<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>andersonville-georgia &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/andersonville-georgia/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "andersonville-georgia"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 18:25:59 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[On This Day, 4-9-08, Lee Surrenders]]></title>
<link>http://johnrandals.wordpress.com/?p=738</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>John Randals</dc:creator>
<guid>http://johnrandals.wordpress.com/?p=738</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Robert E. Lee surrenders
At Appomattox, Virginia, Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrenders his 2]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>Robert E. Lee surrenders</h4>
<p>At Appomattox, Virginia, Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrenders his 28,000 troops to Union General Ulysses S. Grant, effectively ending the American Civil War. Forced to abandon the Confederate capital of Richmond, blocked from joining the surviving Confederate force in North Carolina, and harassed constantly by Union cavalry, Lee had no other option.</p>
<p>"Robert E. Lee surrenders." 2008. The History Channel website. 8 Apr 2008, 02:23 <a href="http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&#38;id=4904.">http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&#38;id=4904.</a></p>
<p>0193 - In the Balkans, the distinguished soldier Septimius Seversus was proclaimed emperor by the army in Illyricum.</p>
<p>1241 - In the Battle of Liegnitz, Mongol armies defeated the Poles and the Germans.</p>
<p>1682 - Robert La Salle claimed the lower Mississippi River and all lands that touch it for France.</p>
<p>1831 - Robert Jenkins lost an ear. The event started a war between Britain and Spain.</p>
<p>1867 - The <a href="http://www.on-this-day.com/us">U.S.</a> Senate ratified the treaty with Russia that purchased the territory of Alaska by one vote.</p>
<p>1900 - British forces routed the Boers at Kroonstadt, South Africa.</p>
<p>1921 - The Russo-Polish conflict ended with signing of Riga Treaty.</p>
<p>1940 - Germany invaded Norway and Denmark.</p>
<p>1942 - In the Battle of Bataan, American and Filipino forces were overwhelmed by the Japanese Army.</p>
<p>1947 - 169 people were killed and 1,300 were injured by a series of tornadoes in <a href="http://www.on-this-day.com/us">Texas</a>, <a href="http://www.on-this-day.com/us">Oklahoma</a> and <a href="http://www.on-this-day.com/us">Kansas</a>.</p>
<p>1959 - NASA announced the selection of America's first seven astronauts.</p>
<p>1968 - Murdered civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., was buried.</p>
<p>1984 - Nicaragua asked the World Court to declare <a href="http://www.on-this-day.com/us">U.S.</a> support for guerilla raids illegal.</p>
<p>1998 - The National Prisoner of War Museum opened in Andersonville, <a href="http://www.on-this-day.com/us">GA</a>, at the site of an infamous Civil War camp.</p>
<p><strong>Billy the Kid convicted of murder</strong></p>
<p>After a one-day trial, Billy the Kid is found guilty of murdering the Lincoln County, New Mexico, sheriff and is sentenced to hang.</p>
<p>There is no doubt that Billy the Kid did indeed shoot the sheriff, though he had done so in the context of the bloody Lincoln County War, a battle between two powerful groups of ranchers and businessmen fighting for economic control of Lincoln County. When his boss, rancher John Tunstall, was murdered before his eyes in February 1878, the hotheaded young Billy swore vengeance. Unfortunately, the leader of the men who murdered Tunstall was the sheriff of Lincoln County, William Brady. When Billy and his partners murdered the sheriff several months later, they became outlaws, regardless of how corrupt Brady may have been.</p>
<p>"Billy the Kid convicted of murder." 2008. The History Channel website. 8 Apr 2008, 02:25 <a href="http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&#38;id=4483">http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&#38;id=4483.</a></p>
<h4>"Chicago Eight" plead not guilty</h4>
<p>The Chicago Eight, indicted on federal charges of conspiracy to incite a riot at the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago, plead not guilty. The trial for the eight antiwar activists had begun in Chicago on March 20. The defendants included David Dellinger of the National Mobilization Committee (NMC); Rennie Davis and Thomas Hayden of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS); Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, founders of the Youth International Party ("Yippies"); Bobby Seale of the Black Panthers; and two lesser known activists, Lee Weiner and John Froines.</p>
<p>They were charged with conspiracy to cross state lines with intent to incite a riot. Attorneys William Kunstler and Leonard Weinglass represented all but Seale. The trial, presided over by Judge Julius Hoffman, turned into a circus as the defendants and their attorneys used the court as a platform to attack Nixon, the war, racism, and oppression. Their tactics were so disruptive that at one point Judge Hoffman ordered Seale gagged and strapped to his chair. (Seale's disruptive behavior eventually caused the judge to try him separately). When the trial ended in February 1970, Hoffman found the defendants and their attorneys guilty of 175 counts of contempt of court and sentenced them to terms ranging from two to four years. Although declaring the defendants not guilty of conspiracy, the jury found all but Froines and Weiner guilty of intent to riot. The others were each sentenced to five years and fined $5,000. However, none of the defendants served time because in 1972 a Court of Appeals overturned the criminal convictions and eventually most of the contempt charges were also dropped.</p>
<p>"Chicago Eight" plead not guilty." 2008. The History Channel website. 8 Apr 2008, 02:27 <a href="http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&#38;id=1780">http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&#38;id=1780.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Assumptions (maybe?... and hopefully not mine) and Civil War "memory"]]></title>
<link>http://cenantua.wordpress.com/?p=83</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>cenantua</dc:creator>
<guid>http://cenantua.wordpress.com/?p=83</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks to a recent comment, I&#8217;ve been made aware of an error. Well, at least it appears to be ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to a recent comment, I've been made aware of an error. Well, at least it appears to be an error. There are two headstones in the <a href="http://www.cem.va.gov/CEMs/nchp/winchester.asp">Winchester National Cemetery</a> in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchester%2C_Virginia">Winchester, Virginia</a> that are mix-match in nature when it comes to data and design. Really, this is no great surprise. As I mentioned in an <a href="http://cenantua.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/more-puzzlements-over-civil-war-memory/">earlier post</a>, when I first saw the headstone of a cousin buried at the cemetery at <a href="http://www.nps.gov/ande/">Andersonville National Historic Site</a>, in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andersonville%2C_Georgia">Andersonville, Georgia</a> I realized that his stone listed the wrong name and state from which he hailed. Then too, at <a href="http://www.cem.va.gov/CEMs/nchp/staunton.asp">Staunton National Cemetery</a> in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staunton%2C_Virginia">Staunton, Virginia</a>, I found a headstone that bore the name of a soldier who died in the Luray Valley in October 1864 (Rather rare when considering graves in the National Cemeteries in the Valley but I have some rather specific details about how he died). Funny thing is, he has another headstone at <a href="http://www.cem.va.gov/CEMs/nchp/grafton.asp">Grafton National Cemetery</a> in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grafton%2C_West_Virginia">Grafton, West Virginia</a>. I feel pretty sure that they didn't select different parts of his body and send the two halves to the two different cemeteries, but I rather believe this to be an administrative error. FYI, for those with inquiring minds, there is a pretty good <a href="http://www.cem.va.gov/cem/hist/hmhist.asp">history of Veterans Administration headstones</a> available on the Web.</p>
<p><a href="http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~langolier/winchester_natl.html"><img align="left" width="170" src="http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~langolier/IMG/GRAVES/ezekial_ashcraft_big.jpg" alt="A photo of Ashcraft's headstone from John Berry's Graveyard's and Gravestones website... I site that I highly recommend" height="224" /></a><a href="http://www.lindapages.com/wvcw/12wvi/12-ashcraft1.htm">Ezekiel Ashcraft's</a> stone identifies him as a member of Co. G, <a href="http://www.lindapages.com/wvcw/12wvi/12thcover.htm">12th West Virginia Infantry</a>. That's all fine and dandy, except the next line really throws thing off as it identifies the unit as in the service of the "CSA." I really doubt that any self-respecting Confederate would admit to an affiliation, in any form or fashion, with the "break-off state." Anyway, other "Confederate identifiers" on Ashcraft's headstone include the distinctive pointed feature at the top of the stone and the "Confederate Cross of Honor" (with a wreath inside the maltese-type cross). Incidentally, since the 12th West Virginia was a Union unit, the distinctive recessed Union shield is absent from the headstone. Also, note that this headstone has "In Memory Of" engraved on the top, just under the Confederate Cross of Honor, meaning, this soldier isn't really buried here. Ohhhhh, I hope this isn't another case of a descendant thinking he knows better than his own ancestor as in the case of <a href="http://cenantua.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/a-grave-case-of-mistaken-identity-i-mean-loyalty/">my posting about Stephen S. Shook</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~langolier/winchester_natl.html"><img align="right" width="166" src="http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~langolier/IMG/GRAVES/j_v_sims_big.jpg" alt="Photo of Lt. Sims' headstone, courtesy of Berry's Gravestones and Graveyards website" height="219" />Then, we have the stone of J.V. Sims. </a><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=6cItAAAAIAAJ&#38;pg=PA119&#38;lpg=PA119&#38;dq=%22john+v.+sims%22&#38;source=web&#38;ots=-zhipoGX5A&#38;sig=xpQ9lE57s1SOGqjRCxDEBbiLWO4&#38;hl=en">First Lieutenant John V. Sims of the 122nd New York Infantry</a>, according to the <a href="http://web.cortland.edu/woosterk/genweb/122d_inf.html">website created in honor of the 122nd NY Infantry</a>, was a member of Co. H, having served as a 1st lieutenant with the company from 8 July 1864 through until his death at Third Winchester on 19 September 1864. As with Ashcraft's stone, Sims' stone has some of the same features that would falsely identify him as a Confederate soldier, but, in contrast with Ashcraft's stone, that "122nd NY Inf., <b>CSA</b>" stands out like a sore thumb.</p>
<p>So, is this a simple matter of "let's just get replacement stones that accurately reflect the nature of the service of these men?" Ummmm, well, it might be a bit more complicated than that. You see, I have it on good authority that an official tied to the cemetery has been telling people that these men were Confederate spies. Does this mean that they were spies in the Union army, spying for the Confederacy or does this mean they had a part-time hitch spying on Confederates? I'm not sure just yet. I suppose either could be possible, but I'd like to know the source of information that makes this official think that these men served as spies (as they say, "inquiring minds want to know"). I may be wrong (and I'll admit it if I am), but personally, I have a hunch that the story about being spies is an assumption based on the way that somebody interpreted meaning into incorrectly inscribed headstones. If this is the case, then we have yet another take on the meaning of Civil War "memory."</p>
<p>I'll keep you posted as more details come to my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
