<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>1780s &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/1780s/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "1780s"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Sheffield on American Commerce (1784)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=541</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=541</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: Observations on the Commerce of the American States. By John Lord Sheffield. With an App]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: Observations on the Commerce of the American States. By John Lord Sheffield. With an Appendix; Containing Tables of the Imports and Exports of Great Britain to and from all Parts, from 1700 to 1783. Also, the Exports of America, &#38;c. With Remarks on those Tables, on the Trade and Navigation of Great Britain, and on the late Proclamation, &#38;c. The Sixth Edition, Enlarged with a Complete Index to the Whole. London: Printed for J. Debrett, opposite Burlington House, Piccadilly, M,DCC,LXXXIV. [1784]</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>INTRODUCTION.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:left;">SINCE the first publication of this work upwards of a year has elapserd, and no less than seven professed answers have appeared; I am not, however, convinced that they disprove one material fact, or confute one essential argument. Many parts, indeed, are misquoted or mis-stated, and others are misunderstood.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">It is the opinion of all with whom I have conversed, that those pamphlets do not require any answer; but as they contain strong assertions, which may perplex or deceive, and as many people may not have taken the trouble of informing themselves sufficiently to see that they are in general without foundation, it is perhaps due to the public, to shew that their authors proceeded upon grounds that are fallacious, and that not one of them fairly meets the question.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">I do not mean to enter the lists in the way of controversy, as such a labour would be almost endless, and would afford no gratification either to the public or myself --- To expose their numberless absurdities and misrepresentations, I should indeed be obliged to comment on almost every page they have written; several of their errors, however, are marked in the notes to the following work, and some others will be noticed in this introduction. Had some of them not been quite so angry, they would possibly have reasoned better: they must excuse me if I do not think it worth while to be angry in my turn; I have no object but to discover and lay open the truth for the public benefit.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">The pamphlet which first appeared, and is entitled "A Letter from an American to a Member of Parliament," does not attempt, even in the most distant manner, to disprove a single fact, or to answer a single argument that I have advanced, unless by asserting, for truths, the greatest extravagancies, without even a shadow of proof to support them. The following is a specimen of this author's knowledge: ---He says, that the American States can now supply the West Indies with beef, butter, tallow candles, soap, beer, and even bar iron, cheaper than Europe -- but enough of such a writer. The second pamphlet is entitled "Considerations on the present Situation of Great Briatian and the Untied States of America; particularly designed to expose the dangerous Tendency of Lord Sheffield's Observation," &#38;c. This appears to claim more attention. The author informs us, that he has spent the summer in collecting materials; but he gives no authority for the calculations he has produced, or the tables he has inserted: wherever he found them, they differ materially from the Custom-house entries both of Briatian and America, and contradict them in very frequent instances; many facts advanced, as from those entries, are found to be without foundation, or enormously exagerated. The author says, the Americans formerly took 25,000 hogsheads of sugar annually from our islands. The Americans had no motive for entering less sugar at the Customs House than what they actually imported from those islands; yet certainly their importations from thence never, in any year, exceeded 6700 hogsheads, reckoning only 1000 cwt. to the hogshead. The exaggeration of the account he gives of the quantity of refined sugar taken from hence, is equally great. Above 150 pages of his work are filled with calculations and assertions, hazarded without any apparent authority: the article relative to shipping is the most extraordinary of the whole; it is entirely built on an erroneous foundation, and therefore the deductions from it must be fallacious. The same author argues, that the American States, although now foreign, ought to be indulged with nearly all the commercial privileges which they enjoyed whilst British subjects; that in return they will supply our West-India islands with provisions, lumber, &#38;c. and take from thence sugar, rum, &#38;c. That they will become our ship builders, we being unable to build ships but at an intolerable loss. Singular as this mode of reasoning is, it is completely of a piece with all his other disquisitions. He holds out this farther advantage to us, That the Americans will take our manufactures when they cannot get the same articles cheaper, better, and on longer credit, than elsewhere. This work at first appeared anaonymous, but a second editon is now published with the name of Richard Champion, Esq. late Deputy Paymaster, &#38;c. with many additions; which serve however only to confirm what was sufficiently evident before, that the author had no sufficient grounds for his former assertions. He seems now to give up the extraordinary account of sugar, and complains that he has been misquoted, particularly as to the shipping. I had no intention of quoting his every words, nor professed to do so; the mistake, as to his meaning, has been general among those whom I have heard mention that passage; but my observation is omitted in the present editon; and it is unnecessary to state particulary what he has said, because no part of his argument is admissible, from the entire want of authority. . . .</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Ramsay's History of the American Revolution (1791)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=548</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=548</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: The History of the American Revolution. By David Ramsay, M.D. of South Carolina. Vol. II]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: The History of the American Revolution. By David Ramsay, M.D. of South Carolina. Vol. II. London: Soldy by J. Johnson and J. Stockdale, M.DCC.XCI. [1791]</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>APPENDIX, NO. III.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><em>Of the treatment of prisoners, and of the distresses of the Inhabitants.</em></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><em></em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> MANY circumstances concurred to make the American war particurlary calamitous. It was originally a civil war in the estimation of both parties, and a rebellion to its termination, in the opinion of one of them. Unfortunately for mankind doubts have been entertained of the obligatory force of the law of nations in such cases. The refinement of modern ages has stripped war of half of its horrors, but the systems of some illiberal men have tended to re-produce the barbarism of Gothic times, by withholding the benefits of that refinement from those who are effecting revolutions. An enlightened philanthropist embraces the whole human race and enquires, not whether an object of distress is or is not an unit of an acknowledged nation. It is sufficient that he is a child of the same common parent, and capable of happiness or misery. The prevalence of such a temper would have greatly lessened the calamities of the American war, but while from contracted policy, unfortunate captives were considered as not entitled to the treatment of prisoners, they were often doomed without being guilty, to suffer the punishment due to criminals.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">The first American prisoners were taken on the 17th of June 1775. These were thrown indiscriminately into the jail at Boston, without any consideration of their rank. Gen. Washington wrote to Gen. Gage on this subject, to which the latter answered by asserting that the prisoners had been treated with care and kindess, though indiscriminately "as he acknowledged no rank that was not derived from the King." To which Gen. Washington replied "You affect, Sir, to despise all rank not derived from the same source with your own; I cannot conceive one mroe honorable, than that which flows from the uncorrupted choice of a brave and free people, the purest sourse and original fountal of all power."</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Gen. Carlton during his command conducted towards the American prisoners with a degree of humanity, that reflected the greatest honor on his character. Before he commenced his operations on the lakes in 1776, he shipped off those of them who were officers for New-Enlgand, but previously supplied them with every thing requisite to make their voyage comfortable. The other prisoners, amounting to 800, were sent home by a flag after exacting an oath from them, not to serve during the war unless exchanged. Many of these being almost naked were comfortably cloathed by his orders, previously to their being sent off.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">The capture of Gen. Lee proved calamitous to several individuals. Six Hessian field officers were offered in exchange for him but this was refused. It was said by the British, that Lee was a deserter from their service, and as such could not expect the indulgences usually given to prisoners of war. The Americans replied, that as he resigned his British commission previously to his acepting one from the Americans, he could not be considered as a deserter. He was nevetheless confined, watched, and guarded. Congress thereupon resolved, that Gen. Washington be directed to inform Gen. Howe, that should the proffered exchange of Gen. Lee for six field officers not be accepted, and the treatment of him as above mentioned be continued, the principles of retaliation should occasion five of the said Hessian field officers, together with Lt. Col. Archibald Campbell to be detained, in order that the said treatment which Gen. Lee received, should be exactly inflicted on their persons. The Campbell thus designated as the subject of retaliation, was a human man, and a meritorious officer, who had been captured by some of the Massachusett's privateers near Boston, which, from the want of information, he was proceeding soon after the British had evacuated it. The above act of Congress was forwarded to Massachusetts with a request that they would detain Lt. Col. Compbell and keep him in safe custody till the further order of Congress. The council of Massachusett's exceeded this request, and sent him to Concord jail, where he was lodged in a gloomy dungeon of twelve or thirteen feet square. The attendance of a single servant on his person was denied him, and every visit from a friend refused.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">The prisoners captured by Sir William Howe in 1776, amounted to many hundreds. The officers were admitted to parole, and has some waste houses assigned to them as quarters; but the privates were shut up in the coldest season of the year in churches, sugar houses, and such like the open buildings. The severity of the weather, and the rigor of their treatment, occasioned the death of many hundreds of these unfortunate men. The filth of the places of their confinement, in consequence of fluxes which prevailed among them, was both offensive and dangerous. Seven dead bodies have been seen in one building, at one time, and all lying in a situation shocking to humanity. The provisions served out to them were deficient in quantity, and of an unwholsome quality. These suffering prisoners were generally pressed to enter into the British service, but hundreds submitted to death, rather than procure a melioration of their circumstances by enlisting with the enemies of their country. After Gen. Washington's successes at Trenton and Princeton, the American prisoners fared somewhat better. Those who survived were offered to be sent out for exchange, but some of them fell down dead in the streets, while attempting to walk to the vessels. Others were so emaciated that their appearance was horrible. A speedy death closed the scene with many.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">The American board of war, after conferring with Mr. Boudinot the commissary-general of prisoners, and examining evidences produced by him, reported among other things, "That there were 900 privates and 300 officers of the American army, prisoners in the city of New-York, and about 500 privates and 50 officers prisoners in Philadelphia. That since the beginning of October all these prisoners, both officers and privates, had been confined in prison ships or the Provost: That from the best evidence the subject could admit of, the general allowance of prisoners, at most did not exceed four ounces of meat per day, and often so damaged as not to be eatable: That it had been a common practice with the British, on a prisoner's being first captured, to keep him three, four or five days without a morsel of meat, and then to tempt him to enlist to save his life: That there were numerous instances of prisoners of war, perishing in all the agonies of hunger."  . . .</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: The New Book of Chronicles [1789]]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=547</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=547</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: The New Book of Chronicles; Delineating in Eccentrical Sketches of the Times a Variety o]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: The New Book of Chronicles; Delineating in Eccentrical Sketches of the Times a Variety of Modern Characters of the Great and Small Vulgar. London: Printed for T. Massey, Snow-Hill, and sold by all the booksellers of Great Britain, [1789].</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>CHAPTER III.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>ARGUMENT.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:left;">In those days the fire burned in Gallia, as the multitude mused on their mighty Monarch.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">2.  Behold, the fury of the flame spread far and wide even until it reached the region of captivity,</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">3.  Called in the Hebrew tongue the <em>Tophet of Tyranny</em> but by the Gauls the <em>Bastile</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">4.  Lo, in that horrible pit were found the <em>Records of Royal Rebellion</em>, written with the blood of the brave asserters of Liberty.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">5.  On that day the <em>Grand </em>Monarch much marveled, and humbled himself before the Lord, and all the people of the Provinces.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">6.  Then fled the Queen and hid herself in a solitary Sanctuary,</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">7.  Which proved not an asylym, for the assembly of the nation for her head offered three hundred thousand livres.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">8.  In the mean time the enraged multitude seized the Governour of the Bastile, and put him to Death, who dealt with him as he deserved.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">9.  The Commandant also was pushed by the people within the reach of the tyrant, whose slave he had been.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">10. And behold, when the frightful king had done to these twain even as they had done to the prisoners of the dungeon, they descended to the shades of <em>Erebus</em>,</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">11. Not meeting in all the way the place which the priests of Rome call <em>Purgatory</em>, even the place of fools.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">12. Now it came to pass, as these slaves of authority arrived at the gate of Pandoemonium,</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">13. That behold <em>Brownrig </em>the wife of <em>Lucifer</em> looked out at a window over the portal of the unhallowed hall.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">14. And she cried with a loud voice, saying, behold, my brethren of the Bastile knock at the door, open it unto them.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">15. As the high harlot of hell spake, lo the gates opened wide to the harsh sound of ten thousand hogs making melody in the <em>Museum </em>of <em>Mawby</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">16. And when forty and five infernals had whipped the slaves into the hall of justice, they stood before <em>Eacus</em>, <em>Minos</em>, and <em>Rhadamanthus</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">17. Howbeit, <em>Belial</em> blushed, <em>Moloch</em> grew mad, <em>Satan </em>saddened his countenance, and all the peers proclaimed a fast, when they were told that their kingdom was falling.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">18. On that day the King caused all the regions of his dominions to be hung with sable, and commanded also the court to appear in the hue of hell, saying:</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">19. Peradventure the mercers and drapers of London may open a trade hither, through the medium of the taylors.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">20. And when he had caused his servants to set before the keepers of the Bastile the bread which Belial had baken and the beer of his brewing,</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">21. At the motion of his sceptre seven of the infernal phalanx thrust them into the fiery furnace;</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">22. And it came to pass, when the door was shut that the whole herd of hardned fiends fell into a fit of festivity, rejoicing to hear the roar of the _____s.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: The Royal Interview (1789)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=546</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=546</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: The Royal Interview: A Fragment by the Author of a Letter from a Country Gentleman to a ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: The Royal Interview: A Fragment by the Author of a Letter from a Country Gentleman to a Member of Parliament. Third Edition. London: Printed at the Logographic Press, and sold by J. Walters, No. 169, Opposite Old Bond Street, Piccadilly; C. Stalker, Stationers-Court, Ludgate-Street; and W. Richardson, under the Royal-Exchange, MDCCLXXXIX. [1789]</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>ROYAL INTERVIEW, &#38;c.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;">K.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To say the truth, it has been my wish and intention not to enter into any conversation with your Royal Highness concerning the public conduct of my ministers, or those who have acted in opposition to them during the affecting interval of my government. It was rather an anxious desire of my own heart to pass over the chasm which the lapse of my understanding occasioned in the public administration of my kingdom. It appeared to me, that there was not intermediate event which could afford a pleasing topic of discussion between you and myself: and as it would ill become me to accompany the blessing of my recovery with resentment to my son, whatever his conduct might have been, I became extremely solicitous to avoid a retrospect. --It is enough for me, that, on awaking from my delerium, I find my kingdom uninjured by my infirmity, and exulting in my restoration. --But as you seem to apprehend ill impressions, of some kind or other, and declare, that the comfort of your life depends on my hearing from yourself the reasons which governed your conduct during my affliction, I shall comply with your requisiton, and listen to you with a paternal patience. It becomes me, however, previously to inform you, that I am well acquainted with every transaction of the late important period, and that my opinion is already formed of the measures that have been adopted, of the opposition that was made to them, and of the persons who have appeared as principal actors on the occasion. It may be also necessary, for a right understanding between us, in the business on which we are about to engage, to observe, that while you possess a full right to plead, I may take the liberty, if I see occasion, to condemn. ----My kindest attention awaits you.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;">P.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">I have very reason to apprehend that some particular leading indivduals, among your Majesty's servants, have represented my demeanour during the late unhappy period, as undutuful to yourself, unfeeling to your situation, and hostile to the interests of your kingdom.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;">K.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">What convincing reason you may possess whereon to buld such an hypothesis, I am not anxious to enquire, because they are without foundation. Both the Lord Chancellor and the first minister have, in their communications to me, delivered themselves with the most respectful attention to you; and if I could suppose it possible for such wise men and faithful servants to step beyond the bounds of decorum in their consultations with me, I should conclude they had done it in the more than earnest manner with which they recommended me to check any, and every suspicion of my breast with respect to the motives that governed the late conduct of your Royal Highness. Indeed, I cannot but express my concern, that, on the very threshold of the business, you should begin with answering an accusation that has never been made, and charging those men with practising against you all the injustice of misrepresentation, who have, on the contrary, acted with a spirit of magnanimity, which would do honour to yourself. But, not to turn you aside from the mode of apology, which, perhaps, you are prepared to adopt; --you are at liberty to suppose that I am perfectly well acquainted with your plans of operation during the time when it was doubtful, whether it would please God to restore me to myself and to my people.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;">P.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">I should be truly sorry, Sir, to suspect where suspicion would be unjust; and your royal word is more than sufficient to remove mine, in the matter before us, from certain of your Majesty's Ministers; but as I know them to be indisposed towards me, I had something like a right to imagine, that, in representing their own services to your Majesty, they would not fail to misrepresent those who oppose them.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;">K.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">I cannot answer for the secret designs or thought of my Ministers, any more than for those of my children. ---To search into the recesses of the human heart, and to discover what is passing there, belongs to that Power alone, before which the monarchs of the world must bend; --but as I wish to hear your sentiments on something more than vague opinion, I must beg your Royal HIghness to confine yourself to yourself; and that you will not do your heart and understanding so great injustice as to look for your justification in the misconduct of others. ---But I perceive your embarrassment; -- to relieve you, therefore, as far as may be in my power, from your very unpleasant situation, and to save you the trouble, as well as the pain, of stating the supposed charges, which your propose to answer --- I will turn catechist, if you please, and offer such interrogatories as may call forth those replies, which will involve all that you wish to say to me in the very interesting subject of the present conference. I shall therefore suppose, what I trust you feel yourself prepared to prove, that, during the late extraordinary and awful period, you have done every thing which was required, by your duty to me, who am your father -- the dignity of your station, which places you next to your Sovereign -- and the interests of the Empire, which, if you live, will one day be your own. On this idea I shall conclude, that, when you had recovered from the severe shock which must have been felt by your mind, on the unexpected nature and possible consequences of my illness, you immediately called to your councils and consolation, some of the first, the wisest, and the best men in this country: or, if you should have thought it more proper, as it might have been at first, to rest the burthen of your mind on one rather than many, I should hope that the distinguished individual would be most worthy of your confidence, and be esteemed as such by the nation, as well as yourself. May I, therfore, ask, whom did your Roayl Highness honour with your earliest communications?</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;">P.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Mr. Sheridan. ---</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;">K.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Mr. Sheridan! --In the name of reason, common sense, and honour, what could induce you to place such a confidence, in such a man? --- . . .</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong></strong></p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Mr. Bridge's Election Sermon (May 27, 1789)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=549</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=549</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: A Sermon Preached Before His Excellency John Hancock, Esq. Governour; His Honor Benjamin]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: A Sermon Preached Before His Excellency John Hancock, Esq. Governour; His Honor Benjamin Lincoln, Esq. Lieutenant-Governour; The Honourable The Council, Senate and House of Representatives, of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, May 27, 1789. Being the Day of General Election. By Josiah Bridge, A.M. Pastor of the Church in East-Sudbury. Boston: Printed by Adams &#38; Nourse, Printers to The Honourable General Court, M,DCC,LXXXIX. [1789]</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>AN</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Election SERMON.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;">PSALM LXXXII. VERSE I.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;">GOD <em>standeth in the Congregation of the Mighty; He judgeth among the</em> GODS.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">THIS passage of scripture may well possess the minds of this mumerous and respectable audience, with reverence and a sacred awe, before him, who is greatly to be feared in the assembly of his saints; and who will be sactified in all them that come nigh to him: It is particularly adapted to arrest the most serious attention of our honoured Rulers; at whose invitation we are assembled in the House of God on this auspicious anniversay, --to supplicate the Divine Presence with them, and his smiles and blessing upon the special business of the day; and their admiration of government the ensuing year; and to enquire of him from his word, agreeable to the laudable practice of our pious Progenitors, from the first settlement of the country, to the present period.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Our text has a primary reference to the Rulers of God's ancient covenant people. But as this passage of scripture is of no private interpretation, it will as fitly apply to our civil fathers now before God, as the the <em>Jewish Sanhedrim</em> of old.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">The words before us, will naturally lead us ---"To make some brief and general observations on government." ---The propriety and usefulness of an <em>assembly</em>, for conducting the important affairs of it. ---The sublime characters rulers sustain. ---The Surpeme Ruler present with them, as an observer, and judge; ready for their assistance and support, when acting up to their character; and carefully noticing whenever they lose sight of the great end of their appointment: And the powerful influence, the consideration of his presence and inspection must have, to engage them in a conscientious discharge of the duties of their exalted stations. May I be indulged your serious and candid attention, while I attempt to dilate a little, upon these several particulars; all obviously contained in, or easily deducible from our text. <em>God standeth in the Congregation of the Mighty: He judgeth among the Gods</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">That our text applies to the supreme government of a community, and involves the various departments of it, is readily seen by looking into the Psalm before us; where we find this congregation of the mighty, reproved for the improper use of their power, and a different mode of conduct enjoined upon them. "How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked? Defend the poor and fatherless: Do justice to the afflicted and needy: Deliver the poor and needy, rid them out of the hand of the wicked."</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Civil government is both a dictate of nature, and revelation; and is accordingly indifferently denominated, <em>the ordinance of God, and the ordinance of man</em>. Man was originally formed for society, and furnished with faculties adapted thereto: Faculties for the improvement of which social intercourse is indispensably necessary. Some of the most important duties, and refined delights of human life are of the social kind.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">In order to obtain the benefits of society, civil rule is essentially requisite. Those lusts of men, from whence come wars and fightings, are so prevalent in this apostate world, that they are obliged to form compacts and combinations, for mutual assistance and support. And there is perhaps no people no [sic] earth, however uncultivated and barbarous, but who have adopted some kind of civil polity.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">The light and law of nature, which uniformly urges to this mode of procedure, may well be accepted, as an expression of the divine will: For God addresses the human mind in divers manners; and he does it by the voice of reason, as well as revelation.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">The providence of God is particularly concerned, in elevating man to post of honour and dignity; and giving them a seat among the congregation of the mighty. "For promotion cometh neither from the east, nor from the west, nor from the south: But God is the judge: He putteth down one, and fitteth up another." "By me (says wisdom, or that glorious Being who is the wisdom of God) by me kings reign, and princes decree justice. By me princes rule and nobles, even all the judges of the earth." And in the New-Testament, we have the same idea held up, in terms equally express. "Let every soul be subject to the higher powers; for there is no power, but of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God." Again, "submit yourselves to every ordinance of man, for the Lord's sake; whether it be to the King, as supreme, or unto Governours, as unto them that are sent by him for the pinishment of evil doers, and for the praise of them that do well. For so is the will of God."</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">These declarations apply to civil government in general, which is indispensably necessary to social felicity and safety. But they are by no means to be extended to every mode of government that has obtained among mankind: Not certainly to despotic and lawless domination. This is not the ordinance of God. Nor indeed any other government, but such a sprotects the subjects in the peaceable possession of their just rights, properties and priviledges.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">. . . Power is an intoxicating quality; and for a single individual to be vested with sovereign rule, is subjecting him to a temptation too strong for human virtue. A desire of pre-eminence is a natural passion, and when properly restrained, may prove highly beneficial to society. But when it has a full free course, and attains the summit of its wish, and feels itself without controul; the  subject of this undue elevation, is apt to be puffed up with pride, to become intolerably supercilious and tyrannical; and to trample upon those rights of the community, and individuals, which it is the prime design of government to protect.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Wherever the will of a despot is the supreme law, the great end of government is usually perverted. This is sufficently attested by facts: And it is no other than what might justly be expected from the nature of man.  . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: A Fragment (1789)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=545</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=545</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: A Fragment which Dropped from the Pocket of a Certain Lord, On Thursday, the 23d April, ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: A Fragment which Dropped from the Pocket of a Certain Lord, On Thursday, the 23d April, 1789, on his way to St. Paul's with the Grand Procession. With Notes by the Finder. London: Printed or W. Priest, in Holborn; and sold by the booksellers in Piccadilly, the Strand, Fleet Street, and Pater-Noster-Row, 1789.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>CHAP. II.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>Oh, ill-star'd wight! misguided pamphleteer!</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>Dull as the vapid taste of mawkish beer;</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>Whose brains, though tortur'd oft, will never raise</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>The mead of solid pence, or empty praise;</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>So strain'd and twisted to each varying hour,</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>Alas! no wonder that the dregs are sour.</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em></em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;">In these lines we think we can discover the irascible J. H---ne T--ke, a man no less distinguished for the accommodating versatility of his political zeal, than the inumberable quantity of pamphlets, letters, election squibs, &#38;c. &#38;c. &#38;c. which his <em>prolific</em> head has given birth to. But as it often happens, the quickest births are not the most perfect, so many of his productions have come into the world in so mangled and undigested a state, that in compliment to his nartural parts, it is but charity to suppose a brain over-heated with chimaeras of promised greatness, has engendered such a motley breed. It has been the misfortune of this <em>weather-beaten </em>politician, that other people cannot see his services with his own eyes, and he has laboured long in the <em>beaten track</em> of plitical controversy without the solacing encouragement of <em>pension</em> or <em>place</em> to inflame his zeal, or shapren the <em>natural virulence</em> of his temper. He has, however, received the <em>negative encouragement</em> of not having yet stood in the <em>pillory</em>, an exaltation to which he has both a claim and a right, (two words which have made a great deal of noise lately,) and which, by the grace of God, no doubt, he will soon come into the possession of; we would advise him however, to make haste, as otherwise the Printers of some of our Morning Papers will be before hand with him, who mean there to enjoy the full "Liberty of the Press." Till that happy day arrives, like the Camelion, he must change his colour, to meet each rising sun, and like that animal too, must feed on air, or what is as bad, the unsubstantial diet of a Minister's promises, which wet the stomach without appeasing its yearnings. How must we admire then the charitable dispositon of our author in taking notice of this neglected wight, who barks like a dog at midnight, when every body is asleep.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>Useless thy works, for head or tail the same;</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>The first they'll deaden, and the last enflame.</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;">With what delicacy does our poet touch upon the consequences of his lucubrations! How modestly does he insinuate, that a blister applied a posteriori, would have the same effect. By many families (it is said) they are used as tinder, and never is a house-maid so happy as when she can lay her hands upon any part of them, in her morning excursions, for fire paper. It has been shrewdly suggested, that the new-invented matches which light of themselves in the middle (<em>in this resembling something else</em>) are partly composed of one of these combustible performances. They were one of the Jack-the-Painter's chief ingredients in setting fire to Portsmouth Dock-Yard, and serve universally for touch-paper to crackers, &#38;c. &#38;c. &#38;c.  In short, their uses are as inumberable as their quantity, and it must be matter of pleasing reflection to their author to find amidst all his disappointmets, that his works, by taking a turn which he could never foresee, have become almost inestimable.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Yet, notwithstanding the great advantages which acrue from his literary labours, the danger which threatens those unaquainted with their <em>inflammatory qualities</em>, by making use of them a posteriori, induces us to join with our author in recommending the following recipe for the oveflowing of his bile, as we would not wish that any of our friends should experience the fate of Hercules, and suffer durance in a poisoned shirt. We therefore, <em>(without a fee) </em>prescribe the following r<em>egimen</em>:</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>Then feed awhile on vegetable food, </em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>To clear thy juices, and correct the blood,</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>Nor think it hard,</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>Virtue like thine should be its own reward. . . .</em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Madison's Papers (1842)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=538</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=538</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: The Papers of James Madison, Purchased by Order of Congress; Being His Correspondence an]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: The Papers of James Madison, Purchased by Order of Congress; Being His Correspondence and Reports of Debates During the Congress of the Confederation and his Reports of Debates in The Federal Convention; Now published from the original manuscripts, deposited in the Department of State, By Direction of the Joint Library Committee of Congress, Under the Superintendence of Henry D. Gilpin.  Volume I.  Mobile:  Allston Mygatt.  1842.</p>
<p>Letters Preceding the Debates of 1783.</p>
<p>To Thomas Jefferson.  Philadelphia, March 27, 1780.</p>
<p>Dear Sir,</p>
<p>Nothing under the title of news has occurred since I wrote last week by express, except that the enemy on the first of March remained in the neighbourhood of Charleston, in the same posture as when the preceding account came away.  From the best intelligence from that quarter, there seems to be great encouragement to hope that Clinton's operations will be again frustrated.  Our great apprehensions at present flow from a very different quarter.  Among the various conjunctures of alarm and distress which have arisen in the course of the Revolution, it is with pain I affirm to you, Sir, that no one can be singled out more truly critical than the present.  Our army threatened with an immediate alternative of disbanding or living on free quarter; the public treasury empty; public credit exhausted, nay, the private credit of purchasing agents employed, I am told, as far as it will bear; Congress complaining of the extortion of the people; the people of the improvidence of Congress; and the army of both; our affairs requiring the most mature and systematic measures, and the urgency of occasions admitting only of temporizing expedients generating new difficulties; Congress recommending plans to the several states for execution, and the States separately rejudging the expediency of such plans, whereby the same distrust of concurrent exertions that has damped the ardor of patriotic individuals must produce the same effect among the States themselves; an old system of finance discarded as incompetent to our necessities, an untried and precarious one substituted, and a total stagnation in prospect between the end of the former and the operation of the latter.  These are the outlines of the picture of our public situation.  I leave it to your own imagination to fill them up.  Believe me, Sir, as things now stand, if the States do not vigorously proceed in collecting the old money, and establishing funds for the credit of the new, that we are undone; and let them be ever so expeditious in doing this, sill the intermediate distress of our army, and hinderance to public affairs, are a subject of melancholy reflection.  General Washington writes that a failure of bread has already commenced in the army; and that, for any thing he sees, it must unavoidably increase.  Meat they have only for a short season, and as the whole dependence is on provisions now to be procured, without a shilling for the purpose, and without credit for a shilling, I look forward with the most pungent apprehensions.  It will be attempted, I believe, to purchase a few supplies with loan-office certificates; but whether they will be received is perhaps far from being certain; and if received will certainly be a more expensive and ruinous expedient.  It is not without some reluctance I trust this information to a conveyance by post, but I know of no better at present, and I ceonceive it to be absolutely necessary to be known to those who are most able and zealous to contribute to the public relief.     </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: The State of the Public Debts and Finances (1783)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=497</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=497</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: The State of the Public Debts and Finances at Signing the Preliminary Articles of Peace ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: The State of the Public Debts and Finances at Signing the Preliminary Articles of Peace in January 1783. With a Plan for Raising Money by Public Loans, and for Redeeming the Public Debts. By Richard Price. London: Printed for T. Cadell, in the Strand, M.DCC.LXXXIII. [1783]</p>
<p align="center"><strong>INTRODUCTION.</strong></p>
<p align="left">IT will appear from the following Tract, that the last Administration, after Saving the Kingdom by giving it peace, intended to proceed to the introduction of measures for preserving it from the calamities with which its Debts threaten it. This was intimated in the King's Speech, at opening the present Sessions of Parliament; and the King's Ministers, when they were obliged to withdraw from power, had under consideration the plan for this purpose which is laid before the Public in these papers. ---The resolutions moved by Mr. Pitt in the House of Commons on the 7th of this month, for correcting the defects in the Representation, have informed the Public of ANOTHER ESSENTIAL SERVICE to which they had directed their views. ---By such services, could they have succeeded, they would have made themselves the best Ministers this country ever saw; for, compared with these, there are no services of any great consequence to the Kingdom. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Rush on Bloodletting (1789)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=512</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=512</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
Medical Inquiries and Observations.  To which is added an Appendix, containing Observat]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>Medical Inquiries and Observations.  To which is added an Appendix, containing Observations on the Duties of a Physician, and the Methods of improving Medicine.  By Benjamin Ruch, M. D. Professor of Chemistry in the University of Pennsylvania.  The Second Edition.  Philadelphia, printed.  London, reprinted for C. Dilly, in the Poultry, MDCCLXXXIX.</p>
<p>An Account of the Effects of Blisters and Bleeding, In the Cure of Obstinate Intermitting Fevers.</p>
<p>The efficacy of these remedies will probably be disputed by every regular-bred physician, who has been a witness of their utility in the above disorder; but it becomes such physicians, before they decide upon this subject, to remember, that many things are true in medicine, as well as other branches of philosophy, which are very improbable. </p>
<p>In all those cases of <em>autumnal </em>intermittents, whether quotidian, tertian, or quartan, in which the bark did not succeed after three or four days trial, I have seldom found it fail after the application of blisters to the wrists.</p>
<p>But in those cases where blisters had been neglected, or applied without effect, and where the disease had been protracted into the <em>winter</em>months, I have generally cured it by means of one or two moderate bleedings. </p>
<p>The pulse in those cases is generally full, and sometimes a little hard, and the blood when drawn for the most part appears sizy. </p>
<p>The bark is seldom necessary to prevent the return of the disorder.  It is always ineffectual, where bloodletting is indicated.  I have known several instances where pounds of this medicine have been taken without effect, in which the loss of ten or twelve ounces of blood has immediately cured the disorder.</p>
<p>How shall we reconcile the practice of bleeding in intermittents, with our modern theories of fever?</p>
<p>May not the long continuance of an intermittent, by debilitating the system, produce such an irritability in the arteries, as to dispose them to the species of inflammatory diathesis which is founded on indirect debility?  Or,</p>
<p>May not such congestions be formed in the viscera, as to produce the same species of inflammatory diathesis which occurs in several other inflammatory diseases?</p>
<p>Doctor Cullen has taught us, in his account of chronic hepatitis, that there may be topical affection and inflammatory diathesis, without much pain or fever; and had I not witnessed several cases of this kind, I should have been forced to have believed it possible, not only in this disorder, but in many others, from the facts which were communicated to me by Doctor Michaelis in his visit to Philadelphia in the year 1783.</p>
<p>I once intended to have added to this account of the efficacy of blisters and bleeding in curing obstinate intermittents, testimonies from a number of medical gentlemen, of the success with which they have used them; but these vouchers have become so numerous, that they would swell this essay far beyond the limits I wish to prescribe to it.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Cui bono? (1781)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=507</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=507</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: Cui Bono? Or, An Inquiry, What Benefits Can Arise Either to the English or the Americans]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: <em>Cui Bono</em>? Or, An Inquiry, What Benefits Can Arise Either to the English or the Americans, the French, Spaniards, or Dutch, from the Greatest Victories, or Successes, in the Present War? Being a Series of Letters, Addressed to Monsieur Necker, Late Controller General of the Finances of France. By Josiah Tucker, D.D. Dean of Glocester. Glocester: Printed by R. Raikes, for T. Cadell, in the Strand; Sold also by Evans and Hazell, in Glocester, M.DCC.LXXXI. [1781]</p>
<p align="center"><strong>LETTER I.</strong></p>
<p align="center">TO MONSIEUR NECKER.</p>
<p align="center"><strong><em>Cui Bono?</em></strong></p>
<p align="left">SIR,</p>
<p align="left">A MAN who has distinguished himself in such critical Times as the present, in the difficult and envied Station of Controller-General of the Finances of France, is certain of being attacked, and as sure of being defended, by Multitudes of Writers. You have experienced the Effects of both Parties; and are, perhaps, by this Time, sufficiently cloyed with the Flattery of the one, and grown callous to the Censures of the other. Therefore it is natural for you to conclude, that when any other Writer is bringing your Name again before the Public, he is only repeating what you have so often heard. ---But if you, Sir, will honour these Letters with a careful Perusal, you will find hardly one Thing in them similar to what you have read before, and yet many of them, perhaps, not unworthy of your serious Attention.</p>
<p align="left">As I wish to treat you with all the Respect due to your distinguished Character; and as my Aim, in the Prosecution of my Subject, is entirely the Good of Mankind; I presume it is unnecessary, as a Stranger to your Person, to apologize for the Liberty I take in thus addressing you. And here allow me to observe, that I was favoured with the Correspondence of your Predecessor, Mons. Turgot, both during the Time he was in Office, and after his Resignation; ---and that I am the same Person, of whose Writings Mons. Necker himself has sometimes condescended to make mention; and more particularly at that Juncture, when the idle Project of invading England, became the general Topic of Conversation throughout Europe.</p>
<p align="left">Setting, therefore, all Apologies aside, and endeavouring to divest myself of national Partialities, and local Prejudices, to the utmost of my Power, I now enter on the Work proposed, not as an Englishman, but as a Citizen of the World; not as having an inbred Antipathy against France, but as a Friend of the whole human Species.</p>
<p align="left">Whatever were your private Views, either of Interest, or of Honour, in publishing your <em>Compte Rendu,</em> the Example you have set deserves universal Commendation. And it is greatly to be wished, that it were made a fundamental Law in all arbitrary Governments, that each Minister, in the grand Departments of Trust and Power, should publish annual Accounts of his respective Administration; ---Accounts I mean, which could stand the Test of an open and impartial Scrutiny, free from those false Colourings, and wilful Misrepresentations, with which yours have been so frequently and expressly charged; and from which I fear you have not yet been able to clear yourself to general Satisfaction.</p>
<p align="left">But waving every Thing of this Nature, (because I do not intend to be either your Advocate, or your Accuser) and taking for granted, what you do not wish to conceal, that the grand Design of the Government, under which you live, in ordering your Account to be made Public, was to shew the World, that France had so many Resources still remaining, as would exhaust and ruin England in the Progress of this war; ---I will here suppose, for Argument Sake, that every Thing has succeeded, or shall succeed according to the warmest Wishes of the most bigotted Frenchman, Poor England is no more! <em>Non modo delenda, sed penitus deleta est Carthage! </em>In short, the Lillies of France, like the Eagles of Rome, are every where triumphant!</p>
<p align="left">Well, my good Sir, after all this Expence and Trouble, after so much Hurry and Confusion in subduing this devoted Island, after such repeated Victories, and immortal Fame, ---will you permit us to rest a while, and to take a Breath: ---And since the French have now raised their Nation to this Pinnacle of Glory, let us pause a little, to view the extended Prospect so far below us? ---This is all the Boon I ask, and in granting this, I hope we shall be induced to <em>think</em> in the next Place, (for we have not yet <em>thought</em> upon the Matter) what would be the inevitable Consequences of these mighty Revolutions, now so ardently desired by every Frenchman, were Providence to permit them to pass.</p>
<p align="left">Such a Subject is surely of Importance, to the Welfare and Happiness of Mankind. And this is the Subject I propose for the ensuing Letter. In the mean Time, I own I am under a strong Temptation to add a few Words concerning the infatuated Conduct of my own Country-men, the English, in the former War, as a Warning and Memento [sic] to future Politicians.</p>
<p align="left">Almost thirty Years ago, when the Colonists in America were at least fifty to one more in Number than the Handful of Men, who could have invaded them from Canada, ---I say, when these fifty undaunted Heroes, of the true English Breed, pretended to be afraid of one Frenchman -- Common Sense might have taught us to have suspected the Truth of such pretended Fears; --- Common Sense also might have suggested the Expediency of pausing a while, and of examining into Facts, <em>particualry relating to the Fur-trade</em>, before we rushed into Hostilities on such weak and frivolous Pretences: ---Lastly, Common Sense might have told us that it would be bad Policy to put these turbulent and factious Colonies above Controul, (if we really thought them worth the keeping) and of placing them in that very State of Independance [sic], which they had ever wished for, and had been constantly aiming at. ---I say, Common Sense might have suggested all these Things, if we had not disdained to ask the Advice of such a Counsellor. Nay more; ---there was a Man at that very Time, who remonstrated strongly against the Absurdity, not to say Injustice of such Proceedings. ---He shewed, with an Evidence not attempted to be invalidated, that the Americans had not assigned a sufficient Cause for going to War for their Sakes; ---and that their pretended Dangers either of being driven into the Sea, or of being put between two Fires (the constant Cry, and Clamour at that Juncture in all our Public Papers) were mere Imposture, and Grimace. ---And what is beyond all, he offered to prove from the English Custom-House Books of Entries or Imports, that the Quantity of Furs brought into England from America was almost double to what it had been in former Times, instead of being monopolized (as was asserted) by the French: ---Though I must own, that had this really been the Case, it would have been something new in the Annals of the World, that a great Nation, and a civilized People had made War on another Natin, because the latter had bought more Skins of Cats, Foxes, Badgers, and of such Sort of Vermin, than the former had been able to do. ---Lastly the same Person ventured to foretel in the most direct Terms, that the driving of the French from the English back Settlements would be the Signal to the Colonies, to meditate a general Revolt. But alas! he was preaching to the Winds and Waves: ---Some would not vouchsafe an Answer to his Letters; ---others were pleased to tell him that the American Colonists were better Judges of their own Dangers, than he had any Right to pretend to be; ---and that the Reflections cast upon them for harbouring thoughts of Independance, and of planning Schemes of Rebellion, were base and scandalous, and utterly void of Foundation. Moreover, not a few plainly declared, that whosoeve should attempt to raise such Suspicions against the best of loyal Subjects, the faithful Americans, could be no other than a Spy in Disguise, and a Pensioner to France. (You, Sir, who so justly complain, that the several Pensions on the French List amount to the enormous Sum of Twenty-eight Millions of Livres, or about £.1,272,727. Sterling; ---you, I say, can best tell, whether you have met with the Name of Tucker among the long Roll of English Mock Patriots, and French Pensioners.)</p>
<p align="left">Now, as we have such a recent Example, before our Eyes of those fatal Consequences, which might have been prevented by a cool and timely Reflection; it is to be hoped, that the like blind, infatuated Part will not be acted over again; ---but that the Powers at War will take Warning by the past, and consider, 'ere it is too late, what would be the Effects of the present furious Contests, were they even to be crowned with all that Brilliancy and Success, which their own fond Hearts can wish, or desire.</p>
<p align="left">With these Sentiments, and with just Esteem for your great Talents, I have the Honour to be,</p>
<p align="left">SIR,</p>
<p align="left">Your most obedient,</p>
<p align="left">Humble Servant,</p>
<p align="left">J.T.</p>
<p align="left">&#160;</p>
<p align="left">&#160;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Trevett against Weeden (1787)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=504</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=504</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
The Case, Trevett against Weeden: On Information and Complaint, for refusing Paper Bills]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>The Case, Trevett against Weeden: On Information and Complaint, for refusing <em>Paper Bills</em> in Payment for <em>Butcher's Meat</em>, in Market, at Par with Specie.  Tried Before the Honourable Superior Court, in the County of <em>Newport</em>, <em>September</em> Term, 1786.  Also, The Case of the Judges of Said Court, Before the Honourable General Assembly, at <em>Providence</em>, <em>October</em> Session, 1786, on Citation, for diminishing said Complaint.  Wherein the Rights of the People to <em>Trial by Jury</em>, <em>&#38;c</em>. are stated and maintained, and the Legislative, Judiciary and Executive Powers of Government examined and defined.  By James M. Varnum, Esq; Major-General of the State of <em>Rhode Island</em>, <em>&#38;c.</em> Counsellor at Law, and Member of Congress for said State.  Providence:  Printed by John Carter, 1787. </p>
<p>Upon the last Monday of September, in the eleventh year of the Idependence of the United States, in the city of Newport, and State of Rhode Island, &#38;c. was heard, before the Superior Court of Judicature, Court of Assize, and General Gaol-Delivery, a certain information, John Trevett against John Weeden, for refusing to receive the paper bills of this State, in payment for meat sold in market, equivalent to silver and gold: And upon the day following the Court delivered the unanimous opinion of the Judges, that the information was not cognizable before them.</p>
<p>That this important decision may be fully comprehended, it will be necessary to recur to the acts of the General Assembly, which superinduced the trial.--At the last May session, an act was made for emitting the sum of one hundred thousand pounds, lawful money, in bills, upon land security, which should pass in all kinds of business, and payments of former contracts, upon par with silver and gold, estimating an ounce of coined silver at six shillings and eightpence.  Another act was passed in the June following, subjecting every person who should refuse the bills in payment for articles offered for sale, or should make a distinction in value between them and silver and gold, or should in any manner attempt to depreciate them, to a penalty of one hundred pounds, lawful money; one moiety to the State, and the other moiety to the informer; to be recovered before either of the Courts of General Sessions of the Peace, or the Superior Court of Judicature, &#38;c.</p>
<p>Experience soon evinced the inadequacy of this measure to the objects of the Administration: And at a session of the General Assembly, specially convened by his Excellency the Governor, upon the third Monday of the following August, another act was passed, in addition to and amendment of that last mentioned, wherein it is provided, that the fine of one hundred pounds be varied; and that for the future the fine should not be less than six, nor exceed thirty pounds, for the first offence: The mode of prosecution and trial was also changed, agreeably to the following clauses, "that the complainant shall apply to either of the Judges of the Superior Court of Judicature, &#38;c. within this State, or to either of the Judges of the Inferior Court of Common Pleas within the county where such offence shall be committed, and lodge his certain information, which shall be issued by the Judge in the following form," &#38;c.  It is then provided, that the person complained of come before a Court to be specially convened by the Judge, in three days; "that the said Court, when so convened, shall proceed to the trial of said offender, and they are hereby authorized so to do, without any jury, by a majority of the Judges present, according to the laws of the land, and to make adjudication and determination, and that three members be sufficient to constitute a Court, and that the judgment of the Court, if against the offender so complained of, be forthwith complied with, or that he stand committed to the county gaol, where the said Court may be sitting, till sentence be performed, and that the said judgment of said Court shall be final and conclusive, and from which there shall be no appeal; and in said process no essoin, protection, privilege or injunction, shall be in anywise prayed, granted or allowed."   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Mr. Adams Election Sermon May 29, 1782]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=478</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=478</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: A Sermon Preached Before His Excellency John Hancock, Esq; Governour; His Honor Thomas ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: A Sermon Preached Before His Excellency John Hancock, Esq; Governour; His Honor Thomas Cushing, Esq; Lieutenant-Governor; The Honorable The Council , And The Honorable The Senate, And House Of Representatives Of The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts, May 29, 1782. Being the Day of General Election. By Zabdiel Adams, A.M. Pastor of the Church in Lunenburg. Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Printed by T. &#38; J. Fleet and J. Gill, [1782]</p>
<p> [Excerpted from pp. 17-20]</p>
<p>Republican governments are said not only to be destitute of energy, but to be slow and unperforming. This defect may be removed by allowing such prerogatives to a single person as are necessary to the vigor and dispatch of public measures. However, in large assemblies, where there is a diversity of interests and opinions, matters of importance will never be speedily discussed. This is an inconvenience to which we must submit, and it is the price we pay for our liberties. It ought to be remembred [sic] there is safety, tho' there is expence in these slow and tedious discussions; and if we allow it a defect, we certainly can find no form of government, but what is chargeable with as great or greater.</p>
<p>In all free states the people have a right, not only to say who shall be their rulers, but also by what tenure they shall hold offices, and the steps by which they shall arrive at them.</p>
<p>In order to avoid the feuds and factions that the election of a chief magistrate would occasion in some large nations, the constitution provides, that certain families should rule by hereditary right. Though this establishment avoids some, it is exposed perhaps to greater inconveniences. By means hereof, they may oftentimes have for their first ruler, tho' not a compleat ideot [sic], yet perhaps one separated therefrom, only by a thin partition. Further, when children are born heirs apparent to some high and important station in government, their education is commonly such, as to fill them with ideas of superiority, unfriendly to the rights of mankind. To govern well, we ought to be acquainted with human nature in the lowest walks of life.</p>
<p>In elective kingdoms, the election for the most part, is either for life or for a considerable number of years. The better way is to chuse our rulers frequently. The term ought to be known and ascertained; at the expiration of which we may omit them if we please. This is true if they conduct ever so well; and there is great reason for it, if they have been guilty of mal-administration. But tho' frequent elections may be proper, yet it must be highly imprudent, frequently to change those who are qualified for their trust and disposed to do the duties of it. This observation is true of any officer, but more especially of those who are high in command. There may be reasons for electing the chief magistrate annually; but if a new person is yearly chosen, it will lessent the influence of authority, weaken the sinews of government, crumble the people into parties, and establish habits inconsistent with that spirit of submission which is highly necessary to the good for society. A monopoly of office should never be permitted; a rotation indeed excludes it; and changes at proper intervals, excite people to a laudable application to business and books, that they may become qualified for posts of eminence and distinction. But on the contrary, if the man who holds the first place in the government, knows that he shall enjoy it but a short space, let his deportment be ever so unexceptionable, he will hardly be warm in his office, get but a miserable acquaintance with his duty, acquire no facility in the performance of it, and lose a grand stimulus to excel. Unless therefore we were born governors, legislators, &#38;c. it must be wise in a people to elect their principal officers for a succession of years, provided they answer the end of their elevation. In this way, we shall secure to ourselves more of the beneficial influences of government, than it is possible for us in the contrary practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Travels through Syria and Egypt (1805)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=463</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/?p=463</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: Travels through Syria and Egypt, in the Years 1783, 1784, and 1785. Containing the Prese]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: Travels through Syria and Egypt, in the Years 1783, 1784, and 1785. Containing the Present Natural and Political State of those Countries, Their Productions, Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce; with Observations on the Manners, Customs, and Government of the Turks and Arabs. By M. C-F. Volney. Translated from the French, and illustrated with Copper-plates. The Third Edition. Vol. I. London: Printed for g. Robinson, Paternoster-Row, 1805.</p>
<p align="center">STATE OF EGYPT.</p>
<p align="center">CHAP. I.</p>
<p align="center"><i>Of Egypt in general, and the City of Alexandria.</i></p>
<p align="left">IT is in vain that we attempt to prepare ourselves, by the perusal of books, for a more intimate acquaintance with the customs and manners of nations; the effect of narratives upon the mind, will always be very different from that of objects upon the senses. The images the former present, have neither correctness in the design, nor liveliness in the colouring; they are always indistinct, and leave but a fugitive impression, very easily effaced. This we more particularly experience, when we are strangers to the objects to be laid before us; for the imagination, in that case, finding no terms of comparison ready formed, is compelled to collect and compose new ideas; and, in this operation, ill directed and hastily executed, it is difficult not to confound the traits, and disfigure the forms. Ought we then to be astonished, if, on beholding the things themselves, we are unable to discover any resemblance between the originals and the copies, and if every impression bears the character of novelty?</p>
<p align="left">Such is the situation of a stranger who arrives, by sea, in Turkey. In vain has he read histories and travels; in vain has he, from their descriptions, endeavoured to represent to himself the aspect of the countries, the appearance of the cities, the dresses and manners of the inhabitants: he is new to all these objects, and dazzled with their variety: every idea he has formed to himself vanishes, and he remains absorbed in surprise and astonishment.</p>
<p align="left">No place is more proper to produce this effect, and prove the truth of this remark, than Alexandria, Egypt. The name of this city, which recalls to memory the genius of one of the most wonderful of men; the name of the country, which reminds us of so many great events; the picturesque appearance of the place itself; the spreading palm-trees; the terraced houses, which seem to have no roof; the lofty slender minarets; all announce to the traveller that he is in another world. A variety of novel objects present themselves to every sense; he hears a language whose barbarous sounds, and sharp guttural accents, offend his ear; he sees dresses of the most unusual and whimsical kind, and figures of the strangest appearance. Instead of our smooth shaved faces, our side curls, our triangular hats, and our short and close dresses; he views with astonishment tanned visages, with beards and mustachios; large rolls of stuff wreathed round their bald heads; long garments, which, reaching from the neck to the feet, serve rather to veil than clothe the body; pipes of six feet long, which every one is provided; hideous camels, which carry water in leathern sacks; and asses, saddled and bridled, which lightly trip along with their riders in sloppers: he observes their markets ill supplied with dates, and round flat little loaves; a filthy drove of half starved dogs roaming through the streets; and a kind of wandering phantoms, which, under a long drapery of a single piece, discover nothing human but two eyes, which show that they are women. Amid this crowd of unusual objects, his mind is incapable of reflexion; nor is it until he has reached his place of residence, so desirable on landing after a long voyage, that, becoming more calm, he reflects on the narrow ill paved streets; the low houses, which, though not calculated to admit much light, are still more obscured by lattice work; the meagre and swarthy inhabitants, who walk bare-footed, without other clothing than a blue shirt fastened with a leathern girdle, or a red handkerchief; while the universal marks of misery, so manifest in all he meets, and the mystery which reigns around their houses, point out to him the rapacity of oppression, and the distrust attendant upon slavery.</p>
<p align="left">But his whole attention is soon attracted by those vast ruins which appear on the land side of the city. In our countries, ruins are an object of curiosity. Scarcely can we discover, in unfrequented places, some ancient castle, whose decay announces rather the desertion of its master, than the wretchedness of the neighbourhood: in Alexandria, on the contrary, we no sooner leave the New Town, than we are astonished at the sight of an immense extent of ground overspread with ruins. During a walk of two hours, you follow a double line of walls and towers, which form the circumference of the ancient Alexandria. The earth is covered with the remains of lofty buildings destroyed; whole fronts crumbled down, roofs fallen i, battlements decayed, and the stones corroded and disfigured by saltpetre [sic]. The traveller passes over a vast plain, firrowed with trenches, pierced with wells, divided by walls in ruins, covered over with ancient columns and modern tombs, amid palm-trees and nopals, and where no living creature is to be met with but owls, bats, and jackalls [sic]. The inhabitants, accustomed to this scene, behold it without emotion; but the stranger, in whom the recollection of ancient ages is revived by the novelty of the objects around him, feels a sensation which not unfrequently [sic] dissolves him in tears, inspiring relexions which fill his heart with sadness, while his soul is elevated by their sublimity. . . .</p>
<p align="left">&#160;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Zeluco (1789)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/item-of-the-day-zeluco-1789/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/item-of-the-day-zeluco-1789/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: Zeluco. Various Views of Human Nature, Taken from Life and Manners, Foreign and Domestic]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: Zeluco. Various Views of Human Nature, Taken from Life and Manners, Foreign and Domestic. Vol. I. London: Printed for A. Strahan; and T. Cadell, in the Strand, M.DCC.LXXXIX. [1789]</p>
<p align="center">CHAP. I.</p>
<p align="center"><em>Strong Indications of a vicious Disposition.</em></p>
<p align="left">RELIGION teaches, that Vice leads to endless misery in a future state; and experience proves, that in spite of the gayest and most prosperous appearance, inward misery accompanies her; for, even in this life, her ways are ways of wretchedness, and all her paths are woe.</p>
<p align="left">This observation has been so often made, that it must be known to all, and its truth is seldom formally denied by any; yet the conduct of men would sometimes lead us to suspect, either that they had never heard it, or that they think it false. To recall a truth of such importance to the recollection of mankind, and to illustrate it by example, may therefore be of use.</p>
<p align="left">Tracing the windings of Vice, however, and delineating the disgusting features of Villany [sic], are unpleasant tasks; and some people cannot bear to contemplate such a picture. It is fair, therefore, to warn Readers of this turn of mind not to peruse the story of Zeluco.</p>
<p align="left">This person, sprung from a noble family in Sicily, was a native of Palermo, where he passed the years of early childhood, without being distinguished by any thing very remarkable in his disposition, unless it was a tendency to insolence, and an inclination to domineer over boys of inferior rank and circumstances. The bad endency of this, however, was so strongly remonstrated against by his father, and others who superintended his education, that it was in a great degree checked, and in a fair way of being entirely overcome.</p>
<p align="left">In the tenth year of his age he lost his father, and was left under the guidance of a mother, whose darling he had ever been, and who had often blamed her husband for too great severity to a son, whom, in her fond opinion, nature had endowed with every good quality.</p>
<p align="left">A short time after the death of his father, Zeluco began to betray strong symptoms of that violent and overbearing disposition to which he had always had a propensity, though he had hitherto been obliged to refrain it. Had that gentleman lived a few years longer, the violence of Zeluco's temper would, it is probable, have been weakened, or entirely annihilated, by the continued influence of this habit of restraint, and his future life might have exhibited a very different character; for he shewed sufficient command of himself as long as his father lived: but very soon after his death, he indulged, without control, every humour and caprice; and his mistaken mother applauding the blusterings of petulance and pride as indications of spirit, his temper became more and more ungovernable, and at length seemed as inflammable as gunpowder, bursting into flashes of rage at the slightest touch of provocation.</p>
<p align="left">It may be proper to mention one instance of this violence of temper, from which the reader will be enabled to form a juster notion than his mother did, of what kind of spirit it was an indication.</p>
<p align="left">He had a favourite sparrow, so tame it picked crumbs from his hand, and hopped familiarly on the table. One day it did not perform certain tricks which he had taught it, to his satisfaction. This put the boy into a passion: the bird being frightened, attempted to fly off the table. He suddenly seized it with his hand, and while it struggled to get free, with a curse he squeezed the little animal to death. His tutor, who was present, was so shocked at this instance of absurd and brutal rage, that he punished him as he deserved, saying, "I hope this will cure you of giving vent to such odious gusts of passion. If it does not, remember what I tell you, Sir; they will render you hateful to others, wretched to yourself, and may bring you one day to open shame and endless remorse. Zeluco complained to his mother; and she dismissed the tutor, declaring, that she would not have her son's vivacity repressed by the rigid maxims of a narrow-minded pedant.</p>
<p align="left">&#160;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Johnson's Lives: Swift (1781)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/item-of-the-day-johnsons-lives-swift-1781/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/item-of-the-day-johnsons-lives-swift-1781/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
The Lives of the English Poets; and a Criticism of their Works. By Samuel Johnson. Vol. ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title:</p>
<p>The Lives of the English Poets; and a Criticism of their Works. By Samuel Johnson. Vol. II. Dublin: Printed for Messrs. Whitestone, Williams, Colles, Wilson, Lynch, Jenkin, Walker, Burnet, Hallhead, Flin, Exshaw, Beatty, and White. M,DCC,LXXXI.</p>
<p>SWIFT.</p>
<p>[...] In his academical studies [Jonathan Swift] was either not diligent or not happy. It must disappoint every reader's expectation, that, when at the usual time he claimed the Bachelorship of Arts, he was found by the examiners too conspicuously deficient for regular admission, and obtained his degree at last by <em>special favour</em>; a term used in that University [Dublin] to denote want of merit.</p>
<p>Of this disgrace it may be easily supposed that he was much ashamed, and shame had its proper effect in producing reformation. He resolved from that time to study eight hours a-day, and continued his industry for seven years, with what improvement is sufficiently known. This part of his story well deserves to be remembered; it may afford useful admonition and powerful encouragement to many men, whose abilities have been made for a time useless by their passions or pleasures, and who, having lost one part of life in idleness, are tempted to throw away the remainder in despair.</p>
<p>In the course of daily application he continued three years longer at Dublin; and in this time, if the observation and memory of an old companion may be trusted, he drew the first sketch of his <em>Tale of a Tub</em>.</p>
<p>When he was about one and twenty (1688), being by the death of Godwin Swift his uncle, who had supported him, left without subsitence, he went to consult his mother, who then lived in Leicester, about the future course of his life, and by her direction solicited the advice and patronage of Sir William Temple, who had married one of Mrs. Swift's relations, and whose father Sir John Temple, Master of the Rolls in Ireland, had lived in great familiarity of friendship with Godwin Swift, by whom Jonathan had been at that time maintained.</p>
<p>Temple received with sufficient kindness the nephew of his father's friend, with whom he was, when they conversed together, so much pleased, that he detained him two years in his house. Here he became known to King William, who sometimes visited Temple when he was disabled by the gout, and, being attended by Swift in the garden, shewed him how to cut asparagus in the Dutch way.</p>
<p>King William's notions were all military; and he expressed his kindness to Swift by offering to make him a captain of horse.</p>
<p>When Temple removed to Moor-park, he took Swift with him; and when he was consulted by the Earl of Portland about the expedience of complying with a bill then depending for making Parliaments triennial, against which King William was strongly prejudiced, after having in vain tried to shew the Earl that the proposal involved nothing dangerous to royal power, he sent Swift for the same purpose to the King. Swift, who probably was proud of his employment, and went with all the confidence of a young man, found his arguments, and his art of displying them, made totally ineffectual by the predetermination of the King; and used to mention this disappointment as his first antidote against vanity.</p>
<p>Before he left Ireland he contracted a disorder, as he thought, by eating too much fruit. The original of diseases is commonly obscure. Almost every boy eats as much fruit as he can get, without any great inconvenience. The disease of Swift was giddiness with deafness, which attacked him from time to time, began very early, pursued him through life, and at last sent him to the grave, deprived of reason.</p>
<p>Being much oppressed at Moor-park by this grievous malady, he was advised to try his native air, and went to Ireland; but finding no benefit, returned to Sir William, at whose house he continued his studies, and is known to have read, among other books, <em>Cyprian</em> and <em>Irenaeus</em>. He thought exercise of great necessity, and used to run half a mile up and down a hill every two hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Aesop's "The Lion and other Beasts" (1782)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/item-of-the-day-aesops-the-lion-and-other-beasts-1782/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/item-of-the-day-aesops-the-lion-and-other-beasts-1782/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: Fables of Aesop and Others: Translated into English. With Applications; And a Print befo]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: Fables of Aesop and Others: Translated into English. With Applications; And a Print before each Fable. By Samuel Croxall. Twelfth Edition, Carefully Revised, and Improved. London: Printed for W. Strahan, J. F. and C. Rivington, T. Caslon, S. Crowder, T. Longman, B. Law, C. Dilly, T. Cadell, J. Bew, T. Lowneds, R. Baldwin, W. Goldsmith, G. Robinson. J. Johnson, E. Newberry, W. Ginger, and B. Collins, M.DCC.LXXXII. [1782]</p>
<p align="center"><strong>FAB. VI. <em>The </em>LION <em>and other</em> Beasts.</strong></p>
<p align="left"> The Lion and several other Beasts, entered into an Alliance offensive and defensive, and were to live very sociably together in the Forest, one Day, having made a sort of an Excursion by way of Hunting, they took a very fine, large, fat Deer, which was divided into four Parts; there happening to be then present, his Majesty the Lion, and only three others. After the Division was made, and the Parts were set out, his Majesty advancing forward some Steps, and pointing to one of the Shares, was pleased to declare himself after the following Manner: This I seize and take Possession of as my Right, which devolves to me, as I am descended by a true, lineal, hereditary Succession from the Royal Family of Lion: That (pointing to the second) I claim, by, I think, no unreasonable Demand; considering that all the Engagements you have with the Enemy turn chiefly upon my courage and Conduct: And you very well know that Wars are to be expensive to be carried on without proper Supplies. Then (nodding his Head towards the Third) That I shall take by Virtue of my Prerogative; to which, I make no Question, but so dutiful and loyal a People will pay all the Deference and Regard that I can desire. Now, as for the remaining Part, the Necessity of our present Affairs is so very urgent, our Stock so low, and our Credit so impaired and weakened, that I must insist upon your granting That without any Hesitation or Demur; and hereof fail not at your Peril.</p>
<p align="center"><em>The </em>APPLICATION.</p>
<p align="left">No Alliance is safe which is made with those that are superior to us in Power. Tho' they lay themselves under the most strict and solemn Ties at the Opening of the Congress, yet the first advantageous Opportunity will tempt them to break the Treaty; and they will never want specious Pretences to furnish out their Declaration of War. It is not easy to determine, whether it is more stupid and ridiculous for a Community, to trust itself first in the Hands of those that are more powerful than themselves, or to wonder afterwards that their Confidence and Credulity are abused, and their Properties invaded.</p>
<p align="left">&#160;</p>
<p align="left">&#160;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Burney’s History of Music (1789)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/item-of-the-day-burney%e2%80%99s-history-of-music-1789/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/item-of-the-day-burney%e2%80%99s-history-of-music-1789/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: A General History of Music, From the Earliest Ages to the Present Period. By Charles Bur]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: A General History of Music, From the Earliest Ages to the Present Period. By Charles Burney, Mus. D. F. R. S.  Volume the Third. London, Printed For the Author: And sold by Payne and Son, at the Mews-Gate; Robson and Clark, Bond-Street; and G. G. J. and J. Robinson, Paternoster-Row. MDCCLXXXIX.</p>
<p>Essay on Musical Criticism.</p>
<p>As Music may be defined as the art of pleasing by the succession and combination of agreeable sounds, every hearer has a right to give way to his feelings, and be pleased or dissatisfied without knowledge, experience, or the fiat of critics; but then he has certainly no right to insist on others being pleased or dissatisfied in the same degree. I can very readily forgive the man who admires a different Music from that which pleases me, provided he does not extend his hatred or contempt of my favourite Music to myself, and imagine that on the exclusive admiration of any one style of Music, and a close adherence to it, all wisdom, taste, and virtue depend.</p>
<p>Criticism in this art would be better taught by specimens of good composition and performance that by reasoning and speculation. But there is a certain portion of enthusiasm connected with a love of the fine arts, which bids defiance to every curb of criticism; and the poetry, painting, or Music that leaves us on the ground, and does not transport us into the regions of imagination beyond the reach of cold criticism, may be correct, but is devoid of genius and passion. There is, however, a tranquil pleasure, short of rapture, to be acquired from Music, in which intellect and sensation are equally concerned; the analysis of this pleasure is, therefore, the subject of the present short Essay; which it is hoped, will explain and apologize for the critical marks which have been made in the course of this History, on the works of great masters, and prevent their being construed into pedantry and arrogance.</p>
<p>Indeed, musical criticism has been so little cultivated in our country, that its first elements are hardly known. In justice to the late Mr. Avison, it must be owned, that he was the first, and almost the only writer, who attempted it. But his judgment was warped by many prejudices. He exalted Rameau and Geminiani at the expense of Handel, and was a declared foe to modern German symphonies. There have been many treatises published on the art of musical composition and performance, but none to instruct ignorant lovers of Music how to listen, or to judge for themselves. So various are musical styles, that it requires not only extensive knowledge, and long experience, but a liberal, enlarged and candid mind, to discriminate and allow to each its due praise:</p>
<p><em>Nullius addictus jurare in verba magistri.</em></p>
<p>A critic should have none of the contractions and narrow partialities of such as can see but a small angle of the art; of whom there are some so bewildered in fugues and complicated contrivances that they can receive pleasure from nothing but canonical answers, imitations, inversions, and counter-subjects; while others are equally partial to light, simple, frivolous melody, regarding every species of artificial composition as mere pedantry and jargon. A chorus of Handel and a graceful opera song should not preclude each other: each had its peculiar merit; and no one musical production can comprise the beauties of every species of composition. It is not unusual for disputants, in all the arts, to reason without principles; but this, I believe, happens more frequently in musical debates than any other. By principles, I mean having a clear and precise idea of the constituent parts of a good composition, and of the principle excellencies of perfect execution. And it seems, as if the merit of musical productions, both as to composition and performance, might be estimated according to De Piles' steel-yard, or test of merit among painters. If a complete musical composition of different movements were analysied [sic], it would perhaps be found to consist of some of the following ingredients: melody, harmony, modulation, invention, grandeur, fire, pathos, taste, grace, and expression; while the executive part would require neatness, accent, energy, spirit, and feeling; and, in a vocal performer, or instrumental, where the tone depends on the player, power, clearness, sweetness; brilliancy of execution in quick movements, and touching expression in slow.</p>
<p>But as all these qualities are seldom united in one composer or player, the piece or performer that comprises the greatest number of these excellences, and in the most perfect degree, is entitled to pre-eminence: though the production or performer that can boast of <em>any</em>of these constituent qualities cannot be pronounced totally devoid of merit. In this manner, a composition, by a kind of chemical precess, may be decompounded as well as any other production of art or nature. </p>
<p>Prudent critics, without science, seldom venture to pronounce their opinion of a composition, decisively, till they have heard the name of the matter, or discovered the sentiments of a professor; but here the poor author is often at the mercy of prejudice, or envy. Yet the opinion of professors of the greatest integrity is not equally infallible concerning every species of musical merit. To judge minutely of <em>singing</em> for instance, requires study and experience in that particular art. Indeed, I have long suspected, some very great instrumental performers of not sufficiently feeling or respecting real good singing. Rapid passages neatly executed seem to please them infinitely more than the finest <em>messa di voce</em>, or tender expression of slow notes, which the sweetest voice, the greatest art, and most exquisite sensibility can produce. They frequently refer all excellence so much to their own performance and perfections, that the adventitious qualities of singers who imitate a hautbois, a flute, or violin, are rated higher than the colouring and refinements that are peculiar to vocal expression; which instrumental performer ought to feel, respect, and try to imitate, however impossible it may be to equal them: approximation would be something, when more cannot be obtained. Of <em>Composition</em> and the genius of particular instruments, whose opinion, but that of composers and performers, who are likewise possessed of probity and candour, can be trusted? There are, alas! but too many professors who approve of nothing which they themselves have not produced or performed. Old musicians complain of the extravagance of the young; and these again of the dryness and inelegance of the old...  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Beccaria's Crimes and Punishments (1788)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/item-of-the-day-beccarias-crimes-and-punishments-1788-2/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/item-of-the-day-beccarias-crimes-and-punishments-1788-2/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title:
An Essay on Crimes and Punishments The Marquis Beccaria of Milan. With a Commentary by ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Full Title:</strong></p>
<p>An Essay on Crimes and Punishments The Marquis Beccaria of Milan. With a Commentary by M. de Voltaire. A New Edition Corrected.</p>
<p>Written by Cesare Beccaria. Printed in Edinburgh by James Donaldson, 1788.</p>
<p>Chap. VIII.</p>
<p>Of the Division of Crimes.</p>
<p>We have proved, then, that crimes are to be estimated by<em> the injury done to society</em>. This is one of those palpable truths, which, though evident to the meanest capacity, yet, by a combination of circumstances, are only known to a few thinking men in every nation, and in every age. But opinions, worthy of the despotism of Asia, and passions armed with power and authority, have, generally by insensible and sometimes violent impressions on the timid credulity of men, effaced those simple ideas which perhaps constituted the first philosophy of infant society. Happily the philosophy of the present enlightened age seems again to conduct us to the same principles, and with that degree of certainty which is obtained by a rational examination and repeated experience.</p>
<p>A scrupulous adherence to order would require, that we should now examine and distinguish the different species of crimes, and the modes of punishment; but they are so variable in their nature, from the different circumstances of ages and countries, that the detail will be tiresome and endless. It will be sufficient for my purpose to point out the more general principles, and the most common and dangerous errors, in order to undeceive, as well those who, from a mistaken zeal for liberty, would introduce anarchy and confusion, as those who pretend to reduce society in general to the regularity of a convent.</p>
<p>Some crimes are immediately destructive of society, or its representative; others attack the private security of the life, property, or honour of individuals; and a third class consists of such actions as are contrary to the laws which relate to the general good of the community.</p>
<p>The first, which are of the highest degree, as they are most destructive to society, are called crimes of <em>Leze-majesty</em>*. Tyranny and ignorance, which have confounded the clearest terms and ideas, have given this appellation to crimes of a different nature, and consequently have established the same punishment for each; and on this occasion, as on a thousand others, men have been sacrificed victims to a word. Every crime, even of the most private nature, injures society; but every crime does not threaten its immediate destruction. Moral, as well as physical actions, have their sphere of activity differently circumscribed, like all the movements of nature, by time and space; it is therefore a sophistical interpretation, the common philosophy of slaves, that would confound the limits of things established by eternal truth.</p>
<p>To these succeed crimes which are destructive to the security of individuals. This security being the principle end of all society, and to which every citizen hath an undoubted right, it becomes indispensibly necessary, that to these crimes the greatest of punishments should be assigned.</p>
<p>The opinion, that every member of society has a right to do anything that is not contrary to the laws, without fearing any other inconveniencies than those which are the natural consequences of the action itself, is a political dogma, which should be defended by the laws, inculcated by the magistrates, and believed by the people; a sacred dogma, without which there can be no lawful society; a just recompence for our sacrifice of that universal liberty of action, common to all sensible beings, and only limited by our natural powers. By this principle, our minds become free, active, and vigorous; by this alone we are inspired with that virtue which knows no fear, so different from that pliant prudence, worthy of those only who can bear a precarious existence.</p>
<p>Attempts, therefore, against the life and liberty of a citizen, are crimes of the highest nature. Under this head we comprehend not only assassinations and robberies committed by the populace, but by grandees and magistrates; whose example acts with more force, and at a greater distance, destroying the ideas of justice and duty among the subjects, and substituting that of the right of the strongest, equally dangerous to those who exercise it, and to those who suffer. </p>
<p>* High-treason.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Mrs. Piozzi’s Observations and Reflections Made in the Course of a Journey through France, Italy and Germany.]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/item-of-the-day-mrs-piozzi%e2%80%99s-observations-and-reflections-made-in-the-course-of-a-journey-through-france-italy-and-germany-2/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/item-of-the-day-mrs-piozzi%e2%80%99s-observations-and-reflections-made-in-the-course-of-a-journey-through-france-italy-and-germany-2/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: Observations and Reflections Made in the Course of a Journey through France, Italy and G]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;">Full Title: Observations and Reflections Made in the Course of a Journey through France, Italy and Germany. By Hester Lynch Piozzi. Vol. I. London: Printed for A. Strahan, and T. Cadell, 1789.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;">The Bolognese dialect is detected by the other Italians, as gross and disagreeable in its sounds: but every nation has the good word of its own inhabitants; and the language which Abbate Bianconi praises as nervous and expressive, I would advise no person, less learned than himself, to censure as disgusting, or condemn as dull. I staid very little at Bologna; saw nothing but their pictures, and heard nothing but their prayers: those were superior, I fancy, to all rivals. Language can be never spoken of by a foreigner to any effect of conviction. I have heard our countryman, Mr. Greatheed himself, who perhaps possesses more Italian than almost any Englishman, and studies it more closely, refuse to decide in critical disputations among his literary friends here, though the sonnets he writes in the Tuscan language are praised by the natives, who best understand it, and have been by some of them preferred to those written by Milton himself. Mean time this is acknowledged to be the prime city for the purity of praise and delicacy of expression, which, at last, is so disguised to me by the guttural manner in which many sounds are pronounced, that I feel half weary of running about from town to town so, and never arriving at any, where I can understand the conversation without putting all the attention possible to their discourse. I am now told that less efforts will be necessary at Rome. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;">Nothing can be prettier, however, than the slow, tranquil manners of a Florentine; nothing more polished than his general address and behaviour: ever in the third person, though to a blackguard in the street, if he has not the honour of his particular acquaintance, while intimacy produces <em>voi</em> in those of the highest rank, who call one another Carlo and Angelo very sweetly; the ladies taking up the same notion, and saying Louisa, or Maddalena, without any addition at all.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;">The Don and Donna of Milan were offensive to me somehow, as they conveyed an idea of Spain, not Italy. Here Signore is the term, which better pleases one's ear, and Signora Contessa, Signora Principessa, if the person is of the higher quality, resembles our manners more when we say my Lady Dutchess, &#38;c. What strikes me as most observable, is the uniformity of style in all the great towns.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;">As Venice the men of literature and fashion speak with the same accent, and I believe the same quick turns of expression as their Gondolier; and the coachman at Milan talks no broader than the Countess; who, if she does not speak always in French to a foreigner, as she would willingly do, tries in vain to talk Italian; and having asked you thus, <em>alla capi?</em> which means <em>ha ella capita?</em> laughs at herself for trying to <em>toscaneggiare</em>, as she calls it, and gives up the point with <em>no cor altr.</em> that comes in at the end of every sentence, and means <em>non occorre altro</em>, there is no more occurs upon the subject...  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Dissertations on the English Language (1789)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/item-of-the-day-dissertations-on-the-english-language-1789/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/item-of-the-day-dissertations-on-the-english-language-1789/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: Dissertations on the English Language: with Notes, Historical and Critical. To which is ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: Dissertations on the English Language: with Notes, Historical and Critical. To which is added, by way of Appendix, an Essay on a Reformed Mode of Spelling, with Dr. Franklin's Arguments on that Subject. By Noah Webster, Jun. Esquire. Boston: Printed for the author, by Isaiah Thomas and Company, MDCCLXXXIX.</p>
<p align="center"><strong>APPENDIX.</strong></p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="center">An ESSAY</p>
<p align="center">On the NECESSITY, ADVANTAGES and PRACTICABILITY</p>
<p align="center">of REFORMING the MODE of SPELLING, and of RENDERING the ORTHOGRAPHY of WORDS</p>
<p align="center"> CORRESPONDENT to the PRONUNCIATION.</p>
<address> </address>
<p align="left">&#160;</p>
<p align="left">IT has been observed by all writers on the English language, that the orthography or spelling of words is very irregular; the same letters often representing different sounds, and the same sounds often expressed by different letters. For this irregularity, two principal causes may be assigned:</p>
<p>1. THE changes to which the pronunciation of a language is liable, from the progress of science and civilization.</p>
<p>2. THE mixture of different languages, occasioned by revolutions in England, or by a predilection of the learned, for words of foreign growth and ancient origin. To the first cause, may be ascribed the difference between the spelling and pronunciation of Saxon words. The northern nations of Europe originally spoke much in gutturals. This is evident from the number of aspirates and guttural letters, which still remain in the orthography of words derived from those nations; and from the modern pronunciation of the collateral branches of the Teutonic, the Dutch, Scotch and German. Thus <em>k</em> before <em>n</em> was once pronounced; as in <em>knave</em>, <em>know</em>; the <em>gh</em> in <em>might</em>, <em>though</em>, <em>daughter</em>, and other similar words; the <em>g</em> in <em>reign</em>, <em>feign</em>, &#38;c.</p>
<p>BUT as savages proceed in forming languages, they lose the guttural sounds, in some measure, and adopt the use of labials, and the more open vowels. The ease of speaking facilitates this progress, and the pronunciation of words is softened, in proportion to a national refinement of manners. This will account for the difference between the ancient and modern languages of France, Spain and Italy; and for the difference between the soft pronunciation of the present languages of those countries, and the more harsh and guttural pronunciation of the northern inhabitants of Europe.</p>
<p>IN this progress, the English have lost the sounds of most of the guttural letters. The <em>k</em> before <em>k</em> in <em>know</em>, the <em>g</em> in <em>reign</em>, and in many other words, are become mute in practice; and the <em>gh</em> is softened into the sound of <em>f</em>, as in <em>laugh</em>, or is silent, as in <em>brought</em>. . . .</p>
<p>BUT such is the state of our language. The pronunciation of the words which are strictly <em>English,</em> has been gradually changing for ages, and since the revival of science in Europe, the langage has received a vast accession of words from other languages, many of which retain an orthography very ill suited to exhibit the true pronunciation.</p>
<p>THE question now occurs; ought the Americans to retain these faults which produce innumerable inconveniencies [sic] in the acquisition and use of the language, or ought they at once to reform these abuses, and introduce order and regularity into the orthography of the AMERICAN TONGUE?</p>
<p>Let us consider this subject with some attention.</p>
<p>SEVERAL attempts were formerly made in England to rectify the orthography of the language. But I apprehend their schemes failed of success, rather on account of their intrinsic difficulties, than on account of any necessary impracticability [sic] of a reform. It was proposed, in most of these schemes, not merely to throw out superfluous and silent letters, but to introduce a number of new characters. Any attempt on such a plan must undoubtedly prove unsuccessful. It is not to be expected that an orthography, perfectly regular and simple, such as would be formed by a "Synod of Grammarians on principles of science," will ever be substituted for that confused mode of spelling which is now established. But is is apprehended that great improvements may be made, and an orthography almost regular, or such as shall obviate most of the present difficulties which occur in learning our language, may be introduced and established with little trouble and opposition.</p>
<p>The principal alterations, necessary to render our orthography sufficiently regular and easy, are these:</p>
<p>1. THE omission of all superfluous or silent letters; as <em>a</em> in <em>bread</em>. Thus <em>bread</em>, <em>head</em>,<em> give</em>, <em>breast</em>, <em>built</em>, <em>meant</em>, <em>realm</em>, f<em>riend</em>, would be spelt, <em>bred</em>, <em>hed</em>, <em>giv</em>, <em>brest</em>, <em>bilt</em>, <em>ment</em>, <em>relm</em>, <em>frend</em>.  Would this alteration produce any inconvenience, any embarrassment or expense? By no means. On the other hand, it would lessent he trouble of writing, and much more, of learning the language; it would reduce the true pronunciation to a certainty; and while it would assist foreigners and our own children in acquiring the language, it would render the pronunciation uniform, in different parts of the country, and almost prevent the possibility of change.</p>
<p>2. A SUBSTITUTE of a character that has a certain definite sound, for one that is more vague and indeterminate. Thus putting <em>ee</em> instead of <em>ea</em> or <em>ie,</em> the words <em>mean</em>, <em>near</em>, <em>speak</em>, <em>grieve,</em> <em>zeal</em>, would become <em>meen</em>, <em>neer</em>, <em>speek</em>, <em>greev</em>, <em>zeel</em>. This alteration could not occasion a moments trouble; at the same time it would prevent a doubt respecting the pronunciation; whereas the <em>ea</em> and the <em>ie </em>having different sounds, may give a learner much difficulty. Thus <em>greef</em> should be substituted for <em>grief</em>; <em>kee </em>for <em>key</em>; <em>beleev</em> for <em>believe</em>; <em>laf</em> for <em>laugh</em>; <em>dawter</em> for <em>daughter</em>; <em>plow</em> for <em>plough</em>; <em>tuf</em> for <em>tough</em>; <em>proov</em> for <em>prove</em>; <em>blud</em> for <em>blood</em>; and <em>draft</em> for <em>draught</em>. In this manner <em>ch</em> in Greek derivatives, should be changed to <em>k</em>; for the English <em>ch</em> has a soft sound, as in <em>cherish</em>; but <em>k</em> always a hard sound. Therefore <em>character</em>, <em>chorus</em>, <em>cholic</em>, <em>architecture</em>, should be written <em>karacter</em>, <em>kours</em>, <em>kolic</em>, <em>arkitecture</em>; and were they thus written, no person could mistake their true pronunciation. . . .</p>
<address> </address>
<address> </address>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: Address and Recommendations to the States (1783)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/item-of-the-day-address-and-recommendations-to-the-states-1783/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/item-of-the-day-address-and-recommendations-to-the-states-1783/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: Address and Recommendations to the States, by the United States in Congress assembled. P]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: Address and Recommendations to the States, by the United States in Congress assembled. Philadelphia: Printed, 1783; Boston: Re-printed, By Order of the Hon. House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1783.</p>
<p align="center"><strong>AN ADDRESS, &#38;c.</strong></p>
<p align="left">THE prospect which has for some time existed, and which is  now happily realized, of a successful termination of the war, together with the critical exigencies of public affairs, have made it the duty of Congress to review and provide for the debts which the war has left upon the United States, and to look forward to the means of obviating dangers which may interrupt the harmony and tranquility of the confederacy. The result of their mature and solemn deliberations on these great objects is contained in their several recommendations of the 18th instant, herewith transmitted. Although these recommendations speak themselves the principles on which they are founded, as well as the ends which they propose. It will not be improper to enter into a few explanations and remarks, in order to place in a stronger view the necessity of complying with them.</p>
<p align="left">The first measure recommended is, effectual provision for the debts of the United States. The amount of these debts, as far as they can now be ascertained, is 42,000,375 dollars, as will appear by the schedule No. I. To discharge the principal of this aggregate debt at once, or in any short period, is evidently not within the compass of our resources; and even if it could be accomplished, the ease of the community would require that the debt itself should be less to a course of gradual extinguishment, and certain funds be provided for paying in the mean time the annual interest. The amount of it commuted to be 2,415,956 dollars. Funds, therefore, which will certainly and punctually produce this annual sum, at least, must be provided.</p>
<p align="left">In devising these funds, Congress did not overlook the mode of supplying the common treasury, provided by the articles of confederation but, after the  most  respectful consideration of that mode, they were constrained to regard it as inadequate and inapplicable to the form into which the public debt must be thrown. The delays and uncertainties incident to a revenue to be established and collected from time to time by thirteen independent authorities, is at first view irreconcilable with the punctuality essential to the discharge of the interest of a national debt. Our own experience, after making every allowance for transient impediments, has been a sufficient illustration of this truth. Some departure, therefore in the recommendations of Congress, from the federal constitution was unavoidable; but it will be found to be as small as could be reconciled with the object in view, and to be supported besides by solid considerations of interest and sound policy. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: The Age of Louis XIV (1780)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/item-of-the-day-the-age-of-louis-xiv-1780/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/item-of-the-day-the-age-of-louis-xiv-1780/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: The Age of Louis XIV. To which is added, AN Abstract of the Age of Louis XV. Translated ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: The Age of Louis XIV. To which is added, AN Abstract of the Age of Louis XV. Translated from the Last Geneva Edition of M. De Voltaire, with notes, critical and explanatory, by R. Griffith, Esq.  Vol. II.  London: Printed for Fielding and Walker, Paternoster-Row.  1780.</p>
<p>Chap. XVII. <em>The memorable war for the succession of the Monarchy of Spain. Conduct of the Ministers and Generals till the year 1703.</em></p>
<p>To William III succeeded the Princess Anne, daughter to King James by the daughter of Counsellor Hyde, afterward Chancellor, and one of the principal [sic] men of the kingdom.  She was married to the Prince of Denmark, who ranked but as the first subject of the realm.  As soon as she came to the crown, she adopted all the measures of King William, though she had been at open variance with him during his life.  These measures were those of the nation.  In other kingdoms, a Prince obliges his people to enter implicitly into all his schemes; but in England a King must enter into those of his people.</p>
<p>The dispositions made by England and Holland for placing if possible, the Archduke Charles, son to the Emperor, on the throne of Spain, or at least to oppose the the establishment of the Bourbon family, merits, perhaps, the attention of all ages.</p>
<p>The Dutch on their part were to keep an army of one hundred and two thousand men in pay, either in garrison or in the field.  This was much more than the whole Spanish monarchy could furnish at that time.  A province of merchants, who, thirty years before, had been almost totally subdued in the space of two months, could now do more than the matters of Spain, Naples, Flanders, Peru, and Mexico.  England promised to furnish forty thousand men, besides its fleets.  It happens in most alliances, that, in the continuance of them, the parties concerned fall short of their stipulations; but England, on the contrary, furnished fifty thousand men, the second year instead of forty; and, towards the latter part of the war, kept in pay, on the frontiers of France, in Spain, Italy, Ireland, America, and on board her fleet, near two hundred thousand fighting men, soldiers and sailors, partly her own troops, partly those of her allies; an expence [sic] almost incredible to those who reflect, that England, properly so called, is not above one third so large as France, and has not one-half of the current coin; but which will appear probable in the eyes of those who know what commerce and credit can do.  The English always bore the greatest share of the burthen [sic] in this alliance, while the Dutch insensibly lessened theirs: for, after all, the Republic of the States-General is only an illustrious trading company; whereas England is a fertile country, a commercial and a warlike nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: New Travels through North-America (1784)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/item-of-the-day-new-travels-through-north-america-1784/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/item-of-the-day-new-travels-through-north-america-1784/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: New Travels through North-America: In a Series of Letters; Exhibiting the History of the]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: New Travels through North-America: In a Series of Letters; Exhibiting the History of the Victorious Campaign of the Allied Armies, under His Excellency General George Washington and the Count de Rochambeau, in the Year 1781. Interspersed with political and philosophical Observations, upon the genius, temper, and customs of the Americans: Also, Narrations of the capture of General Burgoyne, and Lord Cornwallis, with their Armies; and a variety of interesting particulars, which occurred in the course of the War in America. Translated from the Original of the Abbe Robin: One of the Chaplains to the French Army in America. Boston: Printed by E. E. Powars and N. Willis, for F. Battelle, and to be sold by him, at his Book Store, State-Stree, M,DCC,LXXXIV.</p>
<p>[Excerpted from Letter III.]</p>
<p><em>Camp, at Philipsbourg, August 4, 1781.</em></p>
<p>. . . Such are the ideas that arise in the mind, at the sight of this great man [George Washington], in examining the events in which he has had a share, or in listening to those whose duty obliges them to be near his person, and consequently can best display his true character. ---In all these extensive states, they consider him in the light of a beneficent God, dispensing peace and happiness around him. ---Old men, women and children, press about him when he accidentally passes along, and think themselves happy, once in their lives, to have seen him--they follow him through the towns with torches, and celebrate his arrival by public illuminations. ---The Americans, that cool and sedate people, who in the midst of their most trying difficulties, have attended only to the directions and impulses of plain method and common reason, are roused, animated and inflamed at the very mention of his name; and the first songs that sentiment or gratitude has dictated, have been to celebrate General Washington.</p>
<p>It is uncertain how many men his army consists of exactly: some say, only four or five thousand, but this General has always found means to conceal the real number, even from those who compose it.  Sometimes with a few troops he forms a spacious camp, and increases the number of tents; at other times with a great number, he contracts it to a narrow compass; then again by detaching them insensibly, the whole camp is nothing more than the mere skeleton and shadow of an army, while the main body is transported to a distant part of the country.</p>
<p>Neither do these troops in general wear regular uniforms; but the officers and corps of artillery are obliged, without exception, to such distinction. Several regiments have small white frocks, with fringes, which look well enough; also linen over-alls, large and full, which are very convenient in hot weather, and do not at all hinder the free use of the limbs in marching: with food less substantial, and a constitution of body less vigorous than our people, they are better able to support fatique, and perhaps for that very reason. This advantage in dress, I believe, has not been sufficiently considered in France. We are apt to consult the gratification of the eye too far, and forget the troops were designed to act, and not merely to show themselves and their finery. The most proper apparel would be that, which being as little burdensome as possible, would cover the soldier best, and incommode him the least. The regiment of Soissonnais has in all this tedious march, had the fewest stragglers and sick of any other; --one of the principal causes was, without doubt, the precautionof the Colonel, who, on purpose for the campaign, had linen breeches made for his whole regiment.</p>
<p>The American military habit, although easy to be soiled, is nevertheless very decent and neat; this neatness is particularly observable among the officers: to see them, you would suppose they were equipped with every necessary in the compleatest manner, and yet upon entering their tents, where perhaps three or four reside together, I have often been astonished to find, that their whole travelling equipage and furniture would not weigh forty pounds; few or none have matrasses; a single rug or blanket, stretched out upon the rough bark of a tree, serves them for a bed; the soldeirs take the same precaution never to sleep on the ground, whilst ours prefer it to any other way.</p>
<p>Their manner of living is very simple, and gives them but little trouble; they content themselves with boiling their meat, and parching their corn, or baking unleavened dough, made of Indian meal, upon the hot embers.</p>
<p>In some regiemnts they have negro companies, but always commanded by the whites. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Item of the Day: History of the War with America, France, Spain, and Holland (1785)]]></title>
<link>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/08/21/item-of-the-day-history-of-the-war-with-america-france-spain-and-holland-1785/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Caroline Fuchs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://18thcenturyreadingroom.wordpress.com/2007/08/21/item-of-the-day-history-of-the-war-with-america-france-spain-and-holland-1785/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Full Title: History of the War with America, France, Spain; and Holland; commencing in 1775 and endi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Title: History of the War with America, France, Spain; and Holland; commencing in 1775 and ending in 1783. By John Andrews. In Four Volumes with Portraits, Maps and Charts. London: Published by his Majesty's Royal Licence and Authority. For John Fielding, Pater Noster Row; and John Jarvis in the Strand, MDCCLXXXV.</p>
<p align="center">&#160;</p>
<p align="center">INTRODUCTION.</p>
<p align="left">NO Nation ever terminated a war more to its advantage and glory, than that which Great Britain carried on against the united powers of France and Spain, and concluded with the Treaty of Paris, in one thousand seven hundred and sixty-three.</p>
<p align="left">The strength of the British nation had been conducted by the most spirited and fortunate Minister that ever presided over its councils, and had been exerted with a vigour and energy unexampled in any preceding aera; an uninterrupted series of successes attended it in every quarter of the globe, and victories followed each other by sea and land, that astonished all Eruope, and thoroughly subdued the spirit and broke the strength of the enemy.</p>
<p align="left">The terms of the pacification that ended this memorable contest, though not so advantageous, in the opinion of some, as the state of this country on the one side seemed to claim and to expect, the depresst situation of its enemeis might, on the other, have sumbitted, still they were such as exalted the British monarchy to a degree of splendor and power that rendered it equally the envy, the admiration, and the terror of Europe.</p>
<p align="left">By this treaty Great Britain remained entire mistress of the immense continent of North America, from the banks of the Missisippi [sic] to the shores of Greenland. She aquired several valuable islands in the West Indies, and established her power in the eastern parts of the world on such extensive foundations, as left her a decided superiority over all the European nations that have any trade or settlements in those distant countries.</p>
<p align="left">But there were no few politicians, both at home and abroad, who thought they perceived in this spendid conclusion with France and Spain, infallible, though perhaps latent causes of much future mischief. The entire cession of the French possessions in North America, an immense tract, opened a wide field of speculation to people of a thinking dispostion.</p>
<p align="left">While this prodigious extent of land remained in the hands of France, though it might seem a heavy curb to the industry and enterprizing temper of the British nation, it was, in fact, a boundary to the ambitious spirit of its Colonies. By restraining them within determinate limits, and keeping them in perpetual alarms, it obliged them to look continually for aid to the parent-state, and obviated all ideas of disobliging a people, of whose friendship and protection they stood in perpetual need.</p>
<p align="left">It has even been surmised, that France itself fully saw the consequences of her cession of Canada to England, and that some fo the shrewdest of the French Ministry did not refrain from dropping some hints to this purport. However that might be, it may with great truth be said, that no profound penetration was necessary to discover, that the acquisition of the French North American possessions, by delivering the British Colonies from all apprehensions on that dangerous quarter, gave them immediately an ease security in their domestic transactions, to which they must for ever have been strangers; and, of course, excited a train of ideas, which they would not, and could not otherwise have harboured.</p>
<p align="left">While the dread of France was present to their minds, ages would probably have elapsed before they would have thought of facing so great a power singly, and unsupported. The long habit of depending on the assistance of the parent-state would have been retained; and as protection and obedience are reciprocal, the connection that had so long subsisted between Great Britain and her Colonies, would, in all likelihood, have remained the same as before, unimpaired and unaltered, in every circumstance attending it.</p>
<p align="left">To these considerations, others might be added of equal weight: --The state of the British Colonies at the Aera of the general pacification, was such as attracted the attention of all the politicians in Europe. Their flourishing condition at that period was remarkable and striking; their trade had prospered in the midst of all the difficulties and distresses of a war, in which they were so nearly and so immediately concerned. Their population continued on the increase, notwithstanding the ravages and depredations that had been so fiercely carried on by the French, and the native Indians in their alliance. All this shewed the innate strength and vigour of the constitution of the British Colonies.</p>
<p align="left">The conclusion of the quarrel between Great Briatin and France, placed them immediately on such a footing as could not fail to double every advantage they already possest. --They abounded with spirited and active individuals of all denominations. They were flushed with the uncommon porosperity that had attended them in their commercial affairs and military transactions. The natural consequence of such a disposition was, that they were ready for all kind of undertakings; and saw no limits to their hopes and expectations.</p>
<p align="left">As they entertained the highest opinion of their value and importance, and of the immense benefit that England derived from its connection with them, their notions were adequately high in their favour. They deemed themselves, not without reason, entitled to every kindess and indulgence which the mother-country could bestow.</p>
<p align="left">Though their pretensions did not amount to a perfect equality of advantages and privileges in matters of commerce, yet in those of government, they thought them