<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>arts-council-england &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/arts-council-england/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "arts-council-england"</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:31:35 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[New form for arts grant]]></title>
<link>http://leicesterreviewofbooks.wordpress.com/?p=1081</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 09:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>New Writing International</dc:creator>
<guid>http://leicesterreviewofbooks.wordpress.com/?p=1081</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Arts Council England has launched a new, user-friendly application form for its Grants for the arts ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arts Council England has launched a new, user-friendly application form for its Grants for the arts Lottery-funded programme.</p>
<p>The changes to the form and the application process are designed to make it easier for people to apply for a grant, to make it easier to process and to increase the chances of an application being successful.</p>
<p>The form is available online at <a href="http://www.artscouncil.org.uk">www.artscouncil.org.uk</a> and printed packs will be available from May.</p>
<p><em>Source of message: EMIT Writers News (April).</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[£100,000 cut from Scottish Literature Funding]]></title>
<link>http://lambtonbookworm.wordpress.com/?p=51</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>lambtonbookworm</dc:creator>
<guid>http://lambtonbookworm.wordpress.com/?p=51</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia

It&#8217;s not only actors who are complaining about cuts in Arts funding. Due ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="float:right;margin:1em;"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:The_Scotsman_DSC05040.JPG" target="_blank"><img style="border:medium none;display:block;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/The_Scotsman_DSC05040.JPG/202px-The_Scotsman_DSC05040.JPG" alt="The Scotsman ' s offices in Edinburgh" /></a>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:The_Scotsman_DSC05040.JPG" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a></p>
</div>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">It's not only actors who are complaining about cuts in Arts funding. Due to further changes made by the <a class="zem_slink" title="Arts Council England" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arts_Council_England" target="_blank">Arts Council England</a> to its arts and literature budgets earlier this year, the funding body's Scottish sister organisation has quietly axed £100,000 from its grants to Scottish publishers,  reports <a href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2277171,00.html?gusrc=rss&#38;feed=10" target="_blank">the guardian</a>.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">Hugh Andrew, chief executive of the Berlinn/Polygonn group, one of the largest publishing houses in Scotland, earlier told the <a href="http://www.scotsman.com/" target="_blank">Scotsman </a>that the block funding cuts would also harm the ability of larger publishers to invest in new Scottish writing.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">(Ever wondered how the Scottish government were going to be able to afford personal care for the elderly when the English and Welsh can not).</p>
<p><fieldset><legend>Related articles</legend></p>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul" style="margin:1em 0 1.5em;padding:0;">
<li class="zemanta-article"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2277171,00.html?gusrc=rss" target="_blank">£100,000 cut from Scottish literature funding</a> [via Zemanta]</li>
<li class="zemanta-article"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://arts.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2238141,00.html?gusrc=rss" target="_blank">Actors boo Arts Council over cuts</a> [via Zemanta]</li>
</ul>
<p></fieldset></p>
<div id="zemanta-pixie" style="width:100%;margin:5px 0;"><a id="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img style="border:medium none;float:right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixie.png?x-id=c0f1b248-e533-4d71-be5c-e6a3415f2123" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ian McKellen soutient une polémique]]></title>
<link>http://darklordcenter.wordpress.com/?p=451</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>darklordcenter</dc:creator>
<guid>http://darklordcenter.wordpress.com/?p=451</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Arts Council England, association déversant une part de la loterie nationale aux artiste, vient de ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Arts Council England</i>, association déversant une part de la loterie nationale aux artiste, vient de créer une polémique.<br />
Dans son nouveau formulaire, elle demande l'orientation sexuelle des artistes. La question 22 du formulaire a provoqué une polémique. L'association a justifié l'écriture de la question en parlant du secret professionnelle ( non diffusion du contenu du formulaire) et son but de subventionner les minorités.<br />
Plusieurs artistes se sont joints à cette polémique dont Ian McKellen ( Gandalf dans <i>Le Seigneur des Anneaux</i>). </p>
<p><fieldset><b>Ian McKellen</b><br />
«C'est incroyable. Cette question ne devrait pas se trouver sur un formulaire. Cela semble inapproprié.»</fieldset></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Arts Council Madness]]></title>
<link>http://cosmodaddy.wordpress.com/?p=95</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>cosmodaddy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://cosmodaddy.wordpress.com/?p=95</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I have to say, whilst not understanding much about how the Arts are funded in the UK, the recent beh]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, whilst not understanding much about how the Arts are funded in the UK, the <a href="http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5joTbR9-NoF-ZW6upIFXm_i1m6Ckg" title="Arts Council England losing the plot" target="_blank">recent behaviour</a> of the <a href="http://www.artscouncil.org.uk" title="Arts Council England website" target="_blank">Arts Council England</a> has been nothing short of insane. By all accounts their initial decision to cut or remove funding entirely from 194 organisations was based almost entirely on functional, thoroughly marketised principles. What a load of nonsense. It's a principle which doesn't work in health, education or any other social field, yet these people thought removing funding entirely from the <a href="http://www.bushtheatre.co.uk" title="Bush Theatre website" target="_blank">Bush Theatre</a> made commercial sense. This being an organisation which has developed highly important talents like <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1281893/" title="Jonathan Harvey's Imdb entry" target="_blank">Jonathan Harvey</a> - his Bush Theatre production of <a href="http://www.beautiful-thing.com/playprod.shtml" title="Beautiful Thing website" target="_blank">Beautiful Thing</a> changed my life in 1994 - how many people's lives would not have been similarly touched if the Council hadn't been so vehemently challenged by Equity? I saw the show at the Donmar Warehouse theatre, not the Bush, but it was a Bush production. To penalise the Bush for the location of that experience was utter madness. They at least have their <a href="http://arts.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,2250858,00.html" title="Arts Council England's u-turn" target="_blank">funding now partially restored</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.sonypictures.com/classics/beautiful/multimedia/BTBW1.jpg" height="295" width="415" /></p>
<p>It would be easy to read that last linked article and think that the Arts Council's sudden u-turn was a good sign. It's not. Whilst the Bush has had a significant reprieve, other vital venues have still lost out. The <a href="http://www.drillhall.co.uk" title="Drill Hall website" target="_blank">Drill Hall</a>, London's major lesbian and gay performance space, have still lost out entirely. Whilst I had read <a href="http://members.aol.com/Millertale/timmiller.html" title="Tim Miller's website" target="_blank">Tim Miller</a>'s work before seeing him there for the first time, <i>seeing</i> him in a gay-specific venue was absolutely vital. Name me another, similar space where work like that can be held with the same impact, and I'll agree with its <a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-6730.html" title="Pink News' report of the Drill Hall's funding removal" target="_blank">funding removal</a>. Otherwise it too is a backward decision. I just don't get it. Making lesbian and gay contributions to the arts <i>less</i> visible surely couldn't be part of the Council's remit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Arts Council Cuts: the reprieve]]></title>
<link>http://johnsonsrambler.wordpress.com/?p=1236</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tim Rutherford-Johnson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://johnsonsrambler.wordpress.com/?p=1236</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The list of organisations to be reprieved of planned grant cuts was announced by the ACE today:
Afri]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The list of organisations to be reprieved of planned grant cuts was <a href="http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/pressnews/press_detail.php?browse=recent&#38;id=1063">announced by the ACE</a> today:</p>
<blockquote><p>African and Caribbean Music Circuit<br />
Jacksons Lane<br />
Arts Digest<br />
Queer Up North<br />
Northcott Theatre<br />
Rideout (Creative Arts for Rehabilitation)<br />
Bristol Old Vic<br />
National Student Drama Festival<br />
The Bush (Alternative Theatre Company)<br />
Anvil Press<br />
Arcadia Books<br />
Harrogate Theatre<br />
Film London<br />
Orange Tree Theatre<br />
Crafts Council<br />
Eastern Angles<br />
Birmingham Opera Company</p></blockquote>
<p>So nothing for Early Music Network, London Mozart Players, COMA (London), the City of London Sinfonia or the London Musicians' Collective. Birmingham Opera is at least something. The <i>Times</i> has <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/stage/theatre/article3291501.ece">a full list</a> of venues and organisations hit by the cuts.</p>
<p>Further down the ACE's press release is the announcement of</p>
<blockquote><p>An extra £200,000 invested strategically in Literature with an emphasis on encouraging interaction between writers and children and young people, and on further promotion of reading following the National Year of Reading.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sounds to me like £200,000 of ACE money being spent on doing the job of the <a href="http://www.dfes.gov.uk/">Department for Children, Schools and Families</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Arts Council's cuts and music]]></title>
<link>http://johnsonsrambler.wordpress.com/?p=1232</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tim Rutherford-Johnson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://johnsonsrambler.wordpress.com/?p=1232</guid>
<description><![CDATA[While there was plenty of high-profile hoo-ha over Arts Council England&#8217;s proposed cuts to the]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there was plenty of <a href="http://arts.guardian.co.uk/theatre/drama/story/0,,2239819,00.html">high-profile hoo-ha</a> over Arts Council England's proposed cuts to theatres around the country, there hasn't been the same response from musicians. The weighing-in of popular superstars such as Kevin Spacey and Ian McKellen undoubtedly helped get theatre's plight into the news, and likely assisted <a href="http://news.google.co.uk/news/url?sa=t&#38;ct=uk/4-0&#38;fp=47a199e4d384dff2&#38;ei=VKuhR5kFlqSgA4mZ9bIN&#38;url=http%3A//www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre/news/arts-council-gives-11thhour-reprieve-over-funding-cuts-774858.html&#38;cid=0">the funding rethink</a> that is now under way. But where were the musicians?</p>
<p>Among those threatened under the original proposals were <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/whats_on/article3191802.ece">Birmingham Opera</a>, the <a href="http://news.google.co.uk/news/url?sa=t&#38;ct=uk/0-0&#38;fp=47a17ce3f57adaa6&#38;ei=vqyhR_2NJZemoAOx9JW_DQ&#38;url=http%3A//www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article3226908.ece&#38;cid=0">Early Music Network</a>, the <a href="http://www.croydonguardian.co.uk/mostpopular.var.1992615.mostviewed.state_of_the_arts.php">London Mozart Players</a> and the <a href="http://www.l-m-c.org.uk/">London Musicians' Collective</a> - all of them essential and significant contributors to Britain's cultural make up. The news now is that the LMP <a href="http://arts.guardian.co.uk/theatre/news/story/0,,2248234,00.html">may have its £160,000 grant reinstated</a> under the new considerations, but there appears to be no word yet on the other bodies.</p>
<p>Apart from <a href="http://news.google.co.uk/news/url?sa=t&#38;ct=uk/0-0&#38;fp=47a17ce3f57adaa6&#38;ei=vqyhR_2NJZemoAOx9JW_DQ&#38;url=http%3A//www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article3226908.ece&#38;cid=0">the occasional letter to the <i>Times</i></a>, however, the response from leading musicians has been a muted sub-pianissimo. Only the LMC seem to have roused much activity, maintaining <a href="http://benedictdrew.blogspot.com/">a collection of letters of support</a> from the experimental world. Sir Christopher Frayling, chairman of Arts Council England, maintains that "It is not the decibel count which has influenced us, but reasoned argument", but one wonders at the impact of celebrity outrage too. It is easier, after all, to support funding for a <a href="http://www.nsdf.org.uk/">student theatre festival</a> if it happens to include Stephen Fry, Simon Russell Beale, Rik Mayall and Timothy West among its alumni - "Look - grassroots arts are where we find the stars of the future". But that same argument can't quite be made on behalf of music: even the greatest players to make their way with the support of the LMC are going to remain on the fringes; an outstanding oboist in the LMP may end up with the Berlin Phil - but they're still just an orchestral oboist.</p>
<p>It's not that music is short of superstars who can get the ear of a minister or two - plenty of them are happy to pipe up when expiring copyright terms begin to bite into their pension. The argument for maintaining the experimental, unusual, innovative, specialist and esoteric in music is simply harder to make (but no less necessary for that), and not one that much interests Cliff Richard or Bono. It's still sadder that it doesn't appear to have interested Bryn Terfel or Sir Simon Rattle either - at least, I can find no public mention of their complaints. Why is this? Are musicians shrinking violets? Is it because they maintain that music and politics have nothing to say to one another? Or have those at the top of the tree, dazzled by continual performances of canonic works in great venues, lost sight of the importance of small-scale, local music-making?</p>
<p>Who knows. But when the dust settles and the cuts are made, let's hope that the silenced ensembles aren't matched only by the silence of acquiescence.</p>
<p>(Cross posted at <a href="http://www.bitsofnews.com/content/view/6962/">Bits of News</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[0014 Artangel]]></title>
<link>http://gianlucacostantini.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/0014-artangel/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 17:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gianlucacostantini</dc:creator>
<guid>http://gianlucacostantini.wordpress.com/2007/11/04/0014-artangel/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
Paul Pfeiffer
THE SAINTS
Wembley
26 september - 28 October 2007
www.artangel.org.uk
Commisioned by ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://gianlucacostantini.wordpress.com/files/2007/11/14saints.jpg' title='Artangel'><img src='http://gianlucacostantini.wordpress.com/files/2007/11/14saints.jpg' alt='Artangel' /></a></p>
<p>Paul Pfeiffer<br />
THE SAINTS<br />
Wembley<br />
26 september - 28 October 2007<br />
<a href="http://www.artangel.org.uk">www.artangel.org.uk</a><br />
Commisioned by Artangel. Supported by Bloomberg. Produced with Outset Conteporary Art Fund and Ellipse Foundation</p>
<p>Sukhdev Sandhu<br />
NIGHT HAUNTS<br />
<a href="http://www.nighthaunts.org.uk">www.nighthaunts.org.uk</a><br />
Published by Artangel and Verso</p>
<p>Ruth Ewan<br />
DID YOU KISS THE FOOT<br />
THAT KICKED YOU?<br />
October 2007<br />
<a href="http://www.balladofaccounting.org">www.balladofaccounting.org</a><br />
Commisioned by Artangel and the Jerwood Charity, supported by the National Lottery through Arts Council England</p>
<p>Penny Woolcock<br />
EXODUS<br />
64th Venice Film Festival September 2007<br />
The Times 51st BFI London Film Festival October 2007<br />
Channel 4 Broadcast October 2007<br />
<a href="http://www.themargateexodus.org.uk">www.themargateexodus.org.uk</a><br />
Produced by Artangel and commisioned by Channel4, with Creative Partenerships, Arts Council England, Kent County Council and The Esmée Fairbairn Foundation</p>
<p>Roni Horn<br />
VATNASAFN/<br />
LIBRARY OF WATER<br />
Stykkishòlmur, Iceland<br />
<a href="http://www.libraryofwater.is">www.libraryofwater.is</a><br />
Commisioned by Artangel with the Ministry of Education, Sciense and Culture, the Ministry of Communications and the Icelandic Parliament with the support of FL Group, N1, Straumur-Burduras, the VATNASAFN/LIBRARY OF WATER Circle and Artangel International Circle</p>
<p>ARTANGEL's programmes are made possible by Arts Council England, The Company of Angels and Arangel Internazional Circle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
