Henk van Arendonk, European cooperation after fifty years, EC Tax Review. Deventer: 2008. Vol. 17, Iss. 2; pg. 50 [*, ProQuest]

Abstract (Summary)
In the last 50 years, the EC has expanded from 6 to 27 Member States. Supranational powers have also been strengthened. Given these immense changes, institutional reforms were necessary. Only time will tell whether we can move forward on the basis of reforms in the Lisbon Treaty during the coming 50 years. Each amending treaty has to be ratified by the Member States. Where a Member State makes ratification dependent on a referendum, this often turns out badly. In order to prevent the amending treaty from being shot down via a referendum, quite a few Member States choose parliamentary ratification only. Examples are the Netherlands, Denmark, and the UK. A referendum however will be held in Ireland. Whatever the outcome is, it will be influenced by what the EC does in the coming period. If its actions are unacceptable for a Member State, this can have far-reaching consequences for the outcome of the referendum.

Editia inaugurala: Maher Dabbah, Paul Lasok (General editor), Merger Control Worldwide 3 Volume Set, Cambridge University Press, 2008  [*] Capitolul referitor la Romania ii apartine lui Gelu Goran.

Editia supliment: Maher Dabbah, Paul Lasok (General editor), Merger Control Worldwide. Second Supplement to the First Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2008 [*] De la p. 41 la 45 cartea se refera si la Uniunea Europeana. O sinteza e o sinteza.

International trade law, human rights law and development studies share the common objective of promoting higher standards of living in the poorer countries of the world. Human rights and development scholars have been critical of the law of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), as implementing a development strategy which dominates and constrains the development strategy options of developing countries but which perceives development only in a narrow, economic sense. In this paper, the different theoretical underpinnings of international trade law and international human rights law are described and compared and their differing conceptions of development are examined from the perspective of the broader development discourse. The package of rights and obligations of developing countries under WTO law (the ‘WTO-Minus strategy') is also described and examples of significant constraints placed by this package on the development strategy options open to developing countries regarding trade in goods are examined from the perspectives of the broader development discourse and international human rights norms. The capacity of the WTO to incorporate new and multidisciplinary knowledge about development is considered.

Ofer Eldar, Vote-trading in International Institutions, European Journal of International Law, Volume 19, Number 1, February 2008 [*]

There is evidence that countries trade votes among each other in international institutions on a wide range of issues, including the use of force, trade issues, and elections of judges. Vote-trading has been criticized as being a form of corruption, undue influence, and coercion. Contrary to common wisdom, however, I argue in this article that the case for introducing policy measures against vote-trading cannot be made out on the basis of available evidence. This article sets out an analytical framework for analysing vote-trading in international institutions, focusing on three major contexts in which vote-trading may generate benefits and costs: (1) agency costs (collective good), (2) coercive tendering, and (3) agency costs (constituents). The applicability of each context depends primarily on the type of decision in question - i.e. preference-decision or judgement-decision - and the interests that countries are expected to maximize when voting. The analytical framework is applied to evidence of vote-trading in four institutions, the Security Council, the General Assembly, the World Trade Organization, and the International Whaling Commission. The application of the analysis reveals that while vote-trading can create significant costs, there is only equivocal evidence to this effect, and in several cases vote-trading generates important benefits.

Laurence R. Helfer, Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime, European Journal of International Law, Volume 19, Number 1, February 2008 [*]

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is the crown jewel of the world's most advanced international system for protecting civil and political liberties. In recent years, however, the ECtHR has become a victim of its own success. The Court now faces a docket crisis of massive proportions, the consequence of the growing number of states subject to its jurisdiction, its favourable public reputation, its expansive interpretations of individual liberties, a distrust of domestic judiciaries in some countries, and entrenched human rights problems in others. In response to this growing backlog of individual complaints, the Council of Europe has, over the last five years, considered numerous proposals to restructure the European human rights regime and redesign the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This article argues that these proposals should be understood not as ministerial changes in supranational judicial procedure, nor as resolving a debate over whether the ECtHR should strive for individual or constitutional justice, but rather as raising more fundamental questions concerning the Court's future identity. In particular, the article argues for recognition of ‘embeddedness' in national legal systems as a deep structural principle of the ECHR, a principle that functions as a necessary counterpoint to the subsidiary doctrine that has animated the Convention since its founding. Embeddedness does not substitute ECtHR rulings for the decisions of national parliaments or domestic courts. Rather, it requires the Council of Europe and the Court to bolster the mechanisms for governments to remedy human rights violations at home, obviating the need for individuals to seek supranational relief and restoring countries to a position in which the ECtHR's deference to national decision-makers is appropriate.

European Journal of International Law, 2/2008

Armin von Bogdandy, The European Union as Situation, Executive, and Promoter of the International Law of Cultural Diversity - Elements of a Beautiful Friendship, European Journal of International Law, April 2008; Vol. 19, No. 2 [*]

Cultural diversity is an important political and legal topos in the European Union. At the same time, the concern for cultural diversity gives reason for grave reservations towards the Union. This article intends to assist, on the basis of international law, in distinguishing appearance and reality. The Union will be analysed first as a situation of the application of the international law of cultural diversity, secondly as the regional executive of this international law, and thirdly as its global promoter. It shows that international law and Union law reinforce each other. The former conveys to the Union instruments to pursue European unification which at the same time serve its own implementation. Furthermore, it does not set limits to European unity since it protects only cultural pluralism but not state-supporting distinctiveness. A prerequisite for this consonance is that the Union's constitutional law allows for political unity without cultural unity and that international law remains mute about important questions on European unification. The international law perspective thus does not fully exhaust the problem: conformity with international law alone cannot dissipate concern for the future of cultural diversity in the Union.

Ole Kristian Fauchald, The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals - An Empirical Analysis, European Journal of International Law, April 2008; Vol. 19, No. 2 [*]

This empirical analysis of the use of interpretive arguments by ad hoc tribunals of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes covers almost 100 cases decided during the past 10 years. The cases are analysed with a view to determining which arguments the tribunals use and how the arguments are used in light of Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. The analysis provides a basis for addressing the extent to which ICSID tribunals contribute to creating a predictable legal framework in which the interests of investors, states, and third parties are taken properly into account; the extent to which ICSID tribunals contribute to a coherent development of international investment law; and whether ICSID tribunals contribute to a ‘fragmentation' of international law. Despite ICSID tribunals being ad hoc tribunals that solve legal disputes on the basis of heterogeneous legal sources, the article indicates that there is a tendency among ICSID tribunals to contribute to a homogeneous development of the methodology of international law. Nevertheless, the article concludes that ICSID tribunals could do significantly more to align their approaches to interpretive arguments with those of other international tribunals.

Analogia dintre familia formata dintre un sot si o sotie si familia Natiunilor Unite nu este asa de hazardata.

Susan Block-Lieb & Terence Halliday, Harmonization and Modernization in UNCITRAL's Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law, Texas International Law Journal. Austin: Summer 2007. Vol. 42, Iss. 3. [*]

***, The Difference, European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), Volume 4, Issue 01, February 2008

Clemens Ladenburger, Police and Criminal Law in the Treaty of Lisbon, European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), Volume 4, Issue 01, February 2008

Yves Haeck, Clara Burbano Herrera and Leo Zwaak, Non-compliance with a Provisional Measure Automatically Leads To a Violation of the Right of Individual Application ... or Doesn't It?, European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), Volume 4, Issue 01, February 2008

Elena Simina Tănăsescu, The President of Romania, European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), Volume 4, Issue 01, February 2008

Luuk van Middelaar, Spanning the River, European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), Volume 4, Issue 01, February 2008

Thomas Vandamme, Prochain Arrêt: La Belgique!, European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), Volume 4, Issue 01, February 2008

Florian Geyer, European Arrest Warrant: Advocaten voor de Wereld VZW v. Leden van de Ministerraad, European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), Volume 4, Issue 01, February 2008

Jo Shaw, The Political Representation of Europe's Citizens: Developments, European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), Volume 4, Issue 01, February 2008

Adam Łazowski, Poland: Constitutional Tribunal on the Preliminary Ruling Procedure and the Division of Competences Between National Courts and the Court of Justice, European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), Volume 4, Issue 01, February 2008

Christine Kelly récupère son nom de domaine grâce à une requête en revendication, LEGALIS.NET, 15.05.2008

La journaliste de LCI, Christine Kelly, a utilisé une procédure peu commune pour récupérer un nom de domaine: la requête en revendication fondée sur l'article L 624-9 du code de commerce. Celle-ci s'inscrit dans le cadre d'une liquidation judiciaire. En effet, lors de l'ouverture d'une procédure collective, les détenteurs de biens mobiliers (équipements, fonds de commerce, logiciels, etc.) ont la possibilité de revendiquer leur propriété dans des conditions précises de forme et de délai, faute de quoi ces biens tombent dans l'actif de la société en liquidation.
Dans cette affaire, la société Kapado qui avait enregistré christine-kelly.fr en son nom alors qu'elle devait le faire pour le compte de la présentatrice a justement été mise en liquidation judiciaire. Avant la procédure collective, la journaliste avait pourtant entrepris des démarches pour récupérer son identité sur internet. Mais Kapado, qui a reconnu avoir commis une erreur, n'avait pas montré une ferme volonté de la corriger. Face à son inertie et sa négligence, Christine Kelly l'a mise en demeure de remplir un formulaire Afnic pour un transfert volontaire du nom de domaine. Kapado s'est engagée à le faire mais le transfert n'a pas été opéré. Les pourparlers se poursuivent cependant jusqu'au moment où la présentatrice découvre que la société qui détient son nom de domaine est en liquidation judiciaire. Comme le liquidateur refuse d'autoriser le transfert, Christine Kelly se tourne vers le juge.
Dans une décision du 4 avril 2008, le tribunal de commerce de Pontoise a ordonné le transfert du nom de domaine christine-kelly.fr à la présentatrice dont il juge la revendication bien fondée. Selon le tribunal consulaire, «seule Christine Kelly peut être propriétaire du nom de domaine christine-kelly.fr, dont elle revendique la propriété».

(*)

Academic Analysis
• Regulation Lite: The Rise of Emissions Trading
Robert Baldwin

• On being contrarian
Roger McCormick

Law Firm Updates
• Law Reports
Supplied by Allen & Overy LLP
• EU Regulatory Developments
Supplied by Clifford Chance LLP
Abstract:
European Parliament; EU Commission; Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR); Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS); European Central Bank (ECB); European Banking Federation (EBF-FBE)

• Environmental Finance News
Supplied by Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP
• Financial Regulatory Developments
Supplied by Herbert Smith LLP
• Corporate Finance and General
Supplied by Lovells LLP
Practitioner Perspectives
• The Credit Crunch: The Regulatory Way Forward
Etay Katz

Joanna Perkins, A Question of Priorities: Choice of Law and Proprietory Aspects of the Assignment
Abstract:
Among the fields of academic legal research, the topic of choice-of-law rules for the assignment of debts in financial services and markets must be one of the most complicated, challenging and arcane. But what is merely challenging in the academic arena becomes positively daunting when tested in the crucible of legislative reform, where there is little or no room for error. And if said legislative reform is to be accomplished within a tight timeframe in a highly political forum and to be drafted by civil servants rather than conflicts specialists or financial experts, the endeavour must be regarded not so much as difficult but virtually hopeless. Certainly that was the recent experience of the European Council's standing Working Group on Civil Law during the negotiations on the transposition of the Rome Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations 1980 into the European legal acquis as the putative Rome I Regulation.

• The Legal Environment for Asset-backed Securitisation in Russia
Ajay Sud
• Czech Insolvency Reform - Good News for the Financiers?
Mikulas Touska, Silvie Horackova, Eva Vrana, Nick Herrod

Mattias Levin, Code of Conduct on Clearing and Settlement: First Experiences and Future Outlook
 
Abstract
On 7 November 2006, a Code of Conduct on clearing and settlement was presented to Charles McCreevy, the Commissioner for Internal Market and Services. The Code was the culmination of nearly five years of hard work by the European Commission, assessing the European post-trading sector, documenting its achievements and shortcomings, and analysing the options available to improve its efficiency, thereby making it more adapted to a European internal market. A little over a year has now passed since the Code was presented and it is accordingly an appropriate time to take stock of its effectiveness in achieving these objectives. This article takes stock of progress to date, assesses the main outstanding issues and looks at what lies ahead.

• The Turkish Financial Leasing Law - is it Industry Specific?
Yesim Bezen
Special Feature
• Interview with Emmanuel Maurice
• The Development of the Global Markets as Rule-makers: Engagement and Legitimacy
Julia Black, David Rouch

SABRINA PRADUROUX, The European Convention on Human Rights and Environmental Nuisances, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008, pp. 269-281.

Abstract: In as much as environmental nuisances caused by industrial activities can have adverse effects on both the economic and the amenity value of an area, from the European Convention on Human Rights perspective they can be seen to interfere with either the right of property or the right to respect for private and family life. The current case law of the Strasbourg Court shows the Court's preference for applying Article 8, which protects the right to respect for private and family life, and which affords, especially from the procedural point of view, a less far-reaching protection than Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, concerning the right of property.

Liesbeth Enneking, The Common Denominator of the Trafigura Case, Foreign Direct Liability Cases and the Rome II Regulation, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008, pp. 283-312.
Abstract: As part of a current trend towards so-called ‘foreign direct liability cases', attempts are being made to hold parent companies of multinational corporations liable in their home countries for damage caused in host countries. This trend, of which the Trafigura case serves as a recent example here, suggests that tort law may have a regulatory part to play when it comes to the transboundary activities of multinational corporations. However, the extent to which tort law can act as a regulatory mechanism is dependent on its applicability, which, in turn, is determined by private international law.
The recently adopted Rome II Regulation, which lays down conflict-of-law rules for non-contractual obligations, will only have a limited conducive effect on the feasibility of the regulation through tort law of the transboundary activities of multinational corporations. On the basis of this Regulation, it is only in cases where the resulting damage consists of environmental damage that home country tort law may be applicable. In all other cases, attempts to hold the parent company of the multinational corporation liable for damage caused in the host country will have to be based on the tort law of the host country.
This effectively diminishes the feasibility of home country tort law as a mechanism for the regulation of the transboundary activities of multinational corporations.

Petra Joanna Pipková, Gutgläubiger Eigentumserwerb als gesetzliches Limit des verfassungsrechtlich gewährleisteten Rechts auf Eigentum, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008, pp. 313-321
Summary:
Abstract: This contribution deals with the always current topic of good faith acquisition of property. The common Czech private law still applies the old roman principle Nemo plus iuris ad alium transfere potest quam ipse habet. It was introduced into the Czech civil act in 1964 for reasons of protection of the right to property protected and guaranteed by the constitutional law. Later on, the needs of the market were acknowledged and good faith acquisition was introduced in the domain of sale of goods in B2B relations. The common courts had a problem with the recognition of this rule (especially, because some of the cases concerned the acquisition of stolen cars). For that reason, the Constitutional court was several times submitted to decide about the accordance of the good faith acquisition with the fundamental right to property. The Court created a construction of conditions and requirements on the good faith of the acquirer and the proof of it. The Court measures the accordance on a general rule of limitation by law of the fundamental rights which requires the preservation of the substance and purpose of the right and forbids the abuse of the limitating law. The decisions touch the purpose of the limitation - good faith acquisition and interests of the market - but never examine the proportionality of the purpose to the limitation of the fundamental right to property.

Dmitry A. Pentsov, La loi de la Fédération de Russie relative aux biens culturels deplaces en URSS dans le cadre de la Seconde guerre mondiale, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008,  pp. 323-332
Summary:
Abstracts: The issue of the future of thousands of cultural property objects moved to the USSR as a result of the Second World War as a compensation for the destruction of the soviet cultural patrimony during the war and their eventual restitution has become to be openly discussed between the USSR (now, the Russian Federation) and the Federal Republic of Germany in the beginning of the 90s within the framework of the policy of glasnost (the ‘openness'). The fate of the recent Russian federal law ‘On the cultural property moved to the USSR as a result of the Second World War and located in the territory of the Russian Federation' clearly illustrates the magnitude and the contradictions of this debate on the international level, as well as within Russian governmental circles and the Russian society at large. The purpose of this article is to provide a general overview of this recent Russian law on the displaced cultural property. First, the article presents the basic concepts of the law. Second, it examines the issue of ownership to these cultural property objects and their eventual restitution, notably the restitution at the request of private individuals and the restitution of family relics.

Konstantinos Kerameus, Comments on Form and Function of Legal Precedents, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008,  pp. 333-337

Stefan Geiger, Constantin Kruse, House of Lords 3 May 2006, Barker v. Corus Neue Impulse für das Europäische Deliktsrecht vom House of Lords, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008, pp. 339-351
Summary:
Abstract: With Barker v. Corus, the House of Lords has given fresh impetus to European Tort Law. After having affirmed liability in cases of alternative liability in Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services and Others, it has now engaged with the concept of liability due to mere probability. Thus, the importance of the dogma of causation and of the dogma of the injured person's established right for compensation has decreased considerably. The consequences for the law of liability and for the insurance industry are unforeseeable.

Michael Milo, ECHR 30 August 2007, Pye v. United Kingdom: A Technical Retreat from Private (Property) Law, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008, pp. 353-361
Summary:
Abstract: The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has judged on 30 August 2007, in a ten to seven majority opinion, that the arrangements regarding adverse possession under the law of England and Wales is in conformity with Article 1 First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights (Art. 1 FP). This decision reversed the chamber decision on Pye v. UK of 15 November 2005. The Grand Chamber decision is an important decision, for two reasons. The decision makes clear that national arrangements of private (property) law are fundamentally subject to a constitutional review by the ECHR. But the decision also makes clear that the Court - at least for the moment, and according to the majority opinion - will be reticent in exercising this power. While the result is positive for private property law, the court's reasoning may be subject to critique.

Han Van Manen, Prof. Dr. Marcus Lutter e.a. Legal Capital in Europe - European Company and Financial Law Review Special Volume 1, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008, pp. 363-364.

Mike Wienbracke, Wolff, Josef, Trust, Fiducia und fiduziarische Treuhand (zugl.Diss. Universität Salzburg), Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 2005, S. 387, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008, pp. 365-369

W.C.H Ervine, Willem H. Van Boom and Marco Loos (eds), Collective Enforcement of Consumer Law: Securing Compliance in Europe through Private Group Action and Public Authority Intervention, Europa Law Publishing, Groningen 2007 EUR 49, USD 80, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008,  pp. 371-373.

Anna Verena Lauber, Conference ‘CFR and Existing EC Contract Law', Münster,10-11 December 2007, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008, pp. 375-380.

Joan M. Rius Riu, IV International Congress ‘European Private Law Beyond the CFR',Lleida, 25-26 October 2007, European Review of Private Law, vol. 16, nr. 2, 2008, pp. 381-382.

FMT BK

LDR -----nam0-22--------450-

001 000192098

005 20080402144644.0

010 $a 0-88410-168-1

100 $a 20080207d1976----km-y0rumy50------ba

1010 $a eng

102 $a US

2001 $a Humanistic education

$e <<an>> interpretation

$e <<a>> report to Ford Foundation

$f Elizabeth Léonie Simpson

$g with a comprehensive annotated bibliography of humanistic education by Mary Anne Gray

210 $a Cambridge, Mass $c Ballinger $d [1976]

607 $a STATELE UNITE ALE AMERICII

6100 $a Educaţie umanistă

6100 $a Umanism

6100 $a Bibliografie tematică

675 $a 37:009(73)

675 $a 016:37:009(73)

700 1 $a SIMPSON $b Elizabeth Léonie

702 1 $a GRAY $b Mary Anne $4 coment

801 0 $a RO $b BCU Timişoara

936 $a 495926

British Library

FMT       BK

LDR             am a2200301ui 4500

001        011388239

008        790716s1976    xxua    $     000 $ eng

010        $a 76015280

020        $a 0884101681

040        $a Uk $c Uk

082        $a 370.11/2/0973

1001      $a Simpson, Elizabeth Léonie.

24510    $a Humanistic education :

$b an interpretation : a report to the Ford Foundation /

$c Elizabeth Leonie Simpson ; with a comprehensive annotated bibliography of humanistic education by Mary Anne Gray.

260        $a Cambridge, Mass : $b Ballinger, $c 1976.

300        $a xiii,329p. : $b 1 ill. ; $c 24cm.

504        $a Bibliography : p.111-328.

650 0     $a Education, Humanistic $z United States.

650 0     $a Education, Humanistic $z United States $x Bibliography.

653        $a United States $a Liberal education

7001      $a Gray, Mary Anne.

7102      $a Ford Foundation.

85241    $a British Library $b HMNTS $j X.529/33157

8524      $a British Library $b DSC $j 77/4486

SYS        011388239

http://catalogue.bl.uk/

Case C-105/03, Criminal proceedings against Maria Pupino

Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Articles 34 EU and 35 EU – Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA – Standing of victims in criminal proceedings – Protection of vulnerable persons – Hearing of minors as witnesses – Effects of a framework decision

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 16 June 2005 (*)

Ei bine, ceea ce voiam de fapt, e sa redau lista bibliografica existenta pe site-ul eur-lex (*), altfel spus, sa vedeti si domniile voastre cat s-a putut scrie in 2 ani in materie...

Salvatelli, Patrizia: Un'ulteriore tappa sulla via della comunitarizzazione del Terzo Pilastro?, Quaderni costituzionali 2005 p.425-428
Hillgruber, Christian: Juristenzeitung 2005 p.841-844
Fetzer, Thomas ; Groß, Thomas: Die Pupino-Entscheidung des EuGH - Abkehr vom intergouvernementalen Charakter der EU? - Erwiderung auf Herrmann, EuZW 2005, 436, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2005 p.550-551
Adam, Michael: Die Wirkung von EU-Rahmenbeschlüssen im mitgliedstaatlichen Recht, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2005 p.558-561
Herrmann, Christoph: Gemeinschaftsrechtskonforme Auslegung nationalen Rechts in Strafverfahren, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2005 p.436-438
Conti, Roberto ; Foglia, Raffaele: Decisioni quadro e interpretazione conforme del diritto interno, Il Corriere giuridico 2005 p.1149-1153
Killmann, Bernd-Roland: Die rahmenbeschlusskonforme Auslegung im Strafrecht vor dem EuGH, Juristische Blätter 2005 p.566-575
Spencer, J.R.: Child Witnesses and the European Union, The Cambridge Law Journal 2005 p.569-572
Wehnert, Anne: Rahmenbeschlusskonforme Auslegung deutschen Strafrechts, Neue juristische Wochenschrift 2005 p.3760-3762
Bazzocchi, Valentina: Il caso Pupino e il principio di interpretazione conforme delle decisioni-quadro, Quaderni costituzionali 2005 p.884-887
Salvatelli, Patrizia: La Corte di Giustizia e la "comunitarizzazione" del "Terzo Pilastro", Quaderni costituzionali 2005 p.887-891
Zemánek, Jiří: Eurokonformní výklad rámcového rozhodnutí - povinnost nebo nepřípustný soudcovský aktivismus?, EMP Jurisprudence 2005 p.37-40
Lazowski, Adam: Revolution in Luxembourg: Criminal Proceedings against Pupino, European Current Law 2005 Part 11 "Focus" p.xi-xvi
Broussy, Emmanuelle ; Donnat, Francis ; Lambert, Christian: L'obligation d'interpréter le droit national conformément au droit communautaire s'applique également aux décisions-cadres, L'actualité juridique ; droit administratif 2005 p.2336-2337
Uyen Do, T.: Arrêt "Pupino", Revue du droit de l'Union européenne 2005 nº 3 p.650-654
Fletcher, Maria: Extending "indirect effect" to the third pillar: the significance of Pupino?, European Law Review 2005 p.862-877
Favale, Antonietta: Possibile efficacia diretta delle decisioni-quadro nell'ambito della politica di cooperazione di polizia e giudiziaria in materia penale, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 2005 p.1988-1990
Mazák, Ján: Rozsudok "Pupino", Vyber z rozhodnutí Súdneho dvora Európskych spolocenstiev 2005 p.22
Grzelak, Agnieszka: Europejski nakaz aresztowania - orzeczenie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z punktu widzenia prawa Unii Europejskiej, Europejski Przeglad Sadowy 2005 Vol.2 p.24-33
Kauff-Gazin, Fabienne: Effets d'une décision-cadre, Europe 2005 Août-Septembre Comm. nº 274 p.10-11
Calvano, Roberta: Il Caso Pupino: ovvero dell'alterazione per via giudiziaria dei rapporti tra diritto interno (processuale penale), diritto UE e diritto comunitario, Giurisprudenza costituzionale 2005 p.4027-4034
Barcz, Jan: Europejski nakaz aresztowania - konsekwencje braku transpozycji lub wadliwej transpozycji decyzji ramowej w państwie członkowskim UE, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2005 Vol.1 p.11-22
Papapaschalis, P.: Elliniki Epitheorisi Evropaïkou Dikaiou 2005 p.626-628
Streinz, Rudolf: Alles klar zu den Rahmenbeschlüssen? - Nach Pupino, Kommission/Rat (EuGH) und Darkazanli (BVerfG), Europäisches Wirtschafts- & Steuerrecht - EWS 2005 Heft 10 p.I
Von Unger, Moritz: Pupino: Der EuGH vergemeinschaftet das intergouvernementale Recht, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 2006 p.46-49
Corstens, G.J.M.: Eerste "strafarrest" van het Hof van Justitie EG over een kaderbesluit, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2006 p.24-28
Barents, R.: S.E.W. ; Sociaal-economische wetgeving 2006 p.75-78
Salminen, Janne: Euroopan yhteisöjen tuomioistuimen tuomio 16.6.2005 (suuri jaosto) asiassa C-105/03, rikosasia vastaajana Maria Pupino - Myös EU-puitepäätös tuottaa tulkintavaikutuksen: rikosoikeudellisen yhteistyön ja poliisiyhteistyön alalla annetun puitepäätöksen vaikutukset ja niiden perusteet, Lakimies 2006 p.286-299
Borgers, M.J.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2006 nº 500
Gnes, Matteo: L'estensione dell'obbligo di interpretazione conforme alle decisioni quadro, Giornale di diritto amministrativo 2006 p.501-504
Sardella, Barbara: Gli effetti "quasi diretti" delle decisioni-quadro, Giustizia civile 2006 I p.743-753
Marchegiani, Maura: L'obbligo di interpretazione conforme alle decisioni quadro: considerazioni in margine alla sentenza Pupino, Il diritto dell'Unione Europea 2006 p.563-583
Manes, Vittorio: L'incidenza delle "decisioni-quadro" sull'interpretazione in materia penale: profili di diritto sostanziale, Cassazione penale 2006 p.1150-1164
Aprile, Ercole: I rapporti tra diritto processuale penale e diritto dell'Unione europea, dopo la sentenza della Corte di giustizia sul "caso Pupino" in materia di incidente probatorio, Cassazione penale 2006 p.1165-1175
Prevedourou, E.: Epitheorisis Dimosiou Dikaiou kai Dioikitikou Dikaiou 2006 p.219-225
Cherubini, Francesco: L'obbligo di interpretazione conforme "sconfina" nel terzo pilastro: note a margine della sentenza Pupino, Studi sull'integrazione europea 2006 nº 1 p.157-175
Weyembergh, Anne ; De Hert, Paul ; Paepe, Pieter: L'effectivité du troisième pilier de l'Union européenne et l'exigence de l'interprétation conforme: la Cour de justice pose ses jalons (note sous l'arrêt Pupino, du 16 juin 2005, de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes), Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme 2007 p.269-292
Gebbie, George: "Berlusconi" - v- "Pupino": Conflict or Compatibility?, Journal of European Criminal Law 2007 Vol.1 Issue 3 p.31-37
Spaventa, Eleanor: Opening Pandora's Box: Some Reflections on the Constitutional Effects of the Decision in Pupino, European Constitutional Law Review 2007 Vol.3 p.5-24
Magno, Teresa: The Pupino Case: Background in Italian Law and consequences for the national judge, ERA-Forum: scripta iuris europaei 2007 p.215-223
Belfiore, Rosanna: Interpretazione conforme e mandato d'arresto europeo: una conferma viene da oltremanica, Cassazione penale 2007 p.3479-3491

Philipp Kiiver, Lisbon and the Lawyers - Reflections on what the EU Reform Treaty means to Jurists, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Volume 14, Number 4, 2007.

Bernd Riegert, Alexandra Sora, Eurodeputat german [Silvana Koch-Mehrin, nascuta in 1970]: Polonia sa fie exclusa din UE daca nu ratifica Tratatul, Deutsche Welle, 02.07.2008 [*] [*]

Larelle Law Chapple, Colin Ferguson, Diana Kang, Corporate Governance and Misappropriation (June 15, 2007). Available at SSRN.

Laurence Camensuli-Feuillard, L'irresponsabilité du dirigeant à l'égard de l'associé, du créancier et de la société débitrice en difficulté, Bulletin Joly Sociétés, Janvier, 2008

François-Xavier Lucas, La date d'évaluation des parts d'un retrayant, Bulletin Joly Sociétés, Janvier, 2008

Februarie, 2008

Gaël Couturier, Le plan de cession, instrument de restructuration des entreprises défaillantes, Bulletin Joly Sociétés, Février, 2008
Laure Nurit-Pontier, L'obligation aux dettes sociales des associés de sociétés à risque illimité, Bulletin Joly Sociétés, Février, 2008

Martie, 2008

Paul Le Cannu, La SAS dans la concurrence des formes de société, Bulletin Joly Sociétés, Mars, 2008
Laurent Godon, La condition juridique de l'associé de SAS, Bulletin Joly Sociétés, Mars, 2008
Bruno Dondero, Statuts de SAS et pactes extra-statutaires: questions et confrontations, Bulletin Joly Sociétés, Mars, 2008
Thierry Granier, Le commissaire aux comptes dans la société par actions, Bulletin Joly Sociétés, Mars, 2008
Benoît Le Bars, L'utilisation de la SAS dans les groupes de sociétés, Bulletin Joly Sociétés, Mars, 2008
Philippe Puech et Xavier Vamparys, Les clauses de sortie en bourse dans les pactes d'actionnaires, Bulletin Joly Sociétés, Mars, 2008

Asadar, fiind gata sa ajutam populatia, formulam o sugestie: folositi cu incredere, de exemplu, site-ul biliotecii de la ASE, cu catalogul sau online.

Daca ar fi vorba despre lucrari ale strainilor, pentru a nu recurge la cugetarile doctrinarilor autohtoni, atunci exista "google". conditia, insa, este aceea de a sti ce cauti... adica de a fi "mai specific" (sic!).

Ce mai inseamna azi o bibliografie?

Ce bibliografie poti sa faci pe tema "Uniunea Europeana" sau pe "Proprietate intelectuala"...?

Paradoxul Bibliotecii din Alexandria (adaptat, in context) ne urmareste la tot pasul.

Asadar, amintesc aici: aceste bibliografii sunt subiective, sunt titluri pe care le-am intalnit, articole sau carti pe care le-am citit sau nu. Dar unde e valoarea acestui demers?

Raspunsul la aceasta intrebare ma va face intr-o zi sa sterg aceste "bibliografii".

PS Dupa o vreme, adunatura de titluri se va transforma in bibliografie, dar in acel moment va fi cineva capabil sa le urmareasca si sa le inteleaga?

Ian F. Fletcher, Maintaining the Momentum: The Continuing Quest for Global Standards and Principles to Govern Cross Border Insolvency, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Volume 32, Number 3, 2007

Look Chan Ho, Proving COMI: Seeking Recognition Under Chapter 15 of the US Bankruptcy Code (September 13, 2007). Available at SSRN.

Alexander Michael Kipnis, Beyond UNCITRAL: Alternatives to Universality in Transnational Insolvency (July 3, 2006). Available at SSRN.

Junichi Matsushita, Japan's personal Insolvency Law, Texas International Law Journal, Volume 42, Number 3, Summer 2007

Luc Morin, L'actionnaire et l'entreprise insolvable, Ottawa Law Review, Volume 38, Number 1, 2006-2007

Gareth Miller, The Effect of Bankruptcy on Property Adjustment Orders, Family Law, Volume 37, October 2007

Gabriel Moss, QC, Group Insolvency-Choice of Forum and Law: The European Experience Under the Influence of English Pragmatism, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Volume 32, Number 3, 2007Christoph G. Paulus, Global Insolvency Law and the Role of Multinational Institutions, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Volume 32, Number 3, 2007

John A. E. Pottow, The Myth (and Realities) of Forum Shopping in Transnational Insolvency, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Volume 32, Number 3, 2007 (*)

Janis Sarra, From subordination to parity: an international comparison of equity securities law claims in insolvency proceedings, International Insolvency Review, Winter 2007. Vol. 16, Iss. 3; pg. 181 (*)

Keith D Yamauchi, Should reciprocity be a part of the UNCITRAL Model Cross-Border Insolvency Law?, International Insolvency Review, Winter 2007, Vol. 16, Iss. 3; pg. 145.

Keith D. Yamauchi, The UNCITRAL model cross-border insolvency law: the stay of proceedings and adequate protection, International Insolvency Review, Summer 2004. Vol. 13, Iss. 2; p. 87.

Keith D Yamauchi, Evolution, revolution or nothing at all? Recent reforms to Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency legislation, International Insolvency Review, Winter 2006. Vol. 15, Iss. 3; p. 163

***, Implementation of UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency in Great Britain. Summary of Responses and Government Reply, 2006 (*).

Reviste

Norton Journal of Bankruptcy Law and Practice

International Insolvency Review

Legislatie

Decizie nr. 928 din 18.10.2007 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 99 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 85/2006 privind procedura insolvenţei

Decizie nr. 954 din 30/10/2007 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 3 pct. 1 lit. a) şi art. 33 alin. (4) din Legea nr. 85/2006 privind procedura insolvenţei

Jurisprudenta

***, Fallimento: ai fini dei presupposti per la revocatoria conta il contratto definitivo, non il preliminare, Sezione prima, sentenza n. 2005/08; depositata il 29 gennaio [Stop alla sentenza che, rispetto alla conoscibilità dell'insolvenza, era incentrata sulla situazione del promittente venditore (fintosi proprietario dell'immobile) senza motivare sul negozio conclusivo]

Revista Presei

Dana Banzea, AOAR cere guvernului dezbatere publică pentru modificarea Legii Achiziţiilor Publice, Adevarul, 14.09.2007 (cititi si raspunsul Primului Ministru, Calin Popescu Tariceanu, aici) si finalul...aici (26.09.2007).

Proiectul adoptat este publicat aici.

Legislatie

Ordonanţă de urgenţă nr. 129/2007 pentru modificarea Ordonanţei de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 30/2006 privind funcţia de verificare a aspectelor procedurale aferente procesului de atribuire a contractelor de achiziţie publică, a contractelor de concesiune de lucrări publice şi a contractelor de concesiune de servicii, Monitorul Oficial nr. 776 din 15 noiembrie 2007

G. Amorelli, Le privatizzazioni nella prospettiva del Trattato istitutivo della CEE, Padova, 1992.

José Engrácia Antunes, "Law & Economics" Perspectives of Portuguese Corporation Law - System and Current Developments, European Company and Financial Law Review, vol. 2, nr. 3.

Edwin Edwin Baker, The First Amendment and Commercial Speech, U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-42 Available at SSRN.

Steef M. Bartman, European company law in accelerated progress, Kluwer Law International, 2007.

Brigitte Basdevant-Gaudemet (coord.), Contrat ou Institution: un enjeu de société, L.G.D.J., 2004 [prezentarea noastra]

Stephanie Ben-Ishai, Corporate gatekeeper liability in Canada, Texas International Law Journal, Volume 42, Number 3, Summer 2007

Stephanie Ben-Ishai, A Survey of Corporate Gatekeeper Liability in Canada, May 19, 2006 (*)

Lucian Bercea, Regula judecăţii de afaceri: despre noul regim al răspunderii administratorilor societăţii pe acţiuni, Pandectele române, 8/2007

Lucian Bercea, Regula judecăţii de afaceri: un transplant legal imposibil, Pandectele române, nr. 3/2006.

Lucian Bercea, Regula judecăţii de afaceri: despre involuţia instituţiei înainte de naşterea sa, Pandectele Române, nr. 6/2006.

Philippe Bissara, Amicie De Vaulpane, Régis Foy, Droit et pratique de la gouvernance des sociétés cotées, Joly, 2007.

Luca Cerioni, EU Corporate Law And EU Company Tax Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007, 288 p.

H. Bouthinon-Dumas, Le droit des sociétés cotées et le marché boursier, L.G.D.J., 2007

Alexis Constantin, Droit des sociétés. Droit commun et droit spécial des sociétés, Dalloz, 2007

Cristina Cucu, Marilena-Veronica Gavris, Catalin-Gabriel Badoiu, Cristian Haraga, Legea societatilor comerciale adnotata. Repere bibliografice, practica judiciara, decizii ale Curtii Constitutionale, adnotari, Ed. Hamangiu, 2007;

Francisca van Dijken, Corporate social responsibility: market regulation and the evidence, Managerial Law, Volume 49, Number 4, 2007.

Janet Dine, Marios Koutsias, Michael Blecher, Company Law in the New Europe: The EU Acquis, Comparative Methodology, And Model Law (Corporations, Globalisation and the Law), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007, 369 p.

Hülya Eraslan, Wenli Li, Pierre-Daniel Sarte, The anatomy of U.S. personal bankruptcy under Chapter 13, Federal Reserve of Philadelphia, Working Paper NO. 07-31, 2007 (*)

Jean Eaglesham, UK delays final act of companies law, FT.com, Nov 7, 2007

Luca Enriques, Paolo F. Volpin, Corporate Governance Reforms in Continental Europe, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 117-140, Winter 2007, Available at SSRN.

Paola Fasciani, Groups of Companies: The Italian Approach, European Company and Financial Law Review, 2/2007

Holger Fleischer, Legal Transplants in European Company Law - The Case of Fiduciary Duties, European Company and Financial Law Review, vol. 2, nr. 3.

Roberto Fortich, La Ley del Mercado de Valores: Análisis de sus Posibles Consecuencias sobre las Corporaciones en Colombia, Universidad del Rosario, disponibil aici.

Derek French, Blackstone's Statutes on Company Law 2007-2008. Eleventh Edition, Oxford Univeristy Press, 2007. Prezentare aici.

Ross Grantham, Regulatory and Enabling Approaches to Corporate Law Enforcement, University of Queensland Law Journal, 2007 Jan 1;26(1) 209-212.

Stefan Grundmann, The Structure of European Company Law: From Crisis to Boom, European Business Organization Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 601-633, 2004. (*) (*)

Stefan Grundmann, Florian Moslein, Golden Shares - State Control in Privatised Companies: Comparative Law, European Law and Policy Aspects (April 2003). Available at SSRN.

Marjaana Helminen, Freedom of Establishment and Oy AA, European Taxation. Amsterdam: Nov 2007. Vol. 47, Iss. 11; pg. 490 {ProQuest}.

Henry T. C. Hu, Jay Lawrence Westbrook, ABOLITION OF THE CORPORATE DUTY TO CREDITORS, Columbia Law Review, Volume 107, Number 6, October 2007 (*)

Chris Hughes, Shareholders a target for begging bowl, Financial Times, 13.01.2008. [*]

Alice de Jonge, Corporate Governance And China's H-Share Market, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008.

Luc Laeven, Ross Levine, Complex Ownership Structures and Corporate Valuations, IMF Working Paper, 2007

Karel Lannoo, Arman Khachaturyan, Reform of corporate governance in the EU, Centre For European Policy Studies, CEPS Policy Brief no. 38, october 2003.

William S. Laufer, Illusions of compliance and governance, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, nr. 3/2006

Marc Lauterfeld, „Centros" and the EC Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings: The End of the "Real Seat" Approach towards Pseudo-foreign Companies in German International Company and Insolvency Law? -The Danger of Diverging Developments of the Connecting Factors in Company and Insolvency Law-, European Business Law Review, March/April, 2001

Rebecca Lee, Fiduciary Duty Without Equity: "Fiduciary Duties" of Directors Under the Revised Company Law of the PRC, Virginia Journal of International Law, Volume 47, Number 4, Summer 2007

Michael Legg and Ron Schaffer, Sons of Gwalia Ltd v. Margaretic: Encouraging shareholder claims and the fraud on the market theory, Australian Business Law Review, Volume 35, Number 6, December 2007

Cecile Legros, Arbitrage, chaines de contrats et groupes de societes, Journal du Droit International, 3/2007.

Frederick D Lipman, Summary of major corporate governance principles and best practices, International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Volume 4, Number 4, November 2007

Stefano Lombardo, Conflict of Law Rules in Company Law after Überseering: An Economic and Comparative Analysis of the Allocation of Policy Competence in the European Union, European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR), 2/2003.

Anne Looijestijn-Clearie, Have the Dikes Collapsed? Inspire Art a Further Break-through in the Freedom of Establishment of Companies?, European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) (2004), 5: 389-418

Alexander Loos (ed.), Director's Liability: A Worldwide Review, Kluwer Law International, 2006.

Michael Lower, Going Dutch? Who foots the bill in section 459 petitions?, [1995] 1 Web JCLI.

John Lowry, Alan Dignam, Company Law, Fourth Edition, OUP, 2006

Katherine E. Lyons, Piercing the corporate veil in the international arena, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, Spring, 2006.

Jacques Malherbe, Controlled Foreign Corporations in the EU After Cadbury Schweppes, Tax Management International Journal, Volume 36, Number 12, December 2007

Avril Martindale, Jill Delaney, Brand focussed M&As (merger & acquisition), Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, May, 2006, disponibil aici.

Manfred Jürgen Matschke, Gerrit Brösel, Fundamentals of the functional theory of company valuation, MPRA Paper No. 4610, August 2007, disponibil aici.

Lilian Miles, Current changes in labour management and industrial relations in Japan and their impact on its "stakeholder-oriented" governance model, Managerial Law, Volume 49, Number 4, 2007.

Luc Morin, L'actionnaire et l'entreprise insolvable, Ottawa Law Review, Volume 38, Number 1, 2006-2007

Alexander Muravyev, Federal state shareholdings in Russian companies: Origin, forms and consequences for enterprise perfomance, Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition, 2002.

Jean-Louis Navarro, Le parallélisme critiquable entre la compétence ratione personae des tribunaux de commerce et la clause compromissoire au regard du droit des sociétés (Cass. com., 10 juillet 2007), Petites affiches, no. 259, 27 decembre 2007.

J. (Hans) van Oosterhout, Authority and Democracy in Corporate Governance?, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 71, nr. 4/2007. [*]

Tom O'Shea, News Analysis: Finland's Intragroup Financial Transfer, Rules CompatibleWith EU Law, Tax Notes Int'l, 13, 2007, p. 634. (*)

Evaristus Oshionebo, The U.N. Global compact and accountability of transnational corporations: Separating myth from realities, Florida Journal of International Law, Volume 19, Number 1, April 2007

Hari M. Osofsky, Local Approaches to Transnational Corporate Responsibility: Mapping the Role of Subnational Climate Change Litigation, Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, Volume 20, Number 1, 2007

Michael W. Ott, Delaware Strikes Back: Newcastle Partners and the Fight for State Corporate Autonomy, Indiana Law Journal, Volume 82, Issue 1: Winter 2007

Anne Outin-Adam, Sandra Bienvenu, «une action = une voix»: Faut-il imposer une égalité entre participation au capital et détention du pouvoir?, Présentation du rapport Norguet adopté le 24 mai 2007 par la CCIP, La Semaine Juridique Entreprise et Affaires n° 39, 27 Septembre 2007, act. 432

Frédéric-Jérôme Pansier, Matthieu Salvia, L'usage commercial du nom de famille, Gazette du Palais, Gazette de la propriété industrielle, no 2, nr. 266-268, 2007.

Thomas Papadopoulos, The mandatory provisions of the EU Takeover Bid Directive and their deficiencies, Law and Financial Markets Review, Volume 1, Issue 6, November 2007, Vol 1 Issue 6 (November 2007). [*,*]

Gheorghe Piperea, Controlul managementului prin adunarea generala si prin demersurile individuale ale actionarilor, 27 septembrie 2007, juridice.ro, disponibil aici.

Gheorghe Piperea, Controlul managementului prin adunarea generala si prin demersurile individuale ale actionarilor, Curierul Judiciar, nr. 10/2007.

A. P. Rutabanzibwa, What is golden in the golden share?: Company law implications of privatization, The Company Lawyer, 1996, FEB, 17 (2).

Daniel-Mihail Sandru, Reforma dreptului societăţilor comerciale în Uniunea Europeană în 2007, Tribuna Economica, nr. 35/2007.

Gianluca Scarchillo, Le Privatizzazioni In Francia. Assetti Proprietari Delle Società Privatizzate. Un'Indagine Comparativa, Teza, 1998-1999.

Ioan Schiau, Titus Prescure, Legea societatilor comerciale nr. 31/1990. Analize si comentarii pe articole, Ed. Hamangiu, 2007

Xavier Sculfort, Choisir le nom de sa société: les précautions à prendre, LEntreprise.com, 14 septembre 2007.

Wee Meng Seng, Reforming Capital Maintenance Law: The Companies (Amendment) Act 2005, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, Volume 19, Number 2, 2007.

Peter Sester and José Luis Cárdenas T., The Extra-Communitarian Effects of Centros, Überseering and Inspire Art with Regard to Fourth Generation Association Agreements, European Company and Financial Law Review, vol. 2, nr. 3.

Mathias M Siems, The EU Market Abuse Directive: A Case-based Analysis, Law and Financial Markets Review, Vol 2 Issue 1 (January 2008) (*)

Lynn A. Stout, Why We Should Stop Teaching Dodge v. Ford, UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 07-11 Available at SSRN.

D. Daniel Sokol, Globalization of Law Firms: A Survey of the Literature and a Research Agenda for Further Study, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Volume 14, Number 1, Winter 2007

Cristiana I. Stoica, Analiza comparativă între Legea pieţei de capital şi Legea societăţilor comerciale din perspectiva principiului specialia generalibus derogant cu referire la unele particularităţi ale regimului juridic aplicabil unor societăţi pe acţiuni participante la piata de capital, Revista romana de drept privat, nr. 1/2007

Siobhan Sweeney, Enron's legacy lives on: Australia's adoption of Basel II's securitisation framework, Company and Securities Law Journal, Volume 25, Number 8, November 2007

Pier Angelo Toninelli (ed.), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprises in the Western World, Cambridge, 2000 [GoogleBooks;]

Viktor J. Vanberg, Corporate social responsibility and the ‘game of catallaxy': the perspective of constitutional economics, Constitutional Political Economy, Volume 18, Issue 3, September 2007

Karen Vandekerckhove, Piercing the Corporate Veil: A Transnational Approach (European Company Law), Kluwer Law International (Jun 2007)

Aurélie Vaudry, La dépénalisation du droit des sociétés: une réforme de l'abus de bien social, net-iris.fr, 24 sept.2007

E. Norman Veasey, Christine T. Di Guglielmo, What happened in Delaware corporate law and governance from 1992-2004? A retrospective on some key developments, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 153, 2005.

Julian Velasco, Taking shareholder rights seriously, U.C. Davis Law Review, Volume 41, Number 2, December 2007 (*,*)

Marco Ventoruzzo, Experiments in Comparative Corporate Law: The Recent Italian Reform and the Dubious Virtues of a Market for Rules in the Absence of Effective Regulatory Competition, Texas International Law Journal, vo. 40, 2004 (European Company and Financial Law Review, vol. 2/2005)

Marco Ventoruzzo, The Thirteenth Directive and the Contrasts Between European and U.S. Takeover Regulation: Different (Regulatory) Means, Not so Different (Political and Economic) Ends? (October 4, 2005). Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-07 Available at SSRN.

Marco Ventoruzzo, 'Cost-Based' and 'Rule-Based' Regulatory Competition: Markets for Corporate Charters in the U.S. and the EU" . New York University Journal of Law and Business, Fall 2006 Available at SSRN.

Marco Ventoruzzo, Cross-Border Mergers, Change of Applicable Corporate Laws and Protection of Dissenting Shareholders: Withdrawal Rights Under Italian Law, Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16 Available at SSRN.

Alain Viandier, La révocation d'un directeur général, membre d'un directoire, doit être abusive ou sans juste motif pour justifier une indemnisation, La Semaine Juridique Entreprise et Affaires n° 39, 27 Septembre 2007, 2158

Charlotte Villiers, Corporate Reporting and Company Law, Cambridge University Press, Series: Cambridge Studies in Corporate Law (No. 5), 2007. [un fragment poate fi vazut si aici, recenzia semnata de Iris H-Y Chiu in Int Comp Law Q 2007, Iulie 2007]

Annalisa De Vivo, La società europea: alcune riflessioni sul regolamento ce 2157/2001 (*)

D. Vlăsceanu, Utilitatea pactelor încheiate între acţionari, RRDA, nr. 1/2005.

Laura Vladuca, Cum sa infiintezi singur o societate comerciala (contine CD), Ed. Hamangiu, 2007

Peer Zumbansen & Daniel Saam, The ECJ, Volkswagen and European Corporate Law: Reshaping the European Varieties of Capitalism, German Law Journal, Volume 8, Number 11, November 2007

Jonathan Witmer, Lorie Zorn, Estimating and Comparing the Implied Cost of Equity for Canadian and U.S. Firms,

Bank of Canada, Working Paper/Document de travail, 2007-48.

Oliver E. Williamson, Corporate Boards of Directors: In Principle and in Practice, J Law Econ Organ published 29 November 2007, 10.1093/jleo/ewm059.

Stephan Wilske, Laurence Shore & Jan-Michael Ahrens, The „Group of companies doctrine" - where is it heading?, American Review of International Arbitration, Volume 17, Number 1, 2006

Frank Wooldridge, Überseering: Freedom of Establishment of Companies Affirmed, EBLR, 2003.

Nichole Wong, CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT: THE NEED FOR BIG BROTHER, Whittier Law Review, Volume 29, Number 1, Fall 2007.

Miriam Wugmeister, Karin Retzer, & Cynthia Rich, Global solution for cross-border data transfers: making the case for corporate privacy rules, Georgetown Journal of International Law, Volume 38, Number 3, Spring 2007

Eddy Wymeersch, The transfer of the company's seat in European company law, CMLR, 2003

Eddy Wymeersch, Centros: A Landmark Decision in European Company Law, (October 1999). Financial Law Institute Working Paper 99-15. Available at SSRN.

Eddy Wymeersch, Company Law in Europe and European Company Law, (April 2001). Financial Law Institute Working Paper No. 2001-06. Available at SSRN.

Yeo Hwee Ying, Nature and Liability Shield of Limited Liability Partnerships in Singapore, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, Volume 19, Number 2, 2007.

Some important provisions, and implementation of, the Takeovers Directive, Company Lawyer, Volume 28, Number 10, October 2007

***, Hungary: Building corporate barricades, Business Europe 01 Oct 2007 [Abstract]

Lista contine doar carti nou aparute sau carti, mai vechi, asupra carora am facut o recenzie sau prezentare.

si articole, precum si o lista de reviste...

ALI-ABA Business Law Course Materials Journal

The American Bankruptcy Law Journal

Australian Journal of Corporate Law [*]

The Banking Law Journal

Business Europe, Economist Intelligence Unit

The Company Lawyer

Company and Securities Law Journal

Corporate Governance Law Review

European Company and Financial Law Review

European Company Law

Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel

Insolvency Law Journal

Journal of Business & Technology Law

Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation

Journal of Corporate and Financial Law

The Journal of Corporate Law Studies

Norton Journal of Bankruptcy Law and Practice

La Semaine Juridique Entreprise et Affaires, LexisNexis

Law and Financial Markets Review

Tax Management International Journal

Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal

Bibliografii

European Corporate Governance Institute.

Documente

Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2007.[*]

Asian Insolvency Systems: Closing the Implementation Gap. Emerging Economies, OECD, 2007 (Complete Edition - ISBN 9264038329). [*]

Ian Ayres,  Gideon Parchomovsky, Tradable Patent Rights: A New Approach to Innovation (September 28, 2007). U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 07-23 Available at SSRN.

Scott Baker, Pak Yee Lee, Claudio Mezzetti, Intellectual Property Disclosure as “Threat”, University of Leicester, august 2007, disponibil aici.

Thomas O. Barnett, Interoperability Between Antitrust And Intellectual Property, George Mason Law Review, Volume 14, Number 4, Summer 2007

Knut Blind, Katrin Cremers, Elisabeth Mueller, The Influence of Strategic Patenting on Companies’ Patent Portfolios, ZEW Discussion Paper, Dis cus si on Paper No. 07-013, disponibil integral aici.

Verena von Bomhard, Hugh O'Neill, Anat Paz, Licences in OHIM practice, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access, 25 september 2007 {rezumat}

Otilia Calmuschi, Aspecte ale exigenţelor procesului de armonizare privind asigurarea respectării drepturilor de proprietate intelectuală, o prioritate a legiuitorului român, Revista romana de drept privat, nr. 2/2007

Nicholas Economides, William N. Hebert, Patents and Antitrust: Application to Adjacent Markets, The Networks, Electronic Commerce, and Telecommunications (“NET”) Institute, Working Paper, 2007.Avril Martindale, Jill Delaney, Brand focussed M&As (merger & acquisition), Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Maz, 2006, disponibil aici.

A. Michael Ferrill, Leslie Sara Hyman, and William "Butch" Hulse, Antitrust and Consumer Protection, SMU Law Review, volume 60, Number 3, Summer 2007.

Jean-Frédéric Morin, Le bilatéralisme américain: la nouvelle frontière du droit international des brevets, Ed. Larcier, 2007, (Fragmente din carte gasiti aici.)

Frédéric-Jérôme Pansier, Matthieu Salvia, L’usage commercial du nom de famille, Gazette du Palais, Gazette de la propriété industrielle, no 2, nr. 266-268, 2007.

Gary Partington, Protection of shapes and colour marks in Canada, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice published 2 November 2007, 10.1093/jiplp/jpm187, http://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/extract/jpm187v1

Andrew Sarrol, THE COPYRIGHT IMPLICATIONS OF SEARCHABLE DATABASES: A METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYZING THE FOURTH FAIR USE FACTOR, Seton Hall Circuit Review, Volume 3, Number 2, Spring 2007.

Edward Smith, ROCKBASS, LOKTHREAD, and EUROPIG, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice published 10 November 2007, 10.1093/jiplp/jpm188, http://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/jpm188v1

Piotr Staniszewski, The interplay between IP rights and competition law in the context of standardization, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Advance Access, 25 September 2007 {rezumat}

Adiraliba Yebdri, Appréciation comparée du risque de confusion des marques dans la jurisprudence française et communautaire, Gazette du Palais, nr. 128/2007.

 

Brian Whitehead, Stuart Jackson, and Richard Kempner, Patents and enantiomers: Genericsv Lundbeck, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice published 2 November 2007, 10.1093/jiplp/jpm191, http://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/jpm191v1

 

reviste

Australian Intellectual Property Journal

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

European Intellectual Property Review
The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law [full-text]

Intellectual Property Quarterly

International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society

Managing Intellectual Property

Trademark Reporter

Lista Wikipedia de reviste de proprietate intelectuala

Legislatie

Decizie nr. 331 din 08.10.2007 privind desemnarea Asociaţiei pentru Drepturile Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (A.D.P.F.R.) ca organism de gestiune colector al remuneraţiilor stabilite în metodologia publicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 382 din 6 iunie 2007 prin Decizia directorului general al Oficiului Român pentru Drepturile de Autor nr. 192/2007, pentru utilizarea repertoriului gestionat de acest organism de gestiune colectivă

Spete 

Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. WB Music Corp., No. 06-5546, U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 21, 2007 (*).

Michel Doucin, Guide de la liberté associative dans le monde, 183 législations analysées - 2čme edition, La Documentation Francaise, 792 p. 2007

Garry W. Jenkins, Incorporation Choice, Uniformity, and the Reform of Nonprofit State Law, Georgia Law Review, Volume 41, Number 4, Summer 2007

Lizabeth A. Moody, Revising the Model Nonprofit Corporation Act: Plus Ça Change, Plus C'est La Même Chose, Georgia Law Review, Volume 41, Number 4, Summer 2007

Jean Mouly, La responsabilité civile des associations sportives du fait de leurs membres: l’exigence confirmée de la faute de l’auteur du dommage (Cass. Ass. plén., 29 juin 2007), Petites Affiches, No 191, 24 septembre 2007.

Dan Felix Tudoriu, Infiintare cluburi sportive fara scop lucrativ, wwww.modeldecontract.ro, 14 mai 2008, [*]

Legislatie

Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 970 din 22 august 2007 pentru recunoaşterea Asociaţiei Generale a Inginerilor din România ca fiind de utilitate publică

Ordin nr. 2076 din 14 august 2007 pentru organizarea evidenţei speciale a asociaţiilor religioase constituite potrivit Legii nr. 489/2006 privind libertatea religioasă şi regimul general al cultelor

Ordin nr. 763 din 31.08.2007 privind aprobarea ca linii prioritare pentru subvenţionarea în anul 2008, de la bugetul de stat, în baza Legii nr. 34/1998, a asociaţiilor şi fundaţiilor, precum şi a Regulamentului de organizare şi funcţionare al Comisiei de evaluare şi selecţionare şi a Grilei de evaluare a asociaţiilor şi fundaţiilor

Regulament din 31.08.2007 de organizare şi funcţionare al Comisiei de evaluare şi selecţionare

Hotărâre Guvernului nr. 1236 din 10.110.2007 privind recunoaşterea Asociaţiei "Liga Navală Română" ca fiind de utilitate publică [Nota de fundamentare]

Decizie nr. 714 din 13.09.2007 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 55 alin. (2) din Ordonanţa Guvernului nr. 26/2000 cu privire la asociaţii şi fundaţii

Decizie nr. 892 din 16.10.2007 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 33 din Ordonanţa Guvernului nr. 26/2000 cu privire la asociaţii şi fundaţii

Decizie nr. 1068 din 20.11.2007 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 39 şi art. 42 din Legea nr. 230/2007 privind înfiinţarea, organizarea şi funcţionarea asociaţiilor de proprietari

Hotărâre nr. 1553 din 19.12.2007 privind recunoaşterea Asociaţiei Române de Ştiinţe Penale ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărâre Guvernului nr. 41 din 16.01.2008 privind recunoaşterea Asociaţiei "Harghita Visual Art" ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărâre Guvenului nr. 72 din 23.01.2008 privind recunoaşterea Fundaţiei Universitare "Alma Mater" ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 109 din 30.01.2008 privind recunoaşterea Asociaţiei Italienilor din România - RO.AS.IT. ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 124 din 06.02.2008 privind recunoaşterea Fundaţiei "RENAŞTEREA PENTRU EDUCAŢIE, SĂNĂTATE ŞI CULTURĂ" ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 125 din 06.02.2008 privind recunoaşterea Asociaţiei "SANO-HEP" ROMÂNIA ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 126 din 06.02.2008 privind recunoaşterea Fundaţiei "SFÂNTA IRINA" ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărâre nr. 156 din 13.02.2008 rivind recunoaşterea Asociaţiei Comunelor din România ca fiind de utilitate publică

Decizie nr. 40 din 31.01.2008 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a prevederilor art. 45, art. 46 şi art. 50 din Legea nr. 230/2007 privind înfiinţarea, organizarea şi funcţionarea asociaţiilor de proprietari

Hotărâre nr. 283 din 12.03.2008 privind aprobarea prealabilă în vederea recunoaşterii prin hotărâre judecătorească a Fundaţiei YANA-YOU ARE NOT ALONE din Liechtenstein

Hotărâre nr. 285 din 12.03.2008 privind recunoaşterea Fundaţiei "COMMUNITAS" ca fiind de utilitate publică

Lege nr. 38 din 19.03.2008 privind respingerea Ordonanţei de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 183/2005 pentru ratificarea Acordului d intre Guvernul României şi Guvernul Republicii Ungare privind înfiinţarea Fundaţiei Publice Româno-Ungare "Gojdu", semnat la Bucureşti la 20 octombrie 2005

Hotărâre nr. 493 din 14 mai 2008 privind recunoaşterea Asociaţiei pentru Promovarea Femeii din România ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărâre nr. 494 din 14 mai 2008 privind recunoaşterea Asociaţiei "Centrul Diecezan Caritas Iaşi" ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărâre nr. 526 din 21 mai 2008 privind recunoaşterea Fundaţiei Ronald S. Lauder - România ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărâre nr. 530 din 21 mai 2008 privind recunoaşterea Asociaţiei Magistraţilor din România ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărâre nr. 625 din 11/06/2008
privind recunoaşterea Fundaţiei C.I.D. România (Children in Distress - Copii în Dificultate) ca fiind de utilitate publică

Hotărâre nr. 626 din 11/06/2008
privind recunoaşterea Asociaţiei "Catharsis" din Braşov ca fiind de utilitate publică

Propuneri de modificare: Va fi modificata OG nr. 26/2000 cu privire la asociatii si fundatii, 12 sept. 2007.

Revista Presei

Georgian Stoica, Vremuri grele pentru supravietuitorii grupului EuroColumna, Ziarul Financiar, nr. 84, 30 octombrie 2006 [Fundatia Columna]

Andreea Petrescu, Asociatiile non-profit, obligate de Guvern sa se autofinanteze, Gardianul, 14.09.2007

Georgian Stoica, Academia Romana cauta manageri pentru afaceri de miliarde, Ziarul financiar, nr. 127, 17 septembrie 2007

Asociatii

Asociatia Magistratilor Iasi