Those who ended losing this match would have been seriously hurt for facing the following Libertadores match. Boca's fist to the jaw left River groggy for a fatal defeat against San Lorenzo last Thursday! River was winning 2-0 and San Lorenzo was left with 9 men only!!! If you dont know why River Plate are called the chickens now you can clearly see why: THEY ENDED TYING THE MATCH 2-2, which left them OUT of the CUP!!! (first match ended 2-1 for San Lorenzo). River started playing really rough. San Lorenzo was fooled and followed the rough game. But suffered the consequences. Two men were showed the red card. River had the match in their pockets. But incredibly San Lorenzo grabbed strength from nowhere to put the match 2-2 in just ten minutes with 9 men only! Amazing! Important facts: San Lorenzo have in their squad many ex River players. River managment is awful this last years. They did not manage to make grown up players come back to River (as Boca did with many of their stars, including Palermo and Riquelme). Instead, San Lorenzo prepared well for this Cup, bringing formerly River Plate number 10 D'Alessandro from Zaragoza. And San Lorenzo's coach is the most successful River coach at this time. You have to see him shouting goal!! It was incredible to see how River past players and coach were sending them off!! :D
What a week for River! If Boca left them shocked then this was the final Knock-Out! River still is on top of local tournament. But there are NO EXCUSES. They LOST LIKE GALLINAS!!

Meanwhile, BOCA did a superb job in Brazil. Winning 2-1 over a difficult rival in a stadium none Argentinian team have won since 35 years ago. Boca played smart. Palacio finally aimed well and scored the fisrt goal. Then Palermo (best header in the whole world) smashed it with the head to score the second one. Boca not only beat a Brazilian team out of the cup. Boca beat the ghost of a possible difficult week.

Boca smiles to the future :D
Boca is just one point away of being top of tournament. Next match vs one of the three teams on top Estudiantes is important to climb up. Will Boca save players for Libertadores Quaterfinals being played next Wednesday?? It is uncertain. Boca is facing ATLAS once again. The Mexican team that let Boca pass to the Cup playoffs.
The certain thing is while River cries, Boca smiles :)

Netlabel: http://www.netlabelmxl.com.ar

Keywords: progressive, minimal, tech house

Bueno es un honor darle la bienvenida a un nuevo producer, Nacho muy buen debut en nuestro sitio, ritmos y sonidos excelentes, dos temas para bailar. Esperamos mas producciones de este muchacho que como primer referencia se lo recomendamos a todos...Exitos!!!

The beauty of the best - (feat Lulú) - 7:02
Traveller - 06:04

Stream

VBR M3U (Hi-Fi)

Download

VBR ZIP (13 MB)

http://www.archive.org/details

Agora sim podemos falar do segundo dia, acordei, tomei café e vamos ver as Cataratas do lado Brasileiro, para entrar é quinze reais e um cafezinho la dentro custa quatro reais, tudo que você vê de cataratas do lado Brasileiro é quase todo dos nossos “hermanos“ Argentinos, você até consegue sentir uma chuvinha de algumas quedas d’águas mas nada demais, tem um elevador panorâmico e passeio de barco embaixo das quedas d’aguas custa o absurdo de sento e sessenta reais, por volta de duas horas já estávamos no hotel prontos para voltar ao Paraguai e comprar as ultimas coisas do meu irmão, quando era três e meia da tarde as lojas começaram a fechar e ai que nos demos conta que o Paraguai tem fuso horário uma hora a frente, mesmo assim deu para comprar tudo que queria, ai que vem a grande surpresa, como sempre algo de sorte tinha que acontecer e a Receita Brasileira mudou as regras bem no dia, com isso foram duas horas de fila para voltar para o Brasil, e começou a rolar uma bagunça geral já que o lado do Paraguai liberou a passagem de pessoas pelos dois lados da ponte com isso passava quem queria pelo lado errado, assim que passamos o jeito foi pegar um taxi e voltar para Hotel e pedir uma saudosa Pizza para dormir, se pensar foi um dia até que chato mas é divertida a bagunça do Paraguai.

Terceiro e ultimo dia para passeio, dia de ir para Argentina e ver a Garganta do Diabo de perto, a fronteira argentina e bem arrumadinha e só pode passar com RG original ou passaporte, e dependendo para onde for eles farão você sair do carro, iram abrir seu porta malas, como iríamos ver as Cataratas que é bem perto da fronteira não teve problemas, pode parecer chato mas deveria ser assim no Brasil, as fronteiras Brasileiras vivem as moscas, tem apenas alguns seguranças acho que para garantir que não roubem tudo e para fazer uma media.

A entrada do parque de Puerto Iguazu é os mesmos quinze reais, mas como disse é um parque, o local é gigantesco e você pode comer por um preço justo, comprar lembranças, e andar por um lugar muito grande, tanto que tem um Trenzinho que leva as pessoas para certos lugares, ainda tem um barco que leva as pessoas para um tipo de Ilha-Praia, para quem é mais aventureiro pode fazer rapeu, ainda tem umas trilhas, mas o interessante é ver a famosa garganta do diabo, é sensacional, não da para explicar direto é muita água é muito barulho e bonito “pra caraiu!”, e do lado Argentino tem muitas quedas d’aguas que pode chegar bem perto, e realmente você precisa de uma capa de chuva, saímos do parque perto da hora de fechar às cinco horas da tarde.

Entre a fronteira Brasileira e Argentina a um DutyFree, e esse DutyFree é considerado o melhor do mundo, ele é monstruoso e tem de tudo desde de guloseimas bizarras a eletrônicos, traduzindo um lugar irresistível para não gastar mais, passei muito perto de comprar um Playstation 3 por míseros seiscentos dólares, com garantia e tudo mais, pena que era a versão de quarenta gigabytes, e iria acabar me arrependendo futuramente, para sair do DutyFree foi exatas duas horas no caixa, so que a diferença e que eles servem refri, suco, chocolate enquanto você espera, traduzindo de novo enche a barriga do povo que fica tudo feliz, e que maldita fila e tudo por causa que a mulher do caixa verificava até se notas de dez reais eram falsas ou verdadeiras.

Voltando para hotel, tomar banho e ir dar uma volta pela cidade a noite que é bem pacata e estava bem frio cerca de oito graus, na avenida principal fomos ao um restaurante comer picanha na pedra, e que bela janta tivemos, e por muito barato também.

De barriga cheia, hora de voltar para casa, e arrumar as malas que estão bem mais pesadas e gordas depois de comprar tanta bugiganga, depois é só acordar às quatro horas da manha, para chegar no aeroporto as cinco, para um vôo que saia as seis, e chegou as sete e quarenta e cinca em São Paulo, bom voltamos a capital financeira do Pais agora é dormir porque é Domingo e já já chegava a hora da musica amaldiçoada do Fantástico que lembra uma triste segunda-feira de trabalho.

The recent devastation caused by Cyclone Nargis has displaced perhaps over a million and killed tens of thousands. The initial storm flattened villages and sent a tsunami wave crashing over low-lying coastal areas. Water-bourn diseases now pose a further threat to those affected. The military dictatorship has hindered relief efforts from across the world, as agencies struggle to get the aid in to the country that is desperately needed.

When will the people of Burma get the assistance they so badly need? Or will the government of Myanmar continue to hinder relief efforts?

The military junta changed the name from Burma to Myanmar in 1989 (Rangoon also became Yangon). The UN and many nations recognised this, and so refer to the nation as Myanmar. Several countries, including the United Kingdom, United States, Canada and Australia, refer to the country officially as Burma. However, New Zealand’s government appears to now call it Myanmar.

News media differ on what name to refer to the troubled country, often even media within the same country. Considering the politics behind the name change, it is interesting which news sources refer to it as Myanmar and which opt for Burma.

The British media is uniform in their style, perhaps reflecting Britain’s colonial ties to the country. The BBC opts for Burma, as does the Independent, the Guardian, the Telegraph, Express, the Times and Sky News.

European media are, for the most part, similar to the UK’s in that Burma is the name given to the country. Germany’s Der Spiegel uses Burma, as does the remarkably trashy Bild (Sorry Germans, it was the only other German news source I know, feel free to inform my of other, more respectable sources!). France24 and Le Monde also opts for Burma, as does Italy’s La Repubblica and La Stampa. Spain’s El Pais and El Mundo, however, refer to the country as Myanmar.

Particularly fascinating is the American media, as there is no uniformity in the choice of names. The Washington Post opts for Burma, as does USA Today, whereas the New York Times refers to country as Myanmar. The Washington Times, perhaps appeasing all sides, uses both Burma and Myanmar in its stories. CNN, FOX, ABC, CBS and MSNBC each use Myanmar. Newsweek also goes for Myanmar, but Time magazine opts for Burma.

America’s northern neighbour’s media is also heterogeneous in their selections. Canada’s National Post and The Star use Burma, but The Toronto Sun uses Myanmar. The Vancouver Sun, like the Washington Times, uses both Myanmar and Burma (although the name reverts to Myanmar when you select the story online!).

Australia’s media follows their government’s lead; the Sydney Morning Herald, The Australian, West Australian, ABC, National Nine News and 7 News all use the old Burma.

Perhaps just to be different to the Aussies, New Zealand’s government opted for Myanmar, and the media followed suit. The New Zealand Herald, Fairfax’s stuff.co.nz, One News and 3 News all call the Asian nation Myanmar.

Of the Middle Eastern news sources I could find, and of those that actually had any coverage of the disaster, Qatar’s Al Jazeera, Dubai based Al Arabiya and Israel’s Jerusalem Post all refer to the country as Myanmar.

On the African continent, South Africa’s Mail and Guardian and Independent newspapers use Burma, whereas The Times uses Myanmar.

Argentina’s Buenos Aires Herald, Brazil’s Folha and Venezuela’s El Nacional each call the country Burma.

I had particular look forward to seeing how Asian media has covered this story, but unfortunately I can only read those sites that provide an English translation! So I cannot say that those sources I did find are representative of any one countries media. Of those I did find, both names were used, although overwhelmingly Myanmar was used. China’s Xinhua and People’s Daily, Japan’s Japan Times, Hong Kong based South China Morning Post, the Korea Herald and Indonesia’s Jakarta Post all refer to the country as Myanmar. South Korea’s Chosun Ilbo instead opts for Burma. The Times of India, Calcutta’s Telegraph and the New India Times all use Myanmar.

So what do this all mean? Does the use of either term alter the way the country is reported overseas? Should news consumers consider whether the choice of names has any bearing on how the story is reported?

In the case of Cyclone Nargis, I doubt it. Whether Burma or Myanmar is used is most likely irrelevant to how the story is reported. Most reports have focused on the devastation and the lose of life. Most articles have also been critical of the military junta (although it would be interesting to see if those that use Burma are more critical than those that use Myanmar). Additionally, most stories are from the same sources (for example Reuters or Associated Press), and style changes have been made accordingly for each publication.

But considering the political instability in the country, the recent protests by monks and the continued detainment of Aung Sin Suu Kyi, could the name chosen show the bias of the media outlet?

The choice is political. One choice acknowledges the Myanmar military government, whereas one does not. But should this mean there is bias in the reporting?

Does opting for the old Burma illustrate a favouring of the former colonial governance, perhaps implicitly saying that the Burmese are unable to govern themselves and require imperial? Or does using the military’s Myanmar perhaps indicate support for the dictatorship? Or does it not make any difference whatsoever and the names used are irrelevant?

I would probably say it makes little difference. A study looking at the angles taken by media who use either name would likely confirm there is no bias linked to a preference of names. It would certainly be interesting to look into.

Why would a media source choose one over the other?

(The BBC has covered this topic and gives their reasons for opting Burma in this article)

http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/servlet/SirveObras/68004064006461384100080/index.htm