>I will be posting a brief discussion before the end of the week in</p>
<p>combination with this one — What is an “Aeon”?</p>
<p>-Matthew</p>
<p>Here is the <span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">archon</span></span></span> discussion:</p>
<p>An <span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">archon</span></span></span>, sometimes translated as a “power,” is a spiritual entity</p>
<p>or force that serves the <span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">demiurge</span></span></span>, the creator of the physical</p>
<p>world. To be really crude about it you could say they are bad</p>
<p>angels, but it is a lot more complicated than that.. just consider</p>
<p>them the forces that define and limit physical existence.</p>
<p>One of the Nag <span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">Hammadi</span></span></span> texts is called the “Hypostasis of the</p>
<p><span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">Archons</span></span></span>,” and has a mythological discussion of their nature.</p>
<p>You know how in Christian mythology there are some beings</p>
<p>called “archangels?” That is borrowed from this same <span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">greek</span></span></span> word,</p>
<p>meaning “ruler..” so an arch-angel is an angel that is really</p>
<p>powerful and rules over the others, whereas in Gnosticism the</p>
<p><span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">archons</span></span></span> are the “rulers of this world,” the princes of the world</p>
<p>that Christ referred to, for example, in the story of Christ being</p>
<p>tempted in the desert. The tempter shows him the world and promises</p>
<p>to give him the “principalities of the world” if he will bow down in</p>
<p>homage…and we would interpret those principalities as the realms</p>
<p>of the <span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">archons</span></span></span>, so to speak.</p>
<p>The thing I should caution you against is thinking that they</p>
<p>are “demons” or something like that… there are no demons or devils</p>
<p>per <span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">se</span></span></span> in Gnosticism, because ultimately there is no metaphysical</p>
<p>category of “evil,” just various forms of imperfection. The</p>
<p><span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">demiurge</span></span></span> is in some way the full realization of imperfection, just</p>
<p>as God is of perfection. The <span style="background-attachment:scroll;"><span class="goog-spellcheck-word"><span style="background:yellow none repeat scroll 0 50%;">demiurge</span></span></span> personifies and draws within</p>
<p>himself the ultimate manifestations of physical form, limitation,</p>
<p>physical space, time, as well as the dimensions of space-time, as</p>
<p>well as natural laws and natural processes that govern the physical</p>
<p>world — including the law that everything that lives must die.</p>
<p>+Matthew</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&#160;</p>
<p>................</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> --<br />
Better than one thousand verses<br />
Where no profit wings the word,<br />
Is one solitary stanza<br />
Bringing peace of mind when heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Meditation instructions Nov 2, 2007: Jewish Meditation]]></title>
<link>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2007/11/02/meditation-instructions-nov-1-2007-jewish-meditation/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2007/11/02/meditation-instructions-nov-1-2007-jewish-meditation/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Jewish Meditation
by
 
Alan Brill
 
Jewish spirituality encompasses a wide variety of experiences ge]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;text-align:center;line-height:normal;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size:24pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Jewish Meditation</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;line-height:normal;margin:0 1.5in 0.0001pt 0;" align="center"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">by</span><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;line-height:normal;margin:0 1.5in 0.0001pt 0;" align="center"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;line-height:normal;margin:0 1.5in 0.0001pt 0;" align="center"><span style="font-size:18pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Alan Brill</span><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0 1.5in 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0 1.5in 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Jewish spirituality encompasses a wide variety of experiences generally associated with meditation. The traditional texts expect the pious: to visualize God's name continuously or constantly sense God's providence; to commit to daily and weekly sessions of self scrutiny and outpouring of the heart to God; to sense the inner meaning of the Sabbath and holidays; and to picture before prayer that one is standing before the Divine. Many of these techniques were not originally considered special meditations because they were intended for daily practice or were considered goals of ordinary Jewish piety.</span></p>
<p>In contrast, the Jewish meditation which I will discuss is a hierarchical ladder of internal states. It provides in its earliest stages a tether to still of the mind, providing relaxation, and the ability to calm emotions. This level is useful in enhancing intention in the ordinary practice of prayer and in continuously focusing on God's presence. In its higher stages, it leads to equanimity, freedom from emotions, and mind control; in modern terms it deals with creativity, pain, sickness, and trauma. Jewish meditation gives a sense of the Divine energies present in prayer, study, and performing the commandments. This level gives a sense of well being, wholeness. balance, and compassion. The next level is the development of an internal life in which one plays out contemplative dramas in order to enter the Divine. The highest levels are those of an influx of the Divine and prophetic inspiration.</p>
<p>Everyone is suited for Jewish meditation; however he/she needs to find the right teacher and techniques. Some people use their intellect, while others seek a path of the heart. Some need an active path engaged in this world, while others are otherworldly contemplatives. Those with a strong sense of sensory imagination will find the earthy images in the approach of the Piesetzna appealing while those with a scrupulous will can turn towards the introspection in the Mussar movement. Techniques for the Jewish meditation include: intellectual contemplation, visualizations, stillness exercises, imagination meditations, loving kindness meditations and mantras. There are focused meditations, free-form meditations within daily life, and meditations reserved for prayer.</p>
<p>In order to pray with intention, there is a spectrum of techniques from simple focus of the mind on the God's glory (<em>Kavod</em>) to the complex Lurianic <em>kavvanot</em>. Most medieval legal commentators, especially those influenced by philosophy, including Maimonides, Nahmanides, and the students of R. Yonah of Gerona, assume that a person needs a meditative intention in prayer. These are not isolated opinions but are the codified legal requirements for prayer as found in the Tur, the accepted 15th century codification of Jewish Law. Therefore, one of the first goals of a Jewish meditative practice is to have a consciousness of God's glory when one sits down to pray. The Shema has meditative intentions (<em>kavanot</em>) to help one sense the absoluteness of God's kingship and unity. The silent <em>Amidah</em>, according to the Kabbalists, requires before starting an ascent and a binding with the higher will. Afterwards, one makes petitions and senses the divine presence by channeling the energy downward. Falling on one's face (<em>Nefilat Apayim-Tahanun</em>) allows one to descend with the energy and offer up the self to God.</p>
<p>In addition to these required meditations, the <em>Zohar</em>, R. Moses de Leon, and R. Joseph Gikkatila have meditations on Divine lights and names in a variety of spatial configurations allowing an ascent into the higher realms of divinity. There is a lower level of Divinity immanent and embodied in this world receiving its light from above, as light shines into a prism. There is a higher realm of blue (or green, purple, and red) light that is God's manifestation and power. And finally, there is an infinite realm of brilliant shining light that is the source of all light, energy and power. One is to slowly ascend to the infinite realm by creating the needed spatial map of the Divine. In order to successfully work with this map, one works on giving it clarity, breath, and depth and on creating secure mental ladders and safety nets. Then one can bind oneself in emotion, will, and intellect to this infinite light and it will bind its infinite emotion, will, and intellect to the meditator. One slowly descends and brings the infinite light down into the blue light letting it grow and give energy, Then it cascades into the prism, into one's mind and visualization of the Divine name and into one's body and room. One has to make sure that it is channelled slowly and safely to avoid feelings of being overwhelmed. Medieval Kabbalists used this meditation during prayer, ascending before the silent <em>Amidah</em>. There are many variants of this meditation using a candle flame, regions of different colored lights, divine names, sefirot, or parts of the soul. They each provide a ladder of psychic development which inversely parallels a ladder of God's manifestation.</p>
<p>Maimonides presents the path for entering this hierarchy in his <em>Mishneh Torah</em> as the path of prophecy, but alludes to it in his discussions of prayer and the true method of worship. One is to have a breath and depth of knowledge, moral virtues, and complete control of one's desires. Then one contemplates the higher realms and trains one's mind not to have any distractions, and to be always focused on the celestial forms. This is a transformative process in which the practitioner becomes holy and angelic. While this discussion concerns the prophet, in the <em>Guide to the Perplexed</em> he shows that it applies to anyone who wishes to serve God truly. Many Kabbalists worked with this framework. Among the Kabbalists in Safed, there is a connection between mastering the techniques in the pietistic literature which consists of mediation techniques to achieve these spiritual ends, and the employment of the advanced techniques of contemplating Divine names or colors. The method of Maimonides was continued by many segments of the Hasidic tradition in requiring a contemplative approach to prayer. While, the Kabbalistic tradition of meditating on Divine lights and names both during and outside of prayer was carried forward into later centuries which created a complex contemplative tradition. R. Hayim of Volozhin in his <em>Nefesh ha-Hayyim</em> expects his readers during prayer to still the mind from thoughts and emotions, to visualize the Divine name and letters of the prayer, and for those on a high level, to perform the Lurianic Kavvanot.</p>
<p>When I teach meditation the first sessions are not on the Kabbalistic material, but on the basic skills that allow one to succeed in meditation. The first class is on how to sit properly, relax the body, and slow down one's busy mind. One needs to learn how to tether the mind and focus. I introduce meditation on the Divine name, consisting of visualization of the tetragrammaton, as a means of giving the mind a focus. We work on developing a clear image in the mind and learning to control it. I tell the class that this image will be developed in later classes to the point of basic <span> </span><em>yihudim</em> and as the base of ascent into the inner Divine lights. Essential for meditation is to learn how to let go of distractions and to gently let them flow away. I explain how difficult emotions which distract during meditation need slowly over a course of time to be confronted, worked through, and only then can one let go of the hurt. The traditional pietistic works, such as Bahye Ibn Pakuda's <em>Hovot HaLevavot</em> or Moses Hayim Luzzato's <em>Mesillat Yesharim</em>, which are usually read only for their moralistic content, give many directions on releasing emotions. These basic steps take months of practice to perform properly and I suggest taking one's early steps in meditation outside of formal prayer.</p>
<p>The second level is to try various techniques of Jewish meditation and to develop the needed internal framework for actually using these methods. We do a simplified versions of the ascent called <em>The Gate of Intention of the Early Kabbalists</em>, and the light meditations in the <em>Zohar</em>. These give the ability to develop a spatial hierarchy in the mind from the visualization of the divine name in the mind to the <em>Kavod</em> above, and from there to God's manifestation as the divine name, and the to the infinite recess of the <em>Eyn Sof</em>. We discuss colors, shapes, lights, bringing the Divine energy down and how to avoid other unwanted images which come to mind. We grapple with the reorientation away from the popular modern image of God to a Jewish view of God as a source of energy, and as a hierarchy of divinity. This hierarchal model once mastered allows further growth through other techniques.</p>
<p>The third level is an introduction to hasidic techniques of sensing the Divinity immanent in the world. We work on stillness, emptying the mind, and selflessness in order to quiet the mind further and gain openness to the world around us. Worship through corporeality in acts of eating or the routine of everyday life allows the sense of the Divine gained in the ascent meditations to be embodied in this world. Originally, Jewish meditation techniques were elite and qualitatively monastic. Hasidism, especially R. Shalom Baer and R. Yosef Yitzhak of Habad and R. Kalonymous Kalman of Piesetzna adapted or grappled with adapting many spiritual practices for common use. Their approaches help those still having problems in meditation practice overcome and deepen the sense of the divine in daily life.</p>
<p>I do not start with the hasidic approaches because I find that they are self contained. The Kabbalistic techniques need to be brought down into this world, but the worldly techniques do not need to ascend. The Hasidic approaches work well on the emotions, but, they do not train or anchor the mind. Once one uses the emotions as a mental anchor, then visualizing the Divine name seems unnecessary. While the advanced Habad techniques can accomplish the same higher levels as the intellectual visualizations, I have found greater success and user-friendliness in the medieval techniques. Personally, I also found that the formal Jewish prayers seemed redundant or reduced to a mantra when following a Hasidic approach. There was greater oneness in meditation before prayer than during prayer, and when there was a sense of oneness during prayer there was no anchor back to the prayer act. I instruct my class to practice prayer in both Hasidic and non-Hasidic ways. In the Hasidic way, one does the opening <em>Psalms</em> slowly and builds up to an emotional crescendo in the silent <em>Amidah</em>. In the non-Hasidic approach, one does the opening <em>Psalms</em> emotionally and quickly, and slows down to an intellectual contemplative silent <em>amidah</em>. Students differ in which approach overall works for them and whether to use to the other approach also.</p>
<p>Finally, we start with the basic techniques found in Kabbalistic works. It takes months of practice to reach the level which allows one to start performing the Lurianic techniques properly. We learn to combine various forms of the Divine name and use them for ascents to channel the Divine energy. While the approach of visualization on the lights continued into later centuries, the sixteenth century Kabbalists predominantly tended to replace the lights in the Divine hierarchy with Divine names. For many, the Lurianic intentions on Divine names seen baroque and unnecessary at first, but, after experience in the interior castles of the mind, they become a form of active imagination of the Divine energy. Their performance contains many acts and routines as in an epic mythic play. The transformative drama of unifying names, contemplating scriptural verses, and alternating ascents with descents releases much energy. They can also be simplified or single instructions can be used out of context in the same way as acting out only one scene of a play or reciting a soliloquy out of context.</p>
<p>For those who feel that there is to much emphasis on metaphysical structures and filling the mind, we ultimately, do meditations on dissolving the Kabbalistic structures through focusing on the nothingness. The nothingness obliquely alluded to in Aryeh Kaplan's writings is a process of meditating on the space behind the Kabbalistic structures. It causes the fullness to fade away while leaving the path directing one to the infinite. One is left with the simultaneous Kabbalistic fullness and an emptiness of pure expanse.</p>
<p>The first obstacle to meditation is the cultural bias of the enlightenment and Protestant theology against meditation. In order to enter the modern world, the experiential traditions were rejected. Jewish philosophy and <em>halakhah</em> were read by the nineteenth century as abstract enlightenment knowledge, and traditional Jewish philosophic views on God, prophecy, providence, and eschatology were converted in modern scholarship from an ineffable Platonic encounter with the infinite Divine to a limiting negative knowledge or a supernatural theism. I find particularly vivid the account of this process in <em>The Sins of My Youth</em> of the <em>Haskalah</em> writer Moses Leib Lillenblum who on <em>Rosh Hashanah</em> 1861 during his meditation on the Divine name and his tremendous religious ecstasy started to question everything. His story shows how recently these techniques were still part of the accepted tradition. And despite his ability to achieve high religious levels, his meditative practice could not withstand modernity. He, like so many others, rejected meditative practice as worthless to the modern Jew. Modernity changed prayer from a mediative theurgic act into a communal service.</p>
<p>A second major obstacle is that most western Jews have trouble sitting still and releasing their tension. When I first started teaching meditation to my <em>Talmud</em> class and other groups that did not come to me to learn how to meditate, I discovered that most of the participants could not sit still, or not worry about their busy schedules or slow down their bodies. Even worse was that many would start complaining about their back and neck pains, have emotional pits in their stomachs, scrunch their eyes tight, contort their bodies or have various psychosomatic pains. This was something of a surprise to me because traditional Kabbalists and the various American and Israeli academics and <em>yeshiva</em> students attracted to meditation are able to sit still. I realized that most of those I met who are attracted to meditation are already a self selected group of those able to intellectually focus on one point, lead non pressured lives, and have a natural ability to use at least one technique of meditation. Therefore, in order to bring back the advanced levels of the tradition, I realized that I would have to cull the various statements of advice and direction from pietistic literature on how to start practicing. My only (conscious) modification of the tradition was to start the first class with everyone relaxing their bodies as done in a pain reduction or birthing class. These introductions became the first topics in my classes and afterwards I could proceed with the actual techniques of attaining Divine presence.</p>
<p>The third obstacle is the need to still the emotions and attain equanimity.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0 1.5in 5pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">A sage once came to one of the Meditators (Mitbodedim) and asked that he be accepted into their society.</span></p>
<p>The other replied, "My son, blessed are you to God. Your intentions are good. But tell me, have you attained equanimity or not?"</p>
<p>The sage said, "Master, explain your words."</p>
<p>The Meditator said, "If one man is praising you and another is insulting you, are the two equal in your eyes or not?"</p>
<p>He replied, "No my master. I have pleasure from those who praise me and pain from those who degrade me. But I do not take revenge or bear a grudge."</p>
<p>The other said, "Go in peace my son. You have not attained equanimity...You are not prepared for your thoughts to bound on high, that you should come and meditate (<em>hitboded</em>). Go and increase the humbleness of your heart, and learn to treat everything equally until you have become tranquil (<em>hishtavut</em>). Only then will you be able to meditate. (Aryeh Kaplan, <em>Meditation and the Kabbalah</em> 143).</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0 1.5in 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Aryeh Kaplan produced great introductions to the world of Jewish meditation, but, he was negligent in leaving out the basic steps in meditation. A reader of Kaplan's works would enter the meditative realm with too much self concern and personal desire. Basic steps are needed to allow one to work on the visualization techniques without the distraction of thoughts and emotions. These basic steps also provide the release of the tension and emotions to prevent the anxiety, depression, and other forms of potential psychic harm from these techniques. One would burn up in self-effacement or self- delusion if one used the advanced techniques in Kaplan's books without preparation. The Kabbalistic techniques done by themselves increase both physical and emotional tension. R. Hayyim Vital had a horrible reaction the first time R. Isaac Luria gave him a <em>yihud</em> to perform. One needs to confront one's emotions, pains, and traumas before one starts the advanced Kabbalistic techniques. Blocking pain and distracting thoughts or the Hasidic technique of raising them to their source is a slow and gradual process.</span></p>
<p>A third obstacle is knowing one's limit in order not to attempt more than one is ready to handle, and the need for regular practice in order to integrate meditation into ordinary religious life. Maimonides suggests to start one's meditative practice by having intention during <em>Shema</em> and then after several years to proceed to further advances in practice. Lurianic meditations and many other techniques take years of practice, piece by piece, in order to work successfully. One has to start slowly and integrate one or two lines of instruction at a time. In one's mind, one needs to learn slowly to stabilize the images and avoid distractions of even the alluring visions (unless one is doing Kabbalistic creativity and dream work). One also needs to beware of self-destructive plunges into an annihilating nothingness. The goal of meditation is a mature growth of selflessness and wholeness, not a dissolution of one's consciousness.</p>
<p>Integration of meditation in one's daily life involves assessing one's schedule and lifestyle and determining how to devote time daily to meditative practice. The week needs to become sacred time in which time is set aside either on Thursday night and/or on Friday for a week review and for meditating on the oncoming Sabbath; Saturday night is needed to channel the Sabbath into the week. A two hour welcoming the Sabbath service on Friday evening using various techniques of meditation and contemplative reading in addition to prayer transforms the Sabbath into an actual influx of the extra soul. Before the holidays, a similar process is needed to sense the presence of that holiday.</p>
<p>Ultimately, integration of meditation in one's daily life involves overcoming the dualities between meditation and not meditating. R. Zadok HaKohen of Lublin describes religious life as a process of growth along a sliding scale in which one integrates ever greater parts of consciousness towards Divine knowledge and unity. Yesterday's knowledge of God when one was first starting to meditate is today's distractions and inability to focus. A spiritual Sabbath on one level is considered a non-spiritual Sabbath on a higher level. Temporarily, one cannot actively jump above one's level because when one looks at the whole person the true level is revealed. One's dreams and unconscious desires, according to R. Zadok, always reveal ones actual mental preoccupations. Therefore, focused concentration is only one part of attaining continuous consciousness of God. One's entire life should be directed toward slowly becoming filled with the oneness of the Divine.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;line-height:normal;margin:0 1.5in 0.0001pt 0;" align="center"><span style="font-size:24pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"></span></p>
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%" />
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0 1.5in 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Excerpt from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Meditation-Heart-Judaism-Practices-Techniques/dp/1580230490/ref=sr_1_1/103-0617387-8699814?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1193936159&#38;sr=8-1"><em>Meditation from the Heart of Judaism: Today's Teachers Share their Practices, Techniques and Faith</em></a> ©1997 Avram Davis. (Woodstock, VT, Jewish Lights Publishing) For ordering info visit <a href="http://www.jewishlights.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color:blue;">http://www.jewishlights.com</span></a>.</span><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;">&#160;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:1.5in;"><span style="line-height:115%;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"><a href="http://www.ehow.com/how_2031433_practice-jewish-meditation.html">Further Actual techniques</a><br />
</span><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Reflection for November 1, 2007:all things must pass]]></title>
<link>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/reflection-for-november-1-2007all-things-must-pass/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/reflection-for-november-1-2007all-things-must-pass/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8220;For every human there is a
quest to find the answer to why
am I here, who am I, where did I
c]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:115%;">"For every human there is a<br />
quest to find the answer to why<br />
am I here, who am I, where did I<br />
come from, where am I going.<br />
For me that became the most<br />
important thing in my life,<br />
everything else is secondary."</span></p>
<p>-- George Harrison (1943-2001))</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">…………………….</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:115%;">Sunrise doesn't last all morning<br />
A cloudburst doesn't last all day<br />
Seems my love is up and has left you with no warning<br />
It's not always going to be this grey</p>
<p>All things must pass<br />
All things must pass away</p>
<p>Sunset doesn't last all evening<br />
A mind can blow those clouds away<br />
After all this, my love is up and must be leaving<br />
It's not always going to be this grey</p>
<p>All things must pass<br />
All things must pass away<br />
All things must pass<br />
None of life's strings can last<br />
So, I must be on my way<br />
And face another day</p>
<p>Now the darkness only stays the night-time<br />
In the morning it will fade away<br />
Daylight is good at arriving at the right time<br />
It's not always going to be this grey</p>
<p>All things must pass<br />
All things must pass away<br />
All things must pass<br />
All things must pass away</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:115%;">……………………..</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">I am without form,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">without limit.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Beyond space, beyond time,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">I am in everything,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">everything is me.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">I am the bliss of the Universe.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Everything am I.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">--Ram Tirtha</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:115%;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/vm_N3bjqlr4'></param><param name='wmode' value='transparent'></param><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/vm_N3bjqlr4&rel=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='transparent' width='425' height='350'></embed></object></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Reflection for September 22, 2007: emptiness]]></title>
<link>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/reflection-for-september-22-2007-emptiness/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/reflection-for-september-22-2007-emptiness/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In the name of the Living Ones!
Living waters shone forth in the splendor of their Shekinah.
The rob]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="4"><span style="font-style:italic;">In the name of the Living Ones!</span><br />
Living waters shone forth in the splendor of their Shekinah.<br />
The robes of the good were resplendent in their place.<br />
The great Mana was dazzingly bright in his glory.<br />
So too shall these living, brightly shining, steadfast and vigorous souls shine in splendor in the great Place of Light and the Ever lasting Abode.</font></p>
<p><font size="4">--ancient aramaic prayer</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0 2in 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">"Kabbalah teaches that before and after any manifestation, there is emptiness, before and after any being, there is emptiness. Try this principal truth by listening to your own breathing: before inhalation, there is emptiness in your lungs, after exhalation, there is also emptiness in your lungs. Remember the name of God? <em>Ehyeh asher Ehyeh</em> - the sound of your breath, the sound of emptiness. <em>Ayn Sof</em> is the quality of <em>Keter</em>, the Crown and first <em>sefira</em>. <em>Ayn Sof</em> is the emptiness from which all things are born and to which all things return. <em>Ayn Sof</em> is the beginning and end of everything. It is thus the primordial ground of being into which the roots of the Tree of Life are sunk, roots buried in emptiness, because everything that <em>is</em> must go through the cycle of the ten <em>sefirot</em> before returning to emptiness. <em>Ayn Sof</em> is what comes before everything else, and it is generally drawn at the head of the Tree, a stand alone <em>sefira</em> from which all manifestation flows.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0 2in 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">        Emptiness, the energy of the Crown <em>sefira</em>, is not a static, gray, and dull place of death. Think of this emptiness as the most fertile ground. Think of the empty darkness of a woman's womb before impregnation. Think of the darkest night of the year, deep in winter, before the light increases to lead the natural cycle to the fullness and ripeness of spring. Think of the quiet, still place you reach in meditation, before your soul starts speaking to you and revealing the mysteries of the universe. This emptiness is eternal, outside boundaries of time, space, and events.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;margin:0 2in 0.0001pt 0;"><span style="font-size:14pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">        Emptiness is what lies behind you, past events in your life that are but memories, but fragrances of flowers bloomed and faded. Emptiness is what lies before you, future events not yet known, lands yet to be explored. Emptiness is the present, it is you right now."</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">- Avram Davis &#38; Manuela Dunn Mascetti (</span><em><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">Judaic Mysticism</span></em><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';">)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman','serif';"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ain Sof]]></title>
<link>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/ain-sof/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://magdelene.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/ain-sof/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Thank  you to jacobus Swart for compiling this:
Kabbalistic Concepts:
&nbsp;
Ain Sof
(also Ein Sof]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank  you to jacobus Swart for compiling this:</p>
<p align="center"><font size="5">Kabbalistic Concepts:</font></p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="center"><font size="5"><span class="st">Ain</span> Sof</font></p>
<p align="center">(also <em>Ein Sof</em>; <em>En Sof</em>; <em>Ayn Soph</em>; etc.)</p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="center"><font size="5">Part 1</font></p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="center"><strong>a. "The Mystic Quest" by David S. Ariel</strong></p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"> "The Kabbalists introduced a distinction between the hidden and revealed aspects of God. The hidden, infinite aspect of God is called <em>Eyn Sof</em> (without end). This name came to be understood as the proper name for the hidden aspect of God: <em>The Infinite</em>. It only suggest that God exists without implying anything about His character. In fact, according to the Kabbalists, God should be referred to as <em>It</em> rather than <em>He</em>, although there is no neuter gender in the Hebrew language. Because of the great sublimity and transcendence of God, no name at all can be applied to <em>It</em>. The term <em>Eyn-Sof</em> only conveys that God is unlike anything we know. According to these mystics, <em>Eyn Sof</em> is not the object of prayers, since <em>Eyn Sof</em> has no relationship with His creatures.....</font><font size="2"><em>Eyn Sof</em>.....is absolutely impersonal and beyond all characterization. All that can be said about this God is that He is above everything and is called <em>Eyn Sof</em>.</font></p>
<p align="left">&#160;</p>
<p align="center"><strong>b. "Innerspace" by Aryeh Kaplan<!-- D(["mb","\u003c/strong\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"center\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;\u003c/font\&#62; \u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62; &#34;One of the basic axioms of the Kabbalah is that nothing can be said about God Himself. It is for this reason that God is called \u003cem\&#62;Ain Sof\u003c/em\&#62;, which means literally, the One without end or limit. God is infinite and therefore undefineable and uncharacterizable. He is limitless Being and Existence before the act of creation as well as subsequent to it. Even conceptually, there is no category in existence which can define God. This is what the \u003cem\&#62;Tikuney Zohar \u003c/em\&#62;means when it says &#39;Not thought can grasp Him.&#39;\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;        On the level of \u003cem\&#62;Ain Sof\u003c/em\&#62;, therefore, nothing else exists. Every concept and category associated with existence must be created from nothing.....\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;        Since no quality can be ascribed to \u003cem\&#62;Ain Sof\u003c/em\&#62;, it follows that if God has or uses &#39;Will,&#39; He must have created it. The \u003cem\&#62;Zohar \u003c/em\&#62;explicitly states that God does not have &#39;will&#39; in any anthropomorphic sense. Rather, to the extent that we can express it, in order to create the world, God had to will the concept of creation into existence. In order to do this, He had to create the concept of &#39;will.&#39; This, of course, leads to an ultimate paradox, for if God is going to create &#39;will,&#39; this in itself presupposes an act of will. This means that going back to \u003cem\&#62;Ain Sof\u003c/em\&#62;, to God Himself, involves an infinite regression.....\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;\u003cem\&#62;        Ain\u003c/em\&#62;-Nothingness.....This is not a nothingness which implies lack of existence. There is no deficiency in the \u003cem\&#62;Ain\u003c/em\&#62;, only fullness beyond the capacity of any created being  to experience directly. Rather, it is nothingness because of the lack of a category in the mind in which to place it.  \u003cem\&#62;Ain \u003c/em\&#62;is therefore only &#39;nothingness&#39; relative to us. It is the nothingness of ineffability and hiddenness. It is no-thing because it is so much more rarified than the some-thing of creation. In this sense, like God Himself, it is ultimately unfathomable and beyond our ability to comprehend.",1] );  //--></strong></p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"> "One of the basic axioms of the Kabbalah is that nothing can be said about God Himself. It is for this reason that God is called <em><span class="st">Ain</span> Sof</em>, which means literally, the One without end or limit. God is infinite and therefore undefineable and uncharacterizable. He is limitless Being and Existence before the act of creation as well as subsequent to it. Even conceptually, there is no category in existence which can define God. This is what the <em>Tikuney Zohar </em>means when it says 'Not thought can grasp Him.'</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2">        On the level of <em><span class="st">Ain</span> Sof</em>, therefore, nothing else exists. Every concept and category associated with existence must be created from nothing.....</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2">        Since no quality can be ascribed to <em><span class="st">Ain</span> Sof</em>, it follows that if God has or uses 'Will,' He must have created it. The <em>Zohar </em>explicitly states that God does not have 'will' in any anthropomorphic sense. Rather, to the extent that we can express it, in order to create the world, God had to will the concept of creation into existence. In order to do this, He had to create the concept of 'will.' This, of course, leads to an ultimate paradox, for if God is going to create 'will,' this in itself presupposes an act of will. This means that going back to <em><span class="st">Ain</span> Sof</em>, to God Himself, involves an infinite regression.....</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"><em>        <span class="st">Ain</span></em>-Nothingness.....This is not a nothingness which implies lack of existence. There is no deficiency in the <em><span class="st">Ain</span></em>, only fullness beyond the capacity of any created being  to experience directly. Rather, it is nothingness because of the lack of a category in the mind in which to place it.  <em><span class="st">Ain</span> </em>is therefore only 'nothingness' relative to us. It is the nothingness of ineffability and hiddenness. It is no-thing because it is so much more rarified than the some-thing of creation. In this sense, like God Himself, it is ultimately unfathomable and beyond our ability to comprehend.<!-- D(["mb","\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;        On the other hand, God&#39;s Will permeated the entire system of creation. The continued existence of creation, in fact, depends entirely on God&#39;s willing it. Since only God exists in an absolute sense, everything else exists because God wills its existence continually. A human architect can design and construct a building and then forget about it. But God&#39;s creation is more than that. Nothing can exist without God constantly willing it to exist. Without this, it would utterly cease to exist.&#34;\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"4\"\&#62; \u003c/font\&#62; \u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"center\"\&#62;\u003cstrong\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"3\"\&#62;c. &#34;Jewish Mysticism&#34; by Gershom Scholem\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/strong\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"center\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;\u003c/font\&#62; \u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62; &#34;The \u003cem\&#62;Zohar\u003c/em\&#62; expressely distinguishes between two worlds, which both represent God. First a primary world, the most deeply hidden of all, which remains insensible and unintelligible to all but God, the world of \u003cem\&#62;En-Sof\u003c/em\&#62;; and secondly one, joined unto the first, which makes it possible to know God, and of which the Bible says: &#39;Open ye the gates that I may enter;, the world of attributes. The two in reality form one, in the same way - to use the Zohar&#39;s simile - as the coal and the flame; that is to say, the coal exists also without a flame, but its latent power manifest itself only in its light. God&#39;s mystical attributes are such worlds of light in which the dark nature of \u003cem\&#62;En Sof\u003c/em\&#62; manifests itself.....\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;\u003cem\&#62;        \u003c/em\&#62;To the Kabbalist the fundamental fact of creation takes place \u003cem\&#62;in \u003c/em\&#62;God.....The creation of the world, that is to say, the creation of something out of nothing, is itself but the external aspect of something which takes place in God Himself. This is also a crisis of the hidden \u003cem\&#62;En-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; who turns from repose to creation, and it is this crisis, creation and Self-Revelation in one, which constitutes the great mystery of theosophy and the crucial point for the understanding of the purpose of theosophical speculation. The crisis can be pictured as the break-through of the primordial will, but theosophic Kabbalism frequently employs the bolder metaphor of Nothing. The primary start or wrench in which the introspective God is externalized and the light that shines inwardly made visible, this revolution of perspective, transforms ",1] );  //--></font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2">        On the other hand, God's Will permeated the entire system of creation. The continued existence of creation, in fact, depends entirely on God's willing it. Since only God exists in an absolute sense, everything else exists because God wills its existence continually. A human architect can design and construct a building and then forget about it. But God's creation is more than that. Nothing can exist without God constantly willing it to exist. Without this, it would utterly cease to exist."</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"><font size="2"><font size="4"> </font> </font></font></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="center"><strong><font size="3">c. "Jewish Mysticism" by Gershom Scholem</font></strong></p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"> "The <em>Zohar</em> expressely distinguishes between two worlds, which both represent God. First a primary world, the most deeply hidden of all, which remains insensible and unintelligible to all but God, the world of <em>En-Sof</em>; and secondly one, joined unto the first, which makes it possible to know God, and of which the Bible says: 'Open ye the gates that I may enter;, the world of attributes. The two in reality form one, in the same way - to use the Zohar's simile - as the coal and the flame; that is to say, the coal exists also without a flame, but its latent power manifest itself only in its light. God's mystical attributes are such worlds of light in which the dark nature of <em>En Sof</em> manifests itself.....</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"><em>        </em>To the Kabbalist the fundamental fact of creation takes place <em>in </em>God.....The creation of the world, that is to say, the creation of something out of nothing, is itself but the external aspect of something which takes place in God Himself. This is also a crisis of the hidden <em>En-Sof</em> who turns from repose to creation, and it is this crisis, creation and Self-Revelation in one, which constitutes the great mystery of theosophy and the crucial point for the understanding of the purpose of theosophical speculation. The crisis can be pictured as the break-through of the primordial will, but theosophic Kabbalism frequently employs the bolder metaphor of Nothing. The primary start or wrench in which the introspective God is externalized and the light that shines inwardly made visible, this revolution of perspective, transforms <!-- D(["mb","\u003cem\&#62;En-Sof\u003c/em\&#62;, the inexpressible fullness, into nothingness.&#34;\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62; \u003c/div\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"center\"\&#62;\u003cstrong\&#62;d. &#34;Kabbalah&#34; by Gershom Scholem\u003c/strong\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"center\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;\u003c/font\&#62; \u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62; &#34;All kabbalistic systems have their origin in a fundamental distinction regarding the problem of the Divine. In the abstract, it is possible to think of God either as God Himself with reference to His own nature alone or as God in His relation to His creation. However, all kabbalists agree that no religious knowledge of God, even of the most exalted kind, can be gained except through contemplation of the relationship of God to creation. God in Himself, the absolute Essence, lies beyond any speculative or even ecstatic comprehension. The attitude of the Kabbalah toward God may be defined as a mystical agnosticism, formulated to a more or less extreme way and close to the standpoint of neoplatonism. In order to express this unknowable aspect of the Divine the early kabbalists of Provence and spain coined the term \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; (&#39;Infinity&#39;). This expression cannot be traced to a translation of a Latin or Arabic philosophical term. Rather it is a hypostatization which, in contexts dealing with the infinity of God or with His thought that &#39;extends without end&#39; (\u003cem\&#62;le-ein sof\u003c/em\&#62; or \u003cem\&#62;ad le-ein sof\u003c/em\&#62;), treats the adverbial relation as if it were a noun and uses this as a technical term. \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; first appears in the writings of Isaac the Blind and his disciples, particularly in the works of Azriel of Gerona, and later in the Zohar, the \u003cem\&#62;Ma&#39;arechet ha-Elohut\u003c/em\&#62;, and writings of that period. While the kabbalists were still aware of the origin of the term they did not use it with the definite article, but treated it as a proper noun; it was only from 1300 onward that they began to speak of \u003cem\&#62;ha-Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; [the \u003cem\&#62;Ein Sof\u003c/em\&#62;] as well, and generally identify it with other common epithets for the Divine. This later usage, which spread through all the literature, indicates a distinct personal and theistic concept in contrast to the vacillation between an idea of this type and a neutral impersonal concept of ",1] );  //--><em>En-Sof</em>, the inexpressible fullness, into nothingness."</font></p>
<p align="left">&#160;</p>
<p align="center"><strong>d. "Kabbalah" by Gershom Scholem</strong></p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"> "All kabbalistic systems have their origin in a fundamental distinction regarding the problem of the Divine. In the abstract, it is possible to think of God either as God Himself with reference to His own nature alone or as God in His relation to His creation. However, all kabbalists agree that no religious knowledge of God, even of the most exalted kind, can be gained except through contemplation of the relationship of God to creation. God in Himself, the absolute Essence, lies beyond any speculative or even ecstatic comprehension. The attitude of the Kabbalah toward God may be defined as a mystical agnosticism, formulated to a more or less extreme way and close to the standpoint of neoplatonism. In order to express this unknowable aspect of the Divine the early kabbalists of Provence and spain coined the term <em>Ein-Sof</em> ('Infinity'). This expression cannot be traced to a translation of a Latin or Arabic philosophical term. Rather it is a hypostatization which, in contexts dealing with the infinity of God or with His thought that 'extends without end' (<em>le-ein sof</em> or <em>ad le-ein sof</em>), treats the adverbial relation as if it were a noun and uses this as a technical term. <em>Ein-Sof</em> first appears in the writings of Isaac the Blind and his disciples, particularly in the works of Azriel of Gerona, and later in the Zohar, the <em>Ma'arechet ha-Elohut</em>, and writings of that period. While the kabbalists were still aware of the origin of the term they did not use it with the definite article, but treated it as a proper noun; it was only from 1300 onward that they began to speak of <em>ha-Ein-Sof</em> [the <em>Ein Sof</em>] as well, and generally identify it with other common epithets for the Divine. This later usage, which spread through all the literature, indicates a distinct personal and theistic concept in contrast to the vacillation between an idea of this type and a neutral impersonal concept of <!-- D(["mb","\u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; found in some of the earlier sources. At first it was not clear whether the term \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; referred to &#39;Him who has no end&#39; or to &#39;that which has no end.&#39; This latter, neutral aspect was emphasized by stressing that \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof \u003c/em\&#62;should not be qualified by any of the attributes or personal epithets of God found in Scripture, nor should such eulogies as \u003cem\&#62;Baruch Hu \u003c/em\&#62;or \u003cem\&#62;Yitbarach\u003c/em\&#62; [respectively &#34;blessed be He&#34; and &#34;may He be blessed&#34;] (found only in the later literature) be added to it. In fact, however, there were various attitudes to the nature of \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; from the very beginning. Azriel [of Gerona], for example, tended toward an impersonal interpretation of the term, while Asher ben David employed it in a distinctly personal and theistic way.\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;\u003cem\&#62;        Ein-Sof \u003c/em\&#62;is the absolute perfection in which there are no distinctions and no differentiations, and according to some even no volition. It does not reveal itself in a way that makes knowledge of its nature possible, and it is not accessible even to the innermost thought (\u003cem\&#62;hirhur ha-lev\u003c/em\&#62;) of the contemplative. Only through the finite nature of every existing thing, through the actual existence of creation itself, is it possible to deduce the eixtence of \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof \u003c/em\&#62;as the first infinite cause. The author of \u003cem\&#62;Ma&#39;arechet ha-Elohut \u003c/em\&#62;put forward the extreme thesis (not without arousing the opposition of more cautious kabbalists) that the whole biblical revelation, and the Oral Law as well, contained no reference to \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62;, and that only the mystics had received some hint of it. Hence the author of this treatise, followed by several other writers, was led to the daring conclusion that only the revealed God can in reality be called &#39;God,&#39; and not the hidden &#39;\u003cem\&#62;deus absconditus\u003c/em\&#62;,&#39; who cannot be an object of religious thought. When ideas of this kind returned in a later period in Shabbatean and quasi-Shabbatean Kabbalah, between 1670 and 1740, they were considered heretical.",1] );  //--><em>Ein-Sof</em> found in some of the earlier sources. At first it was not clear whether the term <em>Ein-Sof</em> referred to 'Him who has no end' or to 'that which has no end.' This latter, neutral aspect was emphasized by stressing that <em>Ein-Sof </em>should not be qualified by any of the attributes or personal epithets of God found in Scripture, nor should such eulogies as <em>Baruch Hu </em>or <em>Yitbarach</em> [respectively "blessed be He" and "may He be blessed"] (found only in the later literature) be added to it. In fact, however, there were various attitudes to the nature of <em>Ein-Sof</em> from the very beginning. Azriel [of Gerona], for example, tended toward an impersonal interpretation of the term, while Asher ben David employed it in a distinctly personal and theistic way.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2"><em>        Ein-Sof </em>is the absolute perfection in which there are no distinctions and no differentiations, and according to some even no volition. It does not reveal itself in a way that makes knowledge of its nature possible, and it is not accessible even to the innermost thought (<em>hirhur ha-lev</em>) of the contemplative. Only through the finite nature of every existing thing, through the actual existence of creation itself, is it possible to deduce the eixtence of <em>Ein-Sof </em>as the first infinite cause. The author of <em>Ma'arechet ha-Elohut </em>put forward the extreme thesis (not without arousing the opposition of more cautious kabbalists) that the whole biblical revelation, and the Oral Law as well, contained no reference to <em>Ein-Sof</em>, and that only the mystics had received some hint of it. Hence the author of this treatise, followed by several other writers, was led to the daring conclusion that only the revealed God can in reality be called 'God,' and not the hidden '<em>deus absconditus</em>,' who cannot be an object of religious thought. When ideas of this kind returned in a later period in Shabbatean and quasi-Shabbatean Kabbalah, between 1670 and 1740, they were considered heretical.<!-- D(["mb","\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;        Other terms or images signifying the domain of the hidden God that lies beyond any impulse toward creation occur in the writings of the Gerona kabbalists and in the literature of the speculative school. Examples of these terms are \u003cem\&#62;mah she-ein ha-machshavah masseget \u003c/em\&#62;(&#39;that which thought cannot attain&#39; - sometimes used also to describe the first emanation), \u003cem\&#62;ha-or ha-mit&#39;allem \u003c/em\&#62;(&#39;the concealed light&#39;), \u003cem\&#62;sefer ha-ta&#39;alumah \u003c/em\&#62;(&#39;the concealment of secrecy&#39;), \u003cem\&#62;yitron\u003c/em\&#62; (&#39;superfluity&#39; - apparently as a translation of the neoplatonic term \u003cem\&#62;hyperousia\u003c/em\&#62;), \u003cem\&#62;ha-achdut ha-shavah \u003c/em\&#62;(&#39;indistinguishable unity,&#39; in the sense of a unity in which all opposites are equal and in which there is no differentiation), or even simply \u003cem\&#62;ha-mahut\u003c/em\&#62; (&#39;the essence&#39;). The factor common to all these terms is that \u003cem\&#62;Ein Sof\u003c/em\&#62; and its synonyms are above or beyond thought.A certain wavering between the personal and the neutral approach to the concept of \u003cem\&#62;Ein Sof\u003c/em\&#62; can also be seen in the main part of the Zohar, while in the later stratum, in the \u003cem\&#62;Ra&#39;aya Meheimna \u003c/em\&#62;and the \u003cem\&#62;Tikkunim\u003c/em\&#62;, a personal concept is paramount. \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof \u003c/em\&#62;is often (not always) identified with the Aristotelian &#39;cause of all causes,&#39; and, through the kabbalistic use of neoplatonic idiom, with the &#39;root of all roots.&#39; While all the definitions above have a common negative element, occasionally in the Zohar there is a remarkable positive designation which gives the name \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof \u003c/em\&#62;to the nine lights of thought that shine from the Divine Thought, thus bringing \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; out of its concealment and down to a more humble level of emanation (the contrast between the two concepts emerges through comparison between various passages, e.g., e:21a and 2:239a with 2:226a). In later cevelopment of Lurianic Kabbalah, however, in distinct opposition to the view of the earlier kabbalists, several differentiations were made even within ",1] );  //--></font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2">        Other terms or images signifying the domain of the hidden God that lies beyond any impulse toward creation occur in the writings of the Gerona kabbalists and in the literature of the speculative school. Examples of these terms are <em>mah she-ein ha-machshavah masseget </em>('that which thought cannot attain' - sometimes used also to describe the first emanation), <em>ha-or ha-mit'allem </em>('the concealed light'), <em>sefer ha-ta'alumah </em>('the concealment of secrecy'), <em>yitron</em> ('superfluity' - apparently as a translation of the neoplatonic term <em>hyperousia</em>), <em>ha-achdut ha-shavah </em>('indistinguishable unity,' in the sense of a unity in which all opposites are equal and in which there is no differentiation), or even simply <em>ha-mahut</em> ('the essence'). The factor common to all these terms is that <em>Ein Sof</em> and its synonyms are above or beyond thought.A certain wavering between the personal and the neutral approach to the concept of <em>Ein Sof</em> can also be seen in the main part of the Zohar, while in the later stratum, in the <em>Ra'aya Meheimna </em>and the <em>Tikkunim</em>, a personal concept is paramount. <em>Ein-Sof </em>is often (not always) identified with the Aristotelian 'cause of all causes,' and, through the kabbalistic use of neoplatonic idiom, with the 'root of all roots.' While all the definitions above have a common negative element, occasionally in the Zohar there is a remarkable positive designation which gives the name <em>Ein-Sof </em>to the nine lights of thought that shine from the Divine Thought, thus bringing <em>Ein-Sof</em> out of its concealment and down to a more humble level of emanation (the contrast between the two concepts emerges through comparison between various passages, e.g., e:21a and 2:239a with 2:226a). In later cevelopment of Lurianic Kabbalah, however, in distinct opposition to the view of the earlier kabbalists, several differentiations were made even within <!-- D(["mb","\u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62;. In Kabbalah, therefore, \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; is absolute reality, and there was no question as to its spiritual and transcendent nature. This was so even though the lack of clarity in some of the expressions used by the kabbalists in speaking of the relationship of the revealed God to His creation gives the impression tht the very substance of God Himself is also immanent within creation. In all kabbalistic systems, light-symbolism is very commonly used with regard to \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62;, although it is emphasized that this use is merely hyperbolical, and in later Kabbalah a clear distinction was sometimes made between \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; and &#39;the light of \u003cem\&#62;Ein Sof\u003c/em\&#62;.&#39; In the popular Kabbalah which finds expression in ethical writings and chasidic literature, \u003cem\&#62;Ein Sof\u003c/em\&#62; is merely a synonym for the traditional God of religion, a linguistic usage far removed from that of the classical Kabbalah, where there is evidence of the sharp distinction between \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; and the revealed Divine Creator. This can be seen not only in the formulations of the early kabbalists (e.g., Isaac of Acre in his commentary to the \u003cem\&#62;Sefer Yetzirah\u003c/em\&#62;) but also among the later ones; Baruch Kosover (c. 1770) writes: &#39;\u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62; is not His proper name, but a word which signifies his complete concealment, and our sacred tongue has now word like these two to signify his concealment. And it is not right to say &#34;\u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62;, blessed be He&#34; or &#34;may He be blessed&#34; because He cannot be blessed by our lips&#39; (\u003cem\&#62;Ammud ha-Avodah\u003c/em\&#62;).\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;        The whole problem of creation, even in its most recondite aspects, is bound up with the revelaiton of the hidden God and His outward movement - even thought &#39;there is nothing outside Him&#39; (Azriel), for in the last resort &#39;all comes from the One, and all returns to the One,&#39; according to the neoplatonic formula adopted by the early kabbalists. In kabbalistic teaching the transition of ",1] );  //--><em>Ein-Sof</em>. In Kabbalah, therefore, <em>Ein-Sof</em> is absolute reality, and there was no question as to its spiritual and transcendent nature. This was so even though the lack of clarity in some of the expressions used by the kabbalists in speaking of the relationship of the revealed God to His creation gives the impression tht the very substance of God Himself is also immanent within creation. In all kabbalistic systems, light-symbolism is very commonly used with regard to <em>Ein-Sof</em>, although it is emphasized that this use is merely hyperbolical, and in later Kabbalah a clear distinction was sometimes made between <em>Ein-Sof</em> and 'the light of <em>Ein Sof</em>.' In the popular Kabbalah which finds expression in ethical writings and chasidic literature, <em>Ein Sof</em> is merely a synonym for the traditional God of religion, a linguistic usage far removed from that of the classical Kabbalah, where there is evidence of the sharp distinction between <em>Ein-Sof</em> and the revealed Divine Creator. This can be seen not only in the formulations of the early kabbalists (e.g., Isaac of Acre in his commentary to the <em>Sefer Yetzirah</em>) but also among the later ones; Baruch Kosover (c. 1770) writes: '<em>Ein-Sof</em> is not His proper name, but a word which signifies his complete concealment, and our sacred tongue has now word like these two to signify his concealment. And it is not right to say "<em>Ein-Sof</em>, blessed be He" or "may He be blessed" because He cannot be blessed by our lips' (<em>Ammud ha-Avodah</em>).</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2">        The whole problem of creation, even in its most recondite aspects, is bound up with the revelaiton of the hidden God and His outward movement - even thought 'there is nothing outside Him' (Azriel), for in the last resort 'all comes from the One, and all returns to the One,' according to the neoplatonic formula adopted by the early kabbalists. In kabbalistic teaching the transition of <!-- D(["mb","\u003cem\&#62;Ein Sof\u003c/em\&#62; to &#39;manifestation,&#39; or to what might be called &#39;God the Creator,&#39; is connected with the question of the first emanation and its definition. Although there were widely differing views on the nature of the first step from concealment to manifestation, all stressed that no account of this process could be an objective description of a process in \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62;; it was no more than could be conjectured from the perspective of created beings and was expressed through their ideas, which in reality cannot be applied to God at all. Therefore, descriptions of these processes have only a symbolic or, at best, an approximate value. Nevertheless side by side with this thesis, there is detailed speculation which frequently claims objective reality for the process it describes. This is one of the paradoxes inherent in Kabbalah, as in other attempts to explain the world in a mystical fashion.\u003c/font\&#62;\u003c/div\&#62;\n\u003cdiv align\u003d\"left\"\&#62;\u003cfont size\u003d\"2\"\&#62;        The decision to emerge from concealment into manifestation and creation is not in any sense a process which is a necessary consequence of the essence of \u003cem\&#62;Ein-Sof\u003c/em\&#62;, it is a free decision which remains a constant and impenetrable mystery (Cordover, at the beginning of \u003cem\&#62;Elimah\u003c/em\&#62;). Therefore, in the view of most kabbalists, the question of the ultimate motivation of creation is not a legitimate one, and the assertion found in many books that God wished to reveal the measure of His goodness is there simply as an expedient that is never systematically developed. These first outward steps, as a result of which Divinity becomes accessible to the contemplative probings of the kabbalist, take place within God Himself and do not &#39;leave the category of the Divine&#39; (Cordovero). Here the Kabbalah departs from all rationalistic presentations of creation and assumes the character of a theosophic doctrine, that is, one concerned with the inner life and processes of God Himself. A distinction in the stages of such processes in the unity of the Godhead can be made only by human abstraction, but in reality they are bound together and unified in a manner beyond all human understanding. The basic differences in the various kabbalistic systems are already apparent with regard to the first step, and since such ideas were presented in obscure and figurative fashion in the classical literature, such as the ",1] );  //--><em>Ein Sof</em> to 'manifestation,' or to what might be called 'God the Creator,' is connected with the question of the first emanation and its definition. Although there were widely differing views on the nature of the first step from concealment to manifestation, all stressed that no account of this process could be an objective description of a process in <em>Ein-Sof</em>; it was no more than could be conjectured from the perspective of created beings and was expressed through their ideas, which in reality cannot be applied to God at all. Therefore, descriptions of these processes have only a symbolic or, at best, an approximate value. Nevertheless side by side with this thesis, there is detailed speculation which frequently claims objective reality for the process it describes. This is one of the paradoxes inherent in Kabbalah, as in other attempts to explain the world in a mystical fashion.</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2">        The decision to emerge from concealment into manifestation and creation is not in any 