<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>amputations &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/amputations/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "amputations"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:14:02 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Educating Patients with Amputations]]></title>
<link>http://bloggingot.wordpress.com/?p=37</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>aishel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://bloggingot.wordpress.com/?p=37</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Aside from educating an amputee about phantom limb pain, what else do occupational therapists have t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from educating an amputee about phantom limb pain, what else do occupational therapists have to teach patients?  The things I can think of are: skin checks, wound care, ace wrapping, and splint education.  Anything else?</p>
<p>(My question refers to on top of the usual ADL training that we would do)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Diabetes Study Partially Halted After Deaths]]></title>
<link>http://morganrants.wordpress.com/?p=82</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>morganwrites</dc:creator>
<guid>http://morganrants.wordpress.com/?p=82</guid>
<description><![CDATA[(NYT) - For decades, researchers believed that if people with diabetes  lowered their blood sugar to]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>(<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/health/07diabetes.html?ex=1202965200&#38;en=d726ed185a39476d&#38;ei=5070&#38;emc=eta1">NYT</a>) - For decades, researchers believed that if people with diabetes  lowered their blood sugar to normal levels, they would no longer be at high risk  of dying from heart disease. But a major federal study of more than 10,000  middle-aged and older people with Type  2 diabetes has found that lowering blood sugar actually increased their risk  of death, researchers reported Wednesday.The researchers announced that they were abruptly halting that part of the  study, whose surprising results call into question how the disease, which  affects 21 million Americans, should be managed.The study’s investigators emphasized that patients should still consult with  their doctors before considering changing their medications.</p>
<p>Among the study participants who were randomly assigned to get their blood  sugar levels to nearly normal, there were 54 more deaths than in the group  whose levels were less rigidly controlled. The patients were in the study for an  average of four years when investigators called a halt to the intensive blood  sugar lowering and put all of them on the less intense regimen.</p>
<p>The results do not mean blood sugar is meaningless. Lowered blood sugar can  protect against kidney disease, blindness  and amputations, but the findings inject an element of uncertainty into what has  been dogma — that the lower the blood sugar the better and that lowering blood  sugar levels to normal saves lives.</p>
<p>Medical experts were stunned.</p>
<p>“It’s confusing and disturbing that this happened,” said Dr. James Dove,  president of the American College of Cardiology. “For 50 years, we’ve talked  about getting blood sugar very low. Everything in the literature would suggest  this is the right thing to do,” he added.</p>
<p>Dr. Irl Hirsch, a diabetes researcher at the University  of Washington, said the study’s results would be hard to explain to some  patients who have spent years and made an enormous effort, through diet  and medication, getting and keeping their blood sugar down. They will not want  to relax their vigilance, he said.</p>
<p>“It will be similar to what many women felt when they heard the news about estrogen,”  Dr. Hirsch said. “Telling these patients to get their blood sugar up will be  very difficult.”</p>
<p>Dr. Hirsch added that organizations like the American Diabetes Association  would be in a quandary. Its guidelines call for blood sugar targets as close to  normal as possible.</p>
<p><i><b>And some insurance companies pay doctors extra if their diabetic patients get  their levels very low.</b></i> (My emphasis.)</p>
<p>The low-blood-sugar hypothesis was so entrenched that when the National  Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Diabetes and  Digestive and Kidney Diseases proposed the study in the 1990s, they explained  that it would be ethical. Even though most people assumed that lower blood sugar  was better, no one had rigorously tested the idea. So the study would ask if  very low  blood sugar levels in people with Type 2 diabetes — the form that affects 95  percent of people with the disease — would protect against heart disease and  save lives.</p>
<p>Some said that the study, even if ethical, would be impossible. They doubted  that participants — whose average age was 62, who had had diabetes for about 10  years, who had higher than average blood sugar levels, and who also had heart  disease or had other conditions, like high  blood pressure and high cholesterol,  that placed them at additional risk of heart disease — would ever achieve such  low blood sugar levels.</p>
<p>Study patients were randomly assigned to one of three types of treatments:  one comparing intensity of blood sugar control; another comparing intensity of  cholesterol control; and the third comparing intensity of blood  pressure control. The cholesterol and blood pressure parts of the study are  continuing.</p>
<p>Dr. John Buse, the vice-chairman of the study’s steering committee and the  president of medicine and science at the American Diabetes Association,  described what was required to get blood sugar levels low, as measured by a  protein, hemoglobin  A1C,  which was supposed to be at 6 percent or less.</p>
<p>“Many were taking four or five shots of insulin a day,” he said. “Some were  using insulin pumps. Some were monitoring their blood sugar seven or eight times  a day.”</p>
<p>They also took pills to lower their blood sugar, in addition to the pills  they took for other medical conditions and to lower their blood pressure and  cholesterol. They also came to a medical clinic every two months and had  frequent telephone conversations with clinic staff.</p>
<p>Those assigned to the less stringent blood sugar control, an A1C level of 7.0  to 7.9 percent, had an easier time of it. They measured their blood sugar once  or twice a day, went to the clinic every four months and took fewer drugs or  lower doses.</p>
<p>So it was quite a surprise when the patients who had worked so hard to get  their blood sugar low had a significantly higher death rate, the study  investigators said.</p>
<p>The researchers asked whether there were any drugs or drug combinations that  might have been to blame. They found none, said Dr. Denise G. Simons-Morton, a  project officer for the study at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.  Even the drug Avandia,  suspected of increasing the risk of heart attacks in diabetes, did not appear to  contribute to the increased death rate.</p>
<p>Nor was there an unusual cause of death in the intensively treated group, Dr.  Simons-Morton said. Most of the deaths in both groups were from heart attacks,  she added.</p>
<p>For now, the reasons for the higher death rate are up for speculation.  Clearly, people without diabetes are different from people who have diabetes and  get their blood sugar low.</p>
<p>It might be that patients suffered unintended consequences from taking so  many drugs, which might interact in unexpected ways, said Dr. Steven E. Nissen,  chairman of the department of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland  Clinic.</p>
<p>Or it may be that participants reduced their blood sugar too fast, Dr. Hirsch  said. Years ago, researchers discovered that lowering blood sugar very quickly  in diabetes could actually worsen blood vessel disease in the eyes, he said. But  reducing levels more slowly protected those blood vessels.</p>
<p>And there are troubling questions about what the study means for people who  are younger and who do not have cardiovascular disease. Should they forgo the  low blood sugar targets?</p>
<p>No one knows.</p>
<p>Other medical experts say that they will be discussing and debating the  results for some time.</p>
<p>“It is a great study and very well run,” Dr. Dove said. “And it certainly had  the right principles behind it.”</p>
<p>But maybe, he said, “there may be some scientific principles that don’t hold  water in a diabetic  population.”</p>
<p><i>I can't stand it - you who respond need to vent - I'm all tuckered out.</i></div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Coagulatus]]></title>
<link>http://mannabozo.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/coagulatus/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mannabozo</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mannabozo.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/coagulatus/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&nbsp;
Coagulatus
&nbsp;
As I lay down to sleep, I said some words to myself,
soft, peaceful and soo]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Coagulatus</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>As I lay down to sleep, I said some words to myself,<br />
soft, peaceful and soothing words,<br />
".....the world is going to end soon, the world is going to end soon..."<br />
over and over until  I drifted off.</p>
<p>I had a dream that you invited me to a three-way with you and another girl,<br />
but just as I began to say the word "yes", I started growing backwards fast.<br />
Before the last syllable of "yes" could escape my lips, I was already a baby again.<br />
So you two just had beautiful lesbian sex for a while, and then took turns<br />
rocking me to sleep.</p>
<p>I awoke just in time to see the world ending.<br />
<code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Civil War surgeon went to work immediately, hoping to finish before the drug wore off.]]></title>
<link>http://civilwarchronicle.wordpress.com/?p=53</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tellinghistory</dc:creator>
<guid>http://civilwarchronicle.wordpress.com/?p=53</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Surgeons and amputations during the Civil War
“At the time of the Civil War, ether or chloroform ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="snap_preview"><font size="2"><font size="2"><font><font><font> <font size="2"><b>Surgeons and amputations during the Civil War</b></font></font></font></font></font></font></p>
<blockquote><p><font size="2"><font size="2"><font><font><font><font size="2">“At the time of the Civil War, ether or chloroform or a mixture of the two was administered by an assistant, who placed a loose cloth over the patient’s face and dripped some anesthetic onto it while the patient breathed deeply. When given this way, the i</font><font size="2">nitial effects are a loss of consciousness accompanied by a stage of excitement . . . . The Civil War surgeon went to work immediately, hoping to finish before the drug wore off. Although the excited patient was unaware of what was happening and felt no pain, he would be agitated, moaning or crying out, and thrashing about during the operation. He had to be held still by assistants so the surgeon could continue.” Bollet, (p. 32).</font></font></font></font></font></font></p></blockquote>
<p><font size="2"><font size="2"><font><font><font><font size="2"><img src="http://www.civilwargazette.faithsite.com/uploads/1143/55842.jpg" alt="Surgeons operating" align="right" border="0" hspace="3" vspace="3" />It is commonly believed that most Civil War surgeons were simply butchers, amputating arms and legs unnecessarily oftentimes. This popular misconception is partially due to movies and film depicting gross scenes of amputations performed by rogue surgeons against the screaming wishes of his patient as the doctor amputates a bleeding leg. Though grotesque scenes such as these make for good cinema, it was hardly the typical experience during the Civil War.</font></font></font></font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font size="2"><font><font><font><font size="2">Dr. Alfred Bollet dispels several myths about surgery during the Civil War in his fine article (<i>The Truth about Civil War Surgery</i>) in the October 2004 issue of Civil War Times. Bollet explains how surgeons had other procedures they could use besides amputation, how surgery was almost always done with anesthesia, that most wounds were not just to arms and legs, and that not every surgeon had the authority to amputate. </font><font size="2"><img src="http://www.civilwargazette.faithsite.com/uploads/1143/55840.jpg" alt="Amputation kit" align="right" border="0" hspace="3" vspace="3" /></font><br />
<font size="2"><br />
To be sure, there were some isolated incidences of surgery done without anesthesia (for example at Iuka, Mississippi on September 17, 1862) and/or cases where an amputation was not necessary. But medical scholars and historians attest that the surgical care provided by doctors to soldiers during the Civil War was very good for its time. This is all the more remarkable when we realize that little was known about germs, and the spread of infection, and drugs were nearly non-existent in the 1860s. Perhaps a major reason why it was commonly believed, especially by soldiers, is because of how little soldiers knew about anesthesia back then. Bollet writes:</font></font></font></font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font size="2"><font><font><font><font size="2">“At the time of the Civil War, ether or chloroform or a mixture of the two was administered by an assistant, who placed a loose cloth over the patient’s face and dripped some anesthetic onto it while the patient breathed deeply. When given this way, the initial effects are a loss of consciousness accompanied by a stage of excitement . . . . The Civil War surgeon went to work imediately, hoping to finish before the drug wore off. Although the excited patient was unaware of what was happening and felt no pain, he would be agitated, moaning or crying out, and thrashing about during the operation. He had to be held still by assistants so the surgeon could continue.” Bollet, (p. 32).</font></font></font></font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font size="2"><font><font><font><font size="2">Most amputations performed during the Civil War were necessary to save the life of the soldier. Wounds caused by bullets and artillery normally shattered the bone. The only recourse for most soldiers, if they wanted to live, would be to have the shattered bone or limb removed. The closer the amputation occurred to the trunk of the soldier the more likely it was for a soldier to not survive the operation. The fatality rate for soldiers who received an amputation was around 25% overall. Those who did die after amputation often did so because of infection, complications or because the wound was too severe to be able to survive.</font></font></font></font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font size="2"><font><font><font><b>Recommended reads:</b></font></font></font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font size="2"><font><font><font><font size="2"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1883620082/qid=grapevinedisp-20/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/103-0532121-5079042?v=glance&#38;s=books&#38;tag=word08-20&#38;tag=word08-20" target="0">Civil War Medicine: Triumphs and Challenges.</a> Alfred J. Bollet.</font></font></font></font></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2"><font size="2"><font><font><font><font size="2"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1883620082/qid=grapevinedisp-20/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/103-0532121-5079042?v=glance&#38;s=books&#38;tag=word08-20&#38;tag=word08-20" target="0">Gangrene and Glory: Medical Care during the American Civil War.</a> Frank R. Freemon.</font></font></font></font></font></font></div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[I made a splint!]]></title>
<link>http://bloggingot.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/i-made-a-splint/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>aishel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://bloggingot.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/i-made-a-splint/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I made my first splint independently last week.  I&#8217;ve made lots of splints in my time, especia]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made my first splint independently last week.  I've made lots of splints in my time, especially footplates (to prevent foot drop), but every time I ever made a splint before, I had a clinical instructor or someone else right there to help me out.  This splint I did all by myself.  And I did a really good job, too :)  It was a relatively simple splint, a knee extension splint for a below knee amputee (BKA), but I'm happy that I was able to do is all by my lonesome self.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OT in the Army]]></title>
<link>http://bloggingot.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/ot-in-the-army/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>aishel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://bloggingot.wordpress.com/2007/05/13/ot-in-the-army/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a cool video of an occupational therapist at Walter Reed Hospital:

]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a cool video of an occupational therapist at Walter Reed Hospital:</p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/8KX4htNDQdk'></param><param name='wmode' value='transparent'></param><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/8KX4htNDQdk&rel=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='transparent' width='425' height='350'></embed></object></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Successful Diabetes Treatment Through Naturopathic Treatment Regimen]]></title>
<link>http://abouthealth777.wordpress.com/?p=77</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Derrick Walker</dc:creator>
<guid>http://abouthealth777.wordpress.com/?p=77</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine has found significant positive results and benefits fro]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine has found significant positive results and benefits from a naturopathic treatment regimen for diabetes.</strong> </p>
<p><strong>24-7PressRelease/</strong> - TEMPE, AZ, August 05, 2005 —Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine has found significant positive results and benefits from a naturopathic treatment regimen for diabetes.</p>
<p>According to the American Diabetes Association (ADA), diabetes is the fifth deadliest disease in the United States. More than 18 million Americans have diabetes, and one in three is not even aware of it. It has been estimated that the annual economic cost of diabetes over recent years has exceeded $130 billion a year, or approximately one out of every ten health care dollars spent in the United States. Diabetes can be life-threatening, as diabetics have 4-6 times the risk of dying from heart disease and stroke. Other serious complications of uncontrolled diabetes can include blindness, kidney disease, liver disease, and limb amputations.</p>
<p>In addition, there are over 40 million people in the United States, aged approximately 40 to 75, who are in a "pre-diabetes" or "metabolic syndrome" stage. They are insulin- resistant but their blood sugar levels have not yet reached diabetic status. Some recent research suggests that even in the pre-diabetes stage long-term damage to the heart and circulatory system may be occurring.</p>
<p>While these statistics are dramatic, there are avenues for treatment that have shown some significant success, particularly in the area of naturopathic medicine. Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine in Tempe, Ariz., is one of a handful of accredited, four-year academic institutions in the United States teaching students to become naturopathic physicians. A strong emphasis has been on teaching future physicians to treat diabetes patients with complementary medical techniques as a more integrative approach to their patients overall treatment regimen.</p>
<p>Dr. Mona Morstein, Chair of Nutrition at SCNM and Supervising Physician at Southwest Naturopathic Medical Center, the out-patient medical clinic of the medical school has found significant results and benefits from a naturopathic treatment regimen for diabetes through a comprehensive, yet individualized course of treatment for her diabetic patients, no matter which type of diabetes they have.</p>
<p>Part of that treatment includes a low carbohydrate diet. A great deal of evidence-based research supports the use of such a dietary program, even though it is contrary to what the ADA suggests. Dr. Morstein also prescribes various nutrients and anti-oxidants as a result of medical studies having shown that diabetics are lacking in a number of vital nutrients. Further, the research has shown that the problematic progression of their diabetes is considerably slowed by antioxidants. Dr. Morstein uses various botanical medicines to help decrease insulin resistance and sugar cravings, which has the added benefit of aiding in weight loss. Treatment can also include diagnosing and addressing imbalances in other hormones such as cortisol and testosterone. Aerobic exercise and weight lifting are necessary for the patient to regularly engage in and, if need be, stress relaxation and counseling become part of the overall regimen.</p>
<p>The naturopathic treatment regimen has shown other significant benefits, with the reduction and oftentimes elimination of oral hypoglycemics and blood pressure medicines as patients become healthier. For those Type I diabetics that require insulin, a unique way of prescribing the insulin is prescribed which enables the blood sugar levels to be very tightly controlled without causing frightening low blood sugar episodes.</p>
<p>Success has also been demonstrated in lowering patients hemoglobin A1C levels.<br />
Medical studies have proven that lower A1C numbers significantly decrease the risk of diabetics, developing cardiovascular disease, and eye, kidney and nerve damage. Dr. Morstein remarks, "It's very rewarding working with people with diabetes and see them able to reduce or remove some of their medications, and significantly lower their A1Cs. They're very pleased and I know I've helped them lower their risk for developing diabetic complications in the future."</p>
<p>Southwest Naturopathic Medical Center is conducting leading edge efforts and work in the treatment of diabetes and the results are healthier, leaner patients who taking less medications and having more positive health outlooks for the future.</p>
<p>About Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine and Health Sciences<br />
Located in Tempe, Ariz., and founded in 1993, Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine and Health Sciences is an accredited higher learning institution. It offers a four-year medical program that trains students to become primary care physicians. Naturopathic medicine emphasizes the body's innate ability to self-heal. It draws on a rich history of natural, non-toxic therapies in combination with current medical advances. The scope of practice includes all aspects of family and primary care using integrative and complementary treatment modalities such as acupuncture, homeopathy, clinical nutrition, botanical medicine, manipulation and pharmacology. For more information, visit <a target="_blank" href="http://www.scnm.edu">http://www.scnm.edu</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
