<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>artillery &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/artillery/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "artillery"</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Boeing Awarded Mobile Laser Weapon Contract]]></title>
<link>http://pentagonbrief.wordpress.com/?p=367</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>worldmilitaryhistory</dc:creator>
<guid>http://pentagonbrief.wordpress.com/?p=367</guid>
<description><![CDATA[


Aviation Calendar 2009

The military Aviation Calendar 2009 published by TEAMultimedia is availab]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp">
<dl class="wp-caption alignnone">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.cafepress.com/TEAMultimedia/830194"><img src="http://images.cafepress.com/product/292698613v14_150x150_Front.JPG" alt="Aviation Calendar 2009" width="150" height="150" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">Aviation Calendar 2009</dd>
</dl>
<p><a href="http://www.cafepress.com/TEAMultimedia/830194">The military Aviation Calendar 2009 published by TEAMultimedia is available exclusively from The PatriArt Gallery.</a></div>
<p>Boeing announced today that it has been awarded a U.S. Army contract valued at approximately $36 million to continue developing a truck-mounted, high-energy laser weapon system that will destroy rockets, artillery shells and mortar rounds.</p>
<p>Under the High Energy Laser Technology Demonstrator (HEL TD) Phase II contract, awarded Aug. 15, Boeing will complete the design of, then build, test and evaluate, a rugged beam control system on a Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck. Boeing also will develop the system-engineering requirements for the entire HEL TD laser weapon system. Boeing successfully completed the preliminary design of the beam control system earlier this summer.</p>
<p>"This contract award is an important win for Boeing because it supports a cornerstone of the Army's high-energy laser program," said Scott Fancher, vice president and general manager of Boeing Missile Defense Systems. "HEL TD will give warfighters a transformational capability to counter the difficult threats posed by rockets, artillery shells and mortar projectiles."</p>
<p>"Boeing spent the past year developing the preliminary design of the HEL TD beam control system, and we appreciate the confidence the Army has shown in our efforts by awarding us these contract options to continue working on the program," said Gary Fitzmire, vice president and program director of Boeing Directed Energy Systems.</p>
<p>The objective of the HEL TD program is to demonstrate that a mobile, solid-state laser weapon system can effectively counter rocket, artillery and mortar projectiles. The program will support the transition to a full-fledged Army acquisition program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Combined Arms]]></title>
<link>http://xbradtc.wordpress.com/?p=677</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>xbradtc</dc:creator>
<guid>http://xbradtc.wordpress.com/?p=677</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Traditionally, there have been three combat arms in any army. The infantry, the artillery, and the c]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom:0;">Traditionally, there have been three combat arms in any army. The infantry, the artillery, and the cavalry.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">The infantry's role has been to close with the enemy and destroy him by close combat. Artillery has always used firepower to suppress, neutralize and destroy the enemy, and cavalry has always used mobility and shock to destroy the enemy.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">These roles have been recognizable from the first organized armies through today. The weapons and accouterments have changed greatly, but the three branches are just as fundamental as they always have been. Today's infantry, whether mounted on Bradleys or Strykers, or on foot, is still all about getting close and shooting the enemy, rooting him out of his defenses man by man. Artillery of course, has come a long way from the days of the trebouchet or catapult. Still, if there is  a target that needs to be destroyed, call for fire. And what better example of modern mobility and shock than the sight of an M-1 Abrams rolling up where you least expect him?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">What has changed in the last few decades is the concept of combined arms. In the past, each branch did pretty much its own thing. Each branch had officers that were specialists in that branch, but knew little or nothing of the others. In fact, that's why senior officers were called Generals- because they weren't specialists. But there was little coordination between the actions of any two branches in an engagement, let alone between all three.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">Let's fast forward from antiquity to the period just before World War Two. The US Army was well aware that war in Europe was more likely than not. They were also aware that if war came, they would be starting with a tiny army with poor and obsolescent equipment. The popular notion that the US had manufactured its way  to victory in WWI was a myth. The Army knew just how badly equipped it had been in that war. Most Americans had been armed with Enfield rifles, not the American Springfield design. Nor could the Army count on size alone. The Army was also well aware that it might have to fight on two fronts, one in Europe and one in the Pacific. Even if the Army only had to fight in Europe, they might very well find themselves outnumbered by the German army and its allies. To succeed, the Army would have to find a smarter way of doing business.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">The Army in the Depression Era had a minuscule budget. There wasn't enough money to man units up to the strength Congress had mandated. Little or no new equipment could be purchased. But what little money the Army could scrape together was put into its schools. The Army has long had a school system to teach soldiers and serve as the keepers of the tribal knowledge. But the schools were often anachronistic. That all changed in the interwar years. They became not only places to teach soldiers the skills of their professions, they became think tanks to address the problems the Army was likely to face in the next war.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">Even as late as World War I, artillery was fighting its own war. Everyone can recall an image of the doughboys going over the top of a trench and charging into murderous machine gun fire. What most folks forget was that much of WWI was actually an artillery duel, with big guns pounding away for weeks. When an artillery battery received a mission (usually by messenger), the battery commander would perform the trigonometric calculations to aim his battery at the target, then observe the fall of the shot. He would adjust the aim point until he was on target and then fire the mission. If the weather was bad, or during hours of darkness, he had little chance of seeing where his rounds fell and could not adjust. Nor could he react quickly to targets of opportunity. And there was no way for the infantry to know just when a barrage would be lifted. In many ways, it was the big gun version of “spray and pray.”</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">The infantry had its own problems. The basic infantry division in WWI was a “square” division with 4 regiments. The regiments themselves were little more than masses of men, organized almost on the same lines as a regiment of the Civil War some 60 years before. New weapons such as the machine gun had been introduced, but little thought had gone into how an infantry unit should be organized. The square division was large and ponderous. It was difficult for a commander to control once he got it into position. What was the optimum size unit that would balance the mass needed with the requirements of mobility and flexibility of control? Where should the supporting weapons like machine guns and mortars be? At the regiment? Under the control of the battalion? Or should they be pushed all the way down to the company level. Even simple questions like how a squad should be organized were open.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">The cavalry was even worse off. The horse had obviously ceased to be a viable weapon of war. If machine gun  and artillery fire was deadly to men, it was catastrophic to horses. While the tank had been invented and fielded in WWI, it moved at slow pace that infantrymen could match. It was seen more as a moving pillbox than a replacement for the speed and mobility of the horse. Without mobility, would future wars be condemned to a walking pace? That prospect scared the Army. The whole idea was to avoid a static trench warfare fight like WWI.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">Enter the school system. The capstone school, the Command and General Staff School, acted like a think tank while at the same time grooming fairly junior officers to think big. Officers who hadn't even commanded a battalion yet were training to lead divisions, corps and entire armies. The studied what a campaign in Europe would look like. And they assumed that they would need to kick in the door with an assault landing. It soon became clear that the old ways of doing business wouldn't suffice.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">The Artillery center and school was a leader in devising the new approach to fighting. It recognized that the US would probably never have a significant lead in numbers or size or range of artillery weapons. What they devised instead was an entirely new system of fighting artillery.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">No longer would a battery commander calculate the settings to fire his guns. Instead, at the battalion headquarters, a Fire Direction Center was established. The FDC would do the calculations and transmit the information to the batteries. The gunners would just have to dial in the numbers sent to them. The FDC got its target information from a series of forward observers embedded with the infantry's leading units. These observers would tell the artillery where the targets were and then would adjust fires onto the targets. Normally, the battalion would concentrate all its guns on one target at a time, rapidly shifting its fires to subsequent targets.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">The infantry was a big fan of this advancement in artillery. No fools they, it soon became clear that more effective artillery would mean fewer infantry casualties. They also quickly learned that with the observers right next to infantry commanders, they could nominate targets quickly and control the artillery fires to best suite their needs.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">Soon the infantry/artillery team was born. Each infantry regiment in a division would have a battalion of artillery in direct support. The regimental commander had  a weapon with which to suppress enemy machine gun fire, giving his troops the ability to maneuver again. The artillery had a way of quickly finding targets and controlling their fires. This was the birth of Combined Arms. It raised the effectiveness of the infantry and the artillery, not as the sum of their parts, but by an order of magnitude.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">
<p style="margin-bottom:0;">In future installments, we'll address the growth of cavalry into armor and its integration into combined arms teams and the current state of the art with Task Forces and HBCTs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Coleraine Battery]]></title>
<link>http://crusaderproject.wordpress.com/?p=239</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
<guid>http://crusaderproject.wordpress.com/?p=239</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Ronnie, author of the Coleraine Battery website linked to the right has very kindly made his chapter]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronnie, author of the Coleraine Battery website linked to the right has very kindly made his chapter on the activity of the battery in the Western Desert available.  I uploaded it for distribution as a PDF <a href="http://freenet-homepage.de/t34m43/BatBookchp5.pdf"><strong>at this link</strong></a>.</p>
<p>Happy reading, and many thanks to Ronnie for his generosity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Day one of the Georgia-South Ossetia military conflict]]></title>
<link>http://thebivouac.wordpress.com/?p=1357</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>citizenbrain</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thebivouac.wordpress.com/?p=1357</guid>
<description><![CDATA[On Friday, August 8, Georgia launched a military offensive against its breakaway republic of South O]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>On Friday, August 8, Georgia launched a military offensive against its breakaway republic of South Ossetia. Artillery shelling and tanks have reportedly reduced the region's capital Tskhinvaly to ruins. Russia has sent its army to help peacekeepers stop the violence.</span></p>
<p><span>Words above and video below posted by <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/RussiaToday" target="_blank">RussiaToday</a></span></p>
<p><span><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/Hil7k58bFJM'></param><param name='wmode' value='transparent'></param><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/Hil7k58bFJM&rel=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='transparent' width='425' height='350'></embed></object></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[GEORGIA NEO-NAZI WAR AGAINST OSSETIA HAS BEGUN]]></title>
<link>http://4international.wordpress.com/?p=557</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>socialisttruthfacts</dc:creator>
<guid>http://4international.wordpress.com/?p=557</guid>
<description><![CDATA[by Felix Quigley
August 9, 2008

Georgian troops have attacked a small area which has a Russian majo]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Felix Quigley</p>
<p>August 9, 2008</p>
<p><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44906000/jpg/_44906132_rusosafp.jpg" border="0" alt="Tropas georgianas se desplazan durante un conflicto con separatistas de Osetia del Sur." width="416" height="200" /></p>
<p><em><strong>Georgian troops have attacked a small area which has a Russian majority, South Osetia. Note the very latest hardware, courtesy of US and British Imperialists!</strong></em></p>
<p>We have now moved into the field of Neo-Nazi politics with the brutal attack of US puppet Georgia on a disputed area in which there is a Russian majority. It is called South Ossetia which lies to the North of Georgia. There is also another disputed area called Abjasia, which is located on the North West of Georgia (in the shape of a triangle with one side running alongside the Black Sea)</p>
<p><strong><em>It is the Georgian pro Imperialists and reactionaries who are attacking. But it is US and British Imperialism (NATO) which is pulling the strings.<!--more--></em></strong></p>
<p>Harry's Place are on holiday (!!!) but there is no doubt at all which side the Neo Nazis on Harry's Place will line up alongside, with Nazi NATO of course.</p>
<p>We are now being fed a diet of lies by the BBC et al while the report and comments on so-called Israeli site Israpundit need to be seen to be believed! <!--more-->A total lining up with US, British and EU Imperialism on the part of this faux Israeli site! We will deal with this Israpundit treachery later! they are now truly a US Imperialist site bar none! What a shame! What a scandal!</p>
<p>see <a href="http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=1777#comments">http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=1777#comments</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>This is the real situation as described by a Russian (Not a lying NATO Nazi source)</strong></p>
<p>The report is by Andrei Areshev</p>
<p><strong><em>[begin quote here]</em></strong></p>
<div id="title">South Ossetia: The War Began!</div>
<div id="text"><span style="font-size:x-small;font-family:Arial;">The night of August 7, Georgian forces launched an attack on Tskhinvali, which Tbilisi cynically described as an effort to restore the constitutional order. Just hours earlier, Saakashvili declared a ceasefire in the conflict zone, but the move was only a propaganda maneuver disguising the plan for a large-scale offensive. The timing is carefully chosen — the attention worldwide is focused on the opening of the Olympic Games, Russian Prime Minister V. Putin is in Beijing, and Russian President D. Medvedev is on a short vacation.Georgian forces are acting with extreme ferocity. A total devastation of the Tskhinvali downtown which came under Grad missile, artillery, mortar, and machinegun fire has been reported. Dozens of blasts shatter the city every minute. Tens of armored vehicles and thousands of soldiers moved into the conflict zone. Russian Peacekeeping Force Deputy Commander V. Ivanov said that the positions of the peacekeepers were not directly targeted or hit and that they continue to watch the situation in the region. However, the Ossetian side and Russian journalists say that the peacekeepers' headquarters came under fire.</p>
<p>The offensive has already left tens if not hundreds of people dead. Nevertheless, it appears that the activity of the peacekeepers remains limited to monitoring the situation. Their inaction helps the aggressor — the Georgian side states that the Russian peacekeepers are not intervening in the conflict. The army of South Ossetia returned fire, but it has no potential comparable to that of the Georgian forces. Several Ossetian villages have already been seized and there is a possibility that the Zar highway linking the Republic to Russia will be blocked.</p>
<p>The statement made by Mathew Bryza in connection with the events is remarkably cynical — cunningly siding with Georgia and interpreting Moscow's position in the manner of a downright hooligan, he blamed the escalation on South Ossetia. Earlier C. Rice said in Tbilisi that the US was entirely on Georgia's side in the conflict, thus leaving no doubts concerning the US position. US State Department spokesman Gonzalo Gallegos says the US demands that Moscow exert pressure on the leadership of South Ossetia in order to achieve a ceasefire in the conflict zone. At the same time, the Georgian side is no more than advised to exercise restraint.</p>
<p>It is symbolic that Tbilisi launched the aggression on the anniversary of the fall of the Republic of Serbian Krajina. Its demise became a prologue to the next phase of the Balkan war - to the war in Kosovo, the NATO strikes on Serbia, and the humiliation and partition of the country. It has been said many times that the West is reusing the Balkan scenario in the Caucasus, and that this time Russia is planned to play the role of Serbia. Belgrade politicians who said 13 years ago that selling their countrymen in Croatia and Bosnia would preclude the Western aggression now pretend they were unaware that Serbia's turn would come after the Serbs in Croatia and Bosnia.</p>
<p>Is Moscow capable to learn at least anything from the recent past? In 1995, the UN «peacekeepers» opened the way for the Croatian army which was killing Serbs, and these days we see Russian and Ossetian peacekeepers helplessly watch the Georgian artillery hammer residential quarters in Tskhinvali. <strong>In the Caucasus, the consequences of such helplessness are going to be catastrophic — there will be no respect for the weak country unable to normalize the situation at its border and to protect its citizens.</strong></p>
<p>The situation can spin out of control and evolve to the conditions under which the federal authorities will be unable to control not only the activities of informal leaders and the mobs of their followers, but even those of the heads of the Republics of the North Caucasus who — in case the escalation continues - will start acting independently and attempt to somehow establish control over the process. North Ossetian President Taymuraz Mamsurov already said that hundreds of volunteers are on their way to South Ossetia. He said: «We cannot stop them». People from other Republics of the North Caucus and from Abkhazia are ready to do the same. As of 4 a.m. August 8, the border guards in North Ossetia did not report Russian forces crossing the border.</p>
<p>The Georgian aggression deals a heavy blow to Russia's positions in the North Caucasus. In case it is «backed» by several terrorist acts (the blast at a beach in Sochi was a wakeup call), more than just the 2014 Olympiad will be at stake. The entire system of administration in Russia can be rendered shaky by several precisely targeted strikes, the result being a direct threat to the existence of the Russian state.</p>
<p>Sadly, the warnings about the long-term negative consequences of the passivity of the Russian diplomacy in dealing with the issue of the unrecognized Republics have had no effect despite being reiterated for years. The obvious truth that the Georgian authority so heavily armed by the West is not going to play games and some day will go all the way to the end was simply ignored. As in 1992 and 1993, it is Russia who will have to address the resulting problems, the difference being that today's Georgian army is something much more serious than the gangs led by Kitovani and Ioseliani.</p>
<p>So far Moscow has reacted to Georgia's aggressive intentions solely by uncertain calls for peace and invitations to sign an agreement not to use force, thus practically making the job easier for Tbilisi. Hopes that «things will somehow settle down» and that Moscow's non-recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia will delay Georgia's NATO integration — which was a decided matter - have not materialized. Tbilisi openly ridiculed such expectations and remained fully aware of its tasks and of the support of its allies. Unfortunately, Russia did not provide equally decisive support to its friends in the Caucasus.</p>
<p><strong>At the moment, only urgent measures can remedy the situation. Russia should immediately break diplomatic relations with Georgia, and, in case the aggression continues, deliver airstrikes on the Georgian forces in South Osssetia (including the Liakhv corridor which is Georgia's main strategic recourse in the de-facto Republic). </strong></p>
<p>Only a prompt and resolute response can arrest the aggression and also prevent similar developments in Abkhazia, which would destabilize the Caucasus irreversibly. Statements like «we will not just stand by» and «we have an adequate response» are no longer enough. As the informational aspect of the resolute response, Russia should state that it opens an anti-terrorist operation aimed at countering the act of state terrorism and at protecting the lives of civilians.</p>
<p><strong>Following the return to the status quo — this time ensured by force — Russia should immediately form a defense alliance with South Ossetia and Abkhazia and the Russian parliament should establish the status of the two Republics as associated subjects within the Russian Federation. </strong></p>
<p><strong>from</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://en.fondsk.ru/article.php?id=1530">http://en.fondsk.ru/article.php?id=1530</a></p>
<p> </p>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;font-family:Arial;"><strong></strong></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;font-family:Arial;"> </p>
<p></span></p>
<p></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Stockton Gun]]></title>
<link>http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/?p=234</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>caswain01</dc:creator>
<guid>http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/?p=234</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s another cannon related to a specific historical incident, on display at the Washington ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Here's another cannon related to a specific historical incident, on display at the Washington Navy Yard. But this one dates to more of a "political" event prior to the Mexican-American War, rather than the Civil War.</p>
[caption id="attachment_235" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="12-inch Smoothbore &#34;Stockton&#34; Gun"]<a href="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/08/washny-21-july-0271.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-235 " src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/08/washny-21-july-0271.jpg?w=300" alt="12-inch Smoothbore &#34;Stockton&#34; Gun" width="300" height="224" /></a>[/caption]
<p class="MsoNormal">This example is one of three “Stockton Guns” delivered from 1841 to 1945 to design specifications of Robert Field Stockton, a Navy officer of considerably influence.<span> </span>The cannons were 12-inch caliber smoothbore guns of wrought iron construction.<span> </span>Up to this time, guns were typically “cast” not forged or wrought, but these were products of the early industrial revolution.<span> </span>Weighing around 16,700 pounds each, the guns fired 224 pound shot projectiles with 45 pound charges.<span> </span><a name="_ednref1" href="#_edn1"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:11pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[1]</span></span></span></span></a><span> </span>The guns were designed expressly for the USS <em>Princeton</em>,<span> </span>the first warship designed from the start as a screw propelled steam vessel (previous examples had been laid down as sailing schooners and later modified).<span> </span>A John Ericsson design, she used a unique “pendulum” piston engine and exhibited a very fine hull line.<span> </span>An advanced screw design, replacing Ericsson’s type, gave the ship some additional power output.<span> </span>During trials and later service, the <em>Princeton</em> was noted as a fast vessel. <a name="_ednref2" href="#_edn2"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:11pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[2]</span></span></span></span></a><span> </span>All in all, the USS <em>Princeton</em>, launched in 1843 was an advanced weapon system with many highly revolutionary features for its day.<span> </span>And of course the pet project of Commodore Stockton.</p>
[caption id="attachment_236" align="alignright" width="173" caption="Robert Field Stockton - From the Navy Historical Center Collection"]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/rfstockton.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-236 " src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/08/rfstockton.jpg" alt="Robert Field Stockton" width="173" height="225" /></a>[/caption]
<p class="MsoNormal">Stockton descended from a prominent New Jersey family.<span> </span>His grandfather was a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and his father served in the U.S. House of Representatives.<span> </span>Stockton saw service in the War of 1812 and later commanded a ship operating against the African slave trade.<span> </span>During the 1830s, Stockton spent much time managing the considerable family business affairs, and solidified political contacts.<span> </span>Offered the post of Secretary of the Navy, in the Tyler administration in 1841, Stockton opted to return to naval service again and pursue the construction of his advanced warship idea.<a name="_ednref3" href="#_edn3"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:11pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[3]</span></span></span></span></a><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The big 12-inch gun main battery of the ship was a major design hurdle.<span> </span>The wrought iron process was somewhat new for large gun manufacture.<span> </span>The first example of the gun was ordered from Mersey Iron Works, Liverpool, England.<span> </span>In proofing, a crack developed, necessitating a reinforcing iron band around the breech.<span> </span>A second gun was produced by Ward and Company, New York.<span> </span>This piece differed from the British made example by using the hot blast technique and the addition of greater breech diameter (to further reinforce against cracking).<span> </span>The Mersey gun was named “Oregon” and the US production was named “Peacemaker.”<span> </span>While the Oregon was well proofed, and further proofed after reinforcement applied, the Peacemaker did not undergo extensive testing.<a name="_ednref4" href="#_edn4"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:11pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[4]</span></span></span></span></a><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Of course with all that expenditure of effort, materials, and money, the Princeton just had to be shown off to the dignitaries. In late February 1844, she operated out of the Washington Navy Yard and hosted a grand demonstration on the 28th of that month, with the attendees including President Tyler, members of the cabinet, and several congressmen. Space prohibits full discussion of the event here (please refer to the excellent <a title="Fatal Cruise of the Princeton" href="http://www.military.com/NewContent/0,13190,NH_0905_Cruise-P1,00.html" target="_blank">article</a>from Naval History magazine from 2005 by Ann Blackman), but around mid-afternoon, during one last demonstration, the "Peacemaker" burst, killing the Secretaries of State and Navy, several others, and injuring a large portion of those visiting the ship. The President escaped injury by quirk of fate and happenstance. <a name="_ednref5" href="#_edn5"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:11pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[5]</span></span></span></span></a><span> </span></p>
[caption id="attachment_237" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Explosion of the Peacemaker - Naval Historical Center Collection"]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/explosion_aboard_uss_princeton.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-237 " src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/08/explosion_aboard_uss_princeton.jpg?w=300" alt="Explosion of the Peacemaker - Naval Historical Center Collection" width="300" height="207" /></a>[/caption]
<p class="MsoNormal">Repercussions from the explosion were both political and technical.<span> </span>Of course, with two members of his cabinet dead, President Tyler had a shakeup of his staff, with John C. Calhoun stepping in as the Secretary of State.<span> </span>In some regards, the shuffle sharpened the President’s desire to annex Texas, and placed the United States on courses which lead to war with Mexico.<span> </span>Stockton appears to have emerged looking like a well adjusted rose from the incident.<span> </span>He would deliver the proposal for Texas Annexation in 1845.<span> </span>And later he played a key role securing California during the Mexican-American War.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Technically speaking, the bursting of this wrought iron gun re-affirmed the use of cast iron or bronze with gun construction.<span> </span>One additional “Stockton” gun was delivered, but that was the last production wrought iron gun for a decade.<span> </span>However the incident prompted much research within the Army and Navy circles with regard to iron gun manufacture.<span> </span>The end result of this flurry of research were a series of advances which Civil War readers are familiar with by names such as “Rodman” and “Dahlgren.”<span> </span>However, the wrought iron production process in particular was taken on and perfected by Samuel Reeves of the Pheonix Iron Works in later years.<span> </span>Reeves tackled specific problems regarding the joins created in the forge welding processes.<span> </span>The best examples of his work of course, would be the 3-inch Ordnance Rifle, considered the best field rifle of the Civil War by many.<a name="_ednref6" href="#_edn6"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:11pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[6]</span></span></span></span></a><span> </span></p>
<p> Two Stockton Guns exist today.<span> </span>The “Oregon” is on display at Annapolis, Maryland.<span> </span>A replacement for the “Peacemaker” was cast in 1845 by Mersey Iron Works, and that example is at the Washington Navy Yard today.</p>
[caption id="attachment_238" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Bore of the Stockton Gun "]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/wash-ny-1-aug-063.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-238 " src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/08/wash-ny-1-aug-063.jpg?w=300" alt="Bore of the Stockton Gun" width="300" height="224" /></a>[/caption]
[caption id="attachment_239" align="alignright" width="300" caption="Breech of the Stockton Gun"]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/washny-21-july-029.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-239 " src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/08/washny-21-july-029.jpg?w=300" alt="Breech of the Stockton Gun" width="300" height="224" /></a>[/caption]
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div>
<hr size="1" /></div>
<div id="edn1">
<p class="MsoEndnoteText"><a name="_edn1" href="#_ednref1"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[1]</span></span></span></span></a> Spencer Tucker, <em>Arming the Fleet:<span> </span>U.S. Naval Ordnance in the Muzzle-Loading Era</em> (Annapolis, Maryland:<span> </span>Naval Institute Press, 1989), p. 155.</p>
<p class="MsoEndnoteText"> </p>
</div>
<div id="edn2">
<p class="MsoEndnoteText"><a name="_edn2" href="#_ednref2"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[2]</span></span></span></span></a>Donald L. Canney, <em>The Old Steam Navy, Volume One:<span> </span>Frigates, Sloops, and Gunboats, 1815-1885</em> (Annapolis, Maryland:<span> </span>Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 22-24.<span> </span></p>
</div>
<div id="edn3">
<p class="MsoEndnoteText"><a name="_edn3" href="#_ednref3"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[3]</span></span></span></span></a> For more information about the life and career of Robert Stockton, see <em>A Sketch of the Life of Com. Robert F. Stockton</em>, by Samuel John Bayard and Robert Field Stockton, 1856.<span> </span></p>
</div>
<div id="edn4">
<p class="MsoEndnoteText"><a name="_edn4" href="#_ednref4"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[4]</span></span></span></span></a> Tucker, p. 155.</p>
</div>
<div id="edn5">
<p class="MsoEndnoteText"><a name="_edn5" href="#_ednref5"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[5]</span></span></span></span></a>One of the best accounts of the incident is an article by Ann Blackman in Naval History Magazine, September 2005.<span> </span>The article is available on <a href="http://www.military.com/NewContent/0,13190,NH_0905_Cruise-P1,00.html">line</a>.</p>
</div>
<div id="edn6">
<p class="MsoEndnoteText"><a name="_edn6" href="#_ednref6"><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span><span class="MsoEndnoteReference"><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">[6]</span></span></span></span></a>James C. Hazlett, Edwin Olmstead, and M. Hume Parks, <em>Field Artillery of the Civil War</em> Revised Edition (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2004), pp. 120-121.</p>
<p class="MsoEndnoteText"> </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Guns of the CSS Tennessee]]></title>
<link>http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/?p=200</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>caswain01</dc:creator>
<guid>http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/?p=200</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Around the corner from the guns from the CSS Atlanta are three 6.4 inch and one 7 inch Double Banded]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Around the corner from the <a title="CSS Atlanta guns" href="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/guns-of-the-css-atlanta/" target="_blank">guns from the CSS <em>Atlanta</em></a> are three 6.4 inch and one 7 inch Double Banded Brooke Rifles. These four trophies are from the CSS <em>Tennessee</em>. Like those of the CSS <em>Atlanta</em>, these are artifacts linked to a specific historical event, in this case one of the best known naval battles of the Civil War.</p>
[caption id="attachment_202" align="alignnone" width="300" caption="6.4in Double Banded Brooke Rifles"]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/washny-21-july-037.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-202" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/washny-21-july-037.jpg?w=300" alt="6.4in Double Banded Brooke Rifles" width="300" height="224" /></a>[/caption]
<p>On August 5, 1864 at around 6 a.m., from his flagship USS <em>Hartford</em>, Admiral David Farragut led his fleet of eighteen warships, including the four monitors USS <em>Tecumseh</em>, USS <em>Manhattan</em>, USS <em>Winnebago</em>, and USS <em>Chickasaw</em>, into Mobile Bay, Alabama. Running past the forts at the mouth of the bay, at around 7:45 a.m. the USS <em>Tecumseh</em> hit a mine, which of course prompted Farragut's famous reply, "Damn the torpedoes!" Braving the torpedoes (minefield), the Federal fleet soon met the next threat - the CSS <em>Tennessee</em>.</p>
<p>The CSS <em>Tennessee</em> was built from the keel up as an ironclad at Selma, Alabama. Her main armament consisted of two 7 inch Double Banded Brooke Rifles on pivots fore and aft. The broadsides were four 6.4 inch Double Banded Brookes, two per side. For protection, the ironclad had plate iron varying from 6 inch thickness on the forward end, to 5 inch on the sides, down to 2 inches on the deck. This combination of armor and rifled guns made the Confederate ship rather formidable, but for three weaknesses. First was poor propulsion limiting speed to 5 knots. Second, the limited deck armor did not protect the chains linking the steering to the tiller. Lastly, the with the weight of all that iron, the <em>Tennessee</em> ran deep in the water. Prior to the Battle of Mobile Bay, the ironclad had experienced difficulties even getting to Mobile Bay past the shoals and bars in the bay. Confederate Admiral Franklin Buchanan had planned a raid on Pensacola, Florida, only to be thwarted when the <em>Tennessee</em> ran aground prior to the sortie.</p>
<p>Despite the shortcomings, the Admiral Buchanan ordered the <em>Tennessee</em> to close with the Federal fleet (when he could have stayed under the guns of Fort Morgan) that morning in Mobile Bay. For about two hours, the ironclad fought a lopsided contest against the entire Federal fleet. Lacking the speed to maneuver against her opponents, the <em>Tennessee</em> was rammed several times. Later, with the steering linkage shot away, the Confederate ship was at the mercy of her opponents. Buchanan authorized the <em>Tennessee's</em> surrender at around 10 a.m.</p>
<p>As with the CSS <em>Atlanta</em>, after surrender the <em>Tennessee</em> was taken into the Federal Navy. Weeks after its capture, the USS <em>Tennessee</em> assisted in the capture of Fort Morgan, on August 23, 1864. Later she served on the Mississippi. Eventually after the war, she was sold for scrap, of course with the guns salvaged as trophies for the Navy Yard.</p>
<p>The profile of these Brookes show the distinctive second layering of bands (again butt welded, as opposed to wrought iron of the Parrotts). The 6.4 inch Rifles were produced at Tredegar, like their single banded cousins from the <em>Atlanta</em>. But the 7 inch Rifle was a Selma Naval Gun Foundry product.</p>
[caption id="attachment_203" align="alignnone" width="300" caption="7 inch Double Banded Brooke"]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/washny-21-july-033.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-203" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/washny-21-july-033.jpg?w=300" alt="7 inch Double Banded Brooke" width="300" height="224" /></a>[/caption]
<p>But these four guns are not the only artifacts linked to the Battle of Mobile Bay in Washington, D.C. At the front of the Navy Museum is an anchor from the USS <em>Hartford</em>. While this writer feels it stretches things a bit, it is possible the anchor was on board Farragut's flagship during the battle.</p>
[caption id="attachment_204" align="alignnone" width="300" caption="USS Hartford Anchor - Left side of the Entrance"]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/washny-21-july-253.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-204" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/washny-21-july-253.jpg?w=300" alt="USS Hartford Anchor - Left side of the Entrance" width="300" height="224" /></a>[/caption]
<p>Ok, how about one further artifact, sort of:</p>
[caption id="attachment_207" align="alignnone" width="224" caption="Admiral Farragut Monument"]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/dc-23-may-08-088a.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-207" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/dc-23-may-08-088a.jpg?w=224" alt="Admiral Farragut Monument - Farragut Square" width="224" height="300" /></a>[/caption]
<p>Several blocks north, and on the other side of the Capital Mall from the Navy Yard, stands a ten foot tall statue of <a title="Farragut Monument" href="http://www.hmdb.org/marker.asp?marker=4104" target="_blank">Admiral Farragut</a>. The bronze for the mortars at the base of the statue (and possibly the statue itself) were cast using metal from the propellers of the USS <em>Hartford</em>. All told, a lot of "metal" reminders inside the Capital Beltway which share a common link to a battle in Alabama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Boston for the Boys: Good father-son museums]]></title>
<link>http://thevacationer.wordpress.com/?p=200</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Peter Brody</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thevacationer.wordpress.com/?p=200</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Just to continue the Boston conversation that Sharon has started…
I think of these things as “gu]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to continue the <a href="http://thevacationer.wordpress.com/2008/06/16/the-art-of-sightseeing-while-on-a-tight-schedule/">Boston conversation</a> that Sharon has started…<br />
I think of these things as “guy things” but that could just be because I’ve been to Boston a number of times to visit my father who always insists on taking me to one of these museums (among many others):</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.tripcart.com/usa-regions/Coastal-Massachusetts-Rhode-Island/museums/MIT-Museum.html">MIT Museum</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.tripcart.com/usa-regions/Coastal-Massachusetts-Rhode-Island/museums/Larz-Anderson-Auto-Museum.html">Larz Anderson Auto Museum</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.tripcart.com/usa-regions/Coastal-Massachusetts-Rhode-Island/museums/Peabody-Museum-of-Archaeology-Ethnology.html">Peabody Museum of Archeology and Ethnology</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.tripcart.com/usa-regions/Coastal-Massachusetts-Rhode-Island/museums/Ancient-Honorable-Artillery-Company-Museum.html">Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company Museum</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.tripcart.com/usa-regions/Coastal-Massachusetts-Rhode-Island/museums/New-England-Sports-Museum.html">New England Sports Museum</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.tripcart.com/usa-regions/Coastal-Massachusetts-Rhode-Island/museums/USS-Constitution-Museum.html">USS Constitution Museum</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Guns of the CSS Atlanta]]></title>
<link>http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/?p=177</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>caswain01</dc:creator>
<guid>http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/?p=177</guid>
<description><![CDATA[One of the charms about the U.S. Naval Museum at the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C. are the outdoor c]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the charms about the U.S. Naval Museum at the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C. are the outdoor cannon exhibits.  For field artillery, rarely can a specific piece be tracked back to a "known" history.  One notable exception is Calef's gun, firing the first shot at Gettysburg.  On the other hand, a large portion of Naval ordnance can often be traced back to a specific ship and occasionally, by way of that fact, to a specific historical incident.  The collection at the Navy Yard in Willard Park and Leutze Park include some noteworthy pieces with such histories. Four pieces in Willard Park, sitting between a massive World War I railway gun and a 16-inch battleship gun, trace back to an incident which occurred on June 17, 1863.</p>
[caption id="attachment_179" align="alignnone" width="300" caption="Four Brookes in Willard Park"]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/washny-21-july-283.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-179" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/washny-21-july-283.jpg?w=300" alt="Four Brookes in Willard Park" width="300" height="224" /></a>[/caption]
<p>The guns were originally the main armament of the CSS <em>Atlanta</em> captured off the Georgia coast.  All are Brooke Rifles cast at Tredegar Iron Works in Richmond.  The Confederate ironclad included two 7-inch Single Banded Brooke rifles, mounted fore and aft on pivot.   Complementing these were two 6.4 inch Single Banded Brookes, on broadside mounts.</p>
<p>The <em>Atlanta</em> began life as a blockade runner named <em>Fingal</em>.  Like many Confederate naval projects, she was a novel wartime adaptation of what was available.  With the upper structure cut down, a frame was built and armored with railway iron.  The weight of armor caused the ship to run deep, with a draft of 16 feet.  Furthermore the she maneuvered sluggishly.  Both issues that factored in the ironclad's later fate.  On June 17, 1863, commanded by Lieutenant William A. Webb, the <em>Atlanta</em> maneuvered into Wassaw Sound to attempt a breakout to the open sea.  Webb was confronted by the monitors USS <em>Weehawken</em> and USS <em>Nahant</em> under Captain John Rodgers.  Early on, the <em>Atlanta</em> ran aground on a shoal and became an easy target for the Federal gunners.  Faced with an impossible situation, Webb surrendered. The <em>Atlanta</em> was later repaired and placed into Federal navy service.  She served with  the James River squadron blockading Richmond.  Presumably, the armament of the ironclad was dismounted after the war as trophies when the ship was scrapped.  Some accounts have the ship sold to Haiti, without the Brookes obviously, but floundering in transit off Cape Hatteras.</p>
[caption id="attachment_181" align="alignnone" width="444" caption="From the Naval Historical Center Collection"]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/h61902.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-181" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/h61902.jpg" alt="The Atlanta in the James.  Photo from the Naval Historical Center Collection." width="444" height="345" /></a>[/caption]
<p>The Brookes are worth a more detailed discussion.  All four were "early" Brooke guns and share some visual similarities with the Parrott rifles.  While later Brookes had multiple reinforcing bands, these have a single band, much like the Parrotts.  The two main differences between Parrotts and Brookes require some close inspection.  Parrotts have rectangular groove, right hand "gain" twist rifling, with the number of grooves increasing by caliber.  Brookes have a triangular profile, constant rate, right hand twist rifling, with the number of grooves for either caliber set at seven. Furthermore, while the bands look similar, those of the Parrott were wrought iron, while those of the Brooke were but welded.</p>
[caption id="attachment_182" align="alignnone" width="300" caption="6.4 Inch Brooke Single Banded Rifle"]<img class="size-medium wp-image-182" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/washny-21-july-288.jpg?w=300" alt="6.4 Inch Brooke Single Banded Rifle" width="300" height="224" />[/caption]
[caption id="attachment_183" align="alignnone" width="300" caption="7 inch Brooke Single Banded Rifle"]</dt>
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/washny-21-july-292.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-183" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/washny-21-july-292.jpg?w=300" alt="7 inch Brooke Single Banded Rifle" width="300" height="224" /></a>[/caption]
<p>The guns themselves carry interesting "trophy" inscriptions inscribed on the breech.  While each is a little different they generally identify the capture date, the CSS <em>Atlanta</em>, and caliber.  At least one inscription cites the Brooke as an "imitation" of the Parrott rifle.  The inscription and founder's marks link the guns to the ironclad.</p>
[caption id="attachment_185" align="alignnone" width="300" caption="Left side inscription on 7 Inch Brooke  "]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/washny-21-july-285.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-185" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/washny-21-july-285.jpg?w=300" alt="Left side inscription on 7 Inch Brooke" width="300" height="224" /></a>[/caption]
[caption id="attachment_186" align="alignnone" width="300" caption="Right Side Inscription on 7 inch Brooke"]<a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/washny-21-july-284.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-186" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/washny-21-july-284.jpg?w=300" alt="Right Side Inscription on 7 inch Brooke" width="300" height="224" /></a>[/caption]
<p>These are not the only Brookes in the Navy Yard.  Several from the CSS <em>Tennessee</em> in particular are on display nearby.  But those are later models with multiple reinforcing bands.  In fact, only five single banded Brookes exist today.  In addition to the four on display at Willard Park, a fifth single banded Brooke is in the trophy collection at West Point.  It too has an <em>Atlanta</em> connection.  At West Point a 7 inch Brooke is listed as trophy No. 180, captured at Charleston, S.C. at the end of the war.  Previous to it's employment on land defenses, that particular weapon had been issued to the <em>Atlanta</em>, but rejected due to defects.</p>
<p>My "what if" of the day, regards the possibility of the <em>Atlanta</em> reaching open water.  Her speed was not much better than the Federal monitors, so a sortie as a "raider" doesn't make much sense.  However, some hit and run attacks on the blockading squadrons around Savannah, Charleston and North Carolina might have caused concerns.  Timing, of course, is everything.  Imagine the newspapers on July 5, 1863 with competing banner headlines:  "Grant Takes Vicksburg!"  "More Details of the Great Battle in Pennsylvania!"  "Confederate Ram Sinks more Supply Vessels off Charleston!"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Counter battery observation]]></title>
<link>http://crusaderproject.wordpress.com/?p=16</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
<guid>http://crusaderproject.wordpress.com/?p=16</guid>
<description><![CDATA[One aspect of artillery combat that is close to my heart is counter-battery observation. My grandfat]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;">One aspect of artillery combat that is close to my heart is counter-battery observation. My grandfather spent the war in Russia doing this kind of job. It essentially consists of locating enemy gun positions by day and night using sound ranging, and by night using flash ranging, and to guide their own artillery to fire on it.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">In Africa, the Germans had Beobachtungsabteilung 11 doing this (probably under Arko 104 - more on this in the future), and a battery of 15th Panzer, Beobachtungsbatterie (Pz) 33 (326), which was under Panzerartillerieregiment 33.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">For the British, this work was done by 4th (Durham) Survey Regiment R.A. You can download their history <a href="http://www.duffy-eu.com/94loc/">here.</a></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Below is a map of the observation posts of 33 (326) outside Tobruk, taken from Froben's book "Aufklärende Artillerie".  This system observed the western edge of the siege lines.  The 'Flugplatz' is the Gambut airfield.  The 'Achsenstrasse' is the Axis bypass road constructed by the Italians to ensure that supply could continue to run even though Tobruk had not been taken, and the Via Balbia continued to be blocked. 'Panzergraben' is the tank ditch.</p>
<p><a href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_Ca8YXg0H1Kk/R-6gDIKtJxI/AAAAAAAAB58/LgciysX2K4k/s1600-h/B-System+Tobruk+41+small.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_Ca8YXg0H1Kk/R-6gDIKtJxI/AAAAAAAAB58/LgciysX2K4k/s400/B-System+Tobruk+41+small.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Demonstrasi Kuasa Tembakan 2008 (Artileri)]]></title>
<link>http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/?p=160</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>razaklatif</dc:creator>
<guid>http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/?p=160</guid>
<description><![CDATA[









]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://razaklatif.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/kml_kuasa008.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-164" src="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kml_kuasa008.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kml_kuasa005.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-168" src="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kml_kuasa005.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="320" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest058.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-167" src="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest058.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="295" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest050.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-172" src="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest050.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="339" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest028.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-173" src="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest028.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="316" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest052.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-171" src="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest052.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="338" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kml_kuasa003.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-162" src="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kml_kuasa003.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest033.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-169" src="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest033.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="500" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest038.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-161" src="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest038.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="313" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest053.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-166" src="http://razaklatif.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/kuasabest053.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="292" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Iran arms IRGC with smart munitions]]></title>
<link>http://abufazl.wordpress.com/?p=94</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>abufazl</dc:creator>
<guid>http://abufazl.wordpress.com/?p=94</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Iran has started to arm the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps artillery with state-of-the-art smart]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Iran has started to arm the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps artillery with state-of-the-art smart munitions and cluster shells. </strong></p>
<p>Iran's advanced ammunition will be used to protect Iranian territory, said commander of the IRGC missile systems Brigadier General Mahmoud Chaharbaghi.</p>
<p>"Fajr 3 and Fajr 5 long-range rocket launchers along with Zalzal rockets with a range of 150 kilometers are among the high-tech military equipment the IRGC will employ," Gen. Chaharbaghi said.</p>
<p>The top IRGC commander added that Iran has launched a production line for smart munitions, which can hit small mobile targets, and long-range cluster shells.</p>
<p>“IRGC artilleries across the country are currently equipped with 130, 150, DC122 heavy cannons and powerful Katyusha rockets," Gen. Chaharbaghi said.</p>
<p>He concluded that in the event of an attack on the country, IRGC forces would 'overwhelm invaders with their fire power'.</p>
<p>CS/HGH</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;"><a href="http://www.insight-info.com">www.insight-info.com</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Battle of Hanover]]></title>
<link>http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/?p=147</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>caswain01</dc:creator>
<guid>http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/?p=147</guid>
<description><![CDATA[During the last full weekend of June I spent some time with a fellow HMDB regular collecting and doc]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the last full weekend of June I spent some time with a fellow HMDB regular collecting and documenting the markers around Hanover.  With "<a title="PEBGA" href="http://www.stuartsride.com/theCampaign.htm" target="_blank">Plenty Enough Blame to Go Around</a>" in hand for reference, we were able to locate the majority of the markers (<a title="hanover list" href="http://www.hmdb.org/results.asp?Related=4997" target="_blank">list</a>) (<a title="Hanover Map" href="http://www.hmdb.org/map.asp?markers=0,5020,8652,8653,8655,4999,8658,8648,8647,8646,4996,4997,5002,5001,5005,4995,5003,8650,5026,5025,5023,5021,5022,8776,5008,5029" target="_blank">map</a>).  For the set, our photos are a little sparse.   The town of Hanover has grown a bit over the century plus since the battle.  As such, in several places where historical homes or sites are referenced, a modern construction home or business now stands.  Plaques indicating a structure stood at the time of the battle are fixed to numerous buildings around the center of town.  However I cannot locate any specific references which might guide a visitor to the name or history of these structures.  So while I have a score of photos of buildings, none have any context which can be linked to marker entries with any degree of accuracy.</p>
<p>The Federal Monument in Mount Olivet Cemetery is noteworthy.</p>
<p><a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/hanover-28-june-414.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-154" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/hanover-28-june-414.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a></p>
<p>The two field pieces flanking the monument are actually replicas.  Their form and appearance are in line with similar replicas cast for the Gettysburg battlefield.  While looking like 3-inch Ordnance rifles from a distance, these have rough exteriors, a visible lateral casting seam, not to mention a lack of standard markings.</p>
<p>However, in the town square are two authentic Civil War era pieces.  Two 2.9 inch Parrott Rifles.  One of which is touted as "No. 1."  Both carry the letters "C. P." over the trunnions.</p>
<p><a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/hanover-28-june-351.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-150" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/hanover-28-june-351.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="261" height="195" /> </a><a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/hanover-28-june-3541.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-152" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/07/hanover-28-june-3541.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="260" height="194" /></a></p>
<p>While I've read and heard several sources state this particular piece above (No 1) was the "very first Parrott rifle ever made," the claim does not match with the records.  Robert Parrott had experimented with the design prior to 1861, but the first batch accepted by the government was a set of ten 2.9-inch, 10-pounder rifles in May 1861.   However, pre-dating the government delivery considerably, one Parrott rifle was delivered to the Commonwealth of Virginia in 1860.  Just after the outbreak of the war, the states of New York and Pennsylvania ordered examples of the Parrott 10-pounders.  The New York examples are stamped "S.N.Y." over the trunnions.  The Pennsylvania order received the initials "C.P." for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.  (For a full discussion, please refer to <em>Field Artillery Weapons of the Civil War</em>, by James C. Hazlett, Edwin Olmstead, and M. Hume Parks, page 109-110).   In addition to the twins at Hanover, two more examples of this batch are displayed on the Gettysburg battlefield.</p>
<p>The markers at Hanover add to a growing collection of the Gettysburg Campaign.  Most of the Civil War trails markers for the Gettysburg Campaign are in the database now.  As time permits, I'll dress up groupings as done with Antietam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Field Artillery, Old School]]></title>
<link>http://xbradtc.wordpress.com/?p=106</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>xbradtc</dc:creator>
<guid>http://xbradtc.wordpress.com/?p=106</guid>
<description><![CDATA[You have to love the Brit eccentricity.

]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to love the Brit eccentricity.</p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/-wVADKznOhY'></param><param name='wmode' value='transparent'></param><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/-wVADKznOhY&rel=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='transparent' width='425' height='350'></embed></object></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[PAKISTAN: Pakistan Angry as Strike by U.S. Kills 11 Soldiers]]></title>
<link>http://warvictims.wordpress.com/?p=633</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>warvictims</dc:creator>
<guid>http://warvictims.wordpress.com/?p=633</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Pakistan Angry as Strike by U.S. Kills 11 Soldiers
By CARLOTTA GALL and ERIC SCHMITT
ISLAMABAD, Paki]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pakistan Angry as Strike by U.S. Kills 11 Soldiers<br />
By CARLOTTA GALL and ERIC SCHMITT</p>
<p>ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — American air and artillery strikes killed 11 Pakistani paramilitary soldiers during a clash with insurgents on the Afghan border on Tuesday night, a development that raised concerns about the already strained American relationship with Pakistan.</p>
<p>The strikes underscored the often faulty communications involving American, Pakistani and Afghan forces along the border, and the ability of Taliban fighters and other insurgents to use havens in Pakistan to carry out attacks into neighboring Afghanistan.<!--more--></p>
<p>The attack comes at a time of rising tension between the United States and the new government in Pakistan, which has granted wide latitude to militants in its border areas under a new series of peace deals, drawing criticism from the United States.</p>
<p>NATO and American commanders say cross-border attacks in Afghanistan by insurgents have risen sharply since talks for those peace deals began in March.</p>
<p>Although Pakistani government officials softened their response through the day on Wednesday, the Pakistani military released an early statement calling the airstrikes “unprovoked and cowardly.”</p>
<p>Shaken by the initial Pakistani reaction, administration officials braced for at least a short-term rough patch in relations with Islamabad.</p>
<p>“It won’t be good,” said a Pentagon official who followed developments closely throughout the day. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.</p>
<p>The precise circumstances surrounding the reported deaths remained unclear, and American officials said an American-Pakistani investigation was expected to begin immediately.</p>
<p>But according to accounts from American officials, the incident started when Taliban fighters from Pakistan crossed about 200 yards into Kunar Province, on the Afghan side of the border, and attacked American-led forces with small-caliber weapons and rocket-propelled grenade fire.</p>
<p>After coalition forces returned fire, driving the insurgents back into Pakistan, two United States Air Force F-15E fighter-bombers and one B-1 bomber dropped about a dozen bombs — mostly 500-pound munitions — on the attackers. An Air Force statement said the militants were struck “in the open and in buildings in the vicinity of Asadabad.”</p>
<p>A spokesman for the Taliban said their forces had attacked an American and Afghan position near the border, and said eight of their fighters had been killed and nine wounded in the fighting.</p>
<p>Before the airstrike, a Pentagon official said, American forces alerted a Pakistani military liaison officer, trying to ensure that friendly troops were out of harm’s way.</p>
<p>But the Pakistani officer was either unaware that Pakistani paramilitary forces had moved into the area near the insurgents, or the Pakistani forces never got the word to get out of the way, American officials said.</p>
<p>“They got caught in the wrong place at the wrong time,” the Pentagon official said.</p>
<p>Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani of Pakistan denounced the attack in Parliament and said he had instructed the Foreign Ministry to make a formal protest to the American ambassador, Anne Patterson.</p>
<p>But the Pentagon press secretary, Geoff Morrell, told reporters in Washington that “every indication we have at this stage is that it was a legitimate strike in self-defense.” American rules of engagement bar American forces from crossing or firing into Pakistan except to protect themselves.</p>
<p>By Wednesday afternoon, Pakistan’s new ambassador to Washington, Husain Haqqani, had softened his government’s reaction, telling Reuters, “We do look upon it as not an act that should cause us to reconsider our partnership but rather to find ways of improving that partnership.”</p>
<p>Seth Jones, an analyst with the RAND Corporation who was conducting research in Kunar Province last week, said: “It’s almost surprising more of this hasn’t happened given the vast amount of traffic across the border. This creates a real serious impetus for the U.S. to coordinate more closely with Pakistan forces.”</p>
<p>American officials in Pakistan and in Washington, while expressing regret for the Pakistani deaths, said the episode underscored the need to improve the equipping of and coordination with Pakistani security forces operating near the border, including the Frontier Corps, a paramilitary force of about 85,000 members recruited from ethnic groups on the border.</p>
<p>American and Pakistani officials say the Frontier Corps, which is drawn from Pashtun tribesmen who know the language and culture of the tribal areas, is the most suitable force to combat an insurgency over the long term in the border region, where the regular Pakistani military often is not welcomed.</p>
<p>It was unclear whether the Pakistan liaison officer involved in the airstrike on Tuesday was from the Pakistani Army or the Frontier Corps, an important distinction because the two security forces have not always worked together smoothly, American officials said.</p>
<p>Gonzalo Gallegos, a State Department spokesman in Washington, said, “This is a reminder that better cross-border communications between forces is vital.”</p>
<p>The Pentagon has spent about $25 million so far to equip the Frontier Corps with new body armor, vehicles, radios and surveillance equipment, and plans to spend $75 million more in the next year.</p>
<p>Over all, administration officials have said the United States could spend more than $400 million in the next several years to enhance the Frontier Corps, including building a training base near Peshawar.</p>
<p>Until recently, the Frontier Corps had not received American military financing because the corps technically falls under the Pakistani Interior Ministry, a nonmilitary agency that the Pentagon ordinarily does not deal with.</p>
<p>Gen. David D. McKiernan, the new NATO commander in Afghanistan, said last week that one of his first trips as commander would be to meet with the Pakistani Army’s chief of staff, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, to try to resurrect a commission created by NATO and the Afghan and Pakistani militaries to address border issues. In recent months, Pakistan has not taken part in the commission.</p>
<p>The United States, which has about 34,000 military personnel in Afghanistan, part of an international presence totaling about 60,000, is also in the midst of building six border coordination posts that will be operated by Pakistani, American and other allied forces.</p>
<p>At the Pentagon, Mr. Morrell said, “It is incumbent upon both of us not to let an incident like this or any other interfere with that fundamental shared goal of making sure the F.A.T.A. is not a refuge for terrorists.” He was referring to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, the contested border area.</p>
<p>Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was expected to discuss the event with her Pakistani counterpart on Thursday at the Afghan donors conference in Paris, American officials said.</p>
<p>There have been several American strikes recently on insurgents inside Pakistani territory. In March, three bombs, apparently dropped by an American aircraft, killed nine people and wounded nine others in the tribal area of South Waziristan that officials say provides sanctuary to Al Qaeda and the Taliban.</p>
<p>In late January, one of Osama bin Laden’s top lieutenants, Abu Laith al-Libi, was killed by two Hellfire missiles launched from a Predator surveillance aircraft.</p>
<p>The clash on Tuesday occurred at a border post called Chopara on the frontier with the Afghan province of Kunar, where American and Afghan forces have battled insurgents for several years. The insurgents have been using Mohmand and the adjacent area of Bajaur as a base for attacks into Afghanistan.</p>
<p>Fighting has been reported on the Afghan side of the border between insurgents and Afghan and American forces. According to one news report, one militant was killed and three wounded in a firefight on Monday.</p>
<p>The dead on the Pakistani side included a major and were all from the Mohmand Rifles, a paramilitary detachment of the Frontier Corps, the force deployed in Pakistan’s tribal areas bordering Afghanistan, a security official said, speaking in return for customary anonymity.</p>
<p>Officers in the Frontier Corps are generally assigned from the Pakistani Army. The bodies of the dead were being flown to Peshawar on Wednesday morning, the government official said. Among five wounded were three civilians, he said.</p>
<p>Local tribesmen with rocket launchers and Kalashnikov rifles gathered Wednesday near the checkpoint to show their outrage after the attack, Agence France-Presse reported.</p>
<p>Earlier this month, the American commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan said that Taliban forces in southern Afghanistan were fleeing to the Pakistani border after being routed in recent operations by the United States Marines.</p>
<p>Gen. Dan K. McNeill, who stepped down last week as NATO commander in Afghanistan, seemed to warn Pakistan to contain the threat emanating from its land, and said the Taliban and drug traffickers had long used refugee camps across the border as a sanctuary from American firepower.</p>
<p>He said that if the Taliban and foreign insurgents continued to enjoy free sanctuary outside Afghanistan, their numbers would continue to grow.</p>
<p>The new Pakistani government sought peace deals with the militants after many Pakistanis saw a drastic increase in suicide bombings in Pakistan as being in retaliation for American strikes.</p>
<p>Carlotta Gall reported from Islamabad, Pakistan, and Eric Schmitt from Washington. Ismail Khan contributed reporting from Peshawar, Pakistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[//InTheWo0ds_018 RoyalAirForce vs. RandomArtFactory?!]]></title>
<link>http://randomartfactory.wordpress.com/?p=89</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TeMo</dc:creator>
<guid>http://randomartfactory.wordpress.com/?p=89</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Die Nummer 18 geht ganz straight nach vorne! In direkter Auseinandersetzung mit der Kriegsmaschineri]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Die Nummer 18 geht ganz straight nach vorne! In direkter Auseinandersetzung mit der Kriegsmaschinerie des 21.Jahrhunderts obsiegt letzendlich nur das Polygon! Ok genug gesülzt... Im Moment befinde ich mich in der Konzeptionsphase für meine praktische Prüfung als Mediendesigner. Die Theorie hab ich hinter mir - kein gutes Gefühl, aber erstmal vom Tisch!</p>
<p>Am 13. Juni ist dann für mich der ganze Spuk vorbei und ich werde dann auf meine Ergebnisse warten. Alles weitere natürlich hier! Nachm 13.Juni wird DesignFusion, die Briefmarkengeschichte, Spreadshirt (Contest) und unser eigener SpreadShirtShop bearbeitet und abgearbeitet - also fetter StyleSommer!!!</p>
<p>OK, genug geredet schaut euch den nächsten Step an. Wir versuchen jetzt wieder ein wenig Ordnung in unser Chaos zu bekommen: Also nächster FIX-Termin für :mad ist dann der 13.Juni!!!</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a title="IntheWoods" href="http://www.randomartfactory.de//battle/InTheWo0ds/battle2.html" target="_blank"><img src="//www.randomartfactory.de//battle/InTheWo0ds/preview_ever.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="109" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;">&#60;click the pic&#62;</p>
<p>euer TeMo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Some memorable flights]]></title>
<link>http://julesaitch.wordpress.com/?p=14</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Julian Hustwitt</dc:creator>
<guid>http://julesaitch.wordpress.com/?p=14</guid>
<description><![CDATA[My first (ever) flight was in an Ansett (Australia) DC3 from Hobart to Melbourne via Launceston in J]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US">My first (ever) flight was in an Ansett (Australia) DC3 from Hobart to Melbourne via Launceston in January 1953.<span> </span>My father had been crew on a yacht in the Sydney Hobart Race and we'd gone over to Hobart to spend Christmas and to meet him when he got there.<span> </span>They were late finishers and because he was late back at work in Melbourne we took a plane rather than the train from Hobart to Launceston (about 120 miles and it took a whole day) and then the overnight ferry 'Taroona' from Beauty Point, 30 miles from Launceston,  across Bass Strait to Melbourne.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<table class="MsoTableGrid" style="border-collapse:collapse;height:223px;text-align:justify;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="515">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width:213.1pt;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="284" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;" align="center"><span lang="EN-US"></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s113/Xeque22/taroona.jpg" alt="" width="251" height="168" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:9pt;" lang="EN-US">The ferry ‘Taroona’ leaving Melbourne</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:213.15pt;padding:0 5.4pt;" width="284" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;" align="center"><span lang="EN-US"></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p><img src="http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s113/Xeque22/AnsettCabin.jpg" alt="" width="231" height="153" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:9pt;" lang="EN-US">The forward end of an Ansett DC3 cabin.  Compare that to today!<br />
</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US">The ‘Taroona’ would roll on a wet towel and we’d had a very rough crossing on the way over from Melbourne.<span> </span>This may also </span><span lang="EN-US">have </span><span lang="EN-US">influenced my parents decision to fly back instead.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> To say that I was gob-smacked by my first flight would be an understatement.<span> </span>I was 10 years old and I can remember to this day every detail of that flight right down to a rivet popping out of the overhead air trunking and landing in my mother's lap.  The trip was made all the more memorable when my kid sister sprayed the forward end of the cabin with projectile vomit just as we landed at Essendon - Melbourne Aerodrome (they weren’t called airports then).<span> </span>The stewardess was not impressed!</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US">My next flight was 10 years later and whilst I was at sea.<span> </span>During the ships' call at Sydney I had the opportunity to drive to Wagga Wagga stopping in Canberra for lunch and seeing some really impressive scenery along the way.<span> </span>The return was with Airlines of New South Wales in a Fokker F27 Friendship.<span> </span>The most memorable part of that flight was arriving over Sydney  Harbour.<span> </span>Many years later I was able to revisit the memory in a Piper Cherokee from Bankstown Airfield.<span> </span>The intervening years had not diminished the experience in any way.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s113/Xeque22/Sydneyaerial.jpg" alt="" width="527" height="367" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;">Sydney harbour - breathtaking! (photo courtesy Airliners.net)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> I next flew in 1973 on Playboy Club business </span><span lang="EN-US">with BEA </span><span lang="EN-US">to Belfast, out in a Trident and back in a Britannia.<span> </span>The most memorable part of that trip, apart from escorting the Bunny of the Year, was spending a night at the Maze Prison as a guest of the British Army.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US">In 1976 I moved to live and work in Saudi Arabia arriving on a BA VC10 and I seem to have spent a considerable portion of my life sitting in aeroplanes ever since.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> The first of many memorable flights was my first return on Christmas leave from Dhahran along with 180 or so other wine, women and song starved oilmen fresh from several months in the desert.<span> </span>In those days aircraft were lined up nose to tail in two rows across the front of the terminal.<span> </span>Our aircraft was in the outside line waiting to depart when another aircraft from the inside line tried to cut between us and the aircraft parked in front.<span> </span>There wasn’t room and a collision was narrowly averted.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> A call was put out for the only pushback vehicle at Dhahran but it’s regular driver had taken it home!<span> </span>It was three hours before the offending aircraft could be pushed back and we could be on our way.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> We couldn’t be disembarked – there was no room inside the terminal so, in order to quell a rising tide of dissent, the crew took the brave decision to close the doors, shut the blinds and open the bar.<span> </span>The result, three hours later as we took off, was a Tristar full of happily inebriated oilmen. The party continued flat out until we reached Athens where we had to stop to pick up more fuel (and more beer - we were in danger of drinking the plane dry) then on to Heathrow where it continued in the bar at Terminal 1 whilst we all waited for our connecting flights.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> If the Saudi’s had found out we could all have spent Christmas in jail.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> Other memorable flights in no particular order:- </span></p>
<ul style="margin-top:0;text-align:justify;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Arriving and departing the Maldives (the short runway) –      flight deck jump seat Air Lanka B737</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">My first seaplane flight, again      in the Maldives      (see picture below)</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The snow covered Alps on a crystal clear moonlit winters night – flight deck      visit Air France (Airbus A310 I think)</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Flying low level along a desert      runway to scare sleeping camels off it so we could land – Saudi Aramco      Fokker F27 1976</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Hong Kong Kai Tak – sadly not      the ‘chequer board’ approach to runway 13 that I’d hoped for but the      almost as impressive approach to 31 – Cathay Pacific B747 jump seat.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Legging it across the tarmac      between connecting flights as artillery shells started dropping on the      airport boundary – Middle East Airlines Beirut 1979</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">A Hajj flight to Jeddah in an ancient      Saudi B707 in 1977 – open sided luggage racks - it was that old</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Arriving in Baghdad      from Amman      in 1980 as one of only 12 passengers on a B747 – seemed odd at the time</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Trying to get out of Baghdad      to go back to Amman and realizing <span style="text-decoration:underline;">why</span> there were only 12 passengers on the      747 coming in – 5,000+ in the departure lounge with only 1,500 aircraft seats      available that night (Iran Iraq war)</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s113/Xeque22/Afghanhighlands.jpg" alt="Northern Afghanistan" width="532" height="400" /></p>
<p style="text-align:center;">The Afghan highlands.  Not quite as good as the moonlit Alps but still impressive</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s113/Xeque22/FlotterMaldives.png" alt="" width="534" height="255" /></p>
<p style="text-align:center;">Sun Express Twin Otter on floats - Maldives</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"><span lang="EN-US"> But my most memorable flight of all has to be</span><span lang="EN-US"> my first solo when I was learning to fly</span><span lang="EN-US"> - December 12, 1977 .</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">Over the years since, the magic, the excitement and the pleasure of flying with the airlines has faded.  The 'pack 'em in - screw as much as you can outa them' business model has done that for me.   Indeed, I view my next trip to London with so much trepidation that I've decided to fork out for Premium Economy.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">The best bits, as always, will be take-off and landing when the pilot in me listens to every sound, feels every movement and knows exactly what is happening.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">But now, thanks to American inspired 'terrism' paranoia, airline Captains are no longer allowed to invite passengers onto their flight decks thereby giving up a major aspect of their authority to lesser people (i.e. politicians and sundry erks) to the detriment of enthusiasts like me.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;">And that's really sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Artillery]]></title>
<link>http://radial.wordpress.com/?p=165</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>radial</dc:creator>
<guid>http://radial.wordpress.com/?p=165</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Just finished reading In Diyala Province, Persuasion by Artillery Fire and this quote jumped out at ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finished reading <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/last-fall-many.html">In Diyala Province, Persuasion by Artillery Fire</a> and this quote jumped out at me from the US Army colonel the post was about:</p>
<blockquote><p>The artillery helps with "terrain denial" -- driving insurgents away from potential safe havens, he explained. But the strikes are also aimed at persuading the local civilian population, and their leaders.</p>
<p>The rounds have a "profound... psychological impact," Col. Lehr said. "They quickly get your attention, get you to start asking questions" about why the cannons are blasting.</p>
<p>"Six separate times" such strikes "brought tribal leaders to the table,"  Col. Lehr noted.</p></blockquote>
<p>There's a word for inflicting terror on civilian populations to scare them into acquiescing to your political demands, isn't there?  I could swear there is.  It's right on the tip of my tongue...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Valley Forge: The Great Cookout]]></title>
<link>http://dnewell1.wordpress.com/?p=5</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 19:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dave Newell</dc:creator>
<guid>http://dnewell1.wordpress.com/?p=5</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8220;No battle was fought at Valley Forge. Yet, it was the turning point of the Revolutionary War.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"No battle was fought at Valley Forge. Yet, it was the turning point of the Revolutionary War. It was here that the Continental army was desperately against the ropes — bloody, beaten, battle-weary — and ready to quit. Even General Washington conceded, 'If the army does not get help soon, in all likelihood it will disband.'"<sup>[1]</sup></p>
<p>Washington and his men had fought the Battle of White Marsh, the last battle of 1777 before camping at Valley Forge. It wasn't until February of 1778 that relief came. Nearby Hessian solders who had defected from their German regiments gave relief to the American army in the form of bratwursts.</p>
<p>Upon the arrival of the extra food, General Henry Knox, Washington's Chief of Artillery, contributed to the food supply with his famous potato salad and sauerkraut - both were served chilled. The Mustard Tax of 1776 forced General Knox to toss the potato salad with just mayonnaise and seasonings without the popular, more common condiment.</p>
<p>With the combination of a lieutenant's exceptional skill at spit-grilling and General Knox's potato salad and sauerkraut, the following weeks were enjoyable, although the Hessians gave the soldiers bratwursts in packs of six and buns in packs of eight. Because several bratwursts were incorrectly prepared in each batch, General Washington's army suffered from diarrhea for the remainder of the months at Valley Forge.</p>
<p>The war raged on for five more years, but at Valley Forge, Washington and his men won a victory not of weapons but of will<sup>[2] </sup>and potato salad.</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p>[1] ushistory.org</p>
<p><a class="internal" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0271025263"></a></p>
<p>[2] text incorporated from <a class="external text" title="http://www.nps.gov/vafo" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nps.gov/vafo">www.nps.gov/vafo</a> which is in the public domain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[cool paper guns]]></title>
<link>http://bigghettomess.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/cool-paper-guns/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sgamer</dc:creator>
<guid>http://bigghettomess.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/cool-paper-guns/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[MAKE: Blog: Paper Wars exhibition

]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/05/paper_wars_exhibition.html?CMP=OTC-0D6B48984890">MAKE: Blog: Paper Wars exhibition</a></p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fort Foote]]></title>
<link>http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/?p=66</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>caswain01</dc:creator>
<guid>http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/?p=66</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Finally got around to a belated trip report and marker entries for Fort Foote, Maryland. I visited t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally got around to a belated trip report and marker entries for Fort Foote, Maryland. I visited the fort during the first week of March, and in spite of the near freezing wind, enjoyed the walk.  The advantage to the "off season" in the DC area generally is less traffic.  Since Fort Foote is certifiably "off the beaten path" this isn't a worry even in July.  The other advantage, for Fort Foote, is without all the summer vegetation, sections of the fort are much easier to visually trace.  The <a title="FortFooteList" href="http://www.hmdb.org/results.asp?Related=4168" target="_blank">marker set</a> for Fort Foote includes five interpretive waysides.  Several markers on site show signs of wear, weather, and neglect.  The <a title="FortFooteMap" href="http://www.hmdb.org/map.asp?markers=0,4168,7625,7632,7635,7636" target="_blank">map view</a> is noteworthy, since the satellite image was made during the winter months, details of the fort's works including the central traverse, are clear to see.  Also visible from space are two large black objects:</p>
<p><a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/fort-foote-1-mar-08-128.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-101" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/05/fort-foote-1-mar-08-128.jpg?w=300" alt="15in Rodman in Barbette" width="300" height="224" /></a></p>
<p>For the Civil War artillery enthusiast, one lure to the fort is to examine these two 49,000 pound monsters.   After all you don't find <a title="15inMonster" href="http://www.hmdb.org/Marker.asp?Marker=7636" target="_blank">15-inch Rodman Guns </a>laying about just anywhere.</p>
<p>Fort Foote was built between 1863 and 1865 primarily to defend the river approaches to Washington, D.C.  This section of the system included nearby Fort Washington, downstream on the Maryland side of the Potomac, and Fort Hunt and Battery Rogers on the Virginia side of the river.   Fort Foote, unlike most other forts defending Washington, continued to be used after the war including active service through 1878, and a brief period of administrative use during World War I.</p>
<p>During the Civil War, the fort's armament consisted of the two 15-inch Rodmans, between two and four 8-inch Parrott Rifles, and six 30-pounder Parrott Rifles (facing the land side approaches to the fort).  After the war, Fort Foote became somewhat of a demonstration area, with a wider assortment of guns.  When de-activated in 1878, the armament included, in addition to the original guns,  six 12-pounder Napoleons, one 6-pounder field gun,  two 4.5-in rifles, four 3-inch rifled guns, six 10-inch siege mortars, two 8-inch siege mortars, five 24-pounder Coehorn mortars, and two different types of Gatling guns.</p>
<p>Due in part to its proximity to the capital, Fort Foote was often visited by the President and other distinguished guests.  Apparently the favorite activity during these "dog and pony shows" was the firing of the Rodman guns.  During the post war era, at least one of the Rodmans was mounted on a <a title="KingsDepressioncarriage" href="http://www.hmdb.org/marker.asp?marker=7625" target="_blank">modified carriage</a>, which was an evolutionary step towards the disappearing guns that became an important component for the American seacoast defenses until World War II.  After the fort was discontinued, the big guns remained on site, neglected and forgotten.   Only in the 1980s when the National Park Service took over the site were the guns remounted and restored.</p>
<p>The two guns on site are both products of Cyrus Alger &#38; Co.   The first weapon of this type cast by Alger, from 1863 is the western most of the two.  Stamped with the initials "TJR" and a weight of 49,392 lbs., No 1 was inspected by Thomas Rodman himself.  The other, registry number 30, was inspected by Clifton Comly (C.C.) in 1864, and weighs 49,618 pounds.  Here's the "business end" of the two showing the markings:</p>
<p><a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/fort-foote-1-mar-08-131.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-102" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/05/fort-foote-1-mar-08-131.jpg?w=300" alt="RodmanNo1" width="229" height="171" /></a><a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/fort-foote-1-mar-08-144.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-103" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/05/fort-foote-1-mar-08-144.jpg?w=300" alt="Rodman 30" width="233" height="174" /></a></p>
<p>These large Rodmans also feature the distinctive "mushroom" knob at the breech end:</p>
<p><a href="http://markerhunter.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/fort-foote-1-mar-08-130.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-104" src="http://markerhunter.wordpress.com/files/2008/05/fort-foote-1-mar-08-130.jpg?w=300" alt="Rodman Mushroom" width="300" height="224" /></a></p>
<p>This shape replaced the traditional ball shaped knob.  With such tremendous weights involved, the traditional ball/knob and neck type cascabel was structurally a weak point.  Used mostly as a purchase for ropes associated with lifting tackle, the neck tended to break when stressed.  Rodman's solution was simply to flatten the neck and knob, forming what we'd probably call today a more streamlined design.  The groove around the "knob" provided a strong and durable anchor point for the lifting ropes.  Also seen from this view are the sockets used for the elevating mechanism, another Rodman innovation. </p>
<p>Overall a good walk in the woods to see the two iron monsters still faithfully guarding the Potomac. </p>
<p>-------------------</p>
<p>References consulted:</p>
<p> Olmstead, Edwin, Wayne E. Stark, and Spencer C. Tucker. <strong>The Big Guns: Civil War Siege, Seacoast and Naval Cannon</strong>. Alexandria Bay, NY: Museum Restoration Service, 1997.</p>
<p>Coolin, Benjamin Franklin III and Walton H. Owen II. <strong>Mr. Lincoln’s Forts: A Guide to the Civil War Defenses of Washington</strong>. Shippensburg, PA: White Mane Publishing Co, Inc., 1988.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Old Soldier of the Horse Cavalry Passes]]></title>
<link>http://johnibiii.wordpress.com/?p=335</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 15:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>johnibii</dc:creator>
<guid>http://johnibiii.wordpress.com/?p=335</guid>
<description><![CDATA[By John E. Carey
Peace and Freedom
We have been fortunate to meet and converse with several great Am]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By John E. Carey<br />
Peace and Freedom</p>
<p>We have been fortunate to meet and converse with several great Americans who started their military service in the horse cavalry.  One of these gentlemen was still on active duty and living in Saigon during the Vietnam War.  When he met my Vietnamese born bride he was already over 90 years of age.  He was sharp as a tack and recalled many details of his Saigon neighborhood -- an area we all knew and fondly recalled.</p>
<p>Below is the newspaper announcement of the passing of one of these fine gentlemen.  May God Bless and Keep him and all those passing....</p>
<p>Ret Brigadier General Watson C. Stoner, Jr., 95, of 102 Myrtle Avenue, Waynesboro, PA, died Thursday, April 24, 2008 in his home.</p>
<p>He was born on March 17, 1913 in Waynesboro; he was the son of Watson C. and Edith (Cole) Stoner. He lived most of his life in the Waynesboro area.</p>
<p>Mr. Stoner was educated at home and in local Sunday Schools and he graduated from Waynesboro High School with the class of 1931. While in high school he was the sports editor of the Blue and Gold; was active in athletics and a member of the famous Mile Relay Team that brought home medals from the Penn Relays. He further educated himself in mechanical engineering at Penn State University and continued taking courses throughout his life at such colleges as Penn State Mont Alto Campus and Hagerstown Community College.</p>
<p>He was married to his first wife, Catherine S. (Stoner) Stoner in June 1937 in Waynesboro. She died November 1950. He married his second wife, Marian E. (Selser) Stoner on October 25, 1952 in Winchester, VA. She died July 25, 1995.</p>
<p>His military career included schooling in Horse Cavalry, Field Artillery, Chemical Warfare, Intelligence and Nuclear Defense, completed the Command and General Staff College and the Army Management School. He also completed numerous correspondence courses to qualify for promotion until resident courses were available.</p>
<p>General Stoner enlisted as a Private with the Waynesboro Troop F, 104th Cavalry (Horse) of the Pennsylvania National Guards in 1937. He was commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in 1940, retired as a Colonel in the United States Army in 1967 and was promoted to Brigadier General on the retired list of the Pennsylvania National Guard.</p>
<p>He served during World War II in various artillery units, was a Military Police Officer in North Africa and later Artillery inspector with the Chinese Army. He was security officer at Headquarters, SOS China Theater and participated in the liberation of Shanghai. He completed U.S. Air Force flight training and was rated a pilot and later an Army Aviator. He served on the staff and faculty of the United States Army Artillery School in Fort Sill, OK, where he developed a complete training program for National Guards and Army Reserve Aviators nationwide.</p>
<p>He was a Registered Professional Engineer and a Registered Land Surveyor, active in the National, Pennsylvania, and Maryland Societies of Professional Engineers, where he held local, state, and national offices. He was a member of Acacia Lodge #586 F. &#38;A.M., Waynesboro. He was also a member of Scottish Rite of the Valley of Harrisburg, Pen Mar Chapter of the National Sojourners, B.P.O. Elks Lodge #731, Waynesboro, a life member of William Max McLaughlin V.F.W. Post #695 and Joe Stickell American Legion Post #15, both of Waynesboro. He was a member of the Waynesboro Fish and Game Association, the Antietam Humane Society, where he served as President and Director; the Waynesboro Country Club, Burns Hill Cemetery Board of Directors. He was a life member in the Reserve Officers Association of the United States and of Pennsylvania, the National Guard Associations of the United States and Pennsylvania and the National Rifle Association and its Golden Eagles.</p>
<p>Mr. Stoner was an avid railroad fan and a member of the Hagerstown Roundhouse Museum, Hagerstown Model Railroad Club, Friends of the Railway Museum of Pennsylvania, National Railway Historical Society's Baltimore and Hagerstown, MD chapters, Welsh Highland Railway Society of the United Kingdom.</p>
<p>He also served as vice-president of the York Frederick Railway, Inc. and the Secretary/Treasurer of the Maryland Rail, Inc.</p>
<p>He is survived by one daughter, Ann S. Spottswood of Waynesboro; one son Michael W. Stoner of Hagerstown; five grandchildren; and six great-grandchildren.<br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/fc/SC120314.jpg"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fc/SC120314.jpg/758px-SC120314.jpg" border="0" alt="SC120314.jpg" width="758" height="600" /></a><br />
9th U.S. Cavalry, May, 1941.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AK-47's mounted on Chineses artillery barrels]]></title>
<link>http://fnbclan.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/ak-47s-mounted-on-chineses-artillery-barrels/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>fnbclan</dc:creator>
<guid>http://fnbclan.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/ak-47s-mounted-on-chineses-artillery-barrels/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
A photo in the NK AAA article I recently blogged about show AKs mounted on artillery barrels. The t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><img border="1" vspace="4" width="450" src="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/s60plauu7-tm.jpg" hspace="4" alt="S60Plauu7" height="208" /></p>
<p>A photo in the <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008/02/10/fascinating-article-on-north-korean-anti-aircraft-artillery/"><font color="#003c34">NK AAA article</font></a> I recently blogged about show AKs mounted on artillery barrels. The theories on MilitaryPhotos.net are that they could be:</p>
<ul>
<li>Crude Sights</li>
<li>Used to fire tracers</li>
<li>Used to fire bullets during training instead of artillery rounds to save cost.</li>
</ul>
<p>The only other explanation I can think of is that they are just stowed away up there. Although I don’t see how the operators could climb up a hot barrel to fetch it during combat.</p>
<p>Anyone know what they are really there for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
